16.781 Planning and Design of Airport Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

16.781 Planning and Design of Airport Systems

Description:

... Market Main Destination in Central/South America. Although Central America represents almost 45% of ... Coast and Texas from Central America, LIM, SCL, EZE. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:595
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: arden4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 16.781 Planning and Design of Airport Systems


1
16.781 Planning and Design of Airport Systems
Planning for a New International Hub in Mexico
City
Alvaro Covarrubias December 10th, 2002
2
Outline
  • Air market between North America and
    Central/South America.
  • Competitive analysis of different hubs.
  • Case studies airports trying to become hubs.
  • A strategy for Mexico City.

3
Air Market - Airports
Available Seats to Central and South America
For historical, cultural and geographic reasons,
Miami is the main gateway for traffic from Centra
l and South America.
4
Air Market - Airlines
Available Seats to Central and South America
As MIA is a hub for AA, the airline and its
partners dominates the traffic between the two
regions.
5
Air Market Main Destination in Central/South
America
Although Central America represents almost 45 of
the AS
6
Air Market Main Destination in Central/South
America
It only represents a 20 of the ASM.
The business is in South America.
7
Competitive Analysis Geographic Location
Evaluate the geographic suitability of
hubs, for traffic between the 13 airports
with more ASM from US gateways
8
Competitive Analysis Geographic Location
To 18 of the largest metropolitan areas in the
US and Canada.
Results - MEX would only be competitive for tra
ffic to West Coast and Texas from Central America
, LIM, SCL, EZE. - IAH, DFW and LAX would be the
competitors.
9
Competitive Analysis Delays/Capacity
  • IAH and DFW
  • High On-Time performance.
  • High Capacity to grow. New runways are going to
    be built.
  • LAX
  • Lower than average on-time performance.
  • Almost impossible to grow.

10
Competitive Analysis Design
  • DFW Linear buildings, not good for connections.
  • IAH Hybrid design, regular quality for
    connections.
  • LAX Finger piers, long separation between
    international and domestic terminals, no
    people-mover.

11
Case Studies
12
Conclusions
  • Search for an alliance to operate the hub.
  • Build airport gradually, be flexible.
  • Design for easy connections.
  • Engage with airlines, try joint operation of
    terminals.
  • Land banking.
  • Liberalize air service agreements.
  • Volumes do not allow hub operation and
    multi-airports in Mexico City.

13
  • Thank you for your attention!
  • Alvaro Covarrubias
  • alvaroc_at_mit.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com