Title: Creation and Science
1Creation and Science
2The big issues
- Evolution
- Dating methods
- Fossils
- Flood
- Dinosaurs
- Starlight and time
- Irreducible complexity
- Information theory
3Authority of scripture
- All Scripture is given by inspiration of God
- 2 Tim 316
4Evolution
5Evolution
- Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in
our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of
the sea and the birds of the air, over the
livestock, over all the earth, and over all the
creatures that move along the ground." - Genesis 126
- By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food
until you return to the ground, since from it you
were taken for dust you are and to dust you will
return." - Genesis 319
6Evolution
- Let the land produce vegetation seed-bearing
plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with
seed in it, according to their various kinds
plants bearing seed according to their kinds and
trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to
their kinds. - Genesis 111-12
- Let the land produce living creatures according
to their kinds livestock, creatures that move
along the ground, and wild animals, each
according to its kind. - Genesis 124
7Evolution
- Let the land produce vegetation seed-bearing
plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with
seed in it, according to their various kinds
plants bearing seed according to their kinds and
trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to
their kinds. - Genesis 111-12
- Let the land produce living creatures according
to their kinds livestock, creatures that move
along the ground, and wild animals, each
according to its kind. - Genesis 124
8Evolution
- Evolution is a belief system (that claims to be
a science) that says that all life on earth
ultimately derives from a single original life
form, and those life forms have been
progressively changing (evolving) over millions
of years into the complex forms of life
(including human life) we see today - Evolutionary effects are often classified into
one of two categories
- Microevolution changes within a kind
- Macroevolution changes between kinds
9Evolution
- There are two views
- Evolution from non-living elements, up through
endless. development, through ape-like creatures,
till finally human existence became different to
ape existence. This is the atheistic evolutionist
position. - God set evolution in progress and guided progress
and guided the development, and so, in effect,
created man. Therefore man is still responsible
to his Creator, and the evolutionary scientist is
also seen to be credible. This view is known as
theistic evolution.
10Biblical model for change in animals
- God commanded the living things He created to
multiply after their kindan expression
repeated 10 times in Genesis 1 (v 11, 12, 21, 22,
24, 25, 26, 28) - Adams sin brought a curse on the entire
creation one consequence was that mutations
began to accumulate in DNA. - Noah had 2 of each kind (seven of the clean) of
air-breathing land animal (probably around 16,000
individual animals) with him on the Ark. After
the animals disembarked and began to multiply,
they would have migrated to various areas and
adapted to the area they settled in. - We observe reproduction only within the created
kinds today, e.g. dogs breed other dogs,
weasels breed other weasels, etc. - Great amounts of information variability still
exist today in the animal, plant and human
genomes. This means that many varieties can arise
within each kind by sorting out already
existing information. The number of different
offspring that could theoretically be produced
from two people is 102017 (compare to the number
of atoms in the known universe 1080).
11Evolutionary model for change in animals
- Violence and bloodshed are a required part of
evolutionary theory - Animals are improved through the process of
natural selection and genetic mutation - The informational effect of natural selection and
genetic mutation is positive and over time
improved versions of the original animal will
appear - These changes made to animal offspring can be so
severe that they can change the type of animal
from one to another (amphibian to reptile for
example)
12Suggested mechanisms for molecules-to-man
evolution
- Natural Selection
- Thirteen species of finches live on the
Galápagos, the famous island group visited by
Charles Darwin in the 1830s. The finches have a
variety of bill shapes and sizes, all suited to
their varying diets and lifestyles. The
explanation given by Darwin was that they are all
the offspring of an original pair of finches, and
that natural selection is responsible for the
differences. Say some finches ended up on islands
in which there was a shortage of seeds, but many
grubs were living under tree bark. In a
population with much variation, some will have
longer, some shorter, beaks than average. Those
birds carrying more of the long-beak
information could survive on those grubs, and
thus would be more likely to pass the information
on to their descendants, while the others would
die out. In this way, with selection acting on
other characters as well, a woodpecker finch
could arise. The same thing is seen in artificial
selection, with all the various modern breeds of
dogs being more specialized than the parent
(mongrel) population, but carrying less
informationand thus less potential for further
selection (you cant breed Great Danes from
Chihuahuas). In all these sorts of changes,
finches are still finches and dogs are dogs. The
limits to change are set by the amount of
information originally present from which to
select. - Carl Wieland, Darwins Finches
13Suggested mechanisms for molecules-to-man
evolution
- Natural Selection
- Living things are culled based on environmental
pressures or changes.
