Title: Introducing Risk Management Systems: Some Common Problems
1FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT IN EMERGING MARKETS
- Introducing Risk Management Systems Some Common
Problems
Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, February
20-21,2000
Paulina Beato Infrastructure and Financial
Markets Division Inter-American Development Bank
2 Purposes
- Present seven recommendations for an efficient
risk management system - The recommendations are based on the
recommendations from the Basle Committee and
Group of 30 - Identify common problems for following such
recommendations in emerging markets - Discuss some solutions for dealing with the
common problems -
3Definition
- A Risk Management System is a systematic,
objective and homogeneous method for setting
criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, in
order to - Accept or reject financial risks
- Analyze and evaluate the existing risks
- Modify position due to external changes
- Guarantee that all risks are within the limits
established by the institution
All risks should be included
4Traditional View
Business 2
Business 1
Market
Credit
Market
Credit
Legal and Operational
Legal and Operational
Global Risk in Finantial Institutions
Liquidity
Treasury
Each Unit Manages and control all Risks
5Modern View
Global Risk Finantial Institution
Operational
Market
Operational
Manager
Treasury
Legal
Market
Credit
Market
Credit
Legal
Control
Control
6Standard Recommendations
- Relevant Role of Top Management
- Independence between Risk Control Units and
Business and Operational Units - Systematic Method for Managing and Controlling
Credit Risk - Systematic Method for Managing and Controlling
Market Risk - Consistent Risk Measurement on Daily Basis
- Management and Control of Legal and Operational
Risks - Qualified and Experienced Staff
7Issues
- This presentation addresses the following issues
for each recommendation - Meaning and basis of the recommendation
- Problems in implementing each recommendation in
emerging markets - Approaches for solving these problems in emerging
market environments
8Role of Top Management
- The Board of Directors and the Executive
management should define and establish the risk
management and control policies - Risks may entail large losses and top management
is responsible for protecting the institution
value - Top Management should define (on behalf of
shareholders) an acceptable trade-off between
risk and return - Top Management should ensure that maximum
expected losses are backed by sufficient equity - The Board of Directors and the Executive
management should approve the procedures for
implementing the policies - Policies without control systems are not
effective - Staff is reluctant to accept control systems
9Role of Top Management
- What happens in real world financial
institutions? - The Board of Directors and the Executive
management - are involved in policies and control systems
related to credit risks - often forget policies and control systems related
to market risks - Top Management decisions regarding credit risk
and market risk are not consistent - Top management sets strict limits for credit
risk, but does not set limits for market risks - Information regarding market risks usually does
not reach top management - Measures of market and credit risks are not
comparable - Top Management decisions often skip the risk
limits set by themselves
10Role of Top Management
- Why the Board of Directors and the Executive
management are not usually involved in managing
and controlling market risk? - They may be unaware of the market risks
associated with financial activities - Banking deposits fall when interest rates go up
- They may believe that market risk only appears in
sophisticated transactions - We do not have market risk because we do not
operate with derivative products - They may ignore the correlation between market
and credit risk - The risk of insolvency increases when interest
rates go up
11Role of Top Management
- What may promote effective involvement of Top
Management? - Bank regulation and supervision requirements
- Rating agencies requirements regarding control
and management systems for both market and credit
risks - Investors demand for better disclosure of risk
management practices - Fear of lack of liquidity and losses from
financial crisis - Low costs associated with risk management and
control systems in relation to expected benefits
12 Independent Risk Control
- What are the functions of risk control units?
- Set risk limits to commercial units and Treasury
units - Define rules and parameters to measure the risks
- Supervise compliance by all bank units with risk
policies and procedures - Report immediately risk deviations to top
management - The units in charge of controlling risks should
be independent - Business and Commercial Units Manage credit
risks - Treasury Unit Manage market risks
- Independent units should have
- Independent managers to avoids biased decisions
- Independent staff to allow proper specialization
and avoid interest conflicts
13 Independent Risk Control
- What happens often in the real world?
