Title: A Fourth Branch of Government?
1A Fourth Branch of Government?
- The Power of Bureaucracy Strength Through
Obscurity
2Does Bureaucracy Matter? A Case Study
- "FEMA is not going to hesitate at all in this
storm. We are not going to sit back and make this
a bureaucratic process. We are going to move
fast, we are going to move quick, and we are
going to do whatever it takes to help disaster
victims." -FEMA Director Michael Brown, Aug. 28,
2005 - "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of
the levees. President Bush, September 1, 2005 - "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job."
President Bush, to FEMA director Michael Brown,
while touring hurricane-ravaged Mississippi,
Sept. 2, 2005
3A. The Damage Done
4(No Transcript)
5RELATIVE COST BURDEN ON LOUISIANA CITIZENS DWARFS
PREVIOUS DISASTERS
FEMA cost estimates for recent US disasters
(2005)
FEMA cost estimate ( Millions)
Affected population (Millions)
Katrina and Rita Louisiana (2005)
37,100 4.5 8,244 World Trade Center
(2001) 8,140 19.0 428 Northridge
Earthquake (1994) 9,170 29.8
308 Hurricane Andrew (1992) 2,500
12.9 194 Hurricane Iniki (1992) 360
1.1 329 Loma Prieta Earthquake
(1989) 1,360 23.7 57
Cost/ capita
Disaster
Source FEMA, US Census 2000, cost estimates
adjusted for inflation using CPI
6State reported deaths fromHurricanes Katrina and
RitaIdentified and unidentified victims
(12/13/05)
207
NEARLY 5x AS MANY LOUISIANANS WERE KILLED BY
STORMS THAN ANY OTHER STATES CITIZENS
Doesnt account for 3,700 people still missing
1,071
113
2
14
AL
LA
MS
TX
FL
1,094 less 23 non-storm related
deaths Source Louisiana Department of Health and
Human Services, ABC News
7B. The Role of Federal Bureaucrats
- 1. The Long, Long Run Environmental and
Development Policy
8History That Contributed to Tragedy
- 1879 Congress authorized ACE to build levees to
prevent Spring flooding - Oil Industry and other development drained,
dredged, and built channels and canals throughout
wetlands and marshes - Mississippi River was channeled to empty at
continental shelf
9Effects of Levees on Mississippi in Missouri
10Results
- New Orleans sank further below sea level as
earlier sediments and deposits compacted and sank
(no new sediments deposited) - Mississippi Delta and Barrier Islands began to
disappear erosion and subsidence - Wetlands and marshes were fragmented, ripped up,
and destroyed, leading to recession of coastline
112. The Levees The Army Corps of Engineers
12New Orleans Areas Below Sea Level
13FORENSIC ENGINEERING AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA
- Army Corps of Engineers conducted the equivalent
of a forensic investigation at the levees and
floodwalls of New Orleans, drilling into the
earth to examine the soil and reviewing the
design of the structure.
14LEARNING FROM HURRICANE KATRINA
- An Army Corps of Engineers document showed that
a five-foot layer of peat lies beneath the entire
levee system. - The layer of peat played a major role in the
failure, becoming soft and wet and moving as the
water level rose during the hurricane.
15FORENSIC ENGINEERING AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA
- The floodwaters simply pushed the entire Levee
structure out of its way, sliding it in a way
that allowed the water to flow out of Lake
Ponchartrain into New Orleans.
16FORENSIC ENGINEERING AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA
- The conclusion is that faulty design, inadequate
construction, or some combination of the two, are
the likely causes of the breaching of the
floodwalls along the 17th Street and London
Avenue canals. - These two breaches were the source of most of the
flooding of New Orleans.
17CAUSES OF FAILURE
- Katrinas storm surge overtopped some levee
sections. - The cascade of water eroded soils from the base
of the landward side of the levee, causing it to
fail.
18CAUSES OF FAILURE
- In some levee sections, water percolated under
the sheet pilings through layers of peat, sand,
and clay and bubbled up on the other side.
19CAUSES OF FAILURE
- The percolation failures tended to occur where
the pilings were driven only 3-4 m (10 or 11
feet) into the ground. - Where pilings were driven 8 m (25 feet), the
levees kept the city safe.
20CAUSES OF FAILURE
- Percolation failures may have weakened other
sections of the levee system that now appear to
have survived Katrina.
21CAUSES OF FAILURE
- The junctions between different kinds of levees
often were weak spots. - "If it's earth versus concrete, the earth will
lose.
