Taking Charge of Change A Guide for the Alternative Governance Process in New Mexico Los Lunas Teach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

Taking Charge of Change A Guide for the Alternative Governance Process in New Mexico Los Lunas Teach

Description:

Brenda Gray, Patricia Hackney, Deneen Bair, Zia Zaragoza, Juanita Gonzales, ... Time time song. 56. Midas Slide. 57. Table Activity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:253
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: larrybem
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Taking Charge of Change A Guide for the Alternative Governance Process in New Mexico Los Lunas Teach


1
Taking Charge of ChangeA Guide for the
Alternative Governance Process in New MexicoLos
Lunas Teacher Training CenterApril 1, 2008
  • Dr. Shelia Hyde
  • Assistant Secretary of Quality Assurance and
    Systems Integration
  • Dr. Beverly Johnson
  • Director, Priority Schools Bureau
  • Jed Stus Kevin McQuade, Presenters
  • Jed Stus David Johnson, Assistant Directors
  • Brenda Gray, Patricia Hackney, Deneen Bair, Zia
    Zaragoza, Juanita Gonzales,
  • Education Administrators
  • New Mexico Public Education Department

2
Purpose
  • To gain an understanding of
  • NCLB Requirements for Schools with a R-1 status
  • Alternative Governance Plan (AGP) development and
    implementation process
  • School, District and PED Roles
  • Available Support

3
Outcomes
  • Participants will be able to
  • Understand the AGP planning process
  • Requirements
  • Restructuring Options
  • Timelines
  • Facilitate and complete the AGP process with
    their learning communities
  • Incorporate implementation plan from the AGP
    into the 2008-09 EPSS by the June 14th, 2008
    submission date.

4
Restructuring GovernanceWhat Why
  • NCLB requirements
  • School does not meet AYP for 5 consecutive years
  • Plans must be developed for restructuring during
    the 6th year
  • Plan must be implemented during 7th year if AYP
    is missed again

5
RestructuringA Change in Governance
  • Changes the very structure of the organization
  • Changes who makes the decisions and how
  • Defines who has the decision making authority and
    control in the school and how they use it

6
Restructuring continued.
  • Is different from changes solely in the
    curriculum, instruction or professional
    environment -
  • (This works well in a school already
    successful.)
  • Is dramatic and produces changes in how teachers
    teach and how children learn -
  • (This works in struggling schools.)
  • (Learning Point, CCSRI 2006)

7
Activity 1
  • Using School Restructuring Under NCLB What
    Works When (p.7-12) available on the table,
    please read the document.
  • After reading, group moves to stand in the area
    of the definition of the option you would choose
    for your school.
  • Learning Point, CCSRI 2006

8
Restructuring Options
9
Restructuring Options
  • There are 5 options from which to consider and
    choose.
  • More than one option can be chosen.
  • Options are based on New Mexico Statutes, the
    Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act
    Statute and No Child Left Behind.

10
Restructuring Option 1
  • Replacing all or most of the schools staff, which
    may include the principal, who are relevant to
    the school inability to meet AYP (NMSA
    22-2C-7H.1)
  • Considerations
  • Most successful occurrences are with a skilled,
    capable Turnaround Leader and minimal staff
    replacement
  • Bargaining Agreements
  • Can disrupt continuity relationships
  • Lack of skilled Turnaround Leaders

11
Restructuring Option 2
  • Enter into a contract with a private entity such
    as a private management company with a
    demonstrated record of effectiveness to operate
    the school as a public school. (NMSA 22-2C-7H.3)
  • Considerations
  • State statute forbids out of state Takeover
    contracts
  • Local control
  • Not necessarily effective

12
Restructuring Option 3
  • Turn the operation of the school to the PED if
    this option is permitted under state law and the
    state agrees. (NMSA 22-2C-7J.3)
  • Considerations
  • Limited PED resources
  • District loss of financial and local control
  • Collaborative decision
  • Research supportive when state has a plan, for
    example Louisiana, Ohio

13
Restructuring Option 4
  • Recommend re-opening the public school as a state
    chartered charter school as provided by state
    law. (NMSA 22-2C-7.119778)
  • Considerations
  • Time (Plan at least a year in advance)
  • Local control must be initiated by District with
    state support
  • State must have good chartering laws
  • Must be approved by State Chartering Authority

