Title: General Principles in the Assessment and Treatment of Nonunions
1General Principles in the Assessment and
Treatment of Nonunions
- Matthew J. Weresh, MD
- Original Author Peter Cole, MD March 2004
- New Author Matthew J. Weresh, MD Revised
August 2006
2Definitions
- Nonunion A fracture that has not and is not
going to heal - Delayed union A fracture that requires more
time than is usual and ordinary to heal
3Previous Definitions of Nonunion
- Nonunion A fracture that is a minimum of 9
months post occurrence and is not healed and has
not shown radiographic progression for 3
months Orthopaedic Advisory
Panel Food Drug
Administration, 1986
4- Waiting 9 months or more is often inappropriate
- Prolonged morbidity
- Inability to return to work
- Narcotic dependence
- Emotional impairment
5- Definition of nonunion should not limit or
prevent appropriate and timely intervention - The best treatment for nonunions is prevention
- Sir John Charnley
6- The designation of a delayed union or nonunion
is currently made when the surgeon believes the
fracture has little or no potential to heal. - Donald Wiss M.D. William Stetson M.D.
- Journal American and Orthopedic
Surgery 1996
7Classification of Nonunions
- Two important factors for consideration
- (1) Presence or absence of infection
- (2) Vascularity of fracture site
8Classification
- (1) Hypertrophic
- (2) Oligotrophic
- (3) Avascular
-
Weber and Cech, 1976
9Hypertrophic
- Vascularized
- Callus formation present on x-ray
- Elephant foot - abundant callus
- Horse hoof - less abundant callus (see diagram)
10Oligotrophic
- No callus on x-ray
- Vascularity is present on bone scan
11Avascular
- Atrophic or similar to oligotrophic on x-ray
- Ischemic or cold on bone scan
12Hypertrophic (elephant foot)
Hypertrophic (horse hoof)
Oligotrophic or atrophic
13Incidence of Nonunion
- Boyd et.al Connolly
- No. 842(1965) No.602
(1981) - Tibia 35 62
- Femur 19 23
- Humerus 17.5 7
- Forearm 15.5 7
- Clavicle 2 1 Increasing frequency
of tibial nonunion over time
14Increasing relative incidence of tibial and
femoral nonunion most likely secondary to
improved limb salvage techniques
15Etiology of Nonunion Systemic
- Malnutrition
- Diabetes (neurovascular)
- Smoking
16Malnutrition
- Adequate protein and energy is required for wound
healing - Screening test
- serum albumin
- total lymphocyte count
- Albumin less than 3.5 and lymphocytes less than
1,500 cells/ml is significant -
- Seltzer et.al. JPEN 1981
17Diabetes(Neuropathic Fractures)
- Neuro arthropathy is not entirely the result of
unprotected weight bearing on an insensate joint - Inability to control response to trauma can
result in hyperemia, osteopenia, and osteoclastic
bone resorption
18Neuropathic Fracture Nonunions
- Treatment, conservative (bracing) and operative,
are fought with complications - No currently accepted algorithm
- Consider use of biphosphonates to decrease
osteolytic response - Shelby et.al. Diab. Med. 1994
- Connolly J.F. and Csencsitz T.A. CORR 348 1998
- Young e.t. al. Diab. Care 1995
- McCormack R.G. e.t. al. JBJS 1998
-
19Smoking
- Decreases peripheral oxygen tension
- Dampens peripheral blood flow
- Well documented difficulties in wound healing in
patients who smoke - Schmite, M.A. e.t. al. Corr 1999
- Jensen J.A. e.t. al. Arch Surg 1991
20Smoking vs. Fracture Healing
- Most information is anecdotal
- No prospective randomize studies on humans
- Retrospective studies show time to union
- 69 delay in radiographic union with smoker (2 of
44 nonunions in smokers vs. 0 of 59 nonunion in
nonsmokers) increased incidence of nonunion with
smokers - Schmitz, M.A. e.t.al. CORR 1999
21Etiology of Nonunion(Local Factors)
- Infection
- Energy of fracture mechanism
- Mechanical factors of fracture configuration
- Increased motion between fracture fragments
- Inadequate fixation
- Wolfs Law - lack of physiologic stresses to bone
- Anatomic location
22Infection
- Of all prognostic factors in tibia fracture
care, that implying the worst prognosis was
infection - Nicoll E.A. CORR 1974
23The inflammatory response to bacteria at the site
of the fracture disrupts callus, increases gap
between fragments, and increases motion between
fragments.
