Title: Francisella tularensis
1Francisella tularensis
2Francisella tularensis
- Gram stain
- Poorly staining,
- tiny Gram-negative
- coccobacilli
3Francisella tularensis
- - One of the most infectious pathogenic bacteria
known - - Inoculation or inhalation of as few as ten
organisms can cause disease - - Extreme infectivity
- - Substantial capacity to cause illness and
death - Humans cannot transmit infection to others
4Can Survive For Weeks
- Water
- Soil
- Moist hay
- Straw
- Decaying animal carcasses
- Because it is.
- Hardy, non-spore forming organism
5Reservoirs
- Small and medium sized mammals are the
principal natural reservoirs for F. tularensis - Rabbits
- Aquatic Rodents (Beavers, Muskrats)
- Rats
- Squirrels
- Lemmings
- Mice
6Vectors
- Ticks
- Mosquitoes
- Biting Flies
7Also Known As
- Deer-fly fever (Utah)
- Glandular tick fever (Idaho and Montana)
- Market mens disease (Washington D.C.)
- Rabbit fever (Central States)
- OHaras disease (Japan)
8History
- First isolated in 1911 from a plague-like disease
among ground squirrels in California - Its epidemic potential became apparent in the
1930s and 1940s when large waterborne outbreaks
occurred in Europe and the Soviet Union and
epizootic-associated cases occurred in the U.S.
9Incidence across the Globe
Country Years of Cases
Japan 1924-1987 1,355
Slovakia 1985-1994 126
Turkey 1988-1998 205
10Modern Worldwide Death Rate
- Before antibiotics
- pneumonic tularemia50
- localized tularemia5
- After antibiotics
- 2.3
11Reported Cases of Tularemia - 1990-1998
12Four States
- Four states accounted for 56 of all reported
tularemia cases - Arkansas (23)
- Missouri (19)
- South Dakota (7)
- Oklahoma (7)
13U.S. Outbreaks
- Vermont, 1968
- 47 cases in people who handled muskrats four
weeks before the onset of the illness - No fatalities, but 14 patients had severe
prostrating illness that lasted an average of ten
days - Utah, 1971
- 39 cases, most contracted from the bite of an
infected deerfly - All patients recovered
14U.S. Outbreaks, cont.
- South Dakota, 1984
- 20 cases of glandular tularemia in children
- Illness was mild
- presumed to be caused by type B
- Marthas Vineyard, 2000
- 15 cases of tularemia
- 11 patients had primary pneumonic disease
- 1 fatality
- Caused by type A
15OUTBREAK!August, 2002Prairie Dogs
- Health officials were notified that some prairie
dogs at a Texas pet distribution facility had
died unexpectedly - After officials determined that they had died of
Tularemia, further investigation found that
several hundreds of potentially infected dogs
were shipped to Ohio, West Virginia, Florida,
Washington, Mississippi, Nevada, Illinois, and
Virginia
16It gets even worse, as
- Shipments also went out to Japan, the Czech
Republic, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Italy,
and Thailand
17Case Incidence
- The highest incidence of cases was in 1939, when
2,291 cases were reported - The number remained high throughout the 1940s
- Declined in 1950s to the relatively constant
number of cases it is nowless than 200 per year - Most cases occur in rural environments rarely do
they occur in urban settings
18Why the decrease in cases?
