GEOG 3515 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

GEOG 3515

Description:

French Guiana (26/5) Peru (26/7) Ecuador (28/6) Actual Demographic Transition ... French Guiana. Ecuador. Colombia. Chile. Brazil. Bolivia. Argentina. Name ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: isisCsu
Category:
Tags: geog | french | guiana | suriname

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GEOG 3515


1
GEOG 3515
  • The Geography of South America

Class 22 Economic GeographyDemography and the
Demographic Transition
2
South America Population Topics
  • The next sequence of classes up to Thanksgiving
    are about various aspects of South Americas
    population.
  • Firstly we will tackle the geographical aspects
    of the regions demography and its demographic
    transition over time.
  • Secondly we will look at patterns of migration
    and urbanization within the region.
  • Finally, we will examine the geographical
    characteristics of South American cityscapes and
    the particular aspects of squatter settlements.

3
Demography and Transition
  • Demography is a very complex subject that looks
    at geographical and temporal variations in
    population and the shifts caused by migration,
    fertility, births and deaths, and differential
    age structures (which are the historical legacies
    of these variables).
  • South America has seen two principle population
    transitions.
  • Demographic - from high crude birth and crude
    death rates, to declining crude birth and low
    crude death rates.
  • Geographic - from largely rural and agrarian to
    largely urban.
  • There are some considerable differences between
    the countries of South America with respect to
    geographic and demographic population
    characteristics.

4
The Demographic Transition
(sources Wright Nebel, 2002)
5
The Demographic Transition
Phase IV Chile (18/6) Argentina (19/8) Uruguay
(16/10)
Phase II/III Bolivia (32/9) Paraguay (31/5)
Later Phase III Colombia (22/6) Venezuela (24/5)

Guyana (24/8) Suriname (24/7)
Earlier Phase III French Guiana (26/5) Peru (26/
7)
Ecuador (28/6)
(sources Wright Nebel, 2002 Clawson 2004)
6
Actual Demographic Transition
7
Population Distribution (UNDP 2002 2000 data)
8
Age Distributions
  • Many South American nations, due to relatively
    high fertility levels in previous decades, have a
    population age structure that is wide at the base
    and narrows over each consecutive 5-year age
    cohort (e.g. Paraguay and Bolivia).
  • Thus they have a built in engine for continued
    growth and can expect a lag time before social
    factors that cause declining birth rates kick
    in.
  • In Latin America and the Caribbean, the median
    age i.e. middle person from youngest to oldest,
    in 2000 is thought to be 24.4, up from 20.1 in
    1950 in North America it is 35.6.
  • The median age in 2050 is expected to have risen
    in Latin America and the Caribbean to 37.8 i.e.
    the population is expected to age considerably
    as fertility falls, life expectancy at birth
    increases and youthful populations age.

9
UN Population Projections
10
Fertility Factor is Fundamental
  • Latin America and the Caribbean will grow to over
    one billion by 2050 if fertility rates remain
    unchanged.
  • Medium predictions are that population will
    stabilize at around 800 million (about 550
    million for South America), some 60 higher than
    current levels.
  • Replacement rate fertility (RRF) for South
    America is somewhere around 2.2-2.3 to account
    for pre-maternal/paternal age mortality.
  • Actual fertility varies from a low of 2.2 in
    Suriname and a high of 4.2 in Paraguay.
  • Most nations have a total fertility (TF) between
    2.6 and 3.0 leading to a steady growth in the
    younger age groups, although this should drop in
    most countries over time to the RRF.
  • Fertility corresponds closely with GDP/cap and
    the degree of urban living, and is closely
    related to female education.

11
Modernization and Birth Rates
  • Modernization and shifts to urban living has
    profound social consequences that influences
    demographics.
  • Children are no longer needed for farm labor and
    have reduced economic value to the family unit,
    especially if social security and pension
    programs are made available to the newly urban
    workers.
  • Girls are more widely and comprehensively
    educated, which generally results in their
    marrying later, having children later, entering
    the workplace, and spacing their children more
    thus it has an inverse correlation with
    fertility.
  • Educated, working women in combination with a
    population that is mostly only nominally Catholic
    and increasingly Protestant means that birth
    control is more widely practiced over time.

12
Geographic transition
  • The Geographer Wilbur Zelinksy suggested that as
    societies develop, they experience five phases of
    migration or mobility transition within their
    territories.
  • Phase I wholly agrarian or small town, minimal
    population movement.
  • Phase II onset of modernization a great
    shaking loose of migrants from the countryside
    and the beginning of the rural-urban
    transformation.
  • Phase III modernization matures, cities well
    established rural-urban migration slows.
  • Phase IV urbanization completed - most
    migration now occurs between and within urban
    areas (known as residential mobility).
  • Phase V increasing importance of emigration to
    more advanced countries.
  • South American nations seem to be in Phases III-V
    to differing degrees.

