Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology

Description:

Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology 1. Statistical distributions Why are we interested in average growing conditions over time? Average = SIGNAL. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: webUtkEd4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology


1
Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology
2
1. Statistical distributions
  • Why are we interested in average growing
    conditions over time?
  • Average SIGNAL. Means we must shoot for an
    average or mean when we sample.
  • Suggests we also must know the variability about
    this mean.
  • Which means we must be familiar with statistical
    distributions, which are defined by mean and
    variance
  • e.g., the normal distribution, the
    t-distribution, the z-distribution, the Weibull
    distribution

3
1. Statistical distributions
  • population
  • samples are drawn
  • uncertainty sampling error noise
  • maximize signal ( average), minimize noise
  • be aware of sampling bias examples?
  • easy access
  • physical limitations (altitude, health)
  • low budget
  • downright laziness!

4
1. Statistical distributions
  • samples are drawnfrom a population
  • descriptive statistics arecalculated (e.g. mean,
    median,mode, standard deviation,minimum,
    maximum,range)
  • frequency distributionis calculated

5
2. Central Limit Theorem
a. Sample statistics have distributions. b. Thes
e are normally distributed (considers both mean
and variance). c. As one increases sample size,
our sample statistic approaches the population
statistic.
Example from a population of five trees, we can
only sample three. For the year 1842, the five
trees had the following ring widths 0.50 0.75 1.
00 1.50 2.00 population mean ? average of all
sample means ?
6
2. Central Limit Theorem
population mean 1.15 (0.500.751.00)/3
0.75 (0.500.751.50)/3 0.92(0.500.752.00)/3
1.08(0.501.001.50)/3 1.00(0.501.002.00)
/3 1.17(0.501.502.00)/3 1.33(0.751.001.5
0)/3 1.08(0.751.502.00)/3
1.42(1.001.502.00)/3 1.50 average of all
sample means 1.14 (rounding error here)
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.50
2.00
7
2. Central Limit Theorem
Sample size means everything! The more samples
one collects, the closer one obtains information
on the population itself!
  • Average conditions become more prominent.
  • The variability about the mean becomes less
    prominent.
  • Notice relationship with S/N ratio! Signal
    increases while noise decreases!

8
3. Sampling Design
  • A procedure for selecting events from a population
  • Pilot sample (or pretest)
  • Simple random sample
  • random number generators are handy for x/y
    selection

9
3. Sampling Design
  • Systematic random sample
  • select k-th individual from gridded population
  • lay out a line transect, sample individual
    nearest the pre-selected point

10
3. Sampling Design
  • Stratified random sample
  • population is layered into strata and then we
    conduct random or systematic sampling within each
    cell

11
3. Sampling Design
  • Stratified, systematic, unaligned point
    sampling
  • Hybrid technique, favored among geographers

12
3. Sampling Design
  • Stratified, systematic, unaligned point
    sampling
  • Hybrid technique, favored among geographers

13
3. Sampling Design
  • Transect line sampling, but must have a random
    component! (How can this be accomplished?)
  • Many variations
  • Sample all individuals along the transect (row
    1)
  • Sample quadrats along the transect (row 2)
  • Sample all individuals within a belt (row 3)

14
3. Sampling Design
  • Targeted sampling non-random sampling
  • Is this a legitimate technique?
  • It is often necessary because of
  • Time constraints
  • Budget constraints
  • Lack of field labor
  • Physical limitations of field labor
  • Topographic limitations
  • Advantages?
  • Maximize information with minimum resources
  • Target areas where samples are known to exist
  • Less time needed and less money wasted

15
3. Sampling Design
  • Targeted sampling non-random sampling
  • Used in practically all types of dendro research
    fire history, climate reconstruction, insect
    outbreak studies,

16
3. Sampling Design
  • Specifically sample only trees that have best
    record of fire scars. (dots trees, circles
    trees collected with fire scars, Xs fire
    scars, but not sampled poor record.)
  • What issues must we consider? Topography, slope,
    aspect, hydrology, tree density all affect
    susceptibility to scarring by fire.

Shallow slope area Valley bottom
Steep slope area
17
3. Sampling Design
  • Complete inventory is possible
  • Sample all trees that have fire scars, regardless
    of number of scars or quality of preservation,
    but
  • Not very efficient (time, money, labor)
  • Benefits are considerable, though.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com