- The development of effective antibiotics
- Decrease in hunting in the U.S. and other
developed nations reduced human exposure
19Fransicella tularensisHistorical Background
- First described by McCoy in 1912 as agent
responsible for a tularemia outbreak in Tulare
County in California and isolated the organism
from infected squirrels. - Francis one of the premier researchers in the
field elucidated the route of infection in man
as - Rodents?Blood Sucking Insects?Man
20Fransicella tularensisArthropod Vectors
- Primary vectors are ticks (United States, former
Soviet Union, and Japan), mosquitoes (former
Soviet Union, Scandinavia, and the Baltic
region), and biting flies (United States
particularly Utah, Nevada, and California and
former Soviet Union). Examples of specific
species include - Ticks Amblyomma americanum (Lone Star tick),
Dermacentor andersoni (Rocky Mountain wood tick),
Dermacentor variabilis (American dog tick),
Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus, and Ixodes
dentatus - Mosquitoes Aedes cinereus and Aedes excrucians
- Biting flies Chrysops discalis (deerfly),
Chrysops aestuans, Chrysops relictus, and
Chrysozona pluvialis
21Francisella tularensisMorphology and Physiology I
- Small, weakly staining gram-negative
coccobacillus 0.2 to 0.2 0.7 um in size. - Nonmotile, displays bipolar staining with Giemsa
stain, obligate anaerobe, and is weakly catalase
positive. - Young cultures are relatively uniform in
appearance while older cultures display extreme
pleomorphism. - Carbohydrates are dissimilated slowly with the
production of acid but no gas. - Displays a thick capsule whose loss is
accompanied by loss of virulence.
22Francisella tularensisMorphology and Physiology
II
- The lipid concentration in the capsule and cell
wall (50 70, respectively) is unusually high
for a gram negative organism. - The lipid composition is unique with relatively
large amounts of long-chain saturated and
monoenoic C20 to C26 fatty acids as well as alpha
and beta hydroxyl fatty acids. - Biochemical characterization is of little value
in identification (other tests are utilized).
23Francisella tularensisCulture Characteristics
- Optimal growth at 370 C, growth range 240 to 390
C. Survival rate is best at lower temperatures. - Slow growing with a requirement for iron and
cysteine or cystine. - No growth on routine culture media but small
colony growth after 2 - 4 days on
glucose-cysteine-blood agar or peptone-cysteine
agar. - No true hemolysis on blood containing media only
a greenish discoloration.
24Francisella tularensisMicrobial
Genomics-Introduction
- Little is known about the cellular and molecular
modes of infection, proliferation and immune
response to tularemia. - Microbial genomics has begun to hopefully shed
some light on the above mechanisms. - The lack of adequate genetic tools has hampered
efforts to elucidate many questions about F.
tularensis most importantly how it enters cells
and the factors required for intracellular
growth. - At present most of the genome of F. tularensis
ShuS4 (high virulence) has been sequenced,
compiled into contigs and is available at the
web site http//artedi.ebc.uu.se/Projects/Francise
lla/
25Francisella tularensis Microbial
Genomics-Intracellular Growth Genes I
- Five genetic loci with the use of transposon
mutagenesis have been identified in F. novicida
that are associated with intracellular growth. - Gene 1 Alanine racemase catalyzes the
reversible conversion of the L form of alanine to
the D form. Potential effect Alter bacterial
cell wall making it more susceptible to
microbiocidal agents produced by macrophages. - Gene 2 Glutamine phosphoribosylpyrophosphate
amidotransferases (50 identity at a.a. level)
which catalyzes the first step in de novo purine
biosynthesis. Potential effect Inhibition of de
novo purine biosynthesis.
26Francisella tularensis Microbial
Genomics-Intracellular Growth Genes II
- Gene 3 ClpB (60 identity to E.coli protein) an
ATP-dependent protease stress response protein
which hydrolyzes casein and is part of a system
which hydrolyzes denatured proteins.
Potential effect Inhibit the
removal of denatured proteins overwhelming cell. - Gene 4 23Kd protein (99 identity) unique to
Francisella as the dominantly induced protein
after infection.
Potential effect
Unknown. - Gene 5 AF374673 no significant similarity to any
protein with a known function.
Potential effect Unknown.
27Francisella tularensis Microbial
Genomics-Intracellular Growth Genes III
- The five genes found to be involved in
intracellular growth all map using the available
genomic sequence map to the intracellular growth
locus iglABCD. - The iglABCD is a putative operon involved in
intracellular growth and it is possible that all
of the proteins encoded by the iglABCD operon are
needed for intracellular growth and some are
thought to be transcription factors. - The predicted molecular masses of the protein
products from these genes corresponds to the
masses of the observed proteins expressed during
intracellular growth. - These observations suggest that these proteins
play a critical role in the intracellular growth
of F. tullarensis.
