Furman V. Georgia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Furman V. Georgia

Description:

... one-page per curium opinion held that the imposition of the death penalty ... Brennan and Marshall believed the death penalty to be unconstitutional in all ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:923
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: shastali
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Furman V. Georgia


1
Furman V. Georgia
By Cadet Andrew
Argued January 17, 1972DecidedJune 29, 1972
2
THE CASE
  • Furman was burglarizing a private home when a
    family member discovered him. He attempted to
    flee, and in doing so tripped and fell. The gun
    that he was carrying went off and killed a
    resident of the home. He was convicted of murder
    and sentenced to death (Two other death penalty
    cases were decided along with Furman Jackson v.
    Georgia and Branch v. Texas. These cases concern
    the constitutionality of the death sentence for
    rape and murder convictions, respectively).

3
QUESTION?
  • Does the imposition and carrying out of the death
    penalty in these cases constitute cruel and
    unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and
    Fourteenth Amendments?

4
  • Yes. The Court's one-page per curium opinion held
    that the imposition of the death penalty in these
    cases constituted cruel and unusual punishment
    and violated the Constitution. In over two
    hundred pages of concurrence and dissents, the
    justices articulated their views on this
    controversial subject. Only Justices Brennan and
    Marshall believed the death penalty to be
    unconstitutional in all instances. Other
    concurrences focused on the arbitrary nature with
    which death sentences have been imposed, often
    indicating a racial bias against black
    defendants. The Court's decision forced states
    and the national legislature to rethink their
    statutes for capital offenses to assure that the
    death penalty would not be administered in a
    capricious or discriminatory manner.

5
  • In the following four years, 37 states enacted
    new death penalty laws aimed at overcoming
    Stewart's objections to the lack of standards to
    guide the discretion of juries and judges in
    imposing capital sentences. The new laws were in
    large part upheld in a series of decisions in
    1976, led by Gregg v. Georgia.

6
THE END!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com