Overview of MADD: Reasons for Success - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of MADD: Reasons for Success

Description:

1,400,000 drivers arrested for driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence ... Account for half or more of all drivers arrested each year for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Lawrence126
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of MADD: Reasons for Success


1
LIFESAVERS 2006
State Conference on Highway Safety Priorities
Louisville, Kentucky April 24 -26, 2006
2
Strategies for Addressing the Higher Risk Driver
Repeat, High BAC, and DWS Offenders
  • 2006 LIFESAVERS CONFERENCE
  • Louisville, Kentucky
  • April 24, 2006

3
The Impaired Driving ProblemUnited States
  • 16,694 alcohol-related traffic fatalities in 2004
  • An estimated 500,000 people injured in
    alcohol-related traffic crashes each year
  • 51 billion in annual costs to society
  • 1,400,000 drivers arrested for driving while
    intoxicated or driving under the influence

4
DUI Enforcement in the U.S.
  • 1,400,000 drivers arrested for DWI/DUI each year
  • 1 DUI arrest for every 135 licensed drivers
  • 1 DUI arrest for every 772 reported episodes of
    driving after drinking
  • 1 DUI arrest for every 88 episodes of driving
    over the BAC limit
  • 1 DUI arrest for every 6 stops by police for
    suspicion of DWI
  • 120 DUI arrests for every drunk driver involved
    in a fatal crash
  • Sources FBI Uniform Crime Report Zador et
    al. (2000) NHTSA, FARS

5
Estimated of DUIs Caught(One Year Period)
6
Impaired Driving Countermeasures
  • General Deterrence we must deter people from
    driving impaired in the first place e.g. tough
    laws, publicized and visible enforcement,
    alternative transportation
  • Specific Deterrence once caught, we must have
    effective sanctions for offenders e.g. vehicle
    sanctions, interlocks, treatment

7
Alcohol-Related Traffic Fatalities-35
8
Proportion of all Fatally Injured Drivers
Estimated to Have Been Legally Intoxicated
(BACgt.08)-37
9
Proportion of Fatally Injured Driverswith Very
High BAC gt.20-41
10
What Approaches Are Being Taken?
  • Do more of what is effective (science-based,
    data-driven strategies)
  • Fix the system (too complicated, too cumbersome,
    many loopholes)
  • Focus on target populations (repeat offenders,
    hard core drinking drivers, 21-34 year old males,
    etc.)
  • Limit alcohol availability (prohibit over-service
    practices, enforce underage laws, increase taxes,
    better control of advertising, etc.)
  • Find other innovative solutions (better
    alternative transportation, use of technology,
    DUI Task Forces)

11
Definition Higher Risk Driver
  • Offenders convicted of a second or subsequent DUI
    offense within five years a traditional
    repeat offender
  • Offenders convicted of a DUI with a BAC of .15 or
    higher
  • Offenders convicted of a driving-while-suspended
    offense, when the suspension was a result of a
    prior DUI

12
Other High Risk Drinking Drivers
  • Problem Drinkers or Hardcore Drinking Drivers
  • Binge Drinkers (5 drinks per session)
  • Persistent Drinking Drivers
  • Repeat Offenders not identified as such (e.g.
    diversion programs)

13
Repeat DUI Offenders
14
The Repeat Intoxicated Driver Problem
  • Repeat offenders
  • Account for about 1/3 of all drivers arrested
    each year for driving under the influence (DUI)
  • Are over represented as drinking drivers in fatal
    crashes and account for 10-20 of all drinking
    drivers in fatal crashes
  • Are defined as drivers convicted of DUI more than
    once in a 5 year period

15
Repeat Intoxicated Drivers
  • Continue to drink and drive at illegal blood
    alcohol concentrations (BACs) over and over again
  • Are obviously not affected by sanctions for their
    first DUI conviction
  • Often have a history of other behavior problems
  • Often have an alcohol and/or other substance
    abuse problem or have a heavy episodic (binge)
    drinking problem
  • Rarely feel too impaired to drive and to most,
    DUI is not a serious issue