28Francisella tularensisMicrobial Genomics-Tools
- Yet another odd characteristic of F. tularensis
is the absence of its own plasmids in any of the
biovars. It is not clear whether this property is
associated with the environment of the bacterium
or with the specificity of its genetic apparatus. - It has been shown that heterologous plasmids can
replicate in F. tularensis but must be maintained
by antibiotic resistance selection. - One isolate, F. novidica-like strain F6168, is
the only member of the genus that carries a
native plasmid and this plasmid has no known
function or gene products. - The 3990-bp cryptic plasmid from F6168 has been
used to construct two recombinant plasmids,
pFNL10 and pOM1. These plasmids were engineered
to contain antibiotic selection genes, a
polylinker for cloning, and the ori (origin of
replication) from F6168. A third plasmid pKK214
has been designed to assay promoter activity. - These plasmid tools will hopefully help to
elucidate some of the mechanisms of intracellular
growth and virulence.
29Francisella tularensis Microbial
Genomics-Identification
- Extensive allelic variation in the short sequence
tandem repeat, SSTR, (5-AACAAAGAC-3) has been
found among F. tularensis. - With the use of appropriately designed primers
and conditions it is possible through the use of
PCR to identify individual strains. - The analysis of the SSTRs is a powerful tool for
the discrimination of individual strains and
epidemiological analysis.
30Francisella tularensis Detection Methods
- PCR is a rapid accurate detection method that can
distinguish between strains. - ELISA has been used and various antibody labeling
methods can be used for detection. - Time resolved flourometry (TRF) assay system is
more accurate and sensitive than the ELISA method
and requires at least two hours to perform. - Mass spectroscopy (MS) of whole bacteria and
isolated coat proteins has also been developed.
In a clinical lab it is feasible but new portable
MS systems are still unreliable in the field.
31Francisella tularensis New Detection Methods I
- New detection methods should be easy to use,
practical, accurate, highly mobile and developed
in a minimum amount of time. - Unfortunately development of instrumentation
takes 2-5 years and costs millions of dollars. - The use of already tested, off the shelf
components would greatly reduce development time
and cost, time being most important in light of
recent events.
32Francisella tularensis New Detection Methods II
- A cheap easy to use detection system could be
assembled from the following existing products to
perform quick accurate PCR analysis to identify
individual Francisella strains. - Bacteria would be lysed in water at 940 C for 2
minutes? PCR using a capillary light cycler( 25
cycles in less than 10 minutes) ?resolve products
on either low percent pre-cast gel (visual
identification) or fluorescent capillary
electrophoresis (detection via labeled primer)
(5-10 min) - Entire process less than 20 minutes and cost from
15-50 thousand dollars. - Requires power 120V, 10amps so can be transported
and operated in a light truck or helicopter.
33Francisella tularensisImmunology-I
Internalization
- The mode of infection, proliferation, and the
immune response to tularemia are still not well
defined. The cells targeted are the macrophages
and parenchymal cells. - The mode of entry into cells is still unknown but
it is thought to be similar to the Listeria
monocytogenes, another intracellular bacteria. - The mode of entry utilized by L. monocytogenes,
the zipper-type mechanism in which bacterial
surface proteins bind to host cell surface
receptors and the bacteria are internalized. - In L. monocytogenes the E-cadherin has been
identified as the host cell receptor involved,
but to date no receptor has been identified for
Francisella internalization.
34Francisella tularensisImmunology-II Infection
Overview
- F. tularensis enters the cell.
- Proliferation inside acidified compartments
containing iron. - High levels of viable bacteria induce
cytopathagenesis and apoptosis. - Inflammatory response due to pathogen entry
attracts large numbers of macrophages. These
macrophages are not activated and are easier to
infect. - Due to bacterial capsule, immunity to the effect
of neutrophils and complement. - Renewed infection in arriving macrophages.