14
Restructuring Option 5
  • Implement any other major restructuring of the
    school governance arrangement consistent with
    NCLB principles. (NMSA 22-2C-7H.2,3,5,6.)
  • Considerations
  • Option chosen most frequently nationwide
  • Must have specific components in place for
    success
  • Remember it builds upon the improvement process
  • Dr. Garcias letter

15
What Constitutes Other Major Restructuring of the
School Governance
  • NMSA 22-2C-7H.2,3,5,6
  • Decrease management authority of the public
    school
  • Extend school day or year
  • Change the public schools internal organization
  • Implement a new curriculum
  • Dr. Garcias 2/22/08 letter
  • Change governance structure
  • Reopen as focus or theme school
  • Reconstitute smaller autonomous learning
    communities
  • Dissolve school assign students to other
    schools

16
Additional Resource
  • Handbook on Restructuring Substantial School
    Improvement
  • Chapter 3 (pg 53) Restructuring Options and
    Change Process.
  • Detailed overview of Restructuring Options and
    change process

17
Broad Lessons on What Works (2006)
  • When Restructuring is defined as changing the
    very structure of chronically failing
    institutions to spur dramatic improvement three
    lessons are learned
  • 1. Large, fast improvements are preceded by a
    change in the direction and control- and how
    direction and control are used. (Turn-around
    Fresh start)(Hassel,et.al.2006)
  • 2. Eradicating chronically low performing is not
    a one time project it is a commitment that is a
    core part of school and district work.
  • 3. District and school leaders must possess a
    steely will and a compass set firmly on
    childrens learning. (Walberg, 2007)

18
Considerations
  • Is the schools governance impeding its ability
    to make AYP?
  • How is the schools governance impeding the
    schools AYP?
  • Which particular form of alternative governance
    or restructuring will increase the likelihood
    that the school will make AYP?

19
Activity 2Table Discussion
  • As a school team
  • Given the present conditions of your learning
    community, review the 5 restructuring options
    and discuss which would be most appropriate to
    implement.

20
Choosing the Option and Developing the AGP Plan
21
School Reform in New Mexico since 2006
  • Focus on developing
  • School and district use of systems for Continuous
    Improvement
  • Skills and knowledge of teachers using
    researched-based programs for reading and math
  • Accountability within schools and districts
    through data-based decision making
  • Alignment of the taught curriculum with the state
    content standards
  • Monitoring and coaching for leadership skill
    development in school reform

22
Components of School Governance
  • Effective Leadership
  • Quality Teaching and Learning
  • Collaborative Relationships
  • Support for System-wide Improvement

23
(No Transcript)
24
Activity 3 Components of Governance
  • As a table group
  • Use page 2 of AGP template and the Success
    Indicators for your component, develop a visual
    on one of the four components of Governance
    assigned to your group.
  • Address
  • What it is in your own words?
  • What it would looks like at your learning
    community?
  • Assume
  • 15 minutes to dialogue development of a 2
    minute report out.

25
R1 AGP Requirements
  • A school with NCLB status of Restructuring 1 for
    2007-2008 SY
  • Explore restructuring options
  • Required to complete an AGP
  • Incorporate AGP implementation plan into the
    2008-09 EPSS
  • Submit both to PED by the June 14th, 2008
  • Restructuring -1 Delay
  • Review existing AGP

26
Timeline
  • April 1, 08 - AGP development training
  • April-May 08 - Development of AGP at site
  • Mid-April to Mid-May 08 - AGP process check by
    PED representative
  • Mid-May 08 - School Board approval of AGP
  • June 14, 2008 - Submit completed AGP and draft
    08-09 EPSS to Priority Schools Bureau

27
The Intended Impact of the AGP Process
  • Choose the governance option most appropriate for
    your district/school
  • Develop an Alternative Governance Plan designed
    to
  • Improve the schools abilities to meet the needs
    of all children
  • Achieve annual academic performance targets
  • Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

28
ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES
29
Role of Community
  • Represented and involved in AGP planning team
  • Informed of school NCLB status restructuring
    options