- This involves a loss or redistribution of genetic
information as animals become unable to
interbreed, so cannot be a mechanism for
evolution.
- Natural selection is basically a conservative
force, which supports the Biblical teaching that
all things were created to reproduce after their
kind.
14Suggested mechanisms for molecules-to-man
evolution
- Mutations
- Mutations are copying mistakes as genetic
information is passed from parent to child.
- This also involves a loss or corruption of the
original genetic content, not a net gain, as is
required by fish-to-philosopher evolution.
- This is explained by the Biblical teaching that
all things are suffering from the curse God
placed on His creation because of Adams sin
(Genesis 31719, Romans 820-22)
15Suggested mechanisms for molecules-to-man
evolution
- With this array of human diseases that are
caused by mutations, what of positive effects?
With thousands of examples of harmful mutations
readily available, surely it should be possible
to describe some positive mutations if
macroevolution is true. These would be needed not
only for evolution to greater complexity, but
also to offset the downward pull of the many
harmful mutations. But, when it comes to
identifying positive mutations, evolutionary
scientists are strangely silent. The mutation
responsible for sickle cell anaemia has been put
forward as an example of evolution. The problems
with this is obvious, as the sickle cell
mutation, like the many other described
haemoglobin mutations, clearly impairs the
function of the otherwise marvellously
well-designed haemoglobin molecule. It can in no
way be regarded as an improvement in our species,
even though its incidence is enhanced in
malaria-endemic parts of central Africa by
natural selection. - The blind gunman, Institute for Creation research
16Evolution where is the evidence?
- There are no transitional links and intermediate
forms in either the fossil record or the modern
world. Therefore, there is no actual evidence
that evolution has occurred either in the past or
the present.
Absolutely no transitional forms either in the
fossil record or in modern animal and plant life
have been found. All appear fully formed and
complete. The fossil record amply supplies us
with representation of almost all species of
animals and plants but none of the supposed links
of plant to animal, fish to amphibian, amphibian
to reptile, or reptile to birds and mammals are
represented nor any transitional forms at all.
There are essentially the same gaps between all
the basic kinds in the fossil record as exists in
plant and animal life today. There are literally
a host of missing links in the fossil record and
the modern world.
17Dating methods
18Dating methods Carbon-14
- Carbon-14 is made when cosmic rays knock neutrons
out of atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere.
These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit
ordinary nitrogen (14N) at lower altitudes,
converting it into 14C. Unlike common carbon
(12C), 14C is unstable and slowly decays,
changing it back to nitrogen and releasing
energy. This instability makes it radioactive. - Ordinary carbon (12C) is found in the carbon
dioxide (CO2) in the air, which is taken up by
plants, which in turn are eaten by animals. So a
bone, or a leaf or a tree, or even a piece of
wooden furniture, contains carbon. When the 14C
has been formed, like ordinary carbon (12C), it
combines with oxygen to give carbon dioxide
(14CO2), and so it also gets cycled through the
cells of plants and animals. - We can take a sample of air, count how many 12C
atoms there are for every 14C atom, and calculate
the 14C/12C ratio. Because 14C is so well mixed
up with 12C, we expect to find that this ratio is
the same if we sample a leaf from a tree, or a
part of your body. - In living things, although 14C atoms are
constantly changing back to 14N, they are still
exchanging carbon with their surroundings, so the
mixture remains about the same as in the
atmosphere. However, as soon as a plant or animal
dies, the 14C atoms which decay are no longer
replaced, so the amount of 14C in that
once-living thing decreases as time goes on. In
other words, the 14C/12C ratio gets smaller. So,
we have a clock which starts ticking the moment
something dies.
