Lohse: Models of Graphical Perception - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Lohse: Models of Graphical Perception

Description:

Accounts only for routinized, error-free expert performance ... Can the graphical perception models account for animated graphics? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: ChrisHun
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lohse: Models of Graphical Perception


1
Lohse Models of Graphical Perception
  • CptS 538Spring, 2006
  • Christopher Hundhausen

2
Who is Gerald Lohse?
  • Was a member of U Penn Business School
  • Published several papers in graphics and
    visualization areas between 1993 and 2001
  • SIGCHI
  • Visualization 93
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Jumped ship and went to private consulting firm
    in early 2000s
  • Appears to refocused attention on (a) the use of
    graphics in marketing and on websites, and (b)
    modeling consumer behavior, especially w.r.t.
    websites

3
Is a Picture Worth 1,000 Words?
  • The author claims yes, yet he cites literature
    (Larkin Simon, 1987) that critiques this claim
  • At any rate, visualizations might aid
  • Exploratory data analysis
  • Problem solving
  • Decision making
  • Persuasion
  • Memory and retention
  • Aside (for Richard) Specific task being
    performed, and context in which task is
    performed, might influence which perspective
    (cognitive, social, cultural) is most appropriate
    as evaluation framework

4
Graphics Has Storied History
  • Founding father Playfair (1800s)
  • Transformed tables into charts
  • Empirical evaluations of graphics date to the
    1920s
  • WWI spurred use of graphics as basis for
    strategic decisions
  • Business started using charts in 1930s to make
    strategic decisions
  • What we can learn from this history
  • Visualizations are for reasoning about info
  • Graphics design evolved in ad hoc fashion
  • There exists no common theory of effectiveness

5
Graphics Design Principles Rely on Intuition and
Experience
  • Bertin (1967) Semiology of Graphics
  • Efficiency amounts to the amount of viewing time
    required to answer a specific question
  • Graphics design involves mapping retinal
    variables to perceptual approaches
  • Retinal variables express variations in data
    (position, size, saturation, texture, color,
    orientation shape)
  • Perceptual approaches are essentially classes of
    tasks to be performed w/graphics
  • Grouping similar items
  • Distinguishing dissimilar items
  • Ordering items
  • Observing proportions or identifying quantities
  • Each graphic should convey a single message

6
Graphics Design Principles Rely on Intuition and
Experience (cont.)
  • Tufte (1983, 1990)
  • Presents principled critiques of graphics within
    the context of their use
  • Derives graphics design principles from his case
    studies (but not tested empirically)
  • Example eliminate chart junk
  • The best graphics are the simplest
  • Take home message of authors review Graphics
    design principles arent empirically tested

7
Empirical Studies of Graphics
  • Numerous empirical studies have compared human
    performance promoted by graphical designs that
    vary along given dimensions (which form
    independent variables)
  • These studies yield mixed results, as shown in
    massive Table 1 (lets take a look)
  • Some results
  • Color aids attention span, retention, and recall
    better than monochrome
  • People prefer color

8
Aside What Theory of Effectiveness Would These
Results Support?
  • Knowledge Transfer Expert understanding of data
    encoded in graphic, which is then decoded by
    viewer, resulting in robust transfer (goodness of
    encoding impacts transfer)

9
The Problem with Empirical Studies of Graphics
  • Brute force factor analysis of the goodness of
    alternative graphics is unwieldy
  • Impractical to perform a study in every unique
    situation of graphics use
  • Empirical studies of graphics fail in two
    regards
  • They do not provide a priori performance
    predictions, which is what designers need!
  • They do not connect results to the perceptual
    processes that brought the results about (no
    theory)

10
The Solution Predictive Models of Graphical
Perception
  • A starting point Pinkers (1990) classic model
    with three components
  • Perceptual processes
  • Working memory
  • Long term memory (LTM)
  • Steps
  • Early perceptual processes scan in image and
    encode in WM (certain primitives can be scanned
    in parallel, others only serially)
  • WM encoding (which exists for 7 sec) triggers LTM
    graph schema that allows one to interpret and
    comprehend graphic
  • (Graph schemas are learned procedures for
    decoding graphics novices may lack them)
  • Authors comparison of 3 graphics is instructive

11
A Comparison of 7 Models
12
A Comparison of 7 Models (cont.)
13
A Comparison of 7 Models (cont.)
14
Conclusions
  • Empirical studies are informative, but have
    little a priori predictive value in specific
    graphics-viewing situations
  • Cognitive modeling techniques hold promise as
    predictive tools that, in some cases, can
    automate graphics design
  • Major shortcomings of cognitive modeling
    techniques that must be remedied in future work
    include
  • An insensitivity to individual and cultural
    differences
  • An inability to deal with novices and learning

15
Discussion Questions
  • What is the problem with graphic design
    guidelines?
  • What are some key benefits and limitations of the
    graphical perception models reviewed by the
    author?
  • Suppose you are charged with designing a graphic
    to answer a specific question. Suppose further
    that you know that the people who will ultimately
    use the graphic will come from widely varying
    cultural backgrounds. Which of the seven
    graphical perception models reviewed by the
    author would you apply to this problem, and why?
  • What are the advantages of a cognitive modeling
    approach, as opposed to relying strictly on
    empirical studies of human perception?
  • The authors main beef with many of the models is
    that they are invariant to subtle variations in
    the discrimination task. What does he mean by
    this?
  • Can the graphical perception models account for
    animated graphics? If not, how might they be
    extended to do so?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com