24Energy of Fracture Mechanism
- Initial fracture displacement
- Fracture pattern i.e
- comminution
- bone loss
- segmental patterns
- Soft tissue disruption (vascularity and oxygen
delivery)
25Initial Fracture Displacement
Nicoll E.A., 705 cases, 1964
- Delayed union and nonunion were nearly three
times as frequent in tibia fractures with
moderate to severe displacement as compared to
fractures with slight displacement. -
26Fracture Pattern
- Fracture patterns in higher energy injuries
(i.e. comminution, bone loss, or segmental
patterns) have a higher degree of soft tissue and
bone ischemia
27Soft Tissue Disruption
- 1. Introgenic
- 2. Traumatic
28Traumatic Soft Tissue Disruption
- Incidence of nonunion is increased with open
fractures - More severe open fracture (i.e. Gustillo III B vs
Grade I) have higher incidence of nonunion -
Gustilo et.al.Jol 1984 - Widenfalk et.al.Injury 1979
- Edwards et.al. Ortho Trans 1979
- Velazco et.al. TBJS 1983
29Introgenic
- Excessive soft tissue dissection and periosteal
stripping at time of previous fixation
30Tscherne Soft Tissue Classification
- Not all high energy fractures are open fractures.
This classification emphasizes the importance of
viability of the soft tissue envelope at the zone
of injury. - Fractures with Soft Tissue Injuries
- Springer Verlag 1984
31Soft Tissue Classification
- Grade 0 Soft tissue damage is absent or
negligible - Grade I Superficial abrasion or contusion caused
by fragment pressure from within - Grade II Deep, contaminated abrasion associated
with localized skin or muscle contusion from
direct trauma - Grade III Skin extensively contused or crushed,
muscle damage may be severe. Subcutaneous
avulsion, possible artery injury, compartment
syndrome
32Revascularization of ischemic bone fragments in
fractures is derived from the soft tissue. If
the soft tissue (skin, muscle, adipose) is
ischemic, it must first recover prior to
revascularizing the bone. E.A. Holden,
JBJS 1972
33Mechanical Factors
- Excessive motion at fracture secondary to poor
fixation, failed fixation, or inadequate
immobilization - Lack of physiologic mechanical stimulation to
fracture area (i.e. nonweight bearing, fracture
fixed in distraction, adynamic environment with
external fixation)
34Anatomic Location of Fractures
- Some areas of skeleton are at risk for nonunion
due to anatomic vascular considerations i.e. - Proximal 5th metatarsal, femoral neck, carpal
scaphoid
35Diagnosis of Nonunion- History
- Nature of original injury (high or low energy)
- Previous open wounds of injury site
- Pain present at fracture site
- Symptoms of infection i.e.
- Antalgic gait or decrease use secondary to pain
- History of any drainage or wound healing
difficulties
36Examination
- Alignment
- Deformity
- Soft tissue integrity
- Erythema, warm, drainage
- Vascularity of limb
- Pulses, transcutaneous oximetry
- Stability at fracture site
- Pain assessed during this portion of examination
37X-rays
- AP, lateral, and oblique (45degree internal and
45 degree external) - In majority of cases, this is all that is
required to confirm nonunion - Examination under fluoroscopy to check for motion
can occasionally be helpful also
38Tomography
- Linear tomograms
- Helpful if metallic hardware present
- Helps to identify persistent fracture line in
- Hyptrophic nonunions in which x-rays are not
diagnostic and pain persists at fracture site - Computed tomography and MRI are replacing linear
tomography if no hardware present
39Subclinical Undetected Infection
- The main diagnostic dilemma in evaluation of
nonunions
40Radionuclide Scanning
- Technetium - 99 diphosphonate
- Detects repairable process in bone ( not
specific) - Gallium - 67 citrate
- Accumulate at site of inflammation (not specific)
- Sequential technetium or gallium scintigraphy
- Only 50-60 accuracy in subclinical ostoemyelitis
-
Esterhai et.al. J Ortho Res. 1985 - Smith MA et.al. JBJS Br 1987
41Indium III - Labeled Leukocyte Scan
- Good with acute osteomyelitis, but less effective
in diagnosing chronic or subacute bone infections - Sensitivity 83-86, specificity 84-86
- Technique is superior to technetium and gallium
to identify infection - Nepola JV e.t.
al. JBJS 1993 - Merkel KD e.t. al. JBJS 1985
42MRI
- Abnormal marrow with increased signal on T2 and
low signal on T1 - Can identify and follow sinus tacts and
sequestrum - Mason study- diagnostic sensitivity of 100,
specificity 63, accuracy 93 - Berquist TH et.al. Magn Res Img
- Modic MT et.al. Rad. Clin Nur Am 1986
- Mason MD et.al. Rad. 1989
43Tissue Biopsy
- Antibiotic discontinued for 72 hours prior to
biopsy - Multiple representative biopsy specimens should
be obtained - Cultures sent for gram stain, aerobic, anerobic,
fungal, and acid fast studies - Open biopsy techniques can be inconclusive due to
problem of detecting bacteria protected by an
external glycocalyx - Gristina AG el.al
- Inst Con Lect 1990
44Treatment
45Nonoperative
- Ultrasound
- Electric stimulator
- Bone marrow injection
46Ultrasound
- Ultrasound fracture stimulation devices have
shown ability to increase callus response in
fresh fractures (shortens time for visible callus
on x-ray) - Prospective randomized trial in nonunion
population has not been done - Use in nonunions remains theoretical
Goodship Kenwright JBJS 1985
47Electric Stimulation
- Piezoelectric nature of bone - stress generated
electric potentials exist in bone and are related
to callus formation
Fukada Yasuda,J
Phys Soc Jpn 1957
Busse H CAL e.t. al.
