Patient Safety Grand Rounds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Patient Safety Grand Rounds

Description:

Rapid Response Team Planning Group Serving Vanderbilt Since February, 2005 Anna Ambrose, Respiratory Therapy John Barwise, Critical Care John Bingham, CCI Devin Carr ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: mcVanderb
Category:
Tags: grand | patient | rounds | safety

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Patient Safety Grand Rounds


1
Rapid
Response Teams
2
Rapid Response Team Planning GroupServing
Vanderbilt Since February, 2005
  • Anna Ambrose, Respiratory Therapy
  • John Barwise, Critical Care
  • John Bingham, CCI
  • Devin Carr, Nursing
  • Bobbie Dietz, CCI
  • Julie Foss, Nursing
  • Drew Gaffney, Chief Quality Officer
  • Leah Golden, Resuscitation Program
  • Eric Grogran
  • Jeff Guy, Burn Unit
  • Jeff Hill, CCI
  • Brent Lemonds, Administrative Liaison
  • Diane Moat, Risk Management
  • Paul St. Jacques, Anesthesiology
  • Susan Thurman, Nursing
  • Les Wooldridge, Resuscitation Program
  • Jeanne Yeatman, LifeFlight

3
  • The CampaignIHI will join hands with other
    leading American health care organizations in
    launching an unprecedented 100,000 Lives
    Campaign, which will disseminate powerful
    improvement tools, with supporting expertise,
    throughout the American health care system.
  •  
  • This campaign aims to enlist thousands of
    hospitals across the country in a commitment to
    implement changes in care that have been proven
    to prevent avoidable deaths. We are starting with
    these six changes
  •  
  • Deploy Rapid Response Teamsat the first sign of
    patient decline
  • Deliver Reliable, Evidence-Based Care for Acute
    Myocardial Infarctionto prevent deaths from
    heart attack
  • Prevent Adverse Drug Events (ADEs)by
    implementing medication reconciliation
  • Prevent Central Line Infectionsby implementing a
    series of interdependent, scientifically grounded
    steps called the Central Line Bundle
  • Prevent Surgical Site Infectionsby reliably
    delivering the correct perioperative antibiotics
    at the proper time
  • Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumoniaby
    implementing a series of interdependent,
    scientifically grounded steps called the
    Ventilator Bundle

4
Arrest Prevention Assessment Response Team
Rapid Response Team
  • Team members
  • Critical care nurses
  • Respiratory Therapist
  • Physician Intensivist
  • When requested by team
  • Professional consult service for nurses and
    physicians seeking evaluation of a deteriorating
    patient

5
(No Transcript)
6
SBAR
  • The SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommen
    dation) technique provides a framework for
    communication between members of the health care
    team. SBAR is an easy-to-remember, concrete
    mechanism useful for framing any conversation,
    especially critical ones, requiring a clinicians
    immediate attention and action. It allows for an
    easy and focused way to set expectations for what
    will be communicated and how between members of
    the team, which is essential for developing
    teamwork and fostering a culture of patient
    safety.

7
RRT Call 1
  • S pt. desaturated when getting up to bedside
    commode took 20 minutes to resaturate from 60s
    to 95
  • B pulmonary HTN, SOB, anemia
  • A RR30, HR90s, SpO270
  • R RRT called Pulmonary Fellow to bedside, who
    ordered EKG and 40 mg Lasix, transferred to MICU
  • 10-7-05
  • 1045
  • 8 North
  • 51 yo Female
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Staff concerned
  • Labored breathing
  • SpO2 less than 90

Interpretation Appropriate Call, patient stayed
in MICU, made DNR by family and ultimately died.
Debriefing was held, thought to be useful. SBAR
tweaked.
8
RRT Call 2
  • S pt. desaturated to 94
  • B none given
  • A BP109/60, HR105, RR26, SpO294, crackles
    heard on left
  • R suctioned large mucus plug and placed pt. on
    40 trach collar. Pt. remained on 8 North.
  • 10-10-05
  • 1805
  • 8 North
  • 60 yo Female
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Staff concerned

Interpretation Appropriate call. New Nurses,
Good learning tool. Floor suctioned patient
while RRT enroute. RRT found problem resolved.
Patient Discharged on 10/18.
9
RRT Call 3
  • S 3 days post op Primary team aware and
    monitoring pt. symptoms progressing.
  • B moved from 9 South at 1100 for respiratory
    distress and more intensive monitoring
  • A BP104/57, HR142, RR38, SpO293
  • R spoke w/ wife, who required approx. 20
    minutes of conference prior to allowing
    assessment to take place. Pt. continued w/
    increasing RR, HR and confusion-
  • 10-15-05
  • 1620
  • 9 North
  • 59 yo Male
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Staff concerned
  • RR greater than 30
  • Labored breathing
  • HR greater than 120
  • Onset of agitation