22FLAWS IN CONSTRUCTION THAT NEED TO BE FIXED
- USE OF WEAK, POORLY COMPACTED SOIL
- INADEQUATE NUMBER OF STEEL PILINGS TO ANCHOR
FLOOD WALLS TO SUBSURFACE STRATA
233. The Response FEMA
24a. Pre-Katrina FEMA
- 1993-2000 FEMA transformed from Cold War civil
defense organization (gt50 of funds assigned to
post-nuclear war missions) to disaster relief
agency - Northridge Quake-Response w/in 2 hours with
troops and rations. Rebuilt w/in a week. - Hurricane Camille (2nd worst) - Red Cross set up
shelters for 85K before it hit. Cleared 11M tons
of debris in months. - Hurricane Andrew 5K troops deployed w/in 3 days.
25b. 2002 Reorganization Department of Homeland
Security
- Impetus was a 9/11 Terrorist Attack
- Shift in focus to terrorism vs. natural disaster
created personnel/expertise issues. - Created Additional Levels of Bureaucracy
- Lack of a Clear Plan FEMA Priority within DHS
- Delays in Navigating Chain of Commands
- Lack of Coordination and Communication between
federal-state-local authorities.
26c. FEMA failures during/after Katrina
- Prior to the hurricane
- Little advance planning, stockpiling of
necessaries (despite commitment to pre-supply
water, ice, generators medicine) - Only 7 of 28 SAR teams dispatched no personnel
in N.O. until after Katrina passes - Most supplies allocated to states other than
Louisiana (esp. Alabama) - After hurricane
- FEMA waits for specific state/local requests
instead of mounting searches, busing evacuees - Mismanagement of transportation and logistics (no
buses, food for Superdome!) - Hundreds of firefighters delayed by days of
community relations/sexual harassment training - FEMA requests non-response by other state/local
agencies (!), fails to use available military
resources
27II. Key Features of the Federal Bureaucracy
28A. History Created by the New Deal
29B. Orientation Dominated by Defense
30C. Size Smaller than State/Local Bureaucracies
Number in Millions
2002
31D. Composition Highest Ranks Filled By White
Males
2001
32E. Organization
- Key Dimension Access to President
- Order
- White House Staff Greatest Access (Informal
Power) - Executive Office of the President (EOP) Direct
Access, Especially by Key Agencies - Cabinet No longer a decision-making body.
Access to President declining. - Independent Agencies and Government Corporations
Limited Access But Substantial Autonomy
33Overview The Executive Branch
34The White House Staff Informal Power
35Overview The Executive Branch
36The EOP First Line of Policy-Making
Council of Economic Advisors
National Economic Council
Domestic Policy Council
Office of Science And Technology Policy
Council on Environmental Quality
Office of the United States Trade Representative
National Security Council
The President
Office of Administration
Office of the Vice President
Office of Management And Budget
Office of National Drug Control Policy
Office of Faith-Based And Community Relations
Office of National AIDS Policy
White House Office
2005
37THE EOP Recent Trends
Bush II 2001 N65
Clinton 1993 N72
Bush 1989 N50
Reagan 1981 N61
45
45
43
45
Average Age
28
29
14
5
Women
11
8
8
3
Minorities
29
10
10
26
Home State
Capitol Hill
Exec. Branch
Exec. Branch
Pres. Campaign
Most Common Experience
38Overview The Executive Branch
39Overview The Executive Branch
40The Outer Rim Other Bureaucracies
- Independent executive agencies
- Report directly to the president and are not
under a cabinet secretary. - Placed outside departments for political reasons
including the president wanting to keep a closer
eye on them or avoid interference, increase their
effectiveness or make them more prestigious. - Independent regulatory commissions
- Designed to be independent. Bipartisan with
fixed terms. - Can do things that would be politically unpopular
(and thus very hard for the President and
Congress to do). - Government corporations
- When Congress puts the government in the business
of providing services a private corporation might
usually provide - Often created when the services arent being
provided and arent likely to be without
government involvement
41Independent Agencies and Government Corporations
42III. How Much Autonomy Do Bureaucrats Have?
- The Principal-Agent Problem
- Problem Need for people (principals) to delegate
some tasks to others (agents), but they may have
own agendas - Solution Incentives to make agents interest
identical to principals interest - Difficulties
- Individual accountability promotes backstabbing
rather than teamwork - Team accountability promotes free-riding
- Agents have more expertise than principals
- Agents are assigned multiple tasks rewarding
one leads to poorer performance in other areas
434. Implications
- Key to autonomy Who is the principal?
- Multiple principals (e.g. President and Congress)
increase bureaucratic autonomy - Larger gap in expertise between principal and
agent increases autonomy
44B. History
- Early Republic Emphasis on respectability,
individual incentives, long-term service - Jacksonian Era Spoils system, emphasis on
rotation and brief service. Intended to
democratize system but leads to corruption and
patronage.
