Title: HUJI-03
1Financial Risk Management
- Zvi Wiener
- mswiener_at_mscc.huji.ac.il
- 02-588-3049
2Financial Risk Management
- Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill
- Chapter 7
- Portfolio Risk, Analytical Methods
3Portfolio of Random Variables
4Portfolio of Random Variables
5Product of Random Variables
- Credit loss derives from the product of the
probability of default and the loss given default.
When X1 and X2 are independent
6Transformation of Random Variables
- Consider a zero coupon bond
If r6 and T10 years, V 55.84, we wish to
estimate the probability that the bond price
falls below 50. This corresponds to the yield
7.178.
7Example
- The probability of this event can be derived from
the distribution of yields. - Assume that yields change are normally
distributed with mean zero and volatility 0.8. - Then the probability of this change is 7.06
8Marginal VaR
- How risk sensitive is my portfolio to increase in
size of each position? - - calculate VaR for the entire portfolio VaRPX
- - increase position A by one unit (say 1 of the
portfolio) - - calculate VaR of the new portfolio VaRPa Y
- - incremental risk contribution to the portfolio
by A Z X-Y - i.e. Marginal VaR of A is Z X-Y
- Marginal VaR can be Negative what does this
mean...?
9with minor corrections
10Marginal VaR by currency.....
with minor corrections
11Incremental VaR
- Risk contribution of each position in my
portfolio. - - calculate VaR for the entire portfolio VaRP X
- - remove A from the portfolio
- - calculate VaR of the portfolio without A
VaRP-A Y - - Risk contribution to the portfolio by A Z
X-Y - i.e. Incremental VaR of A is Z X-Y
- Incremental VaR can be Negative what does this
mean...?
12Incremental VaR by Risk Type...
with minor corrections
13Incremental VaR by Currency....
with minor corrections
14VaR decomposition
VaR
Incremental VaR
Marginal VaR
Portfolio VaR
Component VaR
Position in asset A
100
15Example of VaR decomposition
Currency Position Individual Marginal
Component Contribution VaR VaR VaR to
VaR in CAD 2M 165,000 0.0528
105,630 41 EUR 1M 198,000 0.1521
152,108 59 Total 3M Undiversified
363K Diversified 257,738 100
16Barings Example
- Long 7.7B Nikkei futures
- Short of 16B JGB futures
- ?NK5.83, ?JGB1.18, ?11.4
VaR951.65??P 835M VaR992.33
??P1.18B Actual loss was 1.3B
17The Optimal Hedge Ratio
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- ?S - change in value of the inventory
- ?F - change in value of the one futures
- N - number of futures you buy/sell
18The Optimal Hedge Ratio
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
Minimum variance hedge ratio
19Hedge Ratio as Regression Coefficient
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The optimal amount can also be derived as the
slope coefficient of a regression ?s/s on ?f/f
20Optimal Hedge
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- One can measure the quality of the optimal hedge
ratio in terms of the amount by which we have
decreased the variance of the original portfolio.
If R is low the hedge is not effective!
21Optimal Hedge
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- At the optimum the variance is
22FRM-99, Question 66
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The hedge ratio is the ratio of derivatives to a
spot position (vice versa) that achieves an
objective such as minimizing or eliminating risk.
Suppose that the standard deviation of quarterly
changes in the price of a commodity is 0.57, the
standard deviation of quarterly changes in the
price of a futures contract on the commodity is
0.85, and the correlation between the two changes
is 0.3876. What is the optimal hedge ratio for a
three-month contract? - A. 0.1893
- B. 0.2135
- C. 0.2381
- D. 0.2599
23FRM-99, Question 66
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The hedge ratio is the ratio of derivatives to a
spot position (vice versa) that achieves an
objective such as minimizing or eliminating risk.
Suppose that the standard deviation of quarterly
changes in the price of a commodity is 0.57, the
standard deviation of quarterly changes in the
price of a futures contract on the commodity is
0.85, and the correlation between the two changes
is 0.3876. What is the optimal hedge ratio for a
three-month contract? - A. 0.1893
- B. 0.2135
- C. 0.2381
- D. 0.2599
24Example
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- Airline company needs to purchase 10,000 tons of
jet fuel in 3 months. One can use heating oil
futures traded on NYMEX. Notional for each
contract is 42,000 gallons. We need to check
whether this hedge can be efficient.