30
Role of the School
  • Review resources
  • Form AGP design team
  • Schedule meetings
  • Review technical assistance
  • coaching reports
  • Complete analysis of Key
  • Elements of Restructuring (AGP doc)
  • Develop implementation plan (AGP doc)
  • Submit plan
  • Incorporate implementation plan
  • into 08-09 EPSS

31
Role of the District
  • Primary responsibility is to provide
  • Technical support
  • Monitoring for accountability
  • Leadership support for schools that do not meet
    AYP
  • Financial support and alignment
  • resources human and fiscal

32
Role of the Public Education Department
  • Leadership support to districts
  • Technical support as outlined in the
    School Improvement Framework
  • Financial
  • Coaching and Monitoring of EPSS accountability

33
Resources
  • Priority Schools Bureau
  • Dr. Garcias letter dated February 21, 2008
  • Technical Assistance Coaching Reports
  • AGP
  • Directions
  • Template
  • Process Check
  • Power point
  • Exemplar
  • Rubric
  • Article Reference
  • PED website
  • School Improvement Framework
  • District

34
AGP Template
35
Key Elements of Restructuring to Address in
Developing the Alternative Governance Plan
  • Need for Change
  • Effective Leadership
  • Quality Teaching and Learning
  • Collaborative Relationships
  • Support for System-wide Improvement

36
(No Transcript)
37
  • Affirmation
  • Root-cause
  • analysis
  • Prioritized

38
  • Introduce last section of Template next slide

Prioritize the Opportunity for Improvement (s)
from the 3rd column of the AGP worksheet based
on the greatest need.
39
Clearly Defined Specific Implementation Plan
40
Model of AGP Process Effective Leadership
Component
  • Introduce Discuss
  • Fact Sheet Effective Leadership
  • Root-Cause Analysis
  • Summary of Prioritized Opportunities for
    Improvement
  • Implementation Plan

41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
Activity 4 AGP Practice Development
  • As a school group
  • Utilize Vanderwagen Mid. Quality Teaching and
    Learning fact sheet, to complete the root-cause
    analysis (AGP pg 5).
  • Prioritize Opportunities for Improvement in
    Summary section
  • Develop implementation Plan to address identified
    Opportunities for Improvement
  • At conclusion of activity we will
  • Discuss process
  • Address questions
  • Share key points

46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
The Relationship between AGP and EPSS
  • AGP action items describe strategies to
  • improve student achievement and
  • are identified and incorporated
  • into the EPSS for 2008-09.

50
Narrative and supporting documentation required
51
Activity 5School Planning Time
  • As a school team
  • Given the present conditions of your learning
    community and with the information presented
    today, review the success indicators in the 4
    Elements of Restructuring and discuss which
    success indictors you will be addressing in your
    AGP.

52
Questions?
  • Contact
  • Priority Schools Bureau
  • 827-6582

53
References
  • Handbook on Restructuring and Substantial School
    Improvement. Herbert J Walberg, Editor. Center
    for Innovation and Improvement, Lincoln, IL. 2007
    www.centerii.org
  • School Restructuring Under No Child Left Behind
    What Works When? A Guide for Education Leaders,
    Learning Point Associates, Washington, DC. 2006.
    www.centerforcsri.org
  • States Progress Toward High School
    Restructuring, National High School Center.
    January 2007. www.betterhighschools.org
  • The Mega System Deciding.Learning.Connecting. A
    Handbook for Continuous Improvement Within a
    Community of the School. Sam Redding. Academic
    Development Institute, Lincoln, IL. www.adi.org

54
ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES
  • Zia Transition slide
  • Picture community/school/district/ped

55
Midas Slide
  • Zia Break slides will need 2
  • Placement to be determined
  • Time time song

56
Midas Slide
57
Table Activity
  • Develop action plan for Quality Teaching and
    Learning

58
Table Activity
  • Schools Working with their own information to
    practice process

59
Large group
  • AGP action items into EPSS

60
Restructuring Element 2 Quality Teaching and
Learning activity
  • School groups complete Summary box with
    prioritized Opportunities for Improvement for
    work they did on here

61
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com