- Lack of culture
- Independence of the credit risk control functions
from the commercial areas is often accepted - Independence of the market risk functions from
treasury department is not usually accepted - Independent units for controlling risks are
considered an unnecessary bureaucracy - Lack of staff specialized in controlling market
and credit risks - Less than brilliant people are usually assigned
to credit risk units - Salary differences between treasury staff and
market risks staff are large, while required
acknowledge is similar
14 Independent Risk Control
- What may promote effective Independent Risk
Control? - Board of Directors and the Executive Management
willingness - Own willingness
- Rating Agency Demands
- Regulatory and supervisory requirements
- Staff rotation in key positions
- Commercial Manager and Treasury Manager from
institutions with risk control culture - Removing staff not involved in independent risk
control - Visits and internships in financial institution
with risk control culture
15Credit Risk Control
- The financial institutions should have a unit for
controlling credit risk with the functions of - Defining the method for measuring credit exposure
- Setting limits to credit exposure and monitoring
its compliance - Avoiding risk concentration country, sector,
corporate groups - Evaluating tools for credit risk reduction
collateral, guarantees - Credit risk unit should integrate the control of
credit risk among commercial operations and
treasury transactions - Joint limits for both type of transactions
- Rules defining how treasury operations consume
corporate limits - Procedures for including compensation agreements
in risk measures
16Credit Risk Control
- What happens often in the real world?
- Credit Risk Units, directly or indirectly, depend
on Commercial managers - Risk analysts often report to commercial managers
- Lack of credit risk control in treasury
transactions - Large financial institutions are safe
- Rating institutions and issues with uniform
criteria are not an extended practice - How they measure credit risk from two different
operations - Assets and liabilities within the same
institution may not be legally offset (netting)
17Credit Risk Control
- What may promote effective Credit Risk Control?
- Shareholders, rating agencies and supervisors
demand a unique measure for credit risk - Consistent guidelines for rating corporations and
issues - Establishment of standard netting agreements
- Establishment of limits according to market
scenarios
18Market Risk Control
- The financial institutions should have a unit for
controlling market risk with the following
functions - Setting appropiate measurement methods and
limits of market risks - Looking after all units bearing market risks and
ensuring consistent market risk management. - Establishing rules for transferring market risks
from commercial units to a treasury unit - The unit controlling market risks should ensure
- Evaluation of positions at market prices,
independently of the accounting systems
accounting books for measurement risks - Ensuring market risks stay within limits
- Measuring market risk consistently
19Market Risk Control
- What happens often in the real world?
- Many financial institutions still do not have a
system for managing market risks within a unified
framework - Responsibility for monitoring and control of
market risk is distributed among commercial units
- Treasury departments manage liquidity, but not
market risk, i.e., they cover the deficit funds
of commercial units and invest the excess funds - Financial institutions with unified frameworks
for managing market risks may not be able to
follow the recommendations because - No daily prices available for many assets and
liabilities - Interest rates are not available
- Reluctance to calculate market value fear of
reporting losses
20Market Risk Control
- What may promote effective Market Risk Control?
- Awareness of market risks to commercial units
- Transfer of market risks to specialized units
- Strengthening capital markets
- Fixed rate securities
- Market- makers
- Ad-hoc procedures for estimating prices and
interest rates - Limited information methods
- Financial institution surveys
- Simulation methods
21Daily and Consistent Risk Measurement
- Financial institutions should have a daily
measure of risk - A measure of credit risk
- A measure of market risk
- An aggregate measure of risk
- The Value-at-risk may be an appropriate measure,
but not the only one - Maximum expected loss with a given probability
- Maximum loss under consistent scenarios may be
another measure - Daily and consistent measure is the key
- This measure should be used to set risk limits
- Equity available to back losses
- Based on risk tolerance
22Daily and Consistent Risk Measurement
- What happens often in the real world?
