Journal Conference - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Journal Conference

Description:

Emergent Use of Anticoagulation for Treatment of Patients With ... TOPAS. Therapy of Patients With Acute Stroke (Stroke. 32(1):22-29, January 2001) TAIST ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: sam64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Journal Conference


1
Journal Conference
  • 2003-10-14
  • ???????
  • ???????

2
Emergent Use of Anticoagulation for Treatment of
Patients With Ischemic Stroke
  • Stroke. 33(3)856-861, March 2002.

3
Trials for Anticoagulants in Acute Ischemic
Stroke
  • FISS
  • Fraxiparine Ischemic Stroke Study (N Engl J Med.
    1995 333 15881593)
  • IST
  • International Stroke Trial (Lancet. 1997 349
    15691581)
  • TOAST
  • Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment
    (JAMA. 1998 279 12651272)
  • FISS-bis
  • second Fraxiparine Ischemic Stroke Study
    (Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 9 1623)
  • HAEST
  • Heparin Aspirin Ischemic Stroke Trial (Lancet.
    2000 355 12051210)
  • TOPAS
  • Therapy of Patients With Acute Stroke (Stroke.
    32(1)22-29, January 2001)
  • TAIST
  • Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (Lancet.
    2001 358 702710)

4
Characteristics of Trials Reviewed
  • Randomised
  • Double blind except IST
  • Anticoagulants was started within 48hr of stroke
  • Studies was analyzed individually

5
(No Transcript)
6
Key Questions Reviewed
  • Safety of Emergent Anticoagulation
  • Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis
  • Prevention of Early Recurrent Stroke
  • Halting Neurological Worsening
  • Reducing Mortality and Disability From Stroke
  • Anticoagulation as an Adjunctive Therapy
  • Current Status of Emergent Anticoagulation

7
Safety of Emergent Anticoagulation
8
Risk of Hemorrhagic Transformation with Emergent
Anticoagulants use
  • NIHSS gt 15
  • High dose anticoagulant is used
  • No comparison of risk between different
    anticoagulants
  • Non-neurologic hemorrhagic complication
  • All the trials demonstrate an increased risk of
    hemorrhage with the administration of
    anticoagulants

9
Prevention of Early Recurrent Stroke
10
Halting Neurological Worsening
11
Reducing Mortality and Disability From Stroke
  • anticoagulants has not been associated with an
    increased rate of early mortality
  • No significant decline in death or disability or
    increase in favorable outcomes with the
    administration of anticoagulants
  • no net benefit from urgent anticoagulation

12
(No Transcript)
13
Current Status of Emergent Anticoagulation
  • Available trials do not provide any data to
    support the emergent administration of
    anticoagulants as a monotherapy for treating most
    patients with acute ischemic stroke
  • No strong evidence to support the use of emergent
    anticoagulant therapy in the prevention of early
    recurrent stroke, in the arrest of neurological
    worsening, in the reduction of mortality, or in
    improving outcomes
  • The studies show that anticoagulants are
    associated with an increase in the risk of
    serious bleeding complications, including
    symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation of the
    infarction

14
Considering the Role of Heparin and
Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in Acute Ischemic
Stroke
  • Stroke. 33(7)1927-1933, July 2002

15
Key Questions Discussed
  • anticoagulation with parenteral unfractionated
    intravenous heparin (UFIH) and low-molecular-weigh
    t heparin (LMWH) for acute ischemic stroke
    remains an area of ongoing controversy
  • lack of knowledge about a number of relevant
    variables such as the precise risk of early
    recurrent stroke (RS), the effect of UFIH and
    LMWH on recurrence risk, the natural history for
    the risk of secondary hemorrhagic conversion
    (SHC) and the effect of heparin on this risk, and
    the effects of UFIH and LMWH on improving stroke
    outcome

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in acute
ischemic stroke Report of the Joint Stroke
Guideline Development Committee of the American
Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke
Association (a Dividion of the American Heart
Association)
  • Neurology July 2002

20
Objectives
  • Reviewed the published evidence relevant to the
    effects of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents
    on acute ischemic stroke mortality, morbidity,
    and recurrence rates as well as associated
    ancillary benefits and risks of those treatments
    on the rates of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary
    embolus, and cardiovascular complications

21
Methods
  • Reviewed by experienced neurologists appointed by
  • Quality Standards Subcommittee (QSS) and the
    Therapeutics and Technology Assessment (TTA)
    Subcommittee of the American Academy of
    Neurology,
  • The Stroke Council and Science Advisory and
    Coordinating Committee (SACC) of the American
    Heart Association (AHA).

