Planning & Conducting Annual Performance Evaluations for Staff - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Planning & Conducting Annual Performance Evaluations for Staff

Description:

Training Agenda Introductions & Sign-in Sheet Housekeeping Plan for the Session Staff Training Session Overview Overview of UCLA Library Process Planning for the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: staffLibr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planning & Conducting Annual Performance Evaluations for Staff


1
Planning ConductingAnnual Performance
Evaluationsfor Staff
  • Performance Evaluation Training for Supervisors
  • Pat Hawthorne
  • Library Human Resources
  • May June 2008

2
Training Agenda
  • Introductions Sign-in Sheet
  • Housekeeping
  • Plan for the Session
  • Staff Training Session Overview
  • Overview of UCLA Library Process
  • Planning for the Annual Process
  • Involving the Employee
  • Setting Performance Standards Goals
  • Evaluation Forms Drafting the Narrative
  • Using the Ratings
  • Summary Follow Up

3
Discussion Question
  • What is the one thing you think employees want
    you to do
  • in regard to their
  • annual performance evaluation?
  • HINT Answer as a supervisor!

4
What Supervisors Think Employees Want
  • Employees want exceeds expectations in all
    categories and overall.
  • Employees want to know where they are doing well
    and where they can improve.
  • Employees want to know if they are getting a
    raise or not.
  • Employees want fairness.
  • Employees want to know deadlines and what they
    need to turn in when.
  • Employees want to know whats different about the
    process than before.

5
Discussion Question
  • What do you as a supervisor
  • want to accomplish
  • in the evaluation process
  • for your employees?

6
Discussion Question
  • What is the one topic, question,
  • or concern
  • you want covered here today?

7
Overview of UCLA Library Process
  • Annual Calendar (February October cycle)
  • Internal calendars with departments and divisions
  • Evaluations due to LHR on August 22, 2008
  • All full- and part-time career staff
  • Not academics (librarians), limited appointment
    staff or students
  • Covers last fiscal year (July 1 June 30)
  • Done by current supervisor
  • Current supervisor gathers input from previous
    supervisor
  • Evaluate on performance of job duties work plan
    progress
  • Evaluations must be signed by employee,
    supervisor, and supervisors supervisor
  • All evaluations go to University Librarian

8
Types of Employees
  • Policy-Covered Employees (Non-Represented or 99s)
  • Represented Employees (Covered by a Collective
    Bargaining Agreement)
  • AFSCME (SX)
  • CUE (CX)
  • UPTE (TX)

9
Relationship to Salary
  • Policy-Covered Employees (Non-Represented or 99s)
  • Merit based increases on October 1
  • Represented Employees (Covered by a Collective
    Bargaining Agreement)
  • Increases as stipulated in contract by year
  • AFSCME (SX) ___________________________
  • CUE (CX) ______________________________
  • UPTE (TX) _____________________________
  • Availability of state funding is critical!

10
Planning for the Annual Process
  • Ensure there are no surprises for employees in
    the process!
  • Plan ahead. Do not procrastinate. Do not rush
    through the process.
  • Develop an internal calendar for yourself and
    your unit and announce internal unit deadlines
    and due dates as appropriate.
  • Prepare employees for the process.
  • Start with the job description.

11
Planning for the Annual Process
  • Involve the employee by asking for input.
  • Have an initial meeting with the employee before
    giving them the written evaluation.
  • Draft evaluation using a variety of data.
  • Review last years evaluation.
  • Share the draft evaluation with the employee
    prior to the final performance evaluation
    meeting. Discuss, make changes as appropriate,
    and finalize.

12
Planning for the Annual Process
  • Ask the employee about long-term career goals.
    Identify areas for improvement.
  • Focus the content on the review period.
  • Keep ratings in perspective.
  • Do a final edit before printing out for
    signatures.
  • Attach the appropriate documents.
  • Submit to supervisor then to LHR.

13
Evaluation Components
  • REQUIRED
  • Evaluation Form w / ALL required signatures
  • Individual Work Plan End-of-the-Year Status
    Report (Last Years Work Plan with status or
    progress reports)
  • Individual Work Plan for Next Fiscal Year
  • OPTIONAL
  • Employee Input
  • Self Evaluation
  • Narrative Report
  • Activities Accomplishments Report
  • Job Description Update

14
Involving the Employee
  • How have you involved employees in the past in
    the process?
  • What techniques/practices worked well?
  • What techniques/practices did not work well?
  • What are you thinking about doing or planning to
    do this year?

15
Setting Performance Standards
  • Performance standards define satisfactory
    performance that meets expectations NOT
    excellent performance that exceeds
    expectations.
  • In setting standards, consider these elements
  • Quantity of output or work
  • Quality of output or work
  • Timeliness of results
  • Manner of performance
  • Effectiveness in use of resources

16
Setting Performance Goals
  • Performance goals are not performance standards.
  • A performance goal can be stated in a manner as
    to exceed expectations, i.e. you can strive for
    excellence.
  • Goals should be SMART
  • Specific and detailed as possible
  • Measurable
  • Achievable by the employee
  • Relevant to the department and organization
  • Time bound/sensitive

17
Evaluation Forms
  • UCLA Form All Job Categories Form
  • UCLA Library Form All Job Categories Form
  • UCLA Form Duties Specific Form
  • Narrative Format
  • Customized Departmental Form

18
Using the Ratings
  • Exceeds Expectations
  • Meets Expectations
  • Partially Meets Expectations
  • Does Not Meet Expectations

19
Rater Errors
  • Recency Effect
  • Initial Impressions
  • Spillover Effect
  • Rating Pattern Leniency or Strictness
  • Central Tendency Error
  • Rater Bias
  • Halo Effect
  • Contrast Error
  • Same As Me
  • Different Than Me

20
For More Information
  • Your Supervisor, Department Head, or Supervisory
    AUL
  • LHR Contacts 310-825-7947
  • Pat Hawthorne
  • Eve Bailey
  • Araceli Bermudez
  • Terry Leonard
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com