Assessing Drug Transfer into Breast Milk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessing Drug Transfer into Breast Milk

Description:

1. Why do we need data? Uncertainty compromises breastfeeding ... in colostrum, transitional, and mature milk; in foremilk and hindmilk 'Level II' Clinical Study ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:276
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: shin158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessing Drug Transfer into Breast Milk


1
Assessing Drug Transfer into Breast Milk
  • Shinya Ito, MD
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • Toronto, Canada

2
Four discussion points
  • Why do we need data?
  • What data do we need?
  • Transporters in the mammary gland?
  • Graded approach

3
1. Why do we need data?
  • Uncertainty compromises breastfeeding
  • Antibiotics and Propylthiouracil (PTU)
  • Identifying a TDM drug
  • Lithium
  • Identifying a contraindicated drug

4
Diarrhea Dewey et al. Pediatrics 1995
Lower respiratory tract infection Wright et
al. BMJ 1989
Bacteremia Takala et al. J Pediatr 1989
Otitis media Owen et al. J Pediatr 1993
Bacterial meningitis Cochi et al. J Pediatr 1986
NEC Lucas Cole. Lancet 1990
5
Silva et al. Aust Ped J 1978 Morley et al.
Arch Dis Child 1988 Lucas et al. Lancet
1992 Pollock. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994 Gale
Martyn. Lancet 1996 Horwood
Fergusson Pediatrics 1998
6
No hard data leads to formula-feeding by default
  • Compliance and antibiotics in breastfeeding
  • (Ito et al. Ann Pharmacother 19932740-42)
  • PTU
  • labeling/imprinting
  • (Lee et al. Pediatrics 200010627-30)

7
Propylthiouracil (PTU) and breastfeeding
Amounts excreted into milk lt0.3 of the
mothers dose on a weight basis
Low et al. Lancet 197921011 Kampman et al.
Lancet 19801736-7 Cooper. N Eng J Med
19843111353-62
8
No effect on the thyroid gland of the breastfed
infant Momotani et al. Clin Endocrinol
198931591-5
Eight infants Mothers PTU (50-300 mg/day) Low
T4/high TSH at birth Normalized despite
breastfeeding
9
  • AAP (1989,1994)
  • compatible
  • Briggs/Freeman/Yaffe (1994)
  • no significant risk
  • Bennett/WHO (1988)
  • probably safe
  • CPS (2001)
  • contraindication

10
Women on PTU do not start breastfeeding
Lee et al. Pediatrics 2000
Control
PTU
11
Women on PTU do not start breastfeeding
Lee et al. Pediatrics 2000
Formula
Adviced by MDs
Breastfeeding
12
TDM drug
  • TDM to individualize management
  • wt-adj maternal dose gt10
  • large interindividual variation
  • dose-dependent effects
  • lithium as an example

13
Identifying contraindicated drug
  • wt-adj maternal dose gt10
  • toxicity (dose-dependent,
  • dose-independent)
  • TDM unsuitable

14
2. What data do we need?
  • To estimate infant exposure level
  • Infant dose (wt-adj maternal dose)
  • Cmilk and maternal dose
  • Infant serum C, PD endpoints
  • Exposure Index
  • To assess effects on milk yield
  • To assess transfer mechanisms, PK factors in
    Cmilk variations
  • MP ratio (maternal PK-Cmilk)

15
Exposure Index
MP ratio
x 10

EI ()
CL (ml/kg/min)
Ito Koren 1994
EIgt10 Phenobarbital 100 Ethosuximide 50
Atenolol 25 Lithium 2-30 Metronidazole
3-18
16
3. Carrier-mediated systems
  • clinical implications
  • interactions
  • potential intervention
  • net transfer may or may not deviate from a
    diffusion model

17
?Organic cation transporters
Maternal plasma
Milk
Cmilk
Cplasma
pH7.4
pH 7.0
Myoepithelia
Epithelia
Diffusion a McNamara lab
18
Organic cation transporters
(OCT1, OCT2, OCT3, OCTN1, and OCTN2, etc)
19
Human mammary gland
P-glycoprotein ???
hOCT2
hOCT1
20
hOCTN1 and N2
hOCTN1
hOCTN2
21
P-gp expression in MCF12A
intracellular
surface
MRK16
22
Saturable TEA uptake in the human mammary
epithelial cells, MCF12A (Dhillon et al. CPT 2000)
Km 3.4 mM Vmax 18.5 nmol/mg protein/0.5 hr
Mean SD (n3)
23
Carnitine uptake results
4oC
24
Saturable carnitine uptake in MCF12A (Kwok et al.
CPT 2001)
Km 1.9 ?M Vmax 158 pmol/106 cells/hr
Mean SD (n3)
25
Inhibitor specificity
Mean SD (n3)
26
4. Graded approach
  • Level 0 pre-clinical study
  • physico-chemical model
  • in vitro cell model
  • involvement of transporters
  • animal model
  • Level I clinical study
  • lactating/non-breastfeeding (e.g., weaning)
  • Level II clinical study
  • breastfeeding dyad

27
Level 0 Preclinical Study
  • various models
  • predict in vivo Cmilk, transport systems etc.
  • potential effects on prolactin etc.
  • provide ethical framework for human
    experimentation

28
Level I Clinical Study
  • lactating/non-breastfeeding women
  • dose-Cmilk (AUC) infant dose, wt-adj maternal
    dose
  • MP ratio Exposure Index
  • in colostrum, transitional, and mature milk in
    foremilk and hindmilk

29
Level II Clinical Study
  • breastfeeding dyad
  • dose-Cmilk to estimate variations
  • Cinfant
  • PD endpoints
  • infant effects
  • milk yield
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com