SEROLOGY OF FUNGAL INFECTIONS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SEROLOGY OF FUNGAL INFECTIONS

Description:

SEROLOGY OF FUNGAL INFECTIONS * * * Biological infection Pathological changes Empirical/targeted therapy Fungitell Aspergillus PCR Aspergillus GM Current diagnostic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:922
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: mycologyma
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SEROLOGY OF FUNGAL INFECTIONS


1
SEROLOGY OF FUNGAL INFECTIONS
2
Diagnosis in the setting of increasing fungal
burden
Biological infection
Clinical infection
Pathological changes
?
INFECTION
Fungitell Aspergillus PCR Aspergillus GM
Current diagnostic methods
Targeted prophylaxis/ Pre-emptive therapy
Empirical/targeted therapy
3
SEROLOGICAL TARGETS
Serology methods utilise the reactions and
properties of serum
  • ANTIBODIES
  • (Use of commercially available
  • antigens)
  • ANTIGENS
  • (Use of specific antibodies)

4
Why use serology
  • Antigens and antibodies are easier to detect than
    finding the organism directly
  • Antigens and antibodies are produced in large
    quantities and can be found in body fluids
    (blood, CSF, urine, BAL)
  • Culture is often problematic, time consuming and
    insensitive due to the low concentration of the
    organism in tissue

5
Available tests
Antibodies
  • Immunodiffusion
  • Radioallergosorbent Test (RAST)

Antigens
  • Latex Agglutination
  • Radioimmunoassay (RIA)

Antibodies and antigens
  • Complement fixation
  • Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
  • Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA)

6
Measures of Accuracy in Serology Assays
  • Sensitivity
  • Quantifies the number of false negatives
  • 80 sensitivity 80/100 patients with culture
    positive sample produce positive result in test
  • Specificity
  • Quantifies the number of false positives
  • 80 specificity 20/100 healthy volunteers with
    no disease produce positive test result
  • Results are variable depending on factors such as
    patient group and monitoring

7
Mycotic diseases
  • Aspergillosis
  • Candidiasis
  • Cryptococcosis

Antigen antibody (?) detection
Opportunistic pathogens
  • Histoplasmosis
  • Blastomycosis
  • Coccidioidomycosis
  • Paracoccidioidomycosis

Antigen antibody (?) detection
True pathogens
8
Aspergillosis
Primary aetiological agents
  • A. fumigatus,
  • A. flavus,
  • A. niger,
  • A. terreus.

Aspergillus spp. have a global distribution
  • airborne spores,
  • soil,
  • water supplies,
  • construction sites,
  • pillows.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Treatment strategies based on the pathophysiology
of aspergillosis
11
McCormick et al. 2010
12
Serological Diagnosis
Aspergillosis
  • Diagnosis of invasive disease
  • Based on the detection of Aspergillus antigens
  • ELISA kits to detect Galactomannan and ?-Glucan
  • Diagnosis of allergic disease
  • Based on the detection of IgE by RAST/ELISA.
  • May also use complement fixation or
    Immunodiffusion.

13
DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS 1976
14
DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS 1979
15
DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS 2011
  • Sandwich-ELISA
  • galactomannan
  • mannan
  • High-resolution CT-scan
  • Ultrasound
  • Bronchoalveolar lavages
  • Biopsy techniques
  • (BLOOD)CULTURES
  • Fungitell (?-1-3-D-glucan)
  • PCR

16
Aspergillosis
Diagnosis of invasive disease
Galactomannan (GM)
  • polysaccharide component of the cell wall

- highly immunogenic antigen
- present in most Aspergilli
- exo-antigen that can be detected in serum, BAL
or CSF
  • monitoring of GM during antifungal therapy
    allows progression of treatment to be measured
  • several commercially available ELISA tests
    (Platelia, Pastorex)

However...
  • GM presence in patients blood is determined by
    multiple factors

- sensitivity of GM detection depends on the site
of infection
- certain antibiotics (e.g. ampicillin,
amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate)
may give false-positive results
  • Aspergillosis should also be confirmed by other
    diagnostic tools (CT)