25Example
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- Spot price of jet fuel 277/ton.
- Futures price of heating oil 0.6903/gallon.
- The standard deviation of jet fuel price rate of
changes over 3 months is 21.17, that of futures
18.59, and the correlation is 0.8243.
26Compute
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The notional and standard deviation f the
unhedged fuel cost in . - The optimal number of futures contracts to
buy/sell, rounded to the closest integer. - The standard deviation of the hedged fuel cost in
dollars.
27Solution
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The notional is Qs2,770,000, the SD in is
- ?(?s/s)sQs0.2117?277 ?10,000 586,409
- the SD of one futures contract is
- ?(?f/f)fQf0.1859?0.6903?42,000 5,390
- with a futures notional
- fQf 0.6903?42,000 28,993.
28Solution
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The cash position corresponds to a liability
(payment), hence we have to buy futures as a
protection. - ?sf 0.8243 ? 0.2117/0.1859 0.9387
- ?sf 0.8243 ? 0.2117 ? 0.1859 0.03244
- The optimal hedge ratio is
- N ?sf Qs?s/Qf?f 89.7, or 90 contracts.
29Solution
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- ?2unhedged (586,409)2 343,875,515,281
- - ?2SF/ ?2F -(2,605,268,452/5,390)2
- ?hedged 331,997
- The hedge has reduced the SD from 586,409 to
331,997. - R2 67.95 ( 0.82432)
30FRM-99, Question 67
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- In the early 90s, Metallgesellshaft, a German oil
company, suffered a loss of 1.33B in their
hedging program. They rolled over short dated
futures to hedge long term exposure created
through their long-term fixed price contracts to
sell heating oil and gasoline to their customers.
After a time, they abandoned the hedge because of
large negative cashflow. The cashflow pressure
was due to the fact that MG had to hedge its
exposure by - A. Short futures and there was a decline in oil
price - B. Long futures and there was a decline in oil
price - C. Short futures and there was an increase in oil
price - D. Long futures and there was an increase in oil
price
31FRM-99, Question 67
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- In the early 90s, Metallgesellshaft, a German oil
company, suffered a loss of 1.33B in their
hedging program. They rolled over short dated
futures to hedge long term exposure created
through their long-term fixed price contracts to
sell heating oil and gasoline to their customers.
After a time, they abandoned the hedge because of
large negative cashflow. The cashflow pressure
was due to the fact that MG had to hedge its
exposure by - A. Short futures and there was a decline in oil
price - B. Long futures and there was a decline in oil
price - C. Short futures and there was an increase in oil
price - D. Long futures and there was an increase in oil
price
32Duration Hedging
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
33Duration Hedging
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
If we have a target duration DV we can get it by
using
34Example 1
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- A portfolio manager has a bond portfolio worth
10M with a modified duration of 6.8 years, to be
hedged for 3 months. The current futures prices
is 93-02, with a notional of 100,000. We assume
that the duration can be measured by CTD, which
is 9.2 years. - Compute
- a. The notional of the futures contract
- b.The number of contracts to by/sell for optimal
protection.
35Example 1
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The notional is
- (932/32)/100?100,000 93,062.5
- The optimal number to sell is
Note that DVBP of the futures is
9.2?93,062?0.0185
36Example 2
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- On February 2, a corporate treasurer wants to
hedge a July 17 issue of 5M of CP with a
maturity of 180 days, leading to anticipated
proceeds of 4.52M. The September Eurodollar
futures trades at 92, and has a notional amount
of 1M. - Compute
- a. The current dollar value of the futures
contract. - b. The number of futures to buy/sell for optimal
hedge.
37Example 2
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The current dollar value is given by
- 10,000?(100-0.25(100-92)) 980,000
- Note that duration of futures is 3 months, since
this contract refers to 3-month LIBOR.
