Science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Science

Description:

Q) How long would it take for it to reassemble? 11. Answer: 10100,000,000,000 years! ... 'Chicken or the Egg' problem. Spontaneous synthesis of first ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: koinoni
Category:
Tags: boil | chicken | do | how | long | science

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Science


1
Science Christianity Christian Faith at
the Interface of Physics, Chemistry,
BiologyJoong Jonathan LeeNovember 3, 2006
2
Science is exciting!
  • Only a rookie who knows nothing about science
    would say science takes away from faith. If you
    really study science, it will bring you closer to
    God. Prof. James Tour, Rice University

3
Outline
  • Physics - Universal Constants - Big Bang
  • Chemistry - Synthesis of Biomolecules
  • Biology - Evolution - Irreducible
    complexity - Fossils, fraud, facts

4
1) Universal Physical Constants
5
Just how precise?
  • For example, Expansion of the Universe
  • If larger, no galaxy formation
  • If smaller, universe collapses before star
    formation
  • ? In fact, its precise to a factor of 1 in
    100,000,000,000,000,000 (1)

6
Even more precise for
  • Force of Gravity
  • If larger, stars would be too hot would burn up
    quickly unevenly
  • If smaller, stars would be too cool nuclear
    fusion would not ignite (no heavy element
    production)
  • ? In fact, its precise to a factor of 1 in
    10100 thats 100 zeros!
  • 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    00000000000000000000000000000000000000
    0000000000000000000000 (1)

7
Very, very, very precise!
  • Over 50 such universal physical constants are
    likewise fine-tuned !
  • ? Universe seems to be intentionally designed
    created for human life

8
2) Big Bang Theory
  • Big Bang Theory has been around since 1929
  • but many refused to accept it because it
    threatened evolution.
  • we must allow evolution an infinite time to get
    started. Sir Arthur Eddington (1882-1944)

9
Big evidence for Big Bang
  • 1992 COBE satellite (Cosmic Background Explorer)
    for background radiation
  • Its the discovery of the century, if not for
    all time Stephen Hawking, Cambridge Univ.
  • The handwriting of God What we have found is
    evidence for the birth of the universe Dr.
    George Smoot, COBE Project Leader, Lawrence
    Berkeley National Laboratory
  • ? There was a beginning to our universe 15
    billion years ago

10
Is 15 billion yrs enough time?
  • Biophysicist Dr. Harold Morowitz wondered
  • If you break all chemical bonds in a bacteria
    put atoms under ideal chemical conditions
  • Q) How long would it take for it to reassemble?

11
Answer 10100,000,000,000 years!
  • Written out completely, that would be
  • 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
    000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00
    0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
    000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00
    0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
    000,000,000,000,000,000,(on and on)
  • ? 1,000 sets of Encyclopedia Britannicas
    filled with zeros!!(but the universe is only
    15,000,000,000 yrs)

12
Physics Review
  • Fine-tuned constants for life
  • ? Appears intentionally designed
  • Big Bang limits age of universe
  • ? Not enough time for random chance

13
3) Synthesis of Biomolecules
Nucleotides
RNA DNA
Amino Acids
Proteins (Enzymes)
  • Big Problem Enzymes are required to help make
    Amino Acids Nucleotides
  • ? Who made 1st amino acids nucleotides?

14
Chicken or the Egg problem
Nucleotides
RNA DNA
Amino Acids BUILDING BLOCKS
Proteins (enzymes) BIG MACHINES
  • Big Question Can we make building blocks
    without big machines?

15
From early earth soup?
  • 1924 Oparins hypothesis of prebiotic (early)
    earths composition
  • Ammonia (NH3), hydrogen (H2), methane (CH4)
  • 1953 Miller boiled these in water electrical
    sparks to simulate early earth
  • ? got some amino acids

16
Flaws of Millers experiment
  • Only simplest amino acids produced as reaction
    continued, got destroyed
  • UV radiation on early earth
  • destroys ammonia (NH3)
  • converts methane (CH4) to hydrocarbons
  • Hydrogen (H2) escapes into the atmosphere
  • Recent studies show early earth only had nitrogen
    (N2), carbon dioxide (CO2), water ? Completely
    different starting materials

17
Miller now confesses
  • 40 years later after his first experiment
    The problem of the origin of life has turned
    out to be much more difficult than I, and most
    other people, envisioned.
  • ? Making these building blocks without big
    machines improbable!

18
Other options?
Nucleotides (4)
RNA DNA
Amino Acids (20)
Proteins (enzymes)
  • Panspermia theory Amino Acids arrive from outer
    space
  • Q) Can random collision of these building
    blocks make big machines?