13
Migration Tendencies
  • Most migrants are young adults.
  • Rural-rural migration usually comprises young
    families (e.g. to the Brazilian Amazon or
    interior Bolivia, Peru and Ecuador) whereas
    rural-urban migration involves single
    individuals, mostly males in the early Phase II,
    and then more females later on.
  • Women frequently migrate to become domestic
    servants or work in light industry (e.g. the
    maquilas) due to the lack of rural employment.
  • Urban migration frequently attracts those from
    the rural populations who have had more schooling
    (e.g. through third grade).
  • International migration is often male and a
    sizeable portion from Latin America has been in
    the form of brain drain.

14
Population Patterns
  • South America has been called the hollow
    continent because population is predominantly
    located around the exterior.
  • Within that periphery, the majority of South
    American population 80 on average is urban
    with many cities growing at 7-8 per year (São
    Paolo is thought to gain 300,000 new residents
    each year!).
  • Some 17 cities now have more than 2 million
    inhabitants, the biggest being São Paolo at
    around 18 million.
  • Several cities in South America have more than
    25 of their nations population, some over 50
    (e.g. Paramaibo, Montevideo) the primate
    cities.
  • Rural to urban migration accelerated over the
    last century with a depopulation rate averaging
    around 1 per year from 1950-90.

15
Rural Trends
  • Rural population levels have been in absolute
    decline in South America because out-migration
    rates have been in excess of birth rates.
  • This trend is more marked in South America than
    in the rest of Latin America and the Caribbean.

16
Push-Pull Factors
  • According to Clawsons estimates, some 150
    million Latin Americans moved to cities in the
    last 100 years.
  • Dating back to the work of Ravenstein in the late
    1800s, geographers have considered rural-urban
    migration as having push and pull forces, which
    obviously work in conjunction.
  • Push factors large families to be supported
    from limited land resources, absence of cash-wage
    opportunities, limited educational, cultural or
    health care conditions, involuntary displacement
    (e.g. due to guerilla war, drug militias,
    environmental deterioriation, etc.)
  • Pull factors - urban life is romanticized
    better jobs, education, health care, housing and
    social opportunities seem possible the biggest
    objective is betterment of economic
    circumstances.

17
Interregional Migrations
  • All scales of migrations can be witnessed in
    South America.
  • Migration of nationals from one country to
    another in South America is common, usually for
    economic opportunities.
  • Significant has been the movement to Argentina by
    Chileans, Bolivians and Paraguayans to work on
    farms and factories, and Uruguayans to work in
    the cities (well over 1 million in all).
  • Also significant has been the move of Colombians
    and Ecuadorians to the Venezuelan oil industry.
  • Peruvians can be found in significant numbers in
    Chile, working in mines and on farms.
  • Significant numbers of these migrants are
    undocumented e.g. around 1 million undocumented
    Colombians are thought to be working in
    Venezuela.
  • Professionals from Argentina, Chile and Uruguay
    can be found all across the regions cities,
    emigres from earlier political repression.

18
Residential Mobility
  • Many new migrants to South American cities live
    in shanty towns, although female domestic workers
    may live in the homes of their middle or upper
    class employers.
  • As or if economic fortunes improve, migrants will
    seek to move from squatter to more formal housing
    in planned neighborhoods.
  • A key goal is to secure access to higher quality
    living conditions and public services, from
    electricity and water to schools.
  • Frequently, squatter settlements are on the
    periphery of economic zones requiring migrants
    who find employment to travel long distances each
    day to work.
  • A modern phenomenon is the export of US Latino
    gangs to South American slums as tougher
    immigration policies export convicted
    non-citizens to their country of origin.

19
Urbanization
  • Spanish colonization centered on the city from
    which the conquered subjects could be governed.
  • Some 225 cities had been established in the
    Americas within 50 years of the arrival of the
    Spanish and Portuguese.
  • An internal core-periphery model developed in
    which cities would suck in all the produce,
    minerals and raw materials from the rural areas
    and invest them in expanding and aggrandizing
    those urban areas, doing little to raise
    standards in the rural areas.
  • This was facilitated by the tradition of allowing
    cities to extend their dominion over the
    surrounding lands up to the point at which they
    met another city coming the other way.
  • The concept of defining urban city limits at the
    actual edge of a city was not applied.

