Goals of Care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Goals of Care

Description:

Goal Setting Categories Rehabilitation Maintenance Prevention Palliative The IDT should determine the overall goal of care with the resident/legal surrogate. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: healthMoG7
Learn more at: https://health.mo.gov
Category:
Tags: care | goals

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Goals of Care


1
Goals of Care
  • Purpose Identify types of goals in LTC goals
    that reflect the residents change of condition,
    and goals that result from purposeful
    conversations.

2
Objectives
  • Understand the diversity of residents in LTC and
    need to individualize
  • Appreciate the need for, and know how to develop
    and change the POC based on the residents
    wishes
  • Apply regulatory guidance for EOL in LTC.

3
Individualized Care
  • LTC facilities have a wide variety of residents,
    such as
  • Physical impairment - Cultural Diversity
  • Cognitive impairment - Lifestyle Diversity
  • Behavioral symptoms - Residents in the last
  • Mental illness in last stages of life
  • Mental retardation
  • Young residents
  • Very old residents

4
Individual Care Plans
  • Based on individual residents strengths, needs,
    and problems
  • Utilizing an interdisciplinary team of experts
  • Form the basis of the Resident Assessment
    Instrument (RAI) required in every
    Medicare/Medicaid certified facility and
  • Revised frequently.

5
The art and science of nursing is
portrayed at its best in palliative caregiving.
6
Purposeful Observations and Conversations
  • Staff must recognize subtle changes.
  • Subtle changes can be difficult and requires
    purposeful observation of each resident, and
  • Purposeful conversations with the resident, or
    responsible party.
  • Goals of treatment and symptom management change
    in response to purposeful observations and
    conversation.

7
Advance Care Planning
  • The more knowledge the interdisciplinary care
    planning team has about the residents value
    system, the more likely it is to establish a care
    plan that meets the residents needs and allows
    for appropriate interventions as symptoms change.

8
Defining Quality of Life
  • The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) should engage
    in purposeful conversations with residents to
    ensure that their values and preferences are
    understood.

9
Ask questions, such as
  • As you look into your future, what do you want?
  • Have you thought about what you would like the
    last phase of your life to be like?
  • What will be most important for you during that
    time?

10
End of life discussions may include
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR),
  • Artificial nutrition and hydration,
  • Hospital transfer,
  • Withholding diagnostic tests,
  • Treatment of existing diagnosis, such as
  • congestive heart failure or osteoporosis.

11
Residents without decision-making ability may
require
  • Court appointment of legal guardian if no living
    will, advance directive, or designation of a
    surrogate or
  • If current documents do not provide guidance in a
    particular situation.
  • Facility may need to consult an attorney for
    advise.

12
Ethical Issues
  • Ethical issues related to surrogate decision
    making are addressed in
  • Considerations regarding life-prolonging
    Treatment for residents of Long-Term Care
    Facilities
  • by
  • Midwest Bioethics Center

13
Shaping Care and Setting Goals
  • The purpose of advance care planning is to
    allow the resident to help shape the care he or
    she receives during the last stages of life.

14
The IDT will make better decisions if it has
relevant information about
  • The residents clinical condition and prognosis,
    and
  • Personal beliefs and social views.

15
Ethics Case Consultation
  • When situations of conflict arise within the
    IDT, may be between family members or between
    professional staff and family members
  • Ethics case consultation for mediation
  • Facilities can develop ethics committees
  • Long-Term Care Ethics Case Consultation by
    Midwest Bioethics Center in conjunction with the
    Missouri Ombudsman Program.

16
Regulatory Compliance for Advance Directives
  • F156
  • Related to maintaining written policies and
    procedures regarding advance directives.
    Includes provisions to inform and provide written
    information to all adult residents concerning the
    right to accept or refuse medical or surgical
    treatment and form an advance directive.

17
Regulatory Compliance for Advance Directives,
cont.
  • F156, cont.
  • This includes a written description of the
    facilitys policies to implement advance
    directives and applicable State law.

18
42 CFR 489.102Hospice Regulation
  • Provide written information concerning right to
    formulate advance directive
  • Document if a resident has an advance directive
    in the medical record
  • Not to discriminate based on whether or not a
    patient has an advance directive
  • Ensure compliance with State law regarding
    advance directives

19
42 CFR 489.102Hospice Regulation, cont.
  • Provide for education of staff regarding
    facilitys policies and procedures on advance
    directives
  • Provide for community education regarding the
    right under State law to formulate an advance
    directive and facilities written policies and
    procedures regarding the implementation of these
    rights, including any limitations on the basis of
    conscience.

20
FYI !!!!!!!
  • The facility is not required to provide care that
    conflicts with an advance directive.
  • The facility is not required to implement an
    advance directive if, as a matter of conscience,
    the provider CANNOT implement an advance
    directive and state law allows the provider to
    conscientiously object.