35Francisella tularensisImmunology-III Host Death
- The accumulation of macrophages without removal
of bacteria initiate granuloma formation and the
continued activation of the immune system. - Host death due to complications due to pnuemonia
and/or due to septic shock due to the large
quantity of cytokines released. - Tularemia does not release or contain any known
toxin that causes disease, but it does usurp the
immune system and uses it against the host.
36Francisella tularensis T-cell Activation
Immunology-IV
- In response to antigen CD4 and CD8 are activated
and produce interferon gamma (IFN-gamma)
activating macrophages. - The activated macrophages release tumor necrosis
factor alpha (TNF-alpha). - IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha together act to up
regulate phagocytosis by macrophages, cause them
to sequester iron within activated macrophages,
and to up regulate nitrous oxide release, levels
of which are good indicators of the extent of
action of this mechanism.
37Francisella tularensis T-cell Activation
Immunology-V
- No individual antigen has yet to be identified.
Hosts recognize a multide of antigens but no
immuno-dominant antigen. - The presence of phosphoantigens have been
identified in extracts of F. tularensis. - Phosphoantigens (alkyl-pyrophoshoesters) are
potent inducers of the gamma/delta subset of T
cells causing clonal expansion. - The role of the expansion of this subset of T
cells and the relevance of phosphoantigens as
vaccine candidates is still unclear.
38Francisella tularensisImmunology-VI B-cell
Involvement
- B-cells play a role in the suppression of
neutrophil mobilization. - B-cells are necessary to develop an immune
response to future encounters with the antigen in
F. tularensis infection. - It is not thought that the production of specific
antibodies play a large part in the response. - IgM and low levels of IgG are detected early
(3-10 days after infection) and are thought to
confer early protective as well as long term
immunity. - Immune responses appear primarily to be in
response to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of the
outer membrane of the bacterium which appears to
be the major protective antigen.
39Francisella tularensisImmunology-VII B-cell
Involvement
- This year the composition of the core LPS
proteins have been uncovered. The composition of
the core, lipid A and the O-side chain of F.
tularensis have been found to have a unique
compositions that does not confer host protection
upon exposure. - Only the intact LPS has been found to induce a
protective immune response.
40Francisella tularensisConclusions
- The ongoing sequencing of the SCHU S4 and LVS
Francisella have resulted in a large increase in
information included targets that can be used for
the generation of attenuated strains. - Large scale proteomic work has begun.
- Together the genomic and proteomic investigations
will lead to the development of new strategies
for genetic manipulation and hopefully lead to an
understanding of the virulence mechanisms of this
potent pathogen.
41Francisella tularensis
- Organisms are strict aerobes that grow best on
blood-glucose-cysteine agar at 37C - Facultative, intracellular bacterium that
multiplies within macrophages - Major target organs are the lymph nodes, lungs,
pleura, spleen, liver, and kidney
42Tularemia
- Contagious --- no
- Infective dose --- 10-50 organisms
- Incubation period --- 1-21 days (average3-5
days) - Duration of illness --- 2 weeks
- Mortality --- treated low untreated
moderate - Persistence of organism ---months in moist soil
- Vaccine efficacy --- good, 80
43Two subspecies
- Type A tularensis
- Most common biovar isolated in North America
- May be highly virulent in humans and animals
- Infectious dose of less then 10 CFU
- Mortality of 5-6 in untreated cutaneous disease
- Type Bpalaeartica (holartica)
- Thought to cause all of human tularemia in Europe
and Asia - Relatively avirulent
- Mortality of less then .5 in untreated cutaneous
disease
447 Forms of Tularemia
- Ulceroglandular
- Glandular