19Dating methods Carbon-14
- Limitations
- Only works for living things (that take in 14C)
- Has a half life of 11,460 years
- Plants discriminate against 14C
- The ratio of 14C/12C in the atmosphere is not
constant - No. 4 means 14C dates are adjusted based on
historically dated objects - No. 5 means 14C dating can only be used for dates
on historical record
20Dating methods Carbon-14
- More Limitations
- Cosmic rays affect the amount of 14C in our
atmosphere based on the suns activity (which we
cannot predict) - The earths magnetic field affects the cosmic rays
entering the atmosphere - The flood buried the 12C producing animals and
plants, but the 14C production would have
remained constant upsetting the 14C/12C ratio
21Dating methods Carbon-14
- How reliable / useful is 14C dating?
- Within certain known parameters it is useful but
there are so many effects that alter the dates
you get out of it that the results are likely to
be incorrect.
22Dating methods other radiometric dating
- There are various other radiometric dating
methods used today to give ages of millions or
billions of years for rocks. These techniques,
unlike carbon dating, mostly use the relative
concentrations of parent and daughter products in
radioactive decay chains. For example,
potassium-40 decays to argon-40 uranium-238
decays to lead-206 via other elements like
radium uranium-235 decays to lead-207
rubidium-87 decays to strontium-87 etc. These
techniques are applied to igneous rocks, and are
normally seen as giving the time since
solidification. - The isotope concentrations can be measured very
accurately, but isotope concentrations are not
dates. To derive ages from such measurements,
unprovable assumptions have to be made such as - The starting conditions are known (for example,
that there was no daughter isotope present at the
start, or that we know how much was there). - Decay rates have always been constant.
- Systems were closed or isolated so that no parent
or daughter isotopes were lost or added.
23Dating methods other radiometric dating
- When a date differs from that expected,
researchers readily invent excuses for rejecting
the result. The common application of such
posterior reasoning shows that radiometric dating
has serious problems. Woodmorappe cites hundreds
of examples of excuses used to explain "bad"
dates. - For example, researchers applied posterior
reasoning to the dating of Australopithecus
ramidus fossils. Most samples of basalt closest
to the fossil-bearing strata give dates of about
23 Ma (Mega annum, million years) by the
argon-argon method. The authors decided that was
too old, according to their beliefs about the
place of the fossils in the evolutionary grand
scheme of things. So they looked at some basalt
further removed from the fossils and selected 17
of 26 samples to get an acceptable maximum age of
4.4 Ma. The other nine samples again gave much
older dates but the authors decided they must be
contaminated and discarded them. That is how
radiometric dating works. It is very much driven
by the existing long-age world view that pervades
academia today. - The forms issued by radioisotope laboratories for
submission with samples to be dated commonly ask
how old the sample is expected to be. Why? If the
techniques were absolutely objective and
reliable, such information would not be
necessary. Presumably, the laboratories know that
anomalous dates are common, so they need some
check on whether they have obtained a good
date.
24Dating methods physical evidences
- Evidence for a rapid formation of geological
strata, as in the biblical flood. Some of the
evidences are lack of erosion between rock
layers supposedly separated in age by many
millions of years lack of disturbance of rock
strata by biological activity (worms, roots,
etc.) lack of soil layers polystrate fossils
(which traverse several rock layers
verticallythese could not have stood vertically
for eons of time while they slowly got buried)
thick layers of rock bent without fracturing,
indicating that the rock was all soft when bent
and more. For more, see books by geologists
Morris and Austin. - Red blood cells and haemoglobin have been found
in some (unfossilized!) dinosaur bone. But these
could not last more than a few thousand
yearscertainly not the 65 Ma since the last
dinosaurs lived, according to evolutionists - The earths magnetic field has been decaying so
fast that it looks like it is less than 10,000
years old. Rapid reversals during the flood year
and fluctuations shortly after would have caused
the field energy to drop even faster. - Radioactive decay releases helium into the
atmosphere, but not much is escaping. The total
amount in the atmosphere is 1/2000th of that
expected if the universe is really billions of
years old. This helium originally escaped from
rocks. This happens quite fast, yet so much
helium is still in some rocks that it has not had
time to escapecertainly not billions of years.
