An International Survey of Gun Laws and Violent Crime: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

An International Survey of Gun Laws and Violent Crime:

Description:

Gun laws are explicitly focused on controlling firearms, but. The promise is that more restrictive gun laws will make society safer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:438
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: garym4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An International Survey of Gun Laws and Violent Crime:


1
An International Survey of Gun Laws and Violent
Crime
  • The Republic of Ireland,
  • Jamaica, Great Britain,
  • Australia, and Canada

2
Dr. Gary A Mauser
  • Professor
  • Institute for Canadian Urban Research Studies
  • Faculty of Business Administration
  • Simon Fraser University
  • Burnaby, BC, Canada
  • Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American
    Society of Criminology
  • Renaissance Hotel, Nashville, Tennessee
  • Saturday, 20 November 2004

3
Do British-style firearm regulations create a
safer society?
  • Gun laws are explicitly focused on controlling
    firearms, but
  • The promise is that more restrictive gun laws
    will make society safer
  • What is the international evidence?

4
An experiment in Brazil
  • The gun law is to cut the spiral of
    violence..
  • President Luiz da Silva, Brazil
  • The amnesty is the latest step in the Brazil
    governments efforts to reduce violent crime.
  • BBC report November 11, 2003

5
Promises in South Africa
  • South Africa hopes to make a dent in its
    frighteningly high crime rate with a new
    gun-control law that went into effect
  • Agence France Presse, National Post, July 3,
    2004, A10
  • We believe that in the long term these laws will
    ultimately create a safer South Africa.
  • Police spokesman Andrew Lesch, July 3, 2004

6
How can we measure improvements in public safety?
  • Violent crime rates should drop
  • Homicide rates should fall
  • Not just criminal violence involving guns, but
    all criminal violence should fall
  • Not just gun homicide, but total homicide

7
Which measures are the most appropriate?
  • Gun deaths
  • Gun violence
  • Total violent crime
  • Robbery, armed robbery
  • Total homicide (or murder)

8
Gun Death is a Red Herring
  • Gun deaths are largely suicides
  • Suicide is not central to public safety
  • Substitution effect is supported empirically
  • The removal of firearms or sharps must balance
    liberty with personal safety

9
Gun death is mostly suicide
  • 57 of gun deaths in the US are due to suicides
  • 77 of gun deaths in Canada are due to suicides

10
Gun Violence
  • It is relevant to ask whether gun laws cause gun
    violence to decrease (or increase),
  • But is this the best measure of public safety?
  • A policy could reduce gun violence, but overall
    violent crime could still increase
  • Gun crime is a small fraction of violent crime

11
Gun violence is a small fraction of violent crime
  • Violent crime involving firearms
  • Canada (2003) 2
  • England and Wales (2001) 1
  • United States (1999) 7

12
The most appropriate measures of public safety
  • Homicide rate (or murder)
  • Violent crime rate
  • Robbery, armed robbery

13
International trends compared with trends in the
US
  • Countries that have introduced harsh general
    firearms laws in the 1990s
  • Australia, Great Britain, and Canada
  • Countries that completely banned firearms in the
    1970s
  • Republic of Ireland and Jamaica

14
A natural quasi-experiment
  • The justice system in the United States has
    increasingly diverged from that in Britain or in
    the Commonwealth
  • Arrest/conviction rates higher in the US,
  • Sentencing/punishment more severe, and
  • Citizens can carry concealed handguns.

15
Please Note
  • To assess the effect of laws, we must compare
    trends across countries
  • Direct comparison of international averages is
    inappropriate
  • Police statistics, despite limitations, are the
    best international measure

16
Republic of Ireland
  • Gun prohibition and terrorism

17
Irish Gun Law
  • Firearms prohibited and confiscated in 1972
  • Concern with terrorism motivated this action as
    well as other police activities

18
Murders continue to increase
19
Jamaica
  • The Gun Court and Drug Violence

20
Jamaican Gun Laws
  • Gun court (1974 - 1982)
  • Firearms and ammunition prohibited
  • Mandatory life sentences
  • No bail, no jury trials for charges of possession
    of firearm or ammunition crimes,
  • Firearm ownership still prohibited

21
Murders continue to increase
22
Jamaican crime trends
23
Violent crime continues to increase
24
Great Britain
25
Firearm laws have targeted legal owners
  • The Firearms Amendment of 1988 was brought in
    following the Hungerford incident
  • Brought in shotgun licences
  • The Firearms Amendment of 1997 was brought in
    after the Dunblane shooting
  • Prohibited and confiscated all handguns

26
Homicide increasing
27
Murders increasing in Scotland
28
Violent crime rates increasing
29
Robbery is increasing but gun ownership (legal)
is decreasing
30
Very few firearms used in homicide are legally
held
31
Australia
32
Australian firearms legislation
  • In 1997, government brought in sweeping firearms
    legislation following shootings in Tasmania
  • Prohibited and confiscated semi-automatic long
    arms,
  • Introduced strict new licencing and registration
    regulations

33
Homicide rates stable in Australia since 1997
gun law
34
Violent crime growing in Australia, but falling
in the United States
35
Robbery rates are climbing in Australia but
falling in the US
36
Canada
37
Canadian firearms legislation
  • 1977, introduced police screening for firearm
    purchasers
  • 1991, stiffer rules for ownership, prohibited a
    variety of firearms, magazines
  • 1995, owner licensing and universal firearm
    registration banned many handguns

38
Homicide rates decreasing faster in the US than
in Canada
39
Violent crime rates are basically flat in Canada,
but falling in the US
40
Decline in firearm suicide rate does not reduce
total suicide rate
41
1995 Canadian firearms regulations
  • Total costs expected to reach 2 billion in 2004
  • Originally estimated to cost 2 million
  • Corruption investigation ongoing
  • No visible effect on violent crime rates or
    suicide rates

42
Summary
  • No evidence that restrictive firearm regulations
    have reduced violent crime or homicide rates in
    Canada, Australia, Great Britain, Jamaica, or the
    Republic of Ireland
  • Only the United States has witnessed a dramatic
    drop in criminal violence

43
Tentative conclusions
  • British-style firearm laws and gun bans are
    ineffective and expensive
  • Prediction new gun laws will fail in both Brazil
    and South Africa to curb violent crime or
    homicide
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com