The Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on Short Term Memory Scanning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on Short Term Memory Scanning

Description:

The Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on Short Term Memory Scanning By Gavin Walsh Purchase College Overview This is an experiment examining the effects of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:165
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: purchaseE
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on Short Term Memory Scanning


1
The Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback on
Short Term Memory Scanning
  • By Gavin Walsh
  • Purchase College

2
Overview
  • This is an experiment examining the effects of
    positive and negative feedback on a
    Sternberg-like short term memory scanning test.

3
Background
  • In 1966 Saul Sternberg developed a method for
    examining Short Term Memory
  • Serial exhaustive search

4
(No Transcript)
5
Social and Cognitive Connections
  • Golightly and Byrne (1964) demonstrate
    application of reinforcement in social psychology
  • Milinski and Wedekind study the impact of memory
    on the Prisoners Dilemma

6
The Experiment
7
Participants
  • 33 undergraduate students
  • 21 female and 12 male
  • Age M 21.03, SD 7.76
  • Median Age 19

8
Materials
  • A laptop computer and the Superlab program

9
Procedure and Design
  • Instructions to the test of creativity and
    perception
  • Creativity test given and graded
  • Feedback

10
Procedure and Design Continued
  • Computer test of short term memory

11
Example
  • Memory Set ABCDE (shown for 1.2
    seconds)
  • Probe C (shown for 2
    seconds)
  • Answer 1
  • Feedback Correct!

12
Results
  • Statistical analysis of this experiment involved
    a 3x5 mixed ANOVA with set size as a repeated
    measures variable and feedback condition as a
    between subjects variable both measured by
    reaction time.
  • In addition a one-way ANOVA was done on the y
    intercept and the slope of the condition.

13
Results Continued
  • The only statistically significant result was in
    set size ( F 4 40.45, p lt .000)
  • There were no statistically significant
    differences in the feedback condition, the slope
    ,or y intercept.

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Limitations
  • Though there was no significant effect from the
    feedback condition this could be because the
    number of subjects was low.

18
Critique Room for Improvement in future
research
  • Experiment was not double blind
  • Time of day variation
  • Subjects waiting
  • Hand placement

19
References
  • Golightly, C., Byrne, D. (1964). Attitude
    Statements as Positive and Negative Reinforcers.
    Science, 146, 798-799.
  • Milinski, M., Wedkind, C. (1998). Working Memory
    Constrains Human Cooperation in the Prisoners
    Dilemma. Proceedings of the National Academy of
    Sciences of the United States of America, 95,
    13755-13758
  • Sternberg, S. (1966). High Speed Scanning in
    Human Memory. Nature, 154,
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com