25Dating methods physical evidences
- A supernova is an explosion of a massive starthe
explosion is so bright that it briefly outshines
the rest of the galaxy. The supernova remnants
(SNRs) should keep expanding for hundreds of
thousands of years, according to physical
equations. Yet there are no very old, widely
expanded (Stage 3) SNRs, and few moderately old
(Stage 1) ones in our galaxy, the Milky Way, or
in its satellite galaxies, the Magellanic Clouds.
This is just what we would expect for young
galaxies that have not existed long enough for
wide expansion. - The moon is slowly receding for the earth at
about 4 centimeters (1.5 inches) per year, and
this rate would have been greater in the past.
But even if the moon had started receding from
being in contact with the earth, it would have
taken only 1.37 billion years to reach its
present distance from the earth. This gives a
maximum age of the moon, not the actual age. This
is far too young for evolutionists who claim the
moon is 4.6 billion years old. It is also much
younger than the radiometric dates assigned to
moon rocks. - Salt is entering the sea much faster than it is
escaping. The sea is not nearly salty enough for
this to have been happening for billions of
years. Even granting generous assumptions to
evolutionists, the sea could not be more than 62
Ma years oldfar younger than the billions of
years believed by the evolutionists. Again, this
indicates a maximum age, not the actual age.
26Dating methods how do we date?
- Creationists understand the limitations of dating
methods better than evolutionists who claim that
they can use processes observed in the present to
prove that the earth is billions of years old.
In reality, all dating methods, including those
that point to a young earth, rely on unprovable
assumptions. - Creationists ultimately date the earth
historically using the chronology of the Bible.
This is because they believe that this is an
accurate eyewitness account of world history,
which bears the evidence within it that it is the
Word of God, and therefore totally reliable and
error-free.
27Fossils
28Fossils Humanist view
- Over millions of years animals and plants have
slowly become fossilised leaving us evidence that
evolution is true that there has been a gradual
upward progression in the animal kingdom.
29Fossils Humanist attacks
- There are millions of dead fossilised things
which are millions of years old all over the
earth we can date these and prove that there
have been millions of years. - The fossils are in layers which prove they
occurred at particular time periods. - The fossil record proves that evolution is true
it is a historic record of the progression of
evolving life on earth.
30Fossils Christian view
- God judged the earth because of the sinfulness of
man with a global flood from which only Noah, his
family, and some of each of the animal types were
saved. During the flood millions of animals and
plants were killed, these would have been
fossilised by the sudden catastrophic influx of
water, leaving us with the fossil record we see
today.
31Fossils Christian counter attacks
- This is just a dating argument, so we can refer
to the things said previously about dating. - We would expect fossils to be in layers because
of the separating effect the flood waters would
have based on animal size / mass, also the more
intelligent and mobile animals would have escaped
to higher ground and so therefore been buried
later. This fits well with what we find. - We know that fossils need to be formed through
sudden catastrophic events because otherwise the
body of the animal would not be fossilised it
would be eaten, float away, etc so this closely
fits a global flood scenario. - There is no evidence of transitional forms in the
fossil record see evolution - We know that rock layers can be formed suddenly
Mt St. Helens it doesnt require millions of
years. - The earth has billions of dead things buried in
rock layers laid down by water all over the
earth. This is stunning proof of the truth of the
flood, it is exactly the kind of evidence we
would expect!