Kedzierska et al, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
(2007) 26755
17
Aspergillosis
Antigen Tests
Galactomannan
Patient group Sensitivity () Specificity ()
Allo HSCT, neutropenia, all on steroids 96 99
Neutropenia, suspected IA, GVHD, steroids 100 93
Allo HSCT 81 89
Haematologic malignancy 80 82
Neutropenia, Cut Off 1.5 88 90
ELISA, LA Cut off 0.5, except neutopenic group
Wheat L.J, Transplant Infect Dis (2006), 8128
18
Aspergillosis
(1?3)-ß-D-glucan
  • widely distributed in nature (fungi, yeast,
    algae, bacteria, plants)
  • not present (or low) in Cryptococcus species,
    zygomycetes and

humans
- exo-antigen
- may also be used in diagnosis of candidiasis or
fusariosis
- commercially available kits Fungitec-G,
Fungitell
- may be used as a complementary test to GM
However...
  • false-positive results may occur (60 of
    bacteraemic patients)

Kedzierska et al, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
(2007) 26755
19
Aspergillosis
Antigen Tests
(1?3)-ß-D-glucan
Patient group Sensitivity () Specificity ()
Haematologic disease 88 85
Neutropenia, suspected IA, GVHD, steroids 55 95
Neutropenia, Cut off 120 pg/ml 88 90
Cut off 60 pg/ml, except neutorpenic group
Wheat L.J, Transplant Infect Dis (2006), 8128
20
Aspergillosis
Diagnosis of allergic Aspergillosis
Antibody Test
Aspergillus antibodies can only be detected in
ABPA, Aspergilloma and CCPA patients.
Less reliable than antigen tests due to the
presence of anti-Aspergillus antibodies in
healthy individuals.
High level of precipitating antibodies does not
prove the presence of ongoing disease
21
Aspergillus precipitin test
Strong reactions indicative of aspergilloma
22
ImmunoCAP
  • IgE
  • IgG
  • ABPA
  • asthma
  • cystic fibrosis
  • COPD
  • cavitary disease

23
(No Transcript)
24
Candidiasis
Primary aetiological agents
  • C. albicans,
  • C. parapsilosis,
  • C. glabrata,
  • C. tropicalis.

Diagnosis
  • Based on detection of
  • antigen gt ß-glucan (Fungitec-G enzymatic
    assay) gt Mannan (Pastorex, Platelia - ELISA)
  • - antibody (?) (IgA, IgG ELISA, Immunodiffusion)

25
Candidiasis
Antigen Test
Mannan
  • highly immunogenic antigen

- immunologically more active then ß-glucan
- polysaccharide component of the cell wall of
Candida spp.
  • positive results may be obtained 2-15 days
    before positive blood

cultures
  • commercially available tests Pastorex and
    Platelia (ELISA)

However...
  • negative results of the tests do not exclude
    infection

Kedzierska et al, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
(2007) 26755
26
Candidiasis
Antigen Test
Sensitivity ()
Specificity ()
Test
LA mannan (Pastorex) MAb
25-28
100
ELISA mannan (Platelia) MAb
42
93-98
ELISA mannan (Platelia) PAb
21-84
98-100
ß-glucan (enzymatic Fungitec-G)
71-97
54-96
MAb monoclonal antibody
PAb polyclonal antibody
Yeo Wong, Clin Micro Rev (2002) 15465
27
Candidiasis
Antibody Test
Sensitivity 80 in immunocompetent individuals
Anti-Candida antibodies may also be present in
healthy individuals and cause false possitive
results
Sensitivity may not be relevant in
immunocompromised individuals
IMMY laboratory manuals
28
Cryptococcosis
Primary aetiological agent
  • C. neoformans

Diagnosis
Only based on detection of capsular
polysaccharide(glucuronoxylomannan) antigen
No antibody tests performed
Several tests
Latex agglutination (PREMIER Cryptococcal antigen
assay)
Enzyme Immunoassay (Pastorex Crypto Plus, IMMY
Latex-Cryptococcus antigen assay)
29
Cryptococcosis
Antigen Test
- detection in serum, BAL or CSF
- false-positive results may be caused by
rheumatoid factor or cross-reactive organisms
(Trichosporon asahii)
Test
Sensitivity ()
Specificity ()
Latex Agglutination
90
95
ELISA MAb
90
70-80
Yeo Wong, Clin Micro Rev (2002) 15465
Santangelo, Med Mycol (2005) 43335
30
The future?
31
Conclusion
  • Serology is a useful tool for rapid diagnosis of
    fungal disease
  • Results may be obtained within a few hours
    without the need of culture
  • Results may also be obtained several days before
    clinical symptoms develop
  • More work needs to be done on candidosis
    serological testing
  • Continued screening allows clinicians to follow
    the progress of the disease however may be
    difficult to obtain appropriate specimens
  • Kits are expensive making continuous monitoring
    difficult
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com