38Example 2
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- If Rates increase, the cost of borrowing will be
higher. We need to offset this by a gain, or a
short position in the futures. The optimal
number of contracts is
Note that DVBP of the futures is
0.25?1,000,000?0.0125
39FRM-00, Question 73
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- What assumptions does a duration-based hedging
scheme make about the way in which interest rates
move? - A. All interest rates change by the same amount
- B. A small parallel shift in the yield curve
- C. Any parallel shift in the term structure
- D. Interest rates movements are highly correlated
40FRM-00, Question 73
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- What assumptions does a duration-based hedging
scheme make about the way in which interest rates
move? - A. All interest rates change by the same amount
- B. A small parallel shift in the yield curve
- C. Any parallel shift in the term structure
- D. Interest rates movements are highly correlated
41FRM-99, Question 61
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- If all spot interest rates are increased by one
basis point, a value of a portfolio of swaps will
increase by 1,100. How many Eurodollar futures
contracts are needed to hedge the portfolio? - A. 44
- B. 22
- C. 11
- D. 1100
42FRM-99, Question 61
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The DVBP of the portfolio is 1,100.
- The DVBP of the futures is 25.
- Hence the ratio is 1100/25 44
43FRM-99, Question 109
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- Roughly how many 3-month LIBOR Eurodollar futures
contracts are needed to hedge a position in a
200M, 5 year, receive fixed swap? - A. Short 250
- B. Short 3,200
- C. Short 40,000
- D. Long 250
44FRM-99, Question 109
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The dollar duration of a 5-year 6 par bond is
about 4.3 years. Hence the DVBP of the fixed leg
is about - 200M?4.3?0.0186,000.
- The floating leg has short duration - small
impact decreasing the DVBP of the fixed leg. - DVBP of futures is 25.
- Hence the ratio is 86,000/25 3,440. Answer A
45Beta Hedging
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- ? represents the systematic risk, ? - the
intercept (not a source of risk) and ? - residual.
A stock index futures contract
46Beta Hedging
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
The optimal N is
The optimal hedge with a stock index futures is
given by beta of the cash position times its
value divided by the notional of the futures
contract.
47Example
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- A portfolio manager holds a stock portfolio worth
10M, with a beta of 1.5 relative to SP500. The
current SP index futures price is 1400, with a
multiplier of 250. - Compute
- a. The notional of the futures contract
- b. The optimal number of contracts for hedge.
48Example
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The notional of the futures contract is
- 250?1,400 350,000
- The optimal number of contracts for hedge is
The quality of the hedge will depend on the size
of the residual risk in the portfolio.
49P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- A typical US stock has correlation of 50 with
SP. - Using the regression effectiveness we find that
the volatility of the hedged portfolio is still
about - (1-0.52)0.5 87 of the unhedged volatility for
a typical stock. - If we wish to hedge an industry index with SP
futures, the correlation is about 75 and the
unhedged volatility is 66 of its original level. - The lower number shows that stock market hedging
is more effective for diversified portfolios.
50FRM-00, Question 93
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- A fund manages an equity portfolio worth 50M
with a beta of 1.8. Assume that there exists an
index call option contract with a delta of 0.623
and a value of 0.5M. How many options contracts
are needed to hedge the portfolio? - A. 169
- B. 289
- C. 306
- D. 321
51FRM-00, Question 93
P. Jorion Handbook, Ch 14
- The optimal hedge ratio is
- N -1.8?50,000,000/(0.623?500,000)289
52Financial Risk Management
- Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill
- Chapter 8
- Forecasting Risks and Correlations
53Volatility
- Unobservable, time varying, clustering
- Moving average rt daily returns
Implied volatility (smile, smirk, etc.)
54GARCH Estimation
- Generalized Autoregressive heteroskedastic
- Heteroskedastic means time varying
55EWMA
- Exponentially Weighted Moving Average
? - is decay factor
56Home assignment
57VaR system
Risk factors
Portfolio
Historical data
positions
Model
Mapping
Distribution of risk factors
VaR method
Exposures
VaR
58Ideas
- Monte Carlo for financial assets
- Stress testing
- VaR OG
- Collar example
- ESOP hedging
- Swaps Credit Derivatives
- Linkage
- Your personal financial Risk