Title: Integrated Plasma Fuel Cell Process (IPFC)
1Integrated Plasma Fuel Cell Process (IPFC)
- Process/Technology Briefing
- Presented by
- James Jordan, President and CEO
- Louis Ventre, Jr. Executive VP and General
Counsel - Meyer Steinberg, VP and Chief Scientist,
- Archer Haskins, VP Marketing
- HCE, LLC
- www.hceco.com
2Integrated Plasma Fuel Cell Process (IPFC)
A Highly Efficient Process for Producing
Electricity, Hydrogen, Gasoline and Diesel Fuels
from Coal, Petroleum, Natural Gas and
Biomass with Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Greening Fossil Energy
3Agenda
- Describe the Integrated Plasma Fuel Cell (IPFC)
Process - Compare the Potential of this Process with the
Other Fossil Fuel Conversion Technologies - Describe the key components
- Discuss Proposed Development and
Commercialization Strategy
4HCE, LLC Seeks Support to Develop a Highly
Efficient and Clean Process for Conversion of
Fossil Fuel to Electricity, Hydrogen and
Synthetic Fuels
- The process is a breakthrough
- The process is more efficient than any other
fossil fuel conversion process - The process can be demonstrated at a pilot scale
in 3 years at a cost of about 18 million - The estimated cost of a follow-on full scale
demonstration plant is about 57 million
5IPFC Process Flowsheet
6IPFC Fischer-Tropsch Synfuel Flowsheet
7The IPFC Process Integrates Two
TechnologiesHydrogen Plasma Black Reactor
HPBRwith Direct Carbon Fuel Cell DCFC
- Lower Production Cost Resulting from
- High Efficiency
- Lower Capital Investment
- Low Pollution Discharges
- Half CO2 in concentrated form
- 5 to 10X less pollution (NOx and SOx than
conventional power plant - Varied Applications Resulting from
- Adaptability of Process
- Scalability of Process
8Lower Production Cost
9Lower Production Cost
10Highest Powerplant Thermal Efficiency
- When compared to other systems, the IPFC promises
the highest powerplant thermal efficiencies ---
ranging from a low of 70 to a high of 92!
(Values vary depending upon the type of fuel, the
amount of hydrogen produced in relation to the
amount of electricity, and the heating value of
the fuel.) - Natural Gas Combined Cycle powerplants typically
achieve 60 thermal efficiency for electricity
production. - Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle plants
typically achieve 50 - 55 thermal efficiency for
electricity production. - Current fossil powerplants (Rankine Cycle)
generate electricity in a range of 35 - 40
thermal efficiency.
11Comparison of IPFC Process with Rankine Plants
and the Advanced IGCC Plant for Likely Fuel Types
12Higher Thermal Efficiency Than IGCC for Variety
of Feedstocks
13Lower CO2 Emissions than IGCC
14Lower Capital Investment
15Lower Production Cost
16Adaptable and Scalable to a Variety of
Feedstocks and Applications
- Feedstock Fuels Natural gas, petroleum, coals,
lignite, bitumen biomass - Basic Unit Produces Electricity and Hydrogen
- HPBR Hydrogen Plasma Black Reactor coupled
with - DCFC Direct Carbon Fuel Cell
- For Electric Power and Transportation Fuels
(gasoline and diesel) - Add Water Gas Shift Reactor (WGS) and
Fischer-Tropsch Reactor - For Electric Power Production Alone
- Add WGS and SOFC Solid oxide fuel cell
- For Hydrogen Alone
- Add WGS and water electrolyzer
- Scalable
- Residential to Large Multi-Megawatt Power Plant
17- HYDROGEN PLASMA BLACK REACTOR
- HPBR
18HPBR How It Works
IPFC Process
19IPFC Process Electric Arc Hydrogen Plasma Black
Reactor
20IPFC Process Electric Arc Hydrogen Plasma Black
Reactor
21Benefits of HPBR
IPFC Process
- Continuously cracks oil and natural gas.
- Proofs needed for continuously cracking coal and
biomass to carbon, hydrogen and carbon monoxide. - The carbon is in a fine particulate form.
- The fine particulate pure carbon is ideal for the
Direct Carbon Fuel Cell - The Hydrogen generated by the HPBR is in a
concentrated form readily usable in other
processes, such as upgrading petroleum refining,
or as a feed stock for synfuels production or for
sale in the commercial market
22- DIRECT CARBON FUEL CELL
- DCFC
23Fuel Cells Overview
24Direct Carbon Fuel CellHow It Works
- Carbon flows into the Direct Carbon Fuel Cell
carried by a molten carbonate electrolyte. - The carbon then combines with oxygen from the
atmosphere, producing electricity and
concentrated carbon dioxide.
25Small-scale Experimental Work at LLNL has
confirmed Proof of Principle of Direct Carbon
Fuel Cell
- A laboratory-scale Direct Carbon Fuel Cell is
shown in the photograph. - It is a fully functional 60 square centimeters
Direct Carbon Fuel Cell. - Lab scale thermal efficiencies achieved up to
90 at 1 kW/m2 and efficiencies of 80 proved
at 2 kW/ m2
26Direct Carbon Fuel Cell
- Inside the barrel shell of the Direct Carbon Fuel
Cell, there is an electrode assembly as shown in
the schematic illustration.