- Oropharyngeal (throat)
- Oculoglandular (eye)
- Typhoidal
- Septic
- Pneumonic
45Mortality Rates
- Overall mortality rate for Severe Type A strains
is 5-15 - In pulmonic or septicemic cases without
antibiotic treatment, the mortality rate has been
as high as 30-60 - With treatment, the most recent mortality rates
in the U.S. have been 2
46Infection
- Routes of Infection
- No human to human transmission
- Inhalation (fewer than 30 organisms)
- Ingestion
- Incisions/Abrasions (fewer than 10 organisms)
- Entry through unbroken skin
- Example Ulceroglandular Tularemia
- Transmitted through a bite from an anthropod
vector which has fed on an infected animal
47Transmission
- Organisms are harbored in the blood and tissues
of wild and domestic animals, including rodents - In US chief reservoir hosts are wild rabbits and
ground squirrels
48Transmission
Route of Transmission Mode of Transmission
Skin or conjunctiva Handling of infected animals
Skin Bite of infected blood-sucking deer flies and wood ticks
GI tract Ingestion of improperly cooked meat or contaminated water
Respiratory tract Aerosol inhalation
49Infection
- Incubation Period
- 1-14 days, dependent on route and dose
- Usually 3-5 days
- Ulceroglandular and glandular tularemia are
rarely fatal (mortality rate lt 3) - Typhoidal tularemia is more acute form of disease
(mortality rate 30-60 )
50Symptoms
- Immediate Symptoms
- Fever, headache, chills, rigors, sore throat
- Subsequent Symptoms
- Loss of energy, appetite, and weight
- Rare Symptoms
- Coughing, chest tightness, nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea
51Symptoms and Reaction
- Symptoms are severe enough to immobilize people
within first two days of infection. - Symptoms depend on route of infection.
- Have localized reaction when there is a specific
infection site (cut, tick bite). - Localized infection can develop into systemic
infection through haematogenous spread.
52Symptoms by Route of Infection
- Aerosol or Ingestion
- Systemic infections, no localized ulcers or lymph
gland swelling - Aerosol
- Pneumonia
- Ingestion
- Gastrointestinal irritation
- Localized
- Enlargement of local lymph glands, ulcer at
infection site
53Outbreaks
Chest X-ray of patient demonstrating complete
whiteout of the left lung
54Tularemia Lesion
55Skin Ulcer of Tularemia
56Diagnosis
- Confirmed by
- Successful culture of bacteria
- Significant rise in specific antibodies
- Problems with above methods
- Culture is difficult and dangerous
- Response from antibody does not occur until
several days after onset of disease
57Future Diagnostic Techniques
- New PCR based technique produces higher success
level for identification than culturing currently
does. - Future tests may allow for identification of the
specific strain infecting a patient. - Could be useful for a bioterrorist attack.
58Prevention
- Best Immunity (Permanent)
- Previous infection with a virulent strain
- Dr. Francis
- Live Vaccine Strain (LVS)
- Best prophylactic
- Foshays Vaccine (killed bacteria)
- Provides lesser immunity towards systemic and
fatal aspects of disease than LVS
59Prevention and Treatment
- Vaccines take too long to have an effect, so
cant be used for treatment after exposure - Antibiotics are effective for treatment after
exposure - Antibiotic treatment must begin several days
post-exposure to prevent relapse
60Live Vaccine
- Live Virus Strain (LVS)
- Pros
- Only effective vaccine against tularemia
- Cons
- Doesnt provide 100 immunity
- Possibility of varying immunogenicity between
different batches - Possibility of a spontaneous return to virulence
61The incidence of acute inhalational Tularemia
Use of a killed vaccine 5.70 cases per 1000 people at risk
Use of a live vaccine 0.27 cases per 1000 people at risk
62Antibiotics to Treat Tularemia
- Streptomycin and aminoglycoside gentamicin
- Pros
- Effective against tularemia
- Cons
- Require intramuscular or intravenous
administration - High toxicity profile
- Can be relapses of tularemia on aminoglycosides
- There exist streptomycin-resistant strains of F.
