APAG Ch. 15 The Judiciary

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

APAG Ch. 15 The Judiciary

Description:

Why are the Justices of the Supreme Court considered 'policymakers' ... 12. When the Supreme Court decides what a constitutional provision or a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: rickk8

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: APAG Ch. 15 The Judiciary


1
APAG Ch. 15 The Judiciary
  • Assignment 1
  • Pages 452-457

2
  • Why are the Justices of the Supreme Court
    considered policymakers?

3
  • 1. They are considered policymakers because they
    have the final say on how the U.S.
    Constitutionthe supreme law of the Landshould
    be interpreted.

4
  • 2. How many states have elected justices? What
    is meant when we say they are for sale?

5
  • 2. 39 states have elected judges. They are
    considered for sale because judges increasingly
    are using their discretion in deciding cases to
    satisfy public opinion and campaign contributors.

6
  • 3. What would be the other major problem if
    justices were elected?

7
  • 3.If elected and because justices, either liberal
    or conservative, might be changed so often, the
    decisions made by the Court as the final
    interpreter of the Constitution, might not be
    very final.

8
  • 4. What is common law? Where did it come from?

9
  • 4. Common Law is judge-made law that originated
    in England from decisions shaped according to
    prevailing custom. Decisions were applied to
    similar situations and gradually became common to
    the nation.

10
  • 5. What is a precedent? A stare decisis?

11
  • A precedent is a court rule bearing on subsequent
    legal decisions in similar cases. Judges rely on
    precedents in deciding cases.
  • Stare Decisis is the judicial policy of
    following precedents established by past
    decisionsto stand on decided cases.

12
  • 6. How many countries have common law systems?
    How did they get them?

13
  • 6. The U.S., Britain, and 13 other countries have
    common law systems. Most acquired them because
    they were colonies of Great Britain.

14
  • 7. What are the sources of American law?

15
  • 7. The sources of American law includes the
    federal and state constitutions, statutes passed
    by legislative bodies, administrative law, and
    case lawthe legal principles expressed in court
    decisions.

16
  • 8. What are state laws called that deal with
    criminal codes, commercial laws, and laws
    relating to variety of other matters?

17
  • 8. State statutes

18
  • 9. What are the laws called made by cities,
    counties, and other local bodies? What do they
    deal with?

19
  • 9. Ordinancesthese ordinances may deal with
    such issues as zoning proposals and public safety.

20
  • 10. What is another source of law besides the
    ones just mentioned?

21
  • 10. Rules and regulations issued by
    administrative agencies.

22
  • 11. What is case law?

23
  • 11. Case law includes judicial interpretations of
    common law principles and doctrines as well as
    interpretations of constitutional law, statutory
    law, and administrative law.

24
  • 12. When the Supreme Court decides what a
    constitutional provision or a statutory phrase
    means, what is it actually doing?

25
  • 12. The Court in effect is establishing law.

26
  • 13. What kind of court system do we have in the
    United States?

27
  • The U.S. has a dual court systemstate and
    federal courts.

28
  • 14. What and when was the first federal secret
    court established? What cases did it hear? How
    many warrants did it approve?

29
  • The first secret court was established in 1978
    with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
    (FISA), which established a court to hear
    requests for warrants for the surveillance of
    suspected spies. Of the thousands of requests
    for warrants that officials have submitted to the
    FISA court, the court has approved almost all of
    them. (99.9)

30
  • 15. How did the Bush Administration change the
    powers of the FISA after 9/11?

31
  • Recent amendments to the FISA changed the wording
    to a significant purposemeaning that warrants
    may now be requested to obtain evidence that can
    be used in criminal trials. The court also has
    the authority to approve physical as well as
    electronic searches, which means that officials
    may search a suspects property without a warrant
    in open court and without notifying the subject.

32
  • President Bush signed the Military Commission Act
    of 2006 which suspends the Habeas Corpus
    provision of the Constitution.
  • This Act allows this President and future
    presidents to permanently detain and/or torture
    (as defined by the Geneva Convention) anyone,
    including American citizens without the
    possibility to defend oneself in a court of law.

33
  • 16. What did Congress pass after the Oklahoma
    City bombing in 1996? What were its provisions?

34
  • 16. It passed the Anti-terrorism Act which a
    provision creating an alien removal court to
    hear evidence against suspected alien
    terrorists. A deportation proceeding can be
    held in U.S. district court. The prosecution
    does not have to follow the normal rules and the
    defendant does not have access to the evidence
    that the prosecution used to secure the hearing.

35
  • 17. What are the two basic requirements before a
    case can be brought before either a state or
    federal court?

36
  • Jurisdiction and Standing to Sue (a sufficient
    stake in a matter to justify bringing suit).

37
  • 18. How does Article III, Section 1 limit federal
    courts?

38
  • It limits the jurisdiction of the federal courts
    to cases that involve either a federal question
    or diversity of citizenship.

39
  • 19. What makes a case a federal question?

40
  • A federal question arises when a case is based,
    at least in part, on the U.S. Constitution, a
    treaty, or a federal law.

41
  • 20. When does diversity of citizenship exists?
    What is the minimum dollar amount required?

42
  • 20. Diversity of citizenship exists when the
    parties to a lawsuit are from different states or
    (more rarely) when the suit involves a U.S.
    citizen and a government or citizen of a foreign
    country. The amount in controversy must be at
    least 75,000 before a federal court can take
    jurisdiction in a diversity case.

43
  • 21. Why wont a court give an advisory opinion on
    hypothetical questions?

44
  • The controversy has to be real and substantial as
    opposed to hypothetical or academic. The courts
    are already overloaded with real cases. They
    would become overloaded if anyone could submit
    hypothetical questions.

45
  • 22. Describe the three tiers that make up the
    federal court system.

46
  • (1) The U.S. district courts and various
    specialized courts of limited jurisdiction.
  • (2) The intermediate U.S. courts of appeals.
  • (3) The U.S. Supreme Court
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)