16
Repeat Intoxicated DriversWhat do they say?
  • Many fear arrest and stop drinking following
    arrest - however, their DUI behavior returns
  • Offenders reduce their DUI behavior when police
    presence is more certain (e.g., checkpoints)
  • They fear license revocation, but many drive on
    revoked licenses
  • Contact with a concerned individual (judge,
    probation officer) often makes a difference

17
High BAC (.15) Offenders
18
The High BAC (.15) Driver Problem
  • High BAC (.15) Offenders
  • Account for half or more of all drivers arrested
    each year for driving under the influence (DUI).
  • Are overrepresented as drinking drivers in fatal
    crashes and account for over half of all drinking
    drivers in fatal crashes.

19
High BAC (.15) Drivers
  • Impairment decrements are on the order of 50 -
    60 for drivers with BACs .08-.09.
  • Can you imagine the decrements for drivers at
    BACs of .15?
  • Most laboratory studies are unable to dose
    subjects to these high levels.

20
High BAC (.15) Drivers
  • Many continue to drink and drive at very high
    blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) over and over
    again.
  • Many have an alcohol and/or other substance abuse
    problem or have a heavy episodic (binge) drinking
    problem.
  • Most rarely feel too impaired to drive and to
    most, DUI is not a serious issue.

21
Distributions of BAC for Drivers Involved in
Fatal Crashes (excluding BAC0), 2000
Source FARS
22
Drinks and BAC in Two Hours
23
Relative Risk of Being Killed as a Driver in a
Single Vehicle Crash by BAC Level Zador, et al,
2000)
.15
382-15,560 Times
.14
.10
29-241 Times
.09
.08
11-52 Times
.07
.05
6-17 Times
.04
.02
3-5 Times
BAC
Relative to drivers at .00 BAC
24
Driving While Suspended (DWS) Offenders
25
High Risk DriversDriving While Suspended DWS
  • 50-75 of DUI convicted drivers continue to drive
    with suspended licenses
  • Well over 20 of drinking drivers in fatal
    crashes are unlicensed
  • One third of suspended 2nd time DUI offenders and
    two-thirds of suspended 3rd time DUI offenders
    either get involved in a crash or receive a
    moving violation during their suspension
  • Unlicensed drivers are 3.7 times more likely to
    be involved in a fatal crash than valid licensed
    drivers

26
Effective Sanctions for DUI
  • Licensing sanctions
  • Vehicle actions
  • Assessment and treatment/rehabilitation
  • Sentencing options and alternatives to jail

27
Generalizations
  • Consistency in sentencing balanced with needs of
    individual
  • For repeat offenders, sentencing shifts to
    separation from the vehicle
  • Assessment and evaluation of alcohol problem
    should precede sentencing
  • Vehicle actions reduce recidivism
  • Intensive probation, frequent contact with judge,
    close monitoring of compliance (e.g. DUI Courts)
    appears to be effective for multiple offenders

28
Reducing Recidivism
  • Assess alcohol problem
  • Select appropriate sanctions
  • Provide treatment
  • Monitor compliance
  • Correct noncompliance
  • Impose vehicle actions (where appropriate)

29
Interlocks Are Effective
Interlock Data 31 Re-arrests/2185
Interlocked/0.45yrs3.15/yr
30
Strategies That Impact the Higher Risk Driver
  • Detecting the Higher Risk Driver
  • Sobriety Checkpoints
  • Standardized Field Sobriety Test training
  • Disabling the Higher Risk Driver
  • Sanctions to prevent offenders from driving
  • License plate confiscation
  • Vehicle immobilization
  • Vehicle impoundment
  • Restricting the Higher Risk Driver
  • Alcohol ignition interlock devices
  • Treating the Higher Risk Driver
  • Education and treatment

31
Contact Information
  • James Pendergraff
  • Law Enforcement Liaison
  • Governors Highway Safety Program
  • 2230 Deep Creek Drive
  • Madisonville, Ky. 42431
  • 270-871-2040
  • E-mail jim.pendergraff_at_hotmail.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com