Exchange Rate DeterminationII Real Factor Approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Exchange Rate DeterminationII Real Factor Approach

Description:

Exchange Rate Determination(II) Real Factor Approach. Dr. J. D. Han. King's College ... in the Canada-US exchange rate had reflected inflation differentials, then ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: instru4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exchange Rate DeterminationII Real Factor Approach


1
Exchange Rate Determination(II)Real Factor
Approach
  • Dr. J. D. Han
  • Kings College
  • U.W. O.

2
1. Recall that S and D of FOREX affect FX Rates
through International Trade
  • Supply Demand
  • International Trade Export Imports
  • FX rate FX rate -

3
2. Real Factor Analysis
  • What are the real factors that affect FOREX
    rates?
  • -Supply of and demand for domestic versus foreign
    goods (tradable goods)
  • -Mainly, Productivity or Technical Innovation of
    Export Industry

4
Real Factor Analysis focuses on the real factors
affecting the Supply and Demand of Exports versus
Imports
  • Exports(Technical Innovation Cost Conditions)
  • Imports(International Demand)
  • Any real factors raising EX-IM will move E down.
  • eg1) Technical Innovation in a Canadian export
    industry will lower the cost and the price of
    exports. As more exports bring in more FOREX, E
    will fall.
  • eg2) Unfavorable tax system and labor movement
    will raise the production cost of the Canadian
    export industry. Then
  • eg3) An increase in the international demand for
    oil sand from Canada will .. _______.

5
2. Case Study I
  • PPP in Japan of the 1970-80s Did it work?
  • Background
  • -Japanese Yen became strong for the Japanese, FX
    rate or e fell
  • - E fell more than P/ Pf fell.

6
1) Facts Data of Japanese FOREX Rate
  • Trends of P/P and E in Japan

P/P
E
76
87
7
2)Analysis
  • - The appreciation of the Japanese Yen, or the
    falling E can be only partially explained by
  • P/Pf as PPP suggests
  • Japanese price level was relatively stable
    compared to the U.S. price level
  • Japanese monetary policy was relatively
    conservative compared to the U.S. monetary policy

8
There is a large part of the falling E, which
cannot be explained by PPP.
  • E Pf / P is not equal to one,
  • as suggested by PPP.

9
Modification of PPP Now, introducing q
  • A Meandering Real ROREX rate
  • E Pf /P q (real factors),
  • where q is called Real Exchange Rate

10
Now use q to explain the whole story
  • (i) Nominal Factors affecting the Price Level
    Relative Overall Price Ratio between Japan and
    U.S. (Pf/ P) remains stable due to monetary
    policies

11
  • (ii) Real Factors affecting the Price Level
    Overall Average Prices do not change very much.
  • Suppose that In Japan, there are two sectors of
    industry Tradables and Non-Tradables
  • The overall price level in Japan is the weighted
    average of the prices of the two sectors
  • P 0.5 PT 0.5 PNT (in simpliest form)
  • Technical Innovation happens only to Tradables
    industry
  • - Due to Technical Innovations, Japanese
    Tradable becomes cheaper. Due to Technical
    Backwardness, Japanese Non-tradable becomes more
    expensive
  • Overall P stays stable (Pf/P stays the same).

12
  • (iii) Real Factors affecting the Prices of
    Tadables, and Trade FOREX rate or E falls
  • Japanese Tradable goods have price
    competitiveness edge over Foreign-produced
    Tradable goods
  • falls.
  • Trade depends on PTf / PT , not Pf/P.
    International Substitution from foreign Tradable
    goods to domestic tradable goods
  • Trade surplus for domestic country
  • Excess Demand for domestic currency
  • (Excess Supply of foreign currency)
  • Nominal FOREX rate or E falls

13
  • (iv) Real FOREX rate or q falls
  • E falls while P f / P looks constant.
  • q E P f / P falls.

14
  • (v) PPP worked for Tradable Goods Prices only,
    not for the Overall Price Level
  • E PT f / PT 1 for Tradable Goods
  • E P f / P ltlt 1 for overall price level
  • Here, q(ltlt1) is a reflection of an increasing
    competitiveness of Japanese export goods.

15
3. Case study of Canada
  • Facts
  • Between 1975-1990s
  • -E continued to rise (against Canadian dollars)
  • -Nominal factors Money supply increased faster
    in Canada than in U.S.
  • -Real factors Canadian productivity lagged
    behind the U.S. productivity
  • Between 2001-2003
  • e continues to fall
  • capital flows from U.S. A higher interest rate
    in Canada than in the U.S.
  • may reflect improving real factors

16
Data US-Canadian FOREX Rates of the 1970s to
2001.
In fact, PPP was not exactly correct
If PPP had been correct
E
q
17
2) Analysis Explaining with q
  • It is true that the Canadian monetary policy was
    more liberal than the U.S. monetary policy up to
    the 1990s This explains the general rise of P
    and E.
  • Theoretically, E and Pcanada /P us should have
    gone up proportionally. Yet, E went up faster
    than P/Pf
  • Canada- inflation differentials between U.S. and
    Canada could not fully explain the changes in the
    nominal FX.
  • This suggests that a substantial part of FOREX
    fluctuations between Canada and US is caused by
    real factors.
  • What have caused the real FX rate to change, or
    deviate from unit(one)?

18
3) One More Application Canada should use U.S.
Dollars?
  • Pros
  • 1.No conversion/transactions cost
  • 2. Eliminated FOREX Risks
  • 3. Monetary Discipline for Canada
  • Cons
  • Most FX transactions were in a large amount and
    do not carry a large percentage of conversion
    costs
  • Recently developed hedging has already reduced
    FOREX risks substantially
  • Not much gains for Canada for now

19
How would the elimination of FX rates between
the two countries affect the Canadian Economy?
  • The same currency means no floating FOREX rates.
  • The same currency means the same monetary
    policies and the same rate of inflation for the
    two country (as PPP says).

20
  • -If the changes in the Canada-US exchange rate
    had reflected inflation differentials, then the
    adoption of the common currency would have
    nominal impacts only.
  • In fact, the floating FOREX rates did have other
    function(s), the adoption of the common currency
    and thus the virtual fixed exchange rates would
    hinder the very function of the floating FOREX
    rates
  • - Canada needs the floating FX rate system, which
    presupposes its own currency.

21
Suppose Real Adverse Shocks for Canada, not
U.S. eg) Canada is hit with a lower
productivity The demand for the Canadian goods
fall.
  • Under Flexible FX system
  • The FOREX rates will take the first beating
    (Option II)
  • The resulting depreciation of the domestic
    currency substantially restores the demand for
    the Canadian goods
  • The changes in Income will be mild.
  • Under Fixed FX system
  • Either
  • Labor demand falls and
  • thus Wages fall
  • Prices fall
  • Demand for the Canadian goods may rise back
  • Or
  • If wages do not fall,
  • Actual exports fall
  • Unemployment rises.

M. Friedman Changing the setting of the clock
is easier Option II is better and easier for
adjustment than Option I.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com