21
19 CSR 30-88.010 (9)State Regulation
  • Prior to or upon admission and at least
    annually after that, each resident or guardian
    shall be informed of facility policies regarding
    provision of emergency and life-sustaining care,
    of an individuals right to make treatment
    decisions and of state laws related to advance
    directives for health-care decision making.

22
State Regulation, cont.
  • If a resident has a written advance health-care
    directive, a copy shall be placed in the
    residents medical record and reviewed annually
    with the resident, unless, in the interval, the
    resident is determined to be incapacitated.

23
State Regulation, cont.
  • Residents guardian or health care
    attorneys-in-fact shall be contacted annually to
    assure their accessibility and understanding of
    the facilities policies regarding emergency and
    life-sustaining care.

24
Goal Setting Categories
  • Rehabilitation
  • Maintenance
  • Prevention
  • Palliative
  • The IDT should determine the overall goal of care
    with the resident/legal surrogate.

25
Palliative Care Goals
  • Palliative care becomes an overall goal for the
    resident during the end stages of life, but
    specific interventions will be needed to attain
    an appropriate level of functioning, to maintain
    the residents highest quality of life, and
    prevent suffering.

26
Recognize the Need to Revise Goals
  • Residents who spend years in facilities must have
    ongoing assessment to determine change of
    condition and the need to revise goals of care.
  • The IDT must recognize and discuss the slow
    decline in the resident with a chronic disease.
  • The IDT can have purposeful conversations with
    the resident/responsible party and set realistic
    goals for resident care.

27
The MDS and Goal Setting
  • Several MDS items help staff recognize the need
    for decisions about goals, however, the most
    significant is
  • Section J5c
  • end-stage disease, 6 months to live
  • A doctors certification that the resident has
    six months or less to live must be present in the
    record before coding the resident as terminal.

28
Other Noteworthy MDS Items
  • Section A10 Advance Directives
  • Section B6. Change in Cognitive Status
  • Section C7. Change in Communication
  • Section E3/ E5. Change in Mood/Behavior
  • Section G9. Change in ADL Status
  • Section H4. Change in Urinary Continence
  • Section Q2. Overall Change in Needs

29
Other Noteworthy MDS Items, cont.
  • Section J1,2, 5. Problem Conditions, Pain
    Symptoms, and Stability of Condition
  • Section K3. Weight Change
  • Section M1. Pressure Ulcers
  • Section P1, 5, and 6. Special Treatments and
    Procedures, Hospital Stay(s), and ER Visits

30
Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA)
  • RAI Manual, Version 2002, clarification
  • The key in determining if an SCSA is required
    for individuals with a terminal condition is
    whether or not the change in condition is an
    expected well-defined part of the disease course
    and is consequently being addressed as part of
    the overall plan of care for the individual.

31
Complete a SCSA
  • For a newly diagnosed resident with end-stage
    disease when
  • - a change is reflected in more than one area of
    decline and
  • -the residents status will not normally resolve
    itself, and
  • -resident requires IDT review and/or revision of
    the plan of care.

32
Complete Subsequent SCSAs
  • Complete subsequent SCSAs based on the degree
    of decline and the impact upon the care plan.
    Consider the following
  • -completion of the last MDS
  • -clinical relevancy and accuracy of the MDS to
    the residents current status and
  • -the need to change the care plan to reflect
    current status.

33
Regulatory Compliance forGoals of Care
  • 19 CSR 30-88.010 (11) Each resident shall be
    afforded the opportunity to participate in the
    planning of his/her total care and medical
    treatment, to refuse treatment.
  • Federal Regulation For the resident to receive
    the necessary care and services to attain or
    maintain the highest practicable physical,
    mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance
    with the comprehensive assessment and care plan.

34
Factors That May Lead toAbuse and Neglect
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
    identifies isolation as a consistent predictor
    of abuse and neglect.
  • The resident may become isolated not only
    because of cognitive and physical dependency, but
    also because staff may feel inadequate in dealing
    with the dying resident.

35
Avoidable vs UnavoidableOutcomes
  • State Operation Manual (SOM) consistently directs
    the surveyor to determine if negative outcomes
    are avoidable or unavoidable.
  • Residents at EOL often have negative outcomes,
    but they may be avoidable.
  • Ongoing assessment, care planning, implementation
    and revision are elements that determine
    avoidable or unavoidable.

36
Documentation
  • Purposeful observations and conversations
  • Information about values and beliefs
  • Ongoing purposeful observations and conversations
    and documentation revised to reflect ongoing
    information.
  • IDT should amend instruction to caregivers.
  • Symptoms should be assessed, interventions
    initiated, and evaluated in documentation.

37
Case Study
  • Mrs. Smith
  • Subsection 2.7 Mrs. Smith
  • Guidelines for End-of-Life Care in Long-Term
    Care Facilities

38
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com