Sand Sampling Apparatus - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Sand Sampling Apparatus

Description:

SAND SAMPLING APPARATUS Eglin Air Force Base Gina Teofilak Richard Klimas Dan Mortensen Ruben De Sousa Overview Size: Length 96 Width 27 Height 24 Weight ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: engFsuEd73
Learn more at: https://eng.fsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sand Sampling Apparatus


1
Sand Sampling Apparatus
  • Eglin Air Force Base
  • Gina Teofilak
  • Richard Klimas
  • Dan Mortensen
  • Ruben De Sousa

2
  • Overview
  • Introduction
  • Current Design
  • Maintenance and Safety
  • Design Specifications
  • Motion Control
  • Motion Control Components
  • Obstacles
  • Cost Analysis
  • Future Plans

3
introduction
  • Introduction

Projectile
Fractured sand
Target shot line
3
4
Eglin Visit 10/31/2008
  • Experimental Changes

Newly added forklift straddles
4
5
Current Design
  • Current Design
  • Uses 2 linear motion actuators for Y and Z
    motion
  • ¾ inch ACME threaded rod
  • Designed to be a lead screw
  • Each will have an aluminum extrusion frame
  • Y and Z are different sizes
  • ¼ inch aluminum rod stabilizers for support
  • motion to be attained from 2 DC motors
  • Z- actuator is mounted directly to the Y-
    actuator
  • Legs of Y- actuator mount to wheels to produce X
    motion

5
6
Current Design
  • Motion in the X-direction
  • Chain and sprocket motion
  • Wheels fit inside aluminum extrusion
    grooves
  • DC motor attached to sprocket
  • Chain is clamped to actuator
  • Clamp has teeth of same pitch as the chain
  • Chain mount is adjustable for chain
  • tension

6
7
  • Future Considerations for X Axis
  • Instead of wheels, an eight foot long steel rod
    is considered with linear
  • bearings
  • Steel rod will make it safer for installation
    than wheel base
  • Prevents tipping when installing onto experiment
  • Wheels might tip
  • Steel rod is cheaper

8
  • Maintenance and Safety
  • Material are corrosive resistant
  • Threaded rod is hardened stainless steel
  • Will not corrode based on interaction with other
    materials used
  • Experiment is only ran one time a month
  • When not used it will be stored in indoor
    atmosphere
  • To keep sand out of moving parts
  • Bearings with brush guards will used
  • Plastic accordion style rod boots will cover the
    lead screws
  • Plastic guards will be mounted to keep sand out
    of x- actuator tracks
  • Lubrication is not required
  • Bearings are shielded
  • ACME lead screw does not require lubrication
  • Safety
  • Chain guard
  • Safety stickers
  • By all moving parts and electrical components

9
Design Specifications
  • Size
  • Length 96
  • Width 27
  • Height 24
  • Weight
  • Mechanism 70 lbs.
  • Vacuum 20 lbs.
  • Electronics 5 lbs.
  • Vacuum
  • Power 6.5 Hp peak
  • Volume 20 gallons
  • (supplied by Eglin)
  • Mechanism Speed
  • 2 in/sec

10
Motion Control
  • Motion control
  • 3 DC motors/ controllers
  • microprocessor
  • encoders/ switches
  • Y axis motion
  • threaded rod
  • aluminum rods for support
  • Z axis motion
  • threaded rod
  • vacuum tube rigidly attached
  • Control Sequence
  • z axis ½-1
  • y axis 24
  • x axis 4

10
11
Motion Control Schematic
Required Torque Needed (ozin) Required Torque Needed (ozin)
X movement 20
Y movement 40
Z movement 20
  • Control System Schematic
  • DC Power supply
  • Microprocessor stores code
  • Motor Controllers
  • Distances components
  • Motors
  • Geared motors
  • Required Torque

12
Motion Control Components
  • Why use different distance components?
  • Encoders
  • Convert rotations of shaft to code
  • Precise measurement of distance
  • Can be used to input exact position
  • Switches
  • Simple short circuit switches
  • Easier to program
  • Cheaper

13
Motion Control Obstacles
  • Make Screens
  • They are a problem
  • Break and Deform
  • Slightly unequally spaced
  • Removed for simplicity
  • Suggested from the sponsor
  • Projectile Entry Tube
  • Adds safety to the experiment
  • Cannot be removed
  • Mechanism is designed
  • to avoid

14
Cost Analysis
  • Shipping
  • Machine Shop
  • Testing Facilities
  • Possible testing table

Option Total (USD)
Wheels and corrosion res.chain 1387.53
Wheels and non-corrosion res.chain 1347.33
Rods and corrosion res.chain 1281.94
Rods and non-corrosion res.chain 1241.74
  • Current design is more expensive than using the
    rod
  • Material Cost
  • Donations

15
Future Plans
  • Purchase Parts
  • Machine and Assemble
  • Write the program
  • Test
  • Write Procedures
  • Make modifications
  • Conduct the Experiment
  • Meet the Class Deliverables

December 2 January 6
January 6 April 24
16
Cost References
REFERENCES
  • Cooper, William Bill, MSgt Wes Schuler, AFRL/RW
  • Munitions Directorate
  • Air Force Research Laboratory
  • Mortensen, Charles, Owner, Dynatech Associates
  • Dr. Chiang Shih, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering,
    Mechanical
  • Dr. Daudi Waryoba, FAMU-FSU College of
    Engineering, Mechanical

Carbon Stick tape http//www.2spi.com/catalog
/spec_prep/cond_adhes-discs.shtml Aluminum
Extrusion Dynatech Associates McMASTER-CARR
http//www.mcmaster.com/
16
17
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com