Title: Journal Conference
1Journal Conference
- 2003-10-14
- ???????
- ???????
2Emergent Use of Anticoagulation for Treatment of
Patients With Ischemic Stroke
- Stroke. 33(3)856-861, March 2002.
3Trials for Anticoagulants in Acute Ischemic
Stroke
- FISS
- Fraxiparine Ischemic Stroke Study (N Engl J Med.
1995 333 15881593) - IST
- International Stroke Trial (Lancet. 1997 349
15691581) - TOAST
- Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment
(JAMA. 1998 279 12651272) - FISS-bis
- second Fraxiparine Ischemic Stroke Study
(Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 9 1623) - HAEST
- Heparin Aspirin Ischemic Stroke Trial (Lancet.
2000 355 12051210) - TOPAