Statutory Demands Overview and some common pitfalls - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Statutory Demands Overview and some common pitfalls

Description:

Statutory Demands Overview and some common pitfalls Wade Roper Law Society of the Northern Territory Corporations Act s459E (1) A person may serve on a company a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: williamfo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Statutory Demands Overview and some common pitfalls


1
Statutory DemandsOverview and some common
pitfalls
Wade Roper
Law Society of the Northern Territory
2
Corporations Acts459E
  • (1) A person may serve on a company a demand
    relating to
  • (a) a single debt that the company owes to the
    person, that is due and payable and whose
    amount is at least that statutory minimum or
  • (b) 2 or more debts that the company owes to
    the person, that are due and payable and whose
    amounts total at least the statutory minimum.
  • (2) The demand
  • (a) if it relates to a single debt must
    specify the debt and its amount and
  • (b) if it relates to 2 or more debts must
    specify the total of the amounts of the debts
  • (c) must require the company to pay the amount
    of the debt, or the total amounts of the debts,
    or to secure or compound for that amount or total
    to the creditors reasonable satisfaction,
    within 21 days after the demand is serve on the
    company

3
Corporations Acts459E (Cont)
  • (d) must be in writing and
  • (e) must be in the proscribed form (if any)
  • (f) must be signed by or on behalf of the
    creditor.
  • (3) Unless the debt, or each of the debts, is a
    judgement debt, the demand must be accompanied by
    an affidavit that
  • (a) verifies that the debt, or the total of the
    amounts of the debts, is due and payable by the
    company and
  • (b) complies with the rules.
  • (4) Assignee may make demand
  • (5) Tax Liability demand
  • (6)

4
Checklist
  • 1. Do we have a debt that is due and payable?
  • (Bonnyview Pty Ltd v David Deane Associates
    P/L 2007 QSC 223, as to interest see Topfelt v
    State Bank of New South Wales Ltd (1993) 120 ALR
    155).
  • 2. Is the demand in the Appropriate Form?
  • The appropriate form is currently 509H to the
    Regulations. The notes in that Form constitute
    part of the same and must appear in the Statutory
    Demand. Always check for the latest version of
    the form before issuing any Statutory Demand do
    not rely on precedents.
  • 3. Signed by the Creditor?
  • Make sure the person who executes the Demand is
    authorised to do so i.e. a proper officer of
    the Company or legal representative.

5
Checklist (Cont.)
  • 4. The Affidavit The Achilles Heel.
  • It is imperative that the Affidavit is sworn on
    the same day as the Demand is issued. Section
    459E(3) requires that the affidavit verify the
    debt is due and owing as claimed in the demand.
    While there is some contention, a number of
    Courts have held that an affidavit sworn before
    the date of the Demand itself cannot possibly
    satisfy this requisite criteria (see Chadmar
    Enterprises P/L v IGA Distribution P/L 92005) 190
    FLR 466, particularly the judgement of Templeman
    J and his discussion of the relevant
    authorities).
  • Although the Act specifically provides an
    exemption from this requirement in the case of
    judgment debts, that is only where the exact
    amount of the judgement debt is claimed. (see
    Anderson Formrite P/L v CASC Hire P/L (2005) 147
    FCR 379).
  • In the Anderson decision, the Court held that a
    Statutory Demand which claimed less than a
    judgment debt required an affidavit under
    459E(3). The same rationale would apply to any
    Demand for an amount in excess of a judgment debt
    i.e. a Demand which purports to claim the
    judgement debt and interest thereon.
  • Again, check your forms for the requisite form
    of the Affidavit. Do not simply assume precedents
    are up to date.

6
Checklist (Cont.)
  • 5. Form 509H relevantly states in paragraph 6
  • (insert the address for service of the
    documents in the State or Territory in which the
    demand is served on the company, being, if
    solicitors are acting for the creditor, the
    address of the solicitors)
  • While a failure to comply may not vitiate the
    Demand per se, it can result in a foundation for
    leave to dispute the debt as owing under s459S
    and/or the dismissal of any winding up
    application under s467A- Highfield Woods P/L v
    Bayview Crane Hire P/L (1996) 19 ACSR
  • 6. The Statutory Demand must be served in
    accordance with the Corporations Act (s109x).
  • To avoid any argument as to the date and time of
    service, the documents should be hand delivered
    to the Registered Office of the debtor and an
    affidavit of service prepared immediately
    thereafter.
  • Recommendation If the registered office is in
    another State use a firm of solicitors as agents
    and provide their address for service and have
    them effect service of the Demand.

7
The 21 Days
  • The time for compliance with a Demand is
  • 1. 21 days (s459F(b)) or
  • 2. If an application to set aside is made, 7 days
    after the determination of the same if the Demand
    remains on foot or such other time as the Court
    might allow (s459F(a)).
  • Where the last day for compliance falls on a
    Saturday, Sunday or Public Holiday the effect of
    section 36 of the Acts Interpretation Act (Cth)
    and s28 of the Interpretation Act (NT) is that
    the application to set aside can be made on the
    next business day.

8
Why Issue a Statutory Demand?
  • Section 459C provides for a presumption of
    insolvency in the event a party fails to
  • (a) comply with a validly issued Statutory
    Demand or
  • (b) make application to set aside the same
    within the requisite timeframe (21 days).
  • This is a powerful presumption which can be used
    to found winding up proceedings.

9
Important Note
  • Issuer
  • The Presumption is only good for 3 months from
    the effluxion of the 21 day period.
  • In other words, you need to finalise any winding
    up proceedings within that three month period or
    you will lose the benefit of the presumption.
  • Recipient
  • A failure to comply with or make application to
    set aside a Statutory Demand may constitute an
    act of insolvency for the purposes of any
    funding/general agreements your client has in
    place.
  • Make sure the terms of your retainer are clear
    and if you are not instructed to give advice on
    these sort of issues, confirm that in writing.

10
What to do when faced with a Statutory Demand
  • First and foremost, there is absolutely no power
    or discretion given to the Court to extend the 21
    days under 459F other than where an application
    to set aside is already on foot.
  • If an application to set aside is not made AND
    served within the 21 days, the presumption arises
    under s 459C. Moreover, the client cannot,
    without leave, raise any argument to the effect
    that the debt claimed is not owing in any
    subsequent winding up proceedings which rely on
    the demand (s459S).

11
Setting Aside a Statutory Demand
  • S459G sets out the requirements for an
    application to set aside.
  • As intimated above, the application must be made
    and served within the requisite 21 days.
  • An affidavit accompanying the application must
    also be filed and served (s459G(3)).

12
Service
  • Serve the Application at the Address provided in
    the Statutory Demand Jin Xin Investments
    Trade Australia P/L v ISC Property P/L (2006) 196
    FLR 350.
  • Do not forget SEPA. If you serve interstate
    without a SEPA notice then notwithstanding
    whether the application comes to the attention of
    the other party there will be no effective
    service for the purposes of s459G and the Demand
    will not be set aside Elan Copra Trading P/L v
    JK International P/L (2005) 226 ALR 349 Marlan
    Financial Services P/L v New England Agricultural
    Traders P/L 1999 158 FLR 256 Highfield Woods
    (supra).

13
Setting Aside a Statutory Demand (cont.)
  • A Statutory Demand may be set aside where
  • 1. there is a genuine dispute as to the
    existence or amount of the debt - s459H(a)
  • 2. there is an offsetting claim for part or all
    of the debt (if for part only the balance will
    need to be paid in such further time as the
    Court allows under 459F(2)(a))
  • 3. there is a defect in the demand which the
    Court is satisfied will cause substantial
    injustice 459J or
  • 4. there is some other reason the Demand should
    be set aside.