Interpretation Appropriate call. Confusion
about consistency of team. Floor expecting MD as
first responder. Team needs to be identified to
staff and family upon arrival. Resident had
issues with team being called. Patient sent to
SICU and intubated.
10
RRT Call 4
  • 10-15-05
  • 1815
  • 9 North
  • 78 yo Female
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Staff concerned
  • RR less than 8
  • SpO2 less than 90
  • Labored breathing
  • Decreased LOC
  • S RRT arrived to find pt. being ventilated w/
    bag-mask
  • B ischemic bowel disease staff noted that LOC
    had been decreasing for 4 days.
  • A none given
  • R pt. intubated and transferred to SICU

Interpretation Appropriate call or would have
been appropriate for STAT team. Notable that LOC
had been decreasing for 4 days. Patient moved to
SICU. Discussing withdrawing care.
11
RRT Call 5
  • 10-29-05
  • 0005
  • 8 North
  • 53 yo Male
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Staff concerned
  • RR less than 8
  • Decreased LOC
  • Onset of agitation
  • SpO2 less than 90
  • S admitted from ED approx. 15 mins prior to RRT
    call nurses noted increasing respiratory
    distress and eventual unresponsiveness and apnea
  • B history of tongue CA s/p chemo and radiation.
    Of note, patient was confused upon admission to
    ED.
  • A HR 126 SpO2 87 BP 160/98
  • R several unsuccessful attempts made at
    establishing definitive airway, including LMA and
    fiberoptic bronchoscopy eventually transferred
    to OR for emergency tracheotomy and then on to
    MICU post-operatively

12
RRT Call 6
  • 10-29-05
  • 355
  • 9 North
  • 65 yo F
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Staff concerned
  • SpO2 less than 90
  • HR greater than 120
  • S pt. became bradycardic (39) and then
    tachycardic (170s) and desaturated to 38.
    Bagged with 100 O2 in response to desaturation
  • B history of esophageal CA tracheomalacia
    requiring tracheostomy of note, resident paged
    from 0400-0430 without response.
  • A BP 153/68
  • R scheduled metoprolol that was held at 2220
    given and patient stayed in room.

13
RRT Call 7
  • 10-30-05
  • 535
  • 8 South
  • 55 yo F
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Labored breathing
  • S air hunger staff afraid her stoma will
    plug. Unable to pass 14 Fr. Suction catheter.
  • B s/p laryngopharyn-gectomy undergoing
    radiation/chemo s/p trach 10-28
  • A RR 30 SpO2 98 LOC intact HR 80
  • R saline lavaged and suctioned w/ 10 Fr.
    Catheter by RT huge mucus plug obtained. Pt.
    reported immediate relief! Decision made to
    transfer pt. to 9 Northno beds transferred to 6
    South

14
RRT Call 8
  • S nurse holding pressure to incision small
    amt. blood bubbling around open incision
  • B hx of end stage lung dz s/p bilat. Lung
    transplant 9-30-05
  • A RR 20 SpO2 95 LOC intact HR 87
  • R vaseline gauze to bedside CXR ordered Rt.
    Lower lung sounds diminished pt. stayed in room
    pending CXR result.
  • 10-30-05
  • 2045
  • 9 North
  • 54 yo M
  • REASON FOR CALL
  • Staff concerned pt coughed incision open

15
Other Findings
  • 9N code 9/30 PEA arrest unsuccessful after 20
    min
  • 8S code 10/1 Resp arrest DNR family desired
    everything except CPR and defib extensive hx.
    Ovarian CA Pt moved to MICU and expired
  • 8N 10/2 PEA arrest found on floor pulseless and
    apneic, possible PE, RUE DVT during admission
    despite anticoagulation, in and out of ICU
    several times including 2 intubations

16
Pilot Unit Data
17
Vanderbilt RRT Performance Measures
Vanderbilt RRT Performance Measures (n24)
18
Vanderbilt Early Warning Signs
Vanderbilt Early Warning Signs(n24 for 9
patients)
19
Highlighted Results of Collaborative20 Academic
Medical Centers
  • 462 calls in collaborative
  • 76 had early warning signs
  • 71 discharged alive
  • 8 went on to have cardiac arrest
  • 41 transferred to ICU
  • Concern about the patient was the most frequent
    early warning sign in 55 of the patients
  • 99.7 of the staff using the teams said they
    would use the RRT in the future
  • Resistance fades as RRT demonstrates value and
    benefit for patient care

20
Housewide Rollout April 1, 2006
21
Addition of Cardiology RRT
  • Responding to Cardiology Floors
  • November, 2008

22
  • Family Initiated RRT
  • Initiated December, 2008 as a pilot
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com