Ch. 2 3 Magruders The Constitution Assign. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

Ch. 2 3 Magruders The Constitution Assign.

Description:

Congress has considered more that 11,000 amendments to the Constitution. ... Only 27 have been ratified ... across parties and in all regions of the country ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: rodney9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ch. 2 3 Magruders The Constitution Assign.


1
Ch. 2 (3 Magruders) The Constitution Assign. 2
Answers
  • 1. What were the five fundamental principles
    established by the U.S. Constitution?

2
  • Popular sovereignty, or control by the people.
  • A republican govt. in which the people choose
    representatives to make decisions for them.
  • Limited govt. with written laws.
  • Separation of powers, with checks and balances
    between braches.
  • A federal system that allowed for states rights.

3
  • How did the federal system work? Why was it
    invented?

4
  • Sovereign powers (ruling powers) are divided
    between the states and the national govt.
  • It was invented by the founders as a compromise
    solution to the controversy over whether the
    states or the central govt. should have ultimate
    sovereignty.

5
  • How many states were needed to ratify the
    Constitution before it became the law of the
    land?

6
  • Nine

7
  • How did the founding fathers get around the fact
    that many state legislatures would not ratify the
    Constitution?

8
  • The delegates agreed that each state should hold
    a special convention. Elected delegates to
    these conventions would discuss and vote on the
    Constitution. It would only require 9 of the 13
    states to ratify.

9
  • What advantages did the Federalists have? The
    Anti-Federalists?

10
  • The Federalists had assumed a positive name.
  • The Federalists had attended the Constitutional
    Convention and knew of all the deliberations that
    had taken place.
  • The Federalists had time, power, and money on
    their side.
  • The Federalists had the best communication.

11
  • The Anti-Federalists had the advantage of
    standing for the status quo.

12
  • 6. What were the Federalists Papers? Who were
    the three authors?

13
  • The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays
    in defense of the Constitution and of a
    republican form of government.
  • The authors were Alexander Hamilton, John Jay,
    and James Madison

14
  • 7. Which of the Federalist Papers is the classic
    in political theory? What did these papers deal
    with?

15
  • Madisons Federalists Paper No. 10 is considered
    a classic in political theory.
  • It deals with the nature of groups or factions as
    he called them. They would be called interest
    groups today.

16
  • 8. What were the problems with the Constitution
    listed by the Anti-Federalists?

17
  • To the Anti-Federalist, it was a document written
    by aristocrats and would lead to aristocratic
    tyranny.
  • It would create an overbearing and overburdening
    central govt. hostile to personal liberty.

18
  • 9. What view was argued by Patrick Henry and
    Samuel Adams? From whom did they get this view?

19
  • They believed that liberty was safe only in
    relatively small societies governed by direct
    democracy or by a large legislature with small
    districts.
  • The French political philosopher Montesquieu.

20
  • 10. Why was Madison more convincing than Henry
    and Adams?

21
  • Madison was convincing because citizens were
    already persuaded that a strong national govt.
    was necessary to combat foreign enemies and to
    prevent domestic insurrections.

22
  • 11. Which two large states barely ratified the
    Constitution?

23
  • Virginia with 89 for and 79 against.
  • New York with 30 for and 27 against.

24
  • 12. What was Charles Beards thesis? Was he
    probably right or wrong?

25
  • His thesis was that the Constitution had been
    produced primarily by wealthy property owners who
    desired a stronger govt. able to protect their
    property rights. The Constitution had been
    imposed by undemocratic methods to prevent
    democratic majorities from exercising real power.

26
  • He was right that it was done by wealthy property
    owners who did use some devious tactics.
    However, considering democracy was an experiment
    of the time, it was fairly liberal for the
    period. It certainly set up a system that
    brought about democratic principles over time.

27
  • 13. Why is the Bill of Rights really a bill of
    limits?

28
  • It was a bill of limits because the amendments
    limited the powers of the national govt. in
    regard to the rights and liberties of individuals.

29
  • 14. Did the Bill of Rights include the right to
    privacy?

30
  • For several decades the liberal courts have held
    that the guarantees set forth in the Bill of
    Rights imply the right to privacy. However, many
    conservative justices like Antonin Scalia and
    Clarence Thomas do not believe that the
    Constitution or Bill of Rights guarantees the
    right to privacy.

31
  • 15. How many state recommendations did Madison
    have to cull through to come up with the Bill of
    Rights? Which important right did he leave out
    and when was it finally added?

32
  • Madison had to cull through more than 200 state
    recommendations.
  • He left out equal protection under the laws.
  • The 14th Amendment was added in 1868 to guarantee
    equal protection under the laws.