20
Types of Cities
  • Unlike the colonization of North America which
    took the form of growing clusters initially along
    only the Eastern seaboard, Spanish South American
    colonization involved the founding of isolated
    cities across the region.
  • Developed in isolation across the different
    viceroyalties, cities were more like city-states
    than mere cities, lacking much regional and
    economic integration.
  • Within their broad regions, however, specific
    cities did tend to develop around specific
    functions which supported that city and the
    colonial empire within which it existed.
  • The cities can be characterized by one of five
    general types agricultural center cities,
    mining center cities, industrial center cities,
    commercial center cities and administrative
    center cities.

21
Important Colonial Cities
  • Agricultural cities producer and supplier of
    foodstuffs to the cities of the region it served
    e.g. Santiago, Chile
  • Mining cities organized and supplied mine
    laborers from the citys territorial lands e.g.
    Potosí, Bolivia
  • Industrial cities built on traditional craft
    regions (weaving) or were selected for new
    industries e.g. Quito, Ecuador respectively.
  • Commercial cities usually key transport nodes
    at seaports or main overland route junctions e.g.
    Mendoza, Argentina.
  • Administrative cities seats of the
    viceroyalties, captaincy-generals or capitanias,
    these were the political, educational and
    ecclesiastical capitals of the colony e.g. Lima,
    Peru.
  • Many of these traditional dominant functions and
    characteristics persist today although diluted a
    little by improved transport and technological
    change.

22
Portuguese urbanization
  • In the Capitanias of Brazil, urban development
    was much later in coming than in the Spanish
    colonies although Brazilian cities are now many
    of the biggest in South America.
  • Portuguese settlers and slaves were mostly
    located on the sugar and cattle plantations
    whereas the cities were relatively small ports
    serving each Capitania e.g. Recife, Rio de
    Janeiro.
  • Urbanization took several centuries to become
    significant, only Rio, Recife and Salvador
    gaining any significant size by the late 1800s.
  • The only significant inland city during the
    colonial period was São Paolo, the base for
    west-ward moving pioneers into the interior of
    the Southern plateau lands in search of mines and
    ranchlands.

23
The Rise of Urbanization in the Republican Era
  • Immigration and improvements in living conditions
    lead to an increase in populations and
    urbanization.
  • The process of mestizo-ization, in which
    indigenous peoples achieved higher social status
    by becoming more European frequently required a
    move to an urban center, thus swelling the ranks
    of the urban population.
  • Urban populations went from 3-13 of the total
    population in 1850 to 60-90 of the population
    150 years later in the various South American
    countries (see graph).

24
(No Transcript)
25
Modern Urban Populations
  • Data on the actual size of South American cities
    today is hampered by poor data collection.
  • Census data is frequently inaccurate, shanty-town
    populations hard to count, and definitions of
    what actually constitutes a citys geographic
    limits are nebulous.
  • For example, South Americas largest city, São
    Paolo, is estimated by some (World Gazeeter) to
    be 18.5 million, and others (Demographic
    Yearbook) to be only 9.9 million.
  • Regardless, South American cities are now three
    of the top 20 largest in the world and growing
    fast.
  • South American cities, in several regions, are
    starting to coalesce to create what is termed a
    megalopolis a massive, unbroken swath of
    largely urban land use in which cities and their
    suburbs expand to fill the space between (like
    our own BosWash and ChiPitts)

26
South American Megalopoli
  • The dominant two are in Brazil, centered around
    Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, and
    Argentina/Uruguay, centered around Buenos Aires
    and Rosario.
  • Candidate megalopoli include the Caracas-Valencia
    region in Venezuela, the Medellín-Cali region in
    Colombia, and the Chilean Central Valley,
    centered around Valparaíso and Santiago.
  • The geographic footprint of the South American
    megalopolis will be smaller than the North
    American megalopolis of a similar population
    size.
  • South American cities are much more densely
    populated than North American ones, usually
    boasting 3-4 times the number of residents per
    square mile/km (7,800-18,200 per square mile
    compared to 1,800-5,200).

27
Sources of Information
  • United National Population Division, 2001. World
    Population Prospects The 2000 Revision. Document
    ESA/P/WP.165, Population Division, Department of
    Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New
    York, NY.
  • United National Population Division, 2001. World
    Population Monitoring 2001 Population,
    environment and development. Document
    ST/ESA/SER.A/203, Population Division, Department
    of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations,
    New York, NY.
  • UNDP 2003. Human Development Report 2002. http//hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2002/en/, New
    York, NY United Nations Development Program,
    (April 14, 2003).
  • World Resources Institute, 2003. World Resources
    2002-2004 Decisions for the Earth Balance, Voice
    and Power. Washington D.C. World Resources
    Institute. (available online at
    64)
  • Caviedes C. and Knapp G. 1995. South America.
    Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  • Blouet W.B and Blouet O.M., 2002. Latin America
    and the Caribbean. New York NY, John Wiley
    Sons.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com