Identifying Indoor and Outdoor Water Use - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Identifying Indoor and Outdoor Water Use

Description:

Since addresses are available, find the tax assessor lot size to create a ... Likewise for the same address, State Street returns State Street. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: natu98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Identifying Indoor and Outdoor Water Use


1
Identifying Indoor and Outdoor Water Use
  • Craig W. Miller
  • Utah Division of Water Resources
  • November 26, 2002

2
Average Salt Lake Water Use
3
Understanding Municipal Water Use

4
Utah is a water poor state
5
Breakdown of water use by category
Understanding Residential Outdoor Water Use is
Key to Conservation
6
Outdoor Water Use
  • Determine use per day December-February
  • Subtract from use in remaining months to obtain
    outdoor water use.
  • Determine from tax assessor records to determine
    number of swamp coolers, subtract 45 gpd for
    each.
  • Determine lot size from assessor database to find
    use per acre (this is the focus of remainder of
    presentation).

7
Address Matching Use Post Office Zip4 For
Greater Accuracy
  • Problems requiring address matching
  • In order to determine outdoor water use
    efficiency, billing records need to be tied to a
    lot size in the tax assessors database.
  • Water purveyors give overlapping boundaries for
    their service areas. In order to determine
    population served correct boundaries must be
    determined.
  • Data exists which relate measured lot size to
    area of irrigated landscape. Unfortunately, the
    measured lot size does not match the tax assessor
    lot size. Since addresses are available, find
    the tax assessor lot size to create a function
    which relates tax assessor lot size to landscaped
    area.

8
Methods Used for Address Matching
  • Home grown methods
  • Variant/alternate spellings of addresses produced
    low match rates (50-60)
  • Geocoding
  • Products for geocoding readily available through
    state or local agencies.
  • Can purchase products from ESRI.
  • Often finds a limited number of matches (85) and
    may not exactly locate a lot or may find the
    wrong lot.
  • Post Office Zip4 address standardization
    yields roughly a 95 find rate in test runs.

9
Correctly Identify Boundaries
  • Needed for
  • Population estimation
  • Per capita use
  • Water planning

10
Readily Available Data SetsUsually Free of Charge
  • County Recorder Lot Coverages
  • Correctly identify lot size
  • County Assessor Tax Database
  • Address of property
  • Identifies use commercial, single family
    residential, etc.
  • Estimate of lot size
  • Property valuation
  • Number of swamp coolers and bathrooms
  • Water purveyor billing records
  • USPS zip4 (always free)

11
Boundary Problems
  • Typical maps of water purveyor boundaries do not
    represent system complexity at the user level.
  • Lack of communication between GIS personnel and
    system administrators
  • Small pockets of purveyor service can exist at a
    neighborhood level.
  • Federal funding guidelines encourage
    gerrymandering.

12
Zip4 Capabilities
  • Can be interactively queried
  • Post Office provides free DLLs but these require
    access to a server and are not well documentedno
    help files.
  • Simple programs written in VB and JAVA can do the
    same thing.
  • Capabilities
  • Resolves alternate spellings
  • Can be used to make an exact key for address
    matching (5-digit zipAddress)

13
Zip4 Resultshttp//www.usps.com/zip4/
  • Example
  • 510 Seventh Avenue
  • 510 7th Ave
  • 510 East Seventh Ave
  • All yield
  • 510 7th Ave

14
Zip4 Resultshttp//www.usps.co/zip4/
  • Examples - continued
  • 6790 Hollow Dale Dr
  • 6790 South Hollowdale Drive
  • Both yield
  • 6790 Hollowdale Dr
  • Clearly indicates when address is not found
  • Conclusion Very robust system

15
Zip4 Problems
  • Sensitive to zip code or city boundary changes.
  • Does not resolve all variant spelling problems.
  • Pony Express Way returns Pony Express Way.
    Likewise for the same address, State Street
    returns State Street.
  • Alternate city spellings are not usually
    corrected.
  • With 95 find rate, database cleanup is much less
    of a problemstill not trivial.

16
Trial Case
  • Identify South Salt Lakes Water Service
    Boundary.
  • Claims to serve same areas as Salt Lake City and
    Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District.

17
Address Preprocessing
  • Remove notes in billing record addresses placed
    there by the company
  • (for example notes in parenthesis)
  • Resolve address range problems
  • Represent (213-215) Some Street Dr with 213 Some
    Street and 215 Some Street?
  • Zip4 does not recognize CR as an abbreviation
    for Circle.
  • (other problems will be noted for your dataset)
  • Create records for variant names (not just
    alternate spellings).

18
Address Processing
  • Takes about 1 second per query.
  • To speed process have subsets of your database
    being processed in tandem.
  • VB processes for web querying take all processor
    cycles available (may take a performance hit in
    other processing).

19
Address Post Processing
  • Remove apartment and suite number
  • Create a unique key from zip address
  • Access and ArcGIS are limited in their ability to
    handle long keys (example 60 characters).
    FoxPro was used to perform the database linkages.
  • Find parcel number field and place in database of
    interest. Addresses, zips, and cities change.
    County parcel numbers are less volatile.

20
VB program used for project
Code available at water.utah.gov/craig/code.zip
21
Sample Output
22
Acknowledgements
  • Utahs Water Resources, Planning for the Future,
    Utah Division of Water Resources, 2001.
  • Salt Lake City, South Salt Lake, Salt Lake
    County, Jordan Valley Water water records,
    property records.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com