Title: ACT As A Brief Intervention Model
1ACT As A Brief Intervention Model
- Kirk Strosahl Ph.D.
- Patricia Robinson Ph.D.
- www.behavioral-health-integration.com
- mconsultinggrp_at_embarq.mail.com
2Why Brief Interventions?
- Average number of therapy sessions 4-6
- Modal number of sessions 1
- Dose effect analyses fail to show linear trend
between session number and outcome - 50 of therapy gain within first 4-8 sessions
- Rapid response literature growing
3Basic Issues in Brief Intervention
- Competing Theories of Human Suffering
- Bio-Medical model
- Emphasizes pathology, symptoms and syndromes,
disease concepts, and a focus on somatic
treatment - Less weight attached to person and environment
interactions, context for behavior and the role
of language in shaping dysfunctional behavior - Many syndromes share the same symptoms and
respond to the same treatments - Emphasizes treatment over time
4Basic Issues in Brief Intervention
- Competing Theories of Human Suffering
- Stress-coping-vulnerability models
- Emphasis on delicate relationship between stress
and coping responses - Symptoms occur when coping responses are
insufficient to manage stress over time - Emphasis on building positive coping responses
and/or decreasing stress - Interventions tend to be more situation specific
and time limited
5Basic Issues in Brief Intervention
- Competing Theories of Change
- Theory of big change (cure)
- People are broken and need to be fixed
- Success if defined by the elimination of symptoms
and eliminating underlying causes - Treatments tend to be staged and longer
- Goal setting often emphasizes large changes in
behavioral, cognitive and emotional functioning - Historically has been very ineffective with more
complicated patients
6Basic Issues in Brief Intervention
- Competing Theories of Change
- Theory of strategic change (function)
- From a person-environment perspective, small
behavior change can have a domino like effect - Evidence shows that small changes are easier to
make than big changes - Focus on using coping skills that work and
stopping what doesnt work - Small change builds self-efficacy or the
conviction that one can make changes - Basis of many evidence based treatments
7Basic Issues in Brief Intervention
- Competing Theories of Agency
- Provider driven change (therapist in charge)
- Places patient in subordinate role
- Provider assumes more responsibility for solving
the patients problems - Generally requires longer and more frequent
contacts - Runs the risk of engendering dependence,
passivity, low motivation for change and
non-adherence
8Basic Issues In Brief Intervention
- Competing Theories of Agency
- Patient driven change (patient is in charge)
- Places patient in co-equal role with provider
- Responsibility for behavior change shifted to
patient - Emphasis on patient education, basic goal setting
with consultation from provider - Change occurs in real life settings, not in the
providers office - Leads to greater motivation, adherence and better
delineation of boundaries
9Basic Brief Intervention Theory
- Gain a single point of entry into the problem
- This allows you to work with more concentration
in one area without consuming more time - If you try to do too many different
interventions, you will automatically require
additional sessions - Remember the 80-20 rule Most of the gain comes
from the first best guess intervention
10Basic Brief Intervention Theory
- Change the frame of reference
- A basic principle of brief strategic therapy
- When you recast the problem in a different
11Basic Brief Intervention Theory
- The problem is not the problem the solution
is the problem
12Basic Brief Intervention Theory
- Emphasize acceptance of the ongoing stream of
experience while behaving differently
13Basic Brief Intervention Theory
- Get the patient to own the need for and ability
to change
14Basic Brief Intervention Theory
- Focus on increasing positive behaviors, rather
than on eliminating negative behaviors
15Basic Brief Intervention Theory
- Focus on picking one small behavior change
16ACT Brief Intervention Principles
- Normalize and validate toxic private events
that are the natural sequalae of being alive - Reframe the issue from whether to to how to
experience what is there to be experienced - Emphasize approach toward rather than retreat
from response ableness - Use spontaneous contact with mindfulness to help
patient see an alternative - Get the patient to stand for something
- Focus on small, value consistent actions
17ACT Brief Intervention Strategies
- Is there anything in front of you here that you
are not big enough to have? - What if the goal were not to feel good, but to
feel it good? - Are you having this? Or is it having you?
- Looks like the more you try to control this
thing, the more uncontrollable it becomes. What
about just letting it be what it is? - What would make what you are going through here
honorable, legitimate and purposeful? - You dont have to do this perfectlyjust get from
point A to point B.
18ACT Brief Intervention Strategies
- What do you think life is trying to teach you
here? - Is there anything about how youre feeling, right
here, right now that you would not be willing to
feel? - What do you want to stand for here?
- What will make you feel like youve grown as a
human being when this situation is done? - It sounds like your mind is telling you to do
things that your experience says doesnt work. - If you were free to choose how to respond here,
what would you like to do? - Is there anything standing in the way of you and
what you want to be about here?