32Fossils quotes
- A thin slice of T. rex bone glowed amber
beneath the lens of my microscope. Blood vessel
channels snaked through a bone matrix, and tiny
chambers known as lacunae, which house
bone-forming cells, appeared as small ovals. The
lab filled with murmurs of amazement, for I had
focused on something inside the vessels that none
of us had ever noticed before tiny round
objects, translucent red with a dark center.
Then a colleague took one look at them and
shouted, Youve got red blood cells. Youve got
red blood cells!Finding remains of dinosaur
blood cells would have astounding implications. - Mary Schweitzer Tracy Staedter,
- The Real Jurassic Park, Earth
33Fossils quotes
- One of the things that we have is a part of the
hip bone or pelvis. Now this specimen actually
looks like it had come from an animal that looks
like it died two or three hundred years ago. All
dry, chalky, this sort of thing. Doesnt actually
mean it died two or three hundred years ago. In
Montana, Ive seen dinosaur bones that look like
theyve come from animals that died two or three
hundred years ago, and I know very well that they
died much longer than that. It gives the
suggestion that Megalania may have been alive
fairly recently. - Dr Ralph Molnar, Into the Unknown,
34If the evidence for the flood is so compelling
why dont scientists agree?
- 5But they deliberately forget that long ago by
God's word the heavens existed and the earth was
formed out of water and by water. 6By these
waters also the world of that time was deluged
and destroyed. - 2 Peter 35-6
35Dinosaurs
36- Dinosaurs the big mystery the Bible cant answer
37Dinosaurs
- According to evolutionists
- Dinosaurs evolved 235 million years ago long
before man - Humans never lived at the same time as dinosaurs
- 65 million years ago the dinosaurs all
disappeared, probably due to an asteroid - Some believe some dinosaurs survived and became
the birds
38Dinosaurs
- According to the Bible
- Dinosaurs first existed 6,000 years ago
- God made the dinosaurs along with the other land
animals on day six - Adam and Eve were made on day six so they lived
at the same time as dinosaurs - Dinosaurs could not have died out before people
because death did not exist before the fall - Some of the kind of dinosaurs would have been
on the ark (possibly as eggs / infants) - Due to post-flood climactic change, lack of food,
disease, and mans activities many animals became
extinct (possibly some or all dinosaurs)
39Dinosaurs
- 15"Look now at the behemoth
- which I made along with you He eats grass like
an ox. 16See now, his strength is in his hips,
And his power is in his stomach muscles. 17He
moves his tail like a cedar The sinews of his
thighs are tightly knit. 18His bones are like
beams of bronze, His ribs like bars of iron.
19He is the first of the ways of God Only He
who made him can bring near His sword. - Job 4015-19
- The phrase first of the ways of God suggests
that this was the biggest animal God had made
(note the elephants and hippos dont fit this
bill)
40Dinosaurs
- Some interesting facts
- There is no mystery if you accept what the Bible
says - Many (recent) dragon legends fit dinosaur
descriptions
41Starlight and time
42Starlight and Time
- Solving the puzzle of distant starlight in a
young universe - These are attempts to solve some unsolved
astrophysics questions in particular - The Bible says the universe is just thousands of
years old, and yet we can see starts that are
billions of light-years away. How can see those
stars? How did the light get here? - Recommended book Starlight and Time, D
Humphreys Ph.D
43Irreducible complexity
44Irreducible complexity
- Irreducible complexity is the idea that a system
cannot be reduced any more, nothing more can be
removed if the system is to continue to function.
If true this suggests the system could not have
evolved in a stepwise manner. - Examples are cillium, blood clotting, AMP and
- production in cells.
- There are some issues with this approach
- Recommended book Darwins black box, M. Behe
45Information theory
46Information theory
- A type of modern scientific design argument based
on information theory - Very complex and esoteric!
- Fun to read if you enjoy those things though!
- Recommended book In the beginning was
Information, Werner Gitt
47Questions