- No information to calculate the standard risk
measures - If there are no daily prices, how to develop a
covariance matrix - The available models are not adapted to emerging
markets - Normal distribution for most relevant variables
- Value-at-risk may have errors due to lack of
relevant information - If the estimates of the value at risk are not
reliable, one may believe that is better off
measuring the risks
23Daily and Consistent Risk Measurement
- What may promote Daily and Consistent Risk
Measurement - A risk measure is necessary, even if it may be
not fully reliable because the measure may be
used as ordinal indicator - Ordinal indicators point out risk changes, but
not absolute levels - How ordinal indicators affect institution
decisions? - The value-at-risk is a good indicator, but is not
the only one - Losses under the worse scenario of the last n
months - More attention to stress test
- Random definition of bad scenarios
24Operational and Legal Risks
- Operational and legal risks are difficult to
measure but have to be monitored and controlled
- Operational and legal risks appear in treasury
and commercial transactions - Procedures for controlling legal and operational
risks are different for both kinds of
transactions - Commercial transaction decisions flow slowly,
while treasury transactions usually take place in
real time
25Operational and Legal Risks
- Recommendations for Treasury Transactions
- Separation of front and back office
responsibilities - Operations manual
- Counterpart confirmation agreements
- Common framework for contracts between financial
institutions ( ISDA, others) - Previous identification of legal and operational
problems before working with new products
26Operational and Legal Risks
- What happens often in the real world?
- Lack of a framework to regulate counterpart
relationships - Many countries are preparing a model-contract
- Transactions are not confirmed on the same day
- An institution requiring immediate confirmation
from counterparts may not find counterparts - Lack of standardized products most available
products are new with a short life - Legal and operational departments do not have
time to identify problems - If there are no new products, no other products
are available
27Operational and Legal Risks
- What may promote effective attention to Legal an
Operational Risks? - Bank regulations should require specific
procedures for controlling legal and operational
risks - Treasury transactions should have written
procedures - Front and back offices should be independent and
located in different places - External evaluation of systems for controlling
operational and legal risks - Establishing a committee of new products
- Incentive to meet demands of treasury department
- Legal, accounting, back office, and trading
expertise
28Professional Expertise
- The Risk function requires staff with a wide
range of knowledge - Finance, statistics, econometrics, accounting,
trading - Only staff with expertise should participate in
the process of controlling and managing risks - Front office, back office, risk control, risk
measurement - Long term careers for these professionals are
required - New products and new systems make staff easily
obsolete - Continuous training requirements
29Professional Expertise
- What happens often in the real world ?
- Lack of professionals with the appropriate
knowledge in the financial institutions and in
the markets as a whole - Good professionals go to Treasury Department and
old fashioned ones goes to risk control units - Traders are brilliant
- Back office staff does not have appropriate
knowledge - Glamour, bonuses, good salaries are in the
treasury and commercial units - Losses are not associated with lack of controls,
but with market crises
30 Professional Expertise
- What may promote effective professional
expertise? - Training the staff from top to bottom
- From the Board of Directors to commercial and
back office staff - Appropriate mix of internal and external training
- Manager participation in training activities
- Reevaluation of risk control staff positions
- Defining appropriate knowledge profile
- Setting appropriate incentives wages and
others - Selecting the staff according to new profile
position
31Final Remarks
Monitoring Credit Risk
Bankrupcy
Specialized Management Market Risk
Late commer
Monitoring Market Risk
Homogeneous Market and Credit Measures
Followers
Management VAR and RORAC
Leaders
32Final Remarks
- Risk Management Systems are as necessary in
emerging market as in mature markets - However, implementing them is often more
difficult in emerging markets - Most problems involved in adopting risk
management systems can seldom be fully solved,
but can always be settled in part - The advantages of implementing a system, even a
non perfect one, are generally larger than the
costs
33Final Remarks
- Risk control managers do not have glamour
- If they do their job well, nothing happens
- I they do a bad job, they do not identify other
people faults, and they loose their jobs - We should enhance the glamour and prestige of
risk controllers of financial institutions - Risk managers avoid losses and increase
shareholder value - In all well known cases of large losses, the
financial institution did not have appropriate
risk management systems - But, all of them had prestigious and glamorous
traders