Title: Benefits from Environmental Regulation
1Benefits from Environmental Regulation
- Environmental quality is a public good -
- Every good has a
- private cost and a
- social cost
2Externalities
- Negative externalities
- (social cost-social benefits)gt(private
cost-private benefits) - Positive externalities
- (social benefit-social cost)gt(private
benefit-private cost) (nonproducers and
nonconsumers are helped)
3Equilibrium and Economic Efficiency
B
A
C
Deadweight social loss
C
4Environmental Protection Regulation
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Largest regulatory agency
- Requesting 7.3 billion for FY2002 and 17,500
employees
5Agency Structure
- Independent agency that reports directly to the
president - Headed by a single person and
- Not in an executive branch department
- Organized along program responsibilities
- Has 10 regional offices
6Authorizing Legislation
- National Environmental Policy Act - 1969
7Agency Support
- Often supporting Congress, some Presidents,
environmental quality advocacy coalition, the
courts, some industries - Often opposed the economic rationality advocacy
coalition, labor unions, some Presidents, some
industries, recently state and local governments
8The Environment
- Most significant effects on manufacturing and
local government - Technological factors are critical
- Complexity and salience
9Four Eras of Pollution Control
- The era of nondecisionmaking 1940s to 1960s
- Public awareness and federal response 1960s to
1970s - Deregulation, devolution, and defunding the
Reagan years 1980s - Competition and compromise - current
10Policy Tools
- Prohibitions
- Command and control regulations
- Licensing and use restrictions
- Market-like incentives
- Marketable discharge permits
- Fiscal inducements
- Information
11Air Quality Regulation
- The Clean Air Acts
- Clean Air Act of 1970 - protect and improve air
quality
12Clean Air Act
- 1970
- Reauthorized in 1977
13Clean Air Act
- 1990 Amendments strengthened act
14Acid-Rain Emissions Trading Program - A Market
Incentive
- Government sets a cap that reduces the number of
tons of sulfur dioxide emitted - Issued 110 of nations dirtiest power plants
tradable certificates that matched their share of
the cap - Some had certificates to sell others needed to
buy - Sold on the Chicago Board of Trade annually
15Water Quality
- Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 1972 (Clear
Water Act) - zero pollutant discharge by 1985, all waters
fishable and swimmable by 1983 - states responsible
- National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
- Amended in 1977
16Shortcomings of FWPCA
- Focused on point sources of water pollution
- Nonpoint pollution accounts for nearly 2/3rds of
water pollutants - Ignored toxic water pollutants
- Municipal waste water treatment grant program
cost too much
17Water Quality Act of 1987
- Addressed nonpoint water pollution -
- Focus more on trace toxic elements,
- requires municipal systems to use aggressive
pretreatment - One-time grants for municipal systems
18July 2000 Rule
- Cracks down on dirty runoff
- States will decide who will be responsible for
reducing runoff and how - Unit of measure is TMDL
19EPD Recent State Requirement
20Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974
- Authorizes EPA to set safe standards of purity
- Requires all owners or operators of public water
systems to comply with primary standards
21Regulating Hazardous Wastes
- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) -
safe storage, treatment, and disposal of
hazardous wastes
22RCRA
- Amended in 1984
- extended regulations to small quantity generators
- banned untreated wastes from landfills
- required EPA to develop treatment and disposal
standards and set standards that would take
effect if EPA didnt write their own
23Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA - Superfund)
- Defining event was Love Canal
- Clean up worst abandoned hazardous waste sites
and assess liability - All toxic waste sites
- Strict, joint, and several liability principle
- Created a fund to pay for cleanup when
responsible parties couldnt or wouldnt
24CERCLA Amendments
- Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) - Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know
(EPCRA)
25Regulating Pesticides
- Regulates the products
- EPA authorization comes from Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide ACT (FIFRA) of 1947 - purpose to protect farmers but 1972 amendment
added environment protection - Pesticide must be registered with EPA
- EPA must produce standards to ensure safety
26FIFRA
- EPA must
- Test pesticides for safety
- Require registration
- Use restrictions and prohibitions
27Amendments to Pesticide Regulation
- Regulations relaxed in Reagan administration
- With1988 amendments compensation when a pesticide
is banned is to applicators rather than
manufacturer - Must review all active pesticide ingredients
28Evaluating Environmental Regulations
- Compliance monitoring
- Three changes suggested
29Costs and Benefits of Regulation
- We spend BIG bucks (130 billion in 1995
- Benefits outweigh costs for air quality, equal
costs for water quality. - Costs far outweigh benefits for hazardous waste
regulation - Doesnt appear to have major costs to economy
30How Effective?
- Major reductions in many emissions dramatically
better air quality in most polluted urban areas - Evidence there is also improved water quality
- Question is would it have happened without
regulation? - Significant reductions in TRIs
31How Well Has Superfund Worked?
32Obstacles to Environmental Regulation
- Issues over property rights
- Unfunded mandates to state and local governments
- Risk based regulation using risk assessment and
risk management
33Who Benefits?
34Priorities
- Clean air
- Clean and safe water
- Safe food
- Pollution prevention
- Better waste management
- Reducing global and cross-border risks
- Expanding Americans right to know