tularensis
63Antibiotics to Treat Tularemia
- Tetracyclines and chloraphenicol
- Pros
- Effective against tularemia
- Can be administered orally
- Low toxicity
- Cons
- Higher relapse rate than aminoglycosides
64Antibiotics to Treat Tularemia
- Quinolines (including ciprofloxacin)
- Pros
- Generally works well
- Low relapse rate
- Can be administered orally
- Cons
- Has not been used extensively for treatment
65Outbreaks
- No large recorded outbreaks of inhalational
tularemia in United States - Single cases or small clusters including
- Laboratory exposures
- Exposure to contaminated animal carcasses
- Infective environmental aerosols
66Outbreaks
- Laboratory Workers
- Began with a fatal case of pulmonary tularemia in
a 43 year old man - Total of 13 people in the microbiology laboratory
and autopsy services used were exposed despite
adhering to established laboratory protocol - Services should have been notified of possibility
of tularemia - Tularemia ranks second in the US and third
worldwide as a cause of laboratory associated
infections
67Outbreaks
- Sweden 1966-1967
- More than 600 patients infected with strains of
milder European biovar of F. tularensis - Farm work created aerosols which caused
inhalational tularemia - Cases peaked during the winter when
rodent-infested hay was being sorted and moved
from field storage sites to barns - No deaths were reported
68Category A Agents
- Based on probability of use, distribution,
availability, and risk assessment, the CDC
specified 6 agents that have the highest
likelihood of successful use - Anthrax
- Plague
- Tularemia
- Botulinum toxin
- Smallpox
- Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers
69Bioterrorism Agents Laboratory Risks
- Agent BSL Laboratory Risk
- B. anthracis 2 Low
- Y. pestis 2 Medium
- F. tularensis 2/3 High
- Botulinum toxin 2 Medium
- Smallpox 4 High
- VHF 4 High
70Why Use Tularemia?
- Col. Gerald Parker, director of USAMRIID
- Ideal agent has availability, easy production,
high rate of lethality or incapacitation,
stability, infectivity, and aerosol
deliverability - Tularemia and anthrax most potent by far, with
the least amount necessary for a 50 kill in a 10
km area
71However
- Col. Parker went on to prioritize smallpox and
anthrax first for probable use, followed by
plague and tularemia, followed by botulinum toxin
and hemorrhagic fever viruses
72Anthrax v. Tularemia
- U.S. test involving dropping light bulbs on the
subway tracks - Observed amount of bacteria seen throughout the
system - Numbers of passengers per train
- Average time per person spent on the subway
- 12,000 cases of anthrax
- 200,000 cases of Tularemia
73- I know of no other infection of animals
communicable to man that can be acquired from
sources so numerous and so diverse. In short, one
can but feel that the status of Tularemia, both
as a disease in nature and of man, is one of
potentiality. - R. R. Parker
74History of use as a Biological Weapon
- During WWII, its potential use was studied both
by Japan and by the U.S. and its allies - In the 1950s and 1960s, the U.S. developed
weapons that could deliver aerosolized organisms
of F. tularensis - It was stockpiled by U.S. military in the late
1960s, and the entire stock was destroyed by 1973 - The Soviet Union continued weapons production of
antibiotic and vaccine resistant strains of F.
tularensis into the early 1990s.
75High Exposure to Infection Rate
- 2500 spores to cause inhalational anthrax
- Fewer than 10 organisms for intracutaneous
tularemia infection - Fewer then 30 F. tularensis organisms through an
aerosol
76Indications of intentional release of biologic
agent
- An unusual clustering of illness (temporal or
geographical) - An unusual age distribution for common diseases
- Patients presenting with clinical signs or
symptoms that suggest an infectious disease
outbreak
77- Outbreaks of pneumonic tularemia,
particularly in low incidence areas, should
prompt consideration of bioterrorism
78Can assume bioterrorism if
- There is an abrupt onset and a single peak of
cases - Among exposed people
- Attack rates would be similar across age and sex
groups - Risk would be related to degree of exposure to
the point source - Rapid progression of a high proportion of cases
from upper respiratory symptoms to life
threatening pleuropneumonitis - An outbreak of inhalational tularemia in an urban
setting
79World Health Organization Study
- In the event that a tularemia mass casualty
biological weapon was used against a modern city
of 5 million people - an estimated 250,000 people would get
sick, and 19,000 people would die
80Economic impact
- Referring to this model, the CDC examined the
expected economic impact of bioterrorist attacks
and estimated the total base costs due to an F.