Science 1962 - Electromagnetic fields influence vascularization
of fibrocartilage, cell proliferation matrix
production Monograph
Series,AAOS
48Three Modalities of Electric bone Growth
Stimulators
- 1. Direct current - percutaneous or implanted
electrodes - 2. Electromagnetic stimulation - uses time
varying magnetic fields (noninvasive) - 3. Capacitive coupling - uses electrodes placed
on skin (noninvasive)
49Two Attempts at Well Controlled Double Blind
(placebo) Studies on Nonunion Healing with
Electric Stimulation
- 1. Pulsed electromagnetic fields
- Tibial delayed unions 16-32 weeks from injury
- 45 united in active device group
- 14 united in placebo group
(P lt 0.02)
Sharrard JBJS e.t. al 1990 - 2. Capacitive coupling
- 6 of 10 with active device healed
- 0 of 11 with placebo device healed
(P lt 0.004)
Scott G and King JBJS 1994
50Contraindication to Electric Stimulation
- Synovial pseudoarthrosis
- Electric stimulation does not address associated
problems of angulation, malrotation and shortening
51Unanswered Questions
- When is electric stimulation indicated
- Which fracture types are indicated
- What are the efficacy rates
- What time after injury is best for
application Ryaby JT Corr 1998
52Bone Marrow Injection
- Percutaneous bone marrow injected to level of
fracture - 9 of 10 delayed tibia fractures united
- 80 of 100 tibial fracture patients united when
in conjunction with adequate fixation - Nonradomized and anecdotal studies
- Connolly J., CORR. 1995
53Surgical Treatment
- Fibular osteotomy
- Bone graft
- Plate osteosynthesis
- Intramedullary nailing
- External fixation
54Fibular Osteotomy
- Fibula can distract or unweight physiologic
forces seen in the tibia Teitz, C.C.
e.t.al.JBJS 1980 - Often used as adjunctive procedure to assist with
deformity correction and surgical stabilization
of tibia - Dynamizes tibial to augment healing environment
55Bone Grafting
- Osteoinductive - contain proteins or chemotactic
factors that attract vascular ingrowth and
healing - i.e.. demineralized bone matrix BMPs
- Osteoconductive - contains a scaffolding for
which new bone growth can occur - i.e. allograft bone, calcium hydroxyappatite
56Bone Grafting
- Used to stimulate biologic response of healing in
nonunions (usually atrophic nonunions) - Also used to fill defects in fracture zone
- i.e. up to 6 cm intercalary defects of long
bones) - Bosse, MJ e.t.al. JBJS 1989
57rhBMP-2
- 44 reduction in need for secondary intervention
in the treatment of acute open tibial fractures - Gorender,S
e.t.al. JBJS 2002
58rhBMP-2
- Reduces incidence of nonunion in high risk
fractures - Believed to reduce the need for autologous bone
grafting - Theoretically makes sense in the operative
treatment of nonunions
59Plate Osteosynthesis
- Corrects malalignment
- Restores function stabilizes fracture fragments
directly - Compresses fragments in some circumstances to
augment healing - Allows patients to mobilize surrounding joints
and dynamize fracture environment - Requires adequate skin and soft tissue coverage
- Often used with adjunctive bone graft
60Locking Plate Technology
- Will give better fixation in pathologic bone
- Most likely will prevent early failure
- Occasionally seen with traditional compression
plating techniques
61Intramedullary Nailing
- Mechanically stabilizes long bone nonunions as a
load sharing implant - Corrects malalignment
- Reaming is initially detrimental to
intramedullary blood supply, but it does recover
and is believed to stimulate biologic healing at
fracture - Allow patient to mobilize surrounding joints and
dynamize fracture environment
62Intramedullary Nailing
- Can be performed without direct exposure or
dissection of the fracture soft tissue envelope - Nonapplicable in articular fractures
63External Fixation
- Correct malalignment
- Used primarily in management of infected
nonunions - Allows for repeated debridements, soft tissue
reconstructive procedures, and adjunctive
bone-grafting - Small wire ring fixators can also allow for bone
transport into large intercalary defects - Ring fixators can also generate large compressive
forces at fracture to allow mobilization of
joints and improve fracture healing environment
If you would like to volunteer as an author for
the Resident Slide Project or recommend updates
to any of the following slides, please send an
e-mail to ota_at_aaos.org
Return to General/Principles Index
E-mail OTA about Questions/Comments