14
Genuine Dispute 459H
  • Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR
    785 per McLelland CJ at 787
  • It is however necessary to consider the meaning
    of expression a genuine dispute where it occurs
    in section of 459H. In my opinion that expression
    connotes a plausible contention requiring
    investigation, and raises much the same sort of
    considerations as the serious question to be
    tried criterion which arises on an application
    for an interlocutory injunction or for the
    extension or removal of a caveat. This does not
    mean that the court must accept uncritically as
    giving rise to a genuine dispute, every statement
    in an affidavit however equivocal, lacking in
    precision, inconsistent with the undisputed
    contemporary documents or other statements by the
    same deponent, or inherently improbable in
    itself, it may be not having sufficient prima
    facie plausibility to merit further investigation
    as to (its) truth (cf Eng Mee Young v
    Letchumanan (1980) AC 331 at 341) or a patently
    feeble legal argument or an assertion of facts
    unsupported by evidence.

15
Genuine Dispute 459H (cont.)
  • Solarite Air Conditioning P/L v York
    International Australia P/L 2002 NSWSC 411 per
    Barrett J at 23
  • the task faced by a company challenging a
    statutory demand on the genuine dispute ground
    is by no means at all a difficult or demanding
    one. The company will fail in that task only if
    it is found upon hearing of its 459G application
    that the contentions upon which it seeks to rely
    in mounting its challenge are so devoid of
    substance that no further investigation is
    warranted. Once the company shows that even one
    issue has asufficent degree of cogency to be
    arguable, a finding of genuine dispute must
    follow

16
Offsetting Claim
  • Per Southwood J in Boutique Venues P/L v JACG P/L
    2007 NTSC 5
  • 1. The offsetting claim must be arguable on the
    basis of facts asserted with sufficient
    particularity to enable the court to determine
    that the claim is not fanciful Macleay Nominees
    Pty Ltd v Belle Property East Pty Ltd 2001
    NSWSC 743 Cooloola Dairys Pty Ltd v National
    Foods Milk Ltd 2005 1 Qd R 12
  • 2. Anyone can make a claim to a right of set off
    against a creditor. What the definition in s 459H
    (5) requires, however, is that it be genuine.
    The same word in s 459H (5) has already elicited
    so many synonyms and shades of meaning that it
    will not help to add more. Its antithesis is to
    be seen in the word artificial. The claim for
    set off against the debt demanded must not have
    been manufactured or got up simply for the
    purpose of defeating the demand against the
    company. It must have an existence that is
    objectively demonstrable independently of the
    exigencies of the demand which evoked it. JJMMR
    Pty Ltd v LG International Corp 2003 QCA 519 at
    par 18 Cooloola Dairys Pty Ltd v National
    Foods Milk Ltd 2005 1 Qd R 12

17
Defect Causing Substantial Injustice 459J(1)(a)
  • Section 9 of the Corporations Act defines
    defect for this purpose to include
  • a. an irregularity
  • b. a misstatement of an amount or total
  • c. a misdescription of a debt or other matter
  • d. a misdescription of a person or entity.
  • While it was once the case that minor defects
    would serve, the Act now defines a Statutory
    Demand as including a document which purports to
    be a statutory demand.
  • For a consideration of when defects will rise
    sufficiently high enough to justify a set aside,
    see his Honour justice Lockharts decision in
    Topfelt as cited above.

18
Some other Reason 459J(1)(b)
  • Some Examples
  • 1. Issuing a demand for an ulterior purpose
  • 2. Failing to state source of knowledge in
    affidavit verifying the same
  • 3. Serving 2 statutory demands in relation to
    debts arising from the same matter.

19
Winding up
  • The presumption under 459C does not mean a
    winding up order automatically follows.
  • It is a presumption only and is rebuttable.
  • It is always open to the debtor to resist the
    winding up by proving solvency Ace Contractors
    Staff P/L v Westgarth Development P/L 1999
    FCA 728 Aussie Vic Plant Hire P/L v Esanda
    Finance Corp Ltd (2008)232 CLR 314.

20
Consideration of when to rely on the Statutory
Demand Process
21
Conclusion and Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com