22
Methods
  • The literature review was based on MEDLINE
    searches from 1966 through February 2001
  • Treatments trial included unfractionated heparin,
    low molecular weight (LMW) heparin, heparinoids,
    aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, dipyridamole,
    hirudin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists
  • a study had to be a controlled clinical trial
    that tested an anticoagulant or antiplatelet
    agent in patients with ischemic stroke
  • the drug must have been given within 48 hours of
    symptom onset

23
(No Transcript)
24
Results
  • Of the 310 study reviewed, only 10 articles
    satisfied all inclusion criteria. Despite the
    apparently common use of anticoagulation for
    progressing stroke or vertebrobasilar stroke, we
    found no Class I or II evidence addressing these
    specific clinical situations.
  • None of the included studies that fulfilled the
    prespecified inclusion criteria and addressed the
    reviews key questions examined the use of
    hirudin, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, or
    clopidogrel in the setting of acute ischemic
    stroke

25
(No Transcript)
26
Recommendations 1
  • Patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting
    within 48 hours of symptom onset should be given
    aspirin (160 to 325 mg/day) to reduce stroke
    mortality and decrease morbidity, provided
    contraindications such as allergy and
    gastrointestinal bleeding are absent, and the
    patient has or will not be treated with
    recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator
    (Grade A). The data are insufficient at this time
    to recommend the use of any other platelet
    antiaggregant in the setting of acute ischemic
    stroke.

27
Recommendations 2
  • Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, LMW
    heparins, and heparinoids may be considered for
    DVT prophylaxis in at-risk patients with acute
    ischemic stroke, recognizing that
    nonpharmacologic treatments for DVT prevention
    also exist (Grade A). A benefit in reducing the
    incidence of PE has not been demonstrated. The
    relative benefits of these agents must be weighed
    against the risk of systemic and intracerebral
    hemorrhage.

28
Recommendations 3
  • Although there is some evidence that fixed-dose,
    subcutaneous, unfractionated heparin reduces
    early recurrent ischemic stroke, this benefit is
    negated by a concomitant increase in the
    occurrence of hemorrhage. Therefore, use of
    subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is not
    recommended for decreasing the risk of death or
    stroke-related morbidity or for preventing early
    stroke recurrence (Grade A).

29
Recommendations 4
  • Dose-adjusted, unfractionated heparin is not
    recommended for reducing morbidity, mortality, or
    early recurrent stroke in patients with acute
    stroke (i.e., in the first 48 hours) because the
    evidence indicates it is not efficacious and may
    be associated with increased bleeding
    complications (Grade B).

30
Recommendations 5
  • High-dose LMW heparin/heparinoids have not been
    associated with either benefit or harm in
    reducing morbidity, mortality, or early recurrent
    stroke in patients with acute stroke and are,
    therefore, not recommended for these goals (Grade
    A).

31
Recommendations 6
  • IV, unfractionated heparin or high-dose LMW
    heparin/heparinoids are not recommended for any
    specific subgroup of patients with acute ischemic
    stroke that is based on any presumed stroke
    mechanism or location (e.g., cardioembolic, large
    vessel atherosclerotic, vertebrobasilar, or
    progressing stroke) because data are
    insufficient. Although the LMW heparin,
    dalteparin, at high doses may be efficacious in
    patients with atrial fibrillation, it is not more
    efficacious than aspirin in this setting. Because
    aspirin is easier to administer, it, rather than
    dalteparin, is recommended for the various stroke
    subgroups (Grade A).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com