33
  • 16. What happened to the proposed amendment that
    Madison characterized as the most valuable
    amendment in the whole lot? Why was this
    significant?

34
  • The amendment which would have prohibited the
    states from infringing on the freedoms of
    conscience, press, and jury trial had been
    eliminated by the Senate.
  • This was significant because the Bill of Rights
    as adopted did not limit STATE power, and
    individual citizens had to rely on the guarantees
    contained in the particular state constitution or
    state bill of rights.

35
  • 17. Why is the Constitution shorter than most
    state constitutions?

36
  • It is shorter because the founders intended it to
    be only a framework for governing, to be
    interpreted by succeeding generations. It has
    remained short because it is difficult to change
    the Constitution.

37
  • 18. Under Article V, what are the two formal
    methods of proposing an amendment to the
    Constitution?

38
  • A two-thirds vote in each chamber of Congress or
  • A national convention that is called by Congress
    at the request of two-thirds of the state
    legislatures (this method has never been used)

39
  • 19. Under Article V, what are the two methods of
    ratification? What was the only time that the
    second method was used?

40
  • 1) By a positive vote in three-fourths of the
    legislatures of the various states or
  • 2) By special conventions called in the states
    for the specific purpose of ratifying the
    proposed amendment and a positive vote in
    three-fourths of them.
  • The second method was used only once to repeal
    Prohibition.

41
  • 20. How many amendments have been considered by
    Congress? Of those, how many were submitted to
    the states for ratification? And of those, how
    many were ratified? Why so few?

42
  • Congress has considered more that 11,000
    amendments to the Constitution.
  • Only 33 have been submitted to the states
  • Only 27 have been ratified
  • The requirements for ratification are very
    stringent and only those amendments that have
    wide popular support across parties and in all
    regions of the country are likely to be approved.

43
  • 21. Why was the amendment process made so
    difficult? Were the founding fathers right?

44
  • The framers feared that a simple amendment
    process could lead to a tyranny of the majority,
    which could pass amendments to oppress disfavored
    individuals and groups.
  • Yes, just look at California and Florida

45
  • 22. What are the time limits on ratification of
    an amendment?

46
  • A reading of Article V of the Constitution
    reveals that the framers of the Constitution
    specified no time limit on the ratification
    process.
  • The Supreme Court held that it had to be
    reasonable
  • Since 1919, most have a 7 year limit.

47
  • 23. How often has the national convention
    provision been used?

48
  • No national convention has been held since 1787.

49
  • Excluding the Bill of Rights, how many amendments
    have been added to the Constitution in the past
    200 years?

50
  • 17

51
  • 25. Why has the Constitution been so successful
    over the past 200 years? Use Article 1, Section
    8 and Article III, Section 1 as examples in your
    answer.

52
  • It has been successful because it gives Congress
    broad powers to carry out its duties as the
    nations legislative body.
  • Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to
    regulate foreign and interstate commerce (without
    a definition of commerce)

53
  • Article III, Section 1, states that the national
    judiciary shall consist of one supreme court and
    such inferior courts, as Congress may from time
    to time ordain and establish. This gave
    Congress the flexibility needed to adjust the
    courts over time.

54
  • 26. How has the executive branch expanded its
    powers under the Constitution?

55
  • Even though the Constitution does not expressly
    authorize the president to propose bills or even
    budgets to Congress, presidents since Wilson
    (1913) have proposed hundreds of bills each year.
  • Presidents have used Article II as
    commander-in-chief to send troops into combat
    even though only Congress can declare war.

56
  • Presidents have also conducted foreign affairs by
    the use of executive agreements without the
    approval of the Senate.

57
  • 27. What is Judicial Review? Was it a novel
    idea? How did it get established?

58
  • Judicial review refers to the power of U.S.
    courts to invalidate actions undertaken by the
    legislative and executive branches of govt.
  • It was not a novel ideaunder the common law
    tradition inherited from England, courts
    traditionally exercised this authority.

59
  • It was established by the Supreme Court in 1803
    with its Marbury v. Madison.

60
  • 28. What did Woodrow Wilson mean when he
    summarized the Supreme Courts work as a
    constitutional convention in continuous session?

61
  • The Supreme Court has reversed itself over time.
    Basically, the law is what the Supreme court says
    it is at any point in time.

62
  • 29. How has the White House changed under the
    Constitution?

63
  • The executive branch provides legislative
    leadership far beyond the intentions of the
    Constitution. Originally, the president had a
    staff consisting of personal secretaries and a
    few others. Today, the executive staff has
    increased to several thousand persons.

64
  • 30. What are the factions mentioned by James
    Madison called today? Are they mentioned in the
    Constitution?

65
  • They are interest groups today and they are not
    mentioned in the Constitution.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com