27A Concept for an Industrial-Scale Direct Carbon
Fuel Cell
28Direct Carbon Fuel Cell
(DCFC) Reduces Pollution
- Emission is nearly pure CO2
- Ten-fold Reduction in offgas volume per MWH
- 5X---no nitrogen in flue gas
- 2X---80 efficiency cuts all flue gas in half
per ton of coal - Reduces costs of sulfur removal
- DCFC retains regulated emissions in molten salt
(e.g., mercury, vanadium, thorium)
29Direct Carbon Fuel Cell
Economics
- Preliminary costs of stacked cells 250/kW at
2kW/m 2 - Estimated 5-year life of cell (graphite corrosion
at 50µm/year
30- IPFC-FT
- ELECTRICITY AND TRANSPORTATION FUELS
31Integrated Plasma Fuel Cell Process SynFuels
Plant IPFC-FT
- Electric Power and Transportation Fuel Production
- HHV Thermal Efficiency and CO2 Emission Reduction
- __________________________________________________
_______ -
- Product Ratio Thermal CO2
Emission - Electric Power Efficiency
Reduction - Fuel Gasoline
from IGCC - __________________________________________________
_______ - Natural Gas 0.53 74.5 31.2
- Petroleum 1.82 82.8 19.0
- N. Dakota Lignite 1.82 82.0 26.5
- Coal
- Kentucky Bituminous 2.76 79.8 25.2
- Coal
- Biomass 0.20 70.4 -
- __________________________________________________
___________________ - Single Conventional Plants CO2 Reduction by
IPFC - Rankine Cycle Electricity -
38 76.4 - Coal Gasification Gasoline - 65
36.4
32Integrated Plasma Fuel Cell Power Plant (IPFC-FT)
- Electric Power and Transportation Fuel Production
- HHV Thermal Efficiency
- __________________________________________________
_______ - Gasoline and Total
- Fuel Electric Power Diesel
Efficiency - __________________________________________________
_______ - Natural Gas 25.7 48.8 74.5
- Petroleum 53.4 29.4 82.8
- N. Dakota Lignite 52.9 29.1 82.0
- Coal
- Kentucky Bituminous 58.6 21.2 79.8
- Coal
- Biomass 11.9 58.5
70.4 - Equivalent IGCC coal plant
60 - __________________________________________________
___________________
33Preliminary Cost Estimate IPFC-FT
PlantElectricity and Gasoline Production
- Plant Electricity
Gasoline Equivalent - Fuel Capital Cost Prod. Cost Prod.
Cost Crude Oil Cost - Cost Kw Mills/Kwh
/gal /Bbl - __________________________________________________
___________________ - Natural Gas
- 6.00/MMBTU 690 50.15 1.76
55.60 - 4.00/MMBTU 690 40.99
1.44 45.50 - 4.00/MMBTU 690 50.00 1.06
33.50 - __________________________________________________
___________________ - N. Dakota Lignite
- 12.40/ton MF 775 28.50 1.00
31.50 - 0.73/MMBTU 775 44.18 0.00
10.50 - __________________________________________________
___________________ - Cost of a barrel of crude oil to refinery to
produce gasoline equivalent to - listed IPFC gasoline cost.
- Selling price of electricity raised from
production cost but not to exceed - conventional price of 50 mills/Kwh(e).
- It costs 0.25/gal to refine crude oil. For
zero production cost, equivalent
34Integration of DCFC in the IPFC Process
- The IPFC process development project will
scale-up the DCFC for industrial application and
integrate it with a continuously circulating
carbon-black-laden molten carbonate stream - The IPFC process project will design, fabricate
and test an off-gas system to collect the
concentrated stream of CO2 for various
applications - The IPFC Project will test performance of the
DCFC with various ranks of fossil fuels
35Design Fabricate Appropriately Scaled Hydrogen
Plasma Black Reactor (HPBR)
- Design a Test Program for Various Ranks of U.S.
and Chinese Coal - Set up an instrumented experimental unit at
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
develop off-gas and processing data to determine
systems design information for off-gas processing
system, molten carbonate system, and a scaled
design for the IPFC pilot plant
36Hydrogen Plasma Black Reactor (HPBR) at Norwegian
University of Science and Technology, Trondheim,
Norway
37Major Level 3 WBS Tasks of Systems Requirements
Definition Task (SRD 1.01)
- Complete Conceptual Design Report
- Scale-Up of Direct Carbon Fuel Cell (DCFC)
- Design Fabricate Appropriately Scaled Hydrogen
Plasma Black Reactor (HPBR) - Design Fabricate Appropriately Scaled Molten
Salt Carbon Transfer System - Design Fabricate Appropriately Scaled Off-Gas
Collection Systems for HPBR and DCFC Components - Testing of Various Ranks of Fossil Fuels in Above
Systems - Perform Trade Studies for Coal Prep and De-Ashing
Systems - Perform Complete Preliminary Conceptual Design
- Perform Complete Analytical Systems Model
- Perform Complete Preliminary Life Cycle Cost
Analysis
38List of IPFC Process Pilot Plant Project
Deliverables
- Complete Pilot Plant TE Report
- Complete Construction of Pilot Plant
- Complete Final E,SH Report
- Complete Final Design of Pilot Plant
- Complete Preliminary Design of Pilot Plant
- Complete Conceptual Design Report for 1 MW Pilot
Plant - Design, Construct TE a full-scale DCFC Module
- Design, Construct TE a multiple module gas
collection system - Design, Construct TE a multiple module molten
carbonate transfer system - Design, Construct TE an appropriately scaled
HPBR - Design, Construct TE an appropriately scaled
fuel prep system
39Greening Fossil Energywww.hceco.com
Thank You
H
C
E