The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California

Description:

The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California s Implementation of No Child Left Behind Coachella Valley Unified School District Dr. Paul Grafton – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: pau7153
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California


1
The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of
Californias Implementation of No Child Left
Behind
  • Coachella Valley Unified School District
  • Dr. Paul Grafton
  • Alma González
  • One Voice Conference
  • July 6, 2008

2
Coachella Valley Unified School DistrictThermal,
California 2007 2008
  • 1,200 Square Miles Attendance Area
  • 17,750 Students
  • 98 Hispanic
  • 91 Free/Reduced Lunch
  • 25 Migrant
  • 75 Speak Spanish in the Home
  • 64 English Language Learners

3
Statement of Our Beliefs
  • Full Support of NCLB Accountability
  • ELL Students Should Learn to Read, Write, and
    Speak English to the Level of Native Speaker as
    Soon as Possible
  • A Child takes from 4 to 7 years to Reach Academic
    English Language Proficiency (CELDT Level 4 or
    Higher)

4
Implementation of NCLB in California
  • Adequate Yearly Progress Federal Measure
    Based on Percentage of Students At or Above
    Proficient
  • Academic Performance Index State Measure
    Based on Growth in Points on a Scale of 200 - 1000

5
California Testing Program- English/Language
Arts, Math, Science, and History Social Science
  • California Standards Test gr. 2 through 11
  • CAPA gr. 2 through 11
  • California Achievement Test gr. 3 7
  • California High School Exit Exam gr. 10, 11 and
    12

6
Language of the Tests Used to Calculate AYP/API
  • All Tests are printed in English
  • No translation into Spanish by the teacher other
    than the Directions
  • Word to Word English/Spanish glossary can be used
    for Math and other content areas but not ELA
  • Students who can not Read, Write, or Speak
    English may be Tested Together and/or have Extra
    Time but within one Sitting

7
Language of the Tests, cont
  • Test Results of English Language Learners are
    included in
  • AYP beginning the Second Year of Attendance
  • API beginning the First Year of Attendance
  • (Second Year as of 2007)

8
What Does NCLB Say?
  • NCLB allows testing in the primary language for
    three years and up to two additional years on a
    case by case basis and the results to be counted
    in the calculations of AYP States such as Ohio
    and New Mexico make use of this flexibility,
    California does not.

9
Reading First
  • NCLB Reading Program K - 3
  • Evaluation Based on Reading First Achievement
    Index (RFAI) Score
  • District Academic Achievement Comparisons and
    Continued Funding Based on RFAI
  • 70 of RFAI comes from California Testing Program
    CST and CAT/6

10
Determining the English Language Proficiency of
English Language Learners
  • Students (K 12) whose Primary Language is
    Spanish are given the California English Language
    Development Test in Listening, Speaking, Reading,
    and Writing which result in an Overall Score
  • Students are placed into one of Five Categories
    Beginning, Early Intermediate, Intermediate,
    Early Advanced, or Advanced

11
English Language Proficiency, cont
  • To move from an English Language Learner to
    Fluent English Proficient, a Student must be at
    the Overall Early Advanced Level with No Sections
    of the Tests below the Intermediate Level
  • The NCLB mechanism for evaluating Adequate
    Progress of English Language attainment is Title
    III AMAO 1, AMAO 2, and AMAO 3

12
What are the CELDT Levels of Students New to our
District?
  • In 2005 2006 of the 2,374 students who took
    the Initial CELDT
  • 46 were CELDT Level 1
  • 60 were CELDT Level 1 or 2
  • 81 were CELDT Level 1, 2, or 3

13
What are the CELDT Levels of Students New to our
District?
  • In 2006 2007 of the 1,904 students who took the
    Initial CELDT
  • 60 are CELDT Level 1
  • 75 are CELDT Level 1 or 2
  • 91 are CELDT Level 1, 2, or 3

14
Title III NCLBs Accountability Measure for
ELLs English Language Attainment Are We
Successful at Teaching our Students English?
  • 2004 AMAO 1 Yes AMAO 2 Yes AMAO 3 No
  • 2005 AMAO 1 Yes AMAO 2 No by lt2 AMAO 3
    No (ELA 13.2/Math 18.7)
  • 2006 AMAO 1 Yes AMAO 2 No by lt1 AMAO 3
    No (ELA 14/Math 21.7)
  • 2007 (CELDT rescaled) AMAO 1 No by 7.6
    AMAO 2 No by 7.7 AMAO 3 (ELA 15.8 No/Math
    24.3 Yes)

15
Failure to Meet NCLB Goals
  • There is an increasing penalty
  • Must Provide Transfers to Parents who Request
    that their Student goes to Another School
  • Must Arrange Vendor-provided Tutoring
  • Change School Structure
  • State Take Over or Close School

16
Questions We Asked
  • Does Giving a Test to a Student in a Language the
    Student does not Understand affect the Estimates
    of Academic Achievement the Test Reports for that
    Student?
  • If so, what is the effect on the NCLB
    Accountability Measures calculated from those
    Test Results?

17
Methodology
  • Matched Case
  • Isolated Students by CELDT Level
  • Applied API/AYP inclusion/exclusion rules to
    Students in each CELDT level
  • Applied API/AYP calculations/cutpoints to Student
    test results in each CELDT Level

18
Adequate Yearly Progress2006 2007
19
Academic Performance Index2006 2007
20
Adequate Yearly Progress2005 2006
21
Academic Performance Index2005 2006
22
Adequate Yearly Progress 2004 2005
23
Academic Performance Index 2004 2005
24
Academic English Language Proficiency
  • What would Happen if only the Scores of ELL
    Students who had attained Academic English
    Language Proficiency on the CELDT (Early Advanced
    or Advanced) were used in calculation of AYP/API?

25
Changes from CDEs AccountabilityProgress Report
2007
26
Changes from CDEs AccountabilityProgress Report
2006
27
Changes from CDEs AccountabilityProgress Report
2005
28
Solutions? Further Research?
  • Continue to test all students but EXCLUDE CELDT
    1, 2, and 3 scores from AYP/API calculations, OR
  • Continue to test all students but SUBSTITUTE the
    SABE/Aprenda/STS scores for CST scores in AYP/API
    calculations, OR
  • Continue to test all students but INCLUDE the
    SABE/Aprenda/STS scores in AYP/API calculations.

29
The Myth of Similar Schools Ranking for Schools
with Large Numbers of English Language Learners
Anecdotal
  • Next time you check the CDE website for your
    similar schools list of comparable schools
  • Go to Data Quest CDE web site for CELDT
    reporting
  • Look at the CELDT Levels of those schools the CDE
    lists as similar to your school
  • If their number of students at CELDT Levels 1, 2,
    and 3 are lower than your schools number of
    students at CELDT Levels 1, 2, and 3
  • Then they are not Similar Schools

30
Questions?
  • Dr. Paul Grafton paulg_at_coachella.k12.ca.us
  • Alma Gonzalez agonzalez_at_coachella.k12.ca.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com