453. The Rise of Bureaucratization
- a. Bureaucratization solved problems of spoils
system. - Specialization and clearly defined jobs could be
mastered more quickly. - Hierarchies more closely monitored and controlled
subordinate officers. - Record keeping was meticulous.
- Government became more impersonal.
- And red tape was born.
46b. New Problems Civil Service and Delegation
- How do you keep an agent faithful? How do you
avoid agency loss or capture by natives? - Career bureaucrats develop their own personal and
institutional interests, and often act on them. - Can become non-responsive to citizens and elected
officials. Difficult to punish such behavior. - Agents become experts in their policy domains.
- Their actions are often shielded from outside
oversight (hidden action). - Civil servants have access to information that is
not available to the public or to other branches
of government - They may not be willing to share this information
if it goes against their goals (hidden
information)
47C. Agency Capture 1. Iron Triangles (a.k.a.
Subgovernments)
Bureaucracy
Tobacco Division of the Department of Agriculture
Rulings on tobacco production and prices
Approve higher budget requests
Information about industry
Support for agencies budget request
Help with constituent complaints
Information
Congressional Subcommittees
Interest Groups
Campaign Contributions
Tobacco lobby, including both farmers and
manufacturers
Info about industry
Subcommittee of the House and Senate Agriculture
Committees
Legislation affecting tobacco farmers and other
members of the industry
482. Clientele Agencies
- Directed by law to foster and promote the
interests of a particular group or segment of
American society - Clients organize to support the agency, thus
leading to the iron triangle - Example Reagan promised to dismantle the
Departments of Energy and Education. Why wasnt
he successful?
493. Capture Theory
- Thesis agencies are captured and controlled by
the very interests theyre supposed to regulate. - Reasons
- Weak agencies vulnerable to political pressure
- Special interest groups more powerful than
general interest groups - Underfunded/overworked agencies rely on
cooperation for success, regulated industries for
key information
50D. Marrying the Natives
- Once-loyal officials sometimes become agents of
their departments. - Bureaucratic culture persistent, patterned way
of thinking about the central tasks of and human
relationships within the organization. - Bureaucrats imbued with their agencys culture
come to dislike interference from outsiders - More likely in final years of Presidential term
officials future careers depend on personal
success
51IV. Bureaucratic Decision-Making What do they do
with autonomy?
- Bureaucratic Politics
- Organizations shape preferences Where you stand
depends on where you sit - Individuals use informal power to fight
organizational constraints Who you know
determines pull - Best predictor of bureaucratic decision is
weighted median voter among stakeholders
(bargaining produces coalitions)
52B. Pathologies of Bureaucracy
- Clientelism serving interest groups behind
program - Parochialism concentration on getting the
agencys job done (blind to trade-offs)
53B. Pathologies of Bureaucracy
- Incrementalism slow implementation of new
programs - Arbitrariness use of Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) (regularized procedures) for
efficiency - Satisficing Choosing good enough rather than
pursuing perfection
54B. Pathologies of Bureaucracy
- Imperialism expanding agency operations and
taking on more responsibilities - Achesons Rule A memorandum is written not to
inform the reader but to protect the writer
558. 51-49 principle Decisions appear to be based
on overconfidence (incentive to misrepresent 51
certainty as 100 for bargaining purposes)
569. Groupthink Hierarchic groups reinforce
conformity, produce poor decisions
57V. Controlling the Fourth Branch
58A. Redundancy Praiseworthy?
- General finding When two or more bureaucracies
assigned same task, competition between them
increases efficiency! - Cost is unnecessary duplication of effort. (Save
Slower, Less Satisfying Results)
59B. The Power of Procedural Rules
- The amended US Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act of 1938 requires pharmaceutical companies to
prove that a drug is safe and efficacious before
marketing it. - The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 requires
that the EPA must prove that a new chemical is
hazardous to human health or the environment
before regulating it. - Result few new drugs are approved and virtually
no chemicals have been proven hazardous.
60C. Which branch exercises most control?
- Consensus Congress controls most effectively
through parallel committee system - Political appointees more likely to be controlled
by President (loyal to President instead of
organizations budget) - Judicial review limited (Chevron deference)
except where agencies act as courts (i.e.
immigration judges)
61VI. How Do Bureaucrats Influence the President?
- Institutionalized EOP constrains President
textbook (Chapter 9) - How can Presidents de-institutionalize EOP?
- Political criteria for technocrats and scientists
- Reduce staff for Congress-mandated sections
- How do Presidents use the EOP and Cabinet?
- (next lecture Making Foreign and Domestic
Policy)