tularensis aerosol attack to be 5.4 billion for
every 100,000 people exposed
81Would expect
- Short half-life due to
- Desiccation
- Solar radiation
- Oxidation
- Other environmental factors
- Limited risk from secondary dispersal
82Vaccine
- A vaccine for Tularemia is under review by the
FDA and is not currently available in the U.S. - Because of the 3-5 day incubation period, and
post-vaccination immunity takes two weeks to
develop, post exposure vaccination is not
considered a viable public health strategy to
prevent disease in the event of mass exposure
83- Careful proactive initiation of post exposure
prophylaxis should not be underestimated for its
medical, public health, psychological and
political merits in coping with a terrorist
attack. - Center for Infectious Disease
84Postexposure Prophylaxis
- One study involving volunteer subjects
demonstrated that use of tetracycline within 24
hours after exposure can prevent disease
occurrence
85for inhalational tularemia
- If release of the agent becomes known during the
incubation period, people in the exposed
population should be placed on oral doxycycline
or ciprofloxacin for 14 days - If release does not become apparent until the
appearance of clinical cases, potentially exposed
people should be placed on a fever watch
86what would happen?
- Any person in whom fever or flu like illness
develops should be evaluated and placed on
appropriate antibiotic therapy for treatment of
tularemia - Parenteral therapy in a contained casualty
setting - Oral therapy in the mass casualty setting
- Treatment should continue for fourteen days
87Where are these helpful items coming from?
- Antibiotics for treating patients infected with
tularemia in a bioterrorism scenario are included
in a national pharmaceutical stockpile maintained
by the CDC, as are ventilators and other
emergency equipment
88Where antibiotics fail
- There is a possibility that genetically induced
antibiotic resistant strains could be used as
weapons - Should be considered if patients deteriorate
despite early initiation of antibiotic therapy - This increases the need to create a test which
could rapidly identify the antibiotic
susceptibility of tularemia strains
89Genetic Manipulation
- Scientists generated a plasmid to insert
resistance genes for tetracycline and
chloraphenicol - Plasmid was capable of replicating within F.
tularensis and E. coli
90Genes to be worried about
- Antibiotic resistance
- Radiation resistance
- Desiccation resistance
- Genes that code for toxins from other bacteria
- Genes that would decrease the incubation time of
tularemia
91Possible Vaccines
- The construction of a defined attenuated mutant
of F. tularensis could provide a safe, effective,
and licensable tularemia vaccine that could
induce protective immunity - The construction of a vaccine that does not use a
live pathogen
92Its critical to develop
- Simple, reliable, and rapid diagnostic test to
identify F. tularensis in people - Fast and accurate procedures to quickly detect F.
tularensis in environmental samples - A system to monitor for the appearance of
antibiotic resistant strains - New, effective antibiotic
93To Prevent Infection
- Isolation would not be helpful given lack of
human-to-human transmission - So.
- Avoid infected animals
- Wash your hands
- Wear gloves, masks, face-shields, eye-protection,
gowns - Handle patient equipment with care
94Dialogue!!!
- Local practitioners, national health
organizations, and the international community
must all communicate to control any outbreak
95Limitations of Commercial Identification Systems
- Potential of generating aerosols
- High probability of misidentification
96Whos working for our safety?
- 1970- The US terminated its biological weapons
development program by executive order - 1973- The US had destroyed its entire biological
arsenal - Since then, USAMRIID has been responsible for
defensive medical research on potential
biological warfare agents - The CDC operates a national program for
bioterrorism preparedness and response