Law of Effect - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Law of Effect

Description:

Law of Effect ... With each trial, latency response decreases (up to ... Melioration models or VR schedules. But note: here matching would be exclusive choice ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:248
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: vfdo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Law of Effect


1
Law of Effect
  • Law of effect (Thorndike, 1911) behavior that is
    followed by a satisfying state of affairs is more
    likely to occur again and vice versa
  • With each trial, latency response decreases (up
    to some point)
  • With each trial, rate of responding increases (up
    to some point)
  • Note that animals improve on performance
    optimize, not just repeat same behavior but make
    it better and more efficient
  • Adaptation to the environment via learning
  • Herrnstein considers this behavior
    change/adaptation a question, and not an answer
    (e.g., what are adapting to how are adapting
    how know to adapt, etc)

2
Violations of Law of Effect and adaptation
  • Ferster and Skinner change in response rate
    between VR and VI schedules why if just stamping
    in of behavior? Why do this?
  • Behavior on conjunctive schedules
  • conjunctive schedule reinforces first response
    after certain number of responses AND first
    response after set amount of time
  • double criteria
  • CONJ FI(t) FR(n1)
  • note for FI schedule rapid responding is
    penalized
  • ratio schedules rapid responding more reward
  • CONJ schedule combines rate of Sr is directly
    proportional to rate of responding only for rates
    of responding on FI schedule, not for FR
    schedule.

3
Herrnstein and Morse (1958)
  • Used a CONJ FI 15 FR (0 to 240) with pigeons
  • Found Rate of responding decreased with
    increases in FR value (which reduced rate of
    reward)
  • Why is the animal doing this? cant be
    stamping in of response or wouldnt get
    fluctuations
  • May have to do with response strength- how?

4
Reinforcement as strength
  • Sr ? making a stronger link between responding
    and reward
  • Relative frequency measure of strength
  • response rate function of reinforcer rate
  • How fast respond function of how fast get
    reinforced.
  • Plot proportion of responses as function of
    proportion of reward
  • Note This is a continuous measure, and not
    discrete trial animal has more choice
  • Discrete trial trial by trial
  • Free operant animal controls how many responses
    it makes

5
Reinforcement as strength
  • Reinforcers come on interval, not ratio schedules
  • if use FR or VR should get exclusive choice
  • Why? faster respond more reinforcers
  • VI schedules allow examination of changes in
    response rate as a function of predetermined rate
    of reinforcer
  • With VI schedules, can use reinforcer rate as the
    independent variable!
  • No proportionality between number of responses
    and number of reinforcers- all time based
  • This becomes basis of matching law
  • P1/P1 Po R1/R1 Ro
  • Herrnstein explains why this true..
  • animal matches ratio of responding to ratio of
    reward!

6
Explain the Use of COD
  • COD change over delay
  • Delay until the reinforcement schedule begins
    again
  • Pecking left, switch to right..schedule is on
    hold for several seconds, then starts again
  • In a sense, a time out for switching
  • Use of a COD affects Response strength and
    choice
  • Shull and Pliskoff (1967) used COD and no COD
    and ICS as reward
  • Used Findley procedure (remember what this was?)
  • matching occurred as long as used COD
  • why important
  • COD not controlling factor, controlling factor
    response ratio
  • COD increases discriminability between the two
    reinforcer schedules
  • Increased discriminability better matching
  • Why?

7
Herrnsteins Matching Equation
  • Single reinforcer and single response
  • P1 kR1
  • ------------
  • R1Ro
  • P1 rate of responding to alternative 1
  • R1 rate of reinforcement for alternative 1
  • Ro rate of unaccounted sources of reinforcement
  • k asymptote of response rate

8
Can derive a more general two-choice equation
  • P1 kR1
  • ------------
  • R1 R2 Ro
  • ---------------------------------------------
  • P2 kR2
  • ------------
  • R1 R2 Ro

9
Cancelling out
  • P1 kR1
  • -------------------------
  • R1 R2 Ro P1 R1
  • ---------------------------------------------
    ? ------ ------

  • P2 R2
  • P2 kR2
  • --------------------------
  • R1 R2 Ro

10
Two-Parameter Matching Equation
  • P1 R1
  • ---- ----
  • P2 R2
  • Must assume that Ro is equal for both P1 and P2
  • What are some possible Ros in our study?
  • Note that are everything is measurable!

11
Objections to matching
  • Several alternative models that suggest that
    matching is a special case
  • Probability models or probability learning
  • Use Melioration models and VR schedules
  • But note here matching would be exclusive choice
  • Can show mathematically can produce matching from
    probability learning
  • Discrete trials procedures do not result in
    matching Why is this not surprising?
  • Note, however
  • getting some deviations from matching under
    certain circumstances-
  • need to address these circumstances from the
    matching law model or else matching law becomes
    too limited-
  • Baum will do this next week!

12
  • Now.lets see how we can use this equation

13
Choice as Behavior and Behavior as Choice
  • Know that relative rate of responding varies with
    relative rate of reinforcement must affect
    absolute rate of responding as well.
  • P1 kR1/R1 Ro
  • makes a hyperbole function
  • some maximum rate of responding

14
How plot?
  • Plot reinforcement rate (responses per minute) as
    a function of reinforcer rate (reinforcers per
    minute)
  • Reinforcement rate on X axis
  • Response rate on Y axis
  • Makes a hyperbola
  • Decelerating ascending curve
  • Why decelerating- why reach asymptote?
  • Note is a STEADY STATE theory, not an acquisition
    model
  • Assumes complete knowledge
  • Use after many, many sessions so no issue of
    whether animals knows schedule ratio

15
Example
  • Plot response rate as a function of reinforcer
    rate

16
Now look at Herrnsteins figures
  • figures on pages 255-256

17
Now you try Which rat(s) follows the equation?
Use P1/P2 R1/R2
Use P1 P1/R1Ro
18
Factors affecting the hyperbola
  • Absolute rates affected by Sr rates
  • Higher the reinforcement rate the higher the rate
    of responding
  • True up to some point (asymptote)- why?
  • Can also plot for P1/R2 R1/R2 and get same
    general trend

19
Enough!
  • next section explains multiple schedule and how
    the model fits this, we will skip that for now
  • Questions for our study
  • Why are we using the four different schedules
  • 60-15 15-60 30-15 15-30
  • How will we plot our data? We dont have
    responses so we must use ____________.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com