Foreign Direct Investment in US Transportation Infrastructure

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Foreign Direct Investment in US Transportation Infrastructure

Description:

Foreign Direct Investment in US Transportation Infrastructure Eva Lerner-Lam, President Palisades Consulting Group, Inc. and Palisades China Group, LLC – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: palisades

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foreign Direct Investment in US Transportation Infrastructure


1
Foreign Direct Investment in US Transportation
Infrastructure
  • Eva Lerner-Lam, President
  • Palisades Consulting Group, Inc. and Palisades
    China Group, LLC
  • Presented at the 2011 ASCE Annual Conference
  • Beyond Financial Engineering
  • Building, Operating, and Maintaining
    Transportation Infrastructure
  • Memphis, TN
  • October 22, 2011

2
Outline
  • Recent History of Foreign Direct Investment in
    Transportation Infrastructure in the US
  • Current Situation Disappointing
  • Reasons for Disappointment
  • What is the US Public Looking for?
  • Who Are Foreign Investors?
  • BRIC Sovereign Wealth Funds are the New Global
    Investors
  • What Foreign Investors Look For
  • Opportunities and Challenges
  • Priming the Pump
  • In Summary

3
Recent History of Foreign Direct Investment in
the US
  • In a 2009 study1, NJ PIRG concluded that
  • Toll road privatization is becoming increasingly
    prevalent in the United States
  • Between 1994 and early 2006, 21 billion was paid
    for 43 highway facilities in the US
  • By the end of 2008, 15 roads had been privatized
    in 10 different states
  • Currently, approximately 79 roads in 25 states
    are under consideration for some form of
    privatization.
  • 1http//cdn.publicinterestnetwork.org/assets/H5Ql0
    NcoPVeVJwymwlURRw/Private-Roads-Public-Costs.pdf

4
Current Situation Disappointing
  • Severe public finance constraints on maintenance
    and upgrading of transportation infrastructure
    made up-front cash payments from private
    investors seem attractive
  • However, many privately-funded projects are not
    performing well financially, creating major
    uncertainties for investors, public agencies and
    taxpayers

5
Reasons for Disappointment
  • Traffic projections were greatly overestimated
  • Compensation and non-compete terms in
    privatization agreements guaranteed returns to
    investors at taxpayer expense
  • Agreements distorted public policy
    decision-making for emergency, traffic and
    environmental management

6
What is the US Public Looking For?
  • Control over regional decisions about
    transportation planning and management
  • Fair value so future toll revenues wont be sold
    off at a discount
  • Deals that do not last longer than the uselife of
    an asset
  • State-of-the art maintenance and safety standards
    instead of statewide minimums
  • Transparency to ensure proper public vetting of
    privatization proposals
  • Full accountability in which the legislature must
    approve the terms of a final deal, not just
    approve that a deal be negotiated.
  • NJPIRG Education Fund (Spring 2009)

7
What is the US Public Looking For?
Knowledgeable and accountable technical and
political leadership
8
Who Are Foreign Investors?
  • Sovereign Wealth Funds from the Middle East,
    Europe and Asia (In 2010, SWFs from the Middle
    East held 44 of all SWF assets under
    management2).
  • Today, the BRIC SWEs have rapidly growing
    foreign exchange accounts and foreign asset
    holdingsthey are the new kid on the block
  • Taken together, SWFs represent trillions in
    available funds for US infrastructure (foreign
    assets under management of SWFs could reach
    US610 trillion by 20133
  • 2Rebuilding America The Role of Foreign Capital
    and Global Public Investors, Brookings Institute,
    March 2011
  • 3Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute,
    http//www.swfinstitute.org/research/imfswfreport.
    pdf

9
BRIC Sovereign Wealth Funds are the New Global
Investors
10
BRIC Sovereign Wealth Funds are the New Global
Investors
11
What Did Foreign Investors Look For?
  • Pre-2008, SWFs looked for
  • 20-30 returns
  • Such high returns required complex, opaque
    agreements involving accelerated depreciation tax
    benefits, taxpayer guarantees of stabilized
    revenues, non-compete restrictions that limit
    public sector management of emergencies, traffic
    and the environment

12
What are Foreign Investors Looking for in a
Post-2008 World?
  • Todays SWFs are looking for
  • In general Long-term investment horizons,
    capital preservation, asset diversification,
    predictable returns, and the mitigation of
    political risk
  • For transportation infrastructure projects
    Transparent, project-finance deals (passive
    minority equity and bond investments)

13
What are Foreign Investors Looking for in a
Post-2008 World?
  • With global economic crises continuing unabated,
    most SWFs are now seeking more traditional,
    conservative places to put cash
  • Private Activity Bonds (PABs) are increasing in
    popularity
  • Timing may be right for civil infrastructure
    investments by SWFs

14
Our Projects, Their Cash
US Infrastructure Projects
Sovereign Wealth Funds Cash
?
highest and best use
15
Our Projects, Their Cash
highest and best use

Sovereign Wealth Funds Cash
US Infrastructure Projects
16
Our Projects, Their Cash
highest and best use

Sovereign Wealth Funds Cash
US Infrastructure Projects
17
Opportunities and Challenges
  • Opportunities New era of infrastructure needs
    and available cash from SWFs
  • Challenges Understanding the economic,
    financial and political motivations for foreign
    investment by SWFs

18
Priming the Pump
  • Evolve a dynamic twenty-first century policy
    architecture (Brookings Institute, March 2011)
  • Encourage a Global Public Investors Roundtable
    (Ibid)

19
Priming the Pump
  • Civil Engineers Engage, and demand a seat at
    that Roundtable

20
Priming the Pump
Knowledgeable and accountable technical and
political leadership
21
In Summary
  • Americas infrastructure funding needs are great
  • Post-2008 financial conditions are changing the
    landscape in private sector infrastructure
    investing
  • Sovereign Wealth Funds owned by BRICs are growing
    substantially they are new, and want to engage
  • We (as a nation, and as a profession) should move
    slowly, but deliberately, toward engagement
    directly with SWFs

22
References
  • Crumbling Infrastructure, Crumbling Democracy
    Infrastructure Privatization Contracts and Their
    Effects on State and Local Governance, Ellen
    Dannin.
  • http//www.law.northwestern.edu/journals/njlsp/v6/
    n1/2/2Dannin.pdf
  •  
  • BRIC Sovereign Wealth Funds The External Wealth
    of Governments, Deutsche Bank, September 24,
    2010.
  • https//www.dws-investments.com/EN/docs/research/B
    RICsovwealthfunds.pdf
  •  
  • Private Roads, Public Costs The Facts About
    Toll Road Privatization and How to Protect the
    Public, Phineas Baxandall, Ph.D., U.S. PIRG
    Education Fund, Spring 2009.
  • http//cdn.publicinterestnetwork.org/assets/H5Ql0N
    coPVeVJwymwlURRw/Private-Roads-Public-Costs.pdf
  •  
  • Privatization and the Sale of Tax Revenues, Julie
    A. Roin.
  • http//www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploa
    ds/2011/06/Roin_PDF.pdf
  •  
  • Rebuilding America The Role of Foreign Capital
    and Global Public Investors, Monday, October 17,
    2011.
  • http//www.brookings.edu/papers/2011/0311_sovereig
    n_wealth_funds.aspx

23
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)