19
No chance even w/ Amino Acids
  • L-Amino Acids (vs. D-Amino Acids) 2 to 1
  • Joining two AAs via a peptide bond 2 to 1
  • Getting the right AA (out of the 20) 20 to 1
  • Odds for 3 specified AAs in sequence would be
    (2220) x (2220) x (2220) 512,000 to 1
  • For a typical protein of 100 AAs, odds would be
    (80)100 10190 to 1 ? outrageous odds!
  • Time computer needs for right sequence 10170
    yrsBut the age of our universe is only
    1010 yrs

20
From a Nobel Laureate
  • Nobel Laureate Dr. Francis Crick The
    origin of life appears to be almost a miracle, so
    many are the conditions which would have had to
    be satisfied to get it going

21
Chemistry Review
  • Chicken or the Egg problem
  • Spontaneous synthesis of first biomolecules is
    almost impossible
  • Even with pre-formed AAs, not enough time for
    specified sequence

22
4) Darwins Theory of Evolution
  • Natural selection working on variation
  • Random mutations ? changes
  • Favorable mutations to next generation
  • Dont keep bad mutations

23
Small vs. Big
  • Microevolution Small changes (coloration,
    height, etc.)
  • ? this is acceptable
  • Macroevolution To form brand new species
  • ? this is under question

24
Darwins own warning
  • The Origin of Species, Charles Darwin
    (1809-1882) If it could be demonstrated that
    any complex organ existed which could not
    possibly have been formed by numerous,
    successive, slight modifications, my theory would
    absolutely break down.
  • Note During Darwins days, the cell was a
    mysterious black box
  • but now, we can see what its inside.

25
Irreducible complexity inside
  • Irreducible complexity (Dr. Behe)
  • several interacting parts that contribute to
    the basic function the removal of any one of the
    parts causes the system to effectively cease
    functioning
  • Example

26
An example from biology
  • Bacteria swim using this swirling flagella
    tail

27
A closer look inside reveals
  • a highly designed molecular machine !

? And many more being discovered now
28
5) Fossil facts
  • Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species
    all living species have been connected with the
    parent-species So that the number of
    intermediate and transitional links, must have
    been inconceivably great.
  • ? So, we should be able to find many fossils of
    these many intermediates

29
Transitional Intermediates?
  • There should be intermediates that connect

but fossil records are lacking! ltVideo clipgt
30
Desperate attempts
  • Piltdown Man (1912)
  • Bones were reshaped stained!
  • Nebraska Man (1922)
  • From a single tooth
  • but it turned out to be a tooth of a wild pig!

31
Be honest with facts
  • Prof. David Raup U. of Chicago Field Museum
    of Natural History We are now about 120 years
    after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil
    record has been greatly expanded. We now have a
    quarter of a million fossil species, but
    ironically, we have even fewer examples of
    evolutionary transition than we had in Darwins
    time. "Conflicts Between Darwin and
    Paleontology," Field Museum of Natural History
    Bulletin, January 1979, pg. 25
  • A large number of well-trained scientists
    outside of evolutionary biology and paleontology
    have unfortunately gotten the idea that the
    fossil record is far more Darwinian than it is.
    This probably comes from the oversimplification
    inevitable in secondary sources low-level
    textbooks, semipopular articles, and so on.
    Also, there is probably some wishful thinking
    involved. In the years after Darwin, his
    advocates hoped to find predictable progressions.
    In general, these have not been found. Yet the
    optimism has died hard, and some pure fantasy has
    crept into textbooks. New
    Scientist, Vol. 90, p.832, 1981

32
Fact or folly?
  • Ernst Haeckel(1834-1919)
  • Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny (aka
    Biogenetic Law)
  • Development of an embryo goes through its
    evolutionary history
  • But he faked changed drawings!

33
Slow to change
  • Haeckels fraud first exposed in 1915 Assmuth
    Hull, Haeckels Frauds and Forgeries
  • Not only did Haeckel add or omit features,but
    he also fudged the scale to exaggerate
    similarities among species, even when there were
    10-fold differences in size E. Pennisi,
    Science, 277, p.1435 (1997)
  • Finally, the 2002 edition of Molecular Biology of
    the Cell, (Alberts, et al.) removed it

34
Old peppered moth example
  • Thought was during industrial revolution,
    darker moths camouflaged better on tree trunks
    (pollution)
  • but moths do not normally rest on tree trunks!
  • Most textbook pictures are from manually
    positioning live moths or by gluing dead
    moths!Coyne, Not Black and White, Nature,
    396, 35-36 (1998)
  • ? Evolution is becoming an endangered theory

35
Biology Review
  • Irreducible complexity of molecular machines
  • ? Suggests an intelligent designer
  • Still missing intermediate fossil records
  • ? Suggests creation explosion (in short time)
  • Misleading information still in books
  • Stephen Jay Gould astonished and ashamed by
    the century of mindless recycling that has led to
    the persistence of these drawings in a large
    numberof modern textbooks.

36
Final Conclusions
  • Not enough time for random chance to produce
    complex biological machines
  • Recent data strongly suggests an Intelligent
    Designer
  • ? Now, former atheist Dr. Anthony Flew believes
    in God

37
Some references
  • Physics
  • Hugh Ross, The Creator and the Cosmos (Colorado
    Springs NavPress, 2001)
  • Chemistry
  • J. P. Moreland (ed.), The Creation Hypothesis
    (Downers Grove, Illinois InterVarsity Press,
    1994)
  • Charles Thaxton, Walter Bradley, and Roger Olsen,
    The Mystery of Lifes Origin Reassessing
    Current Theories (Dallas Lewis and Stanley,
    1992)

38
  • Biology
  • Michael Behe, Darwins Black Box (New York The
    Free Press, 1996)
  • General
  • William Dembski and James Kushiner (eds.), Signs
    of Intelligence (Grand Rapids Brazos Press,
    2001)
  • www.origins.org - www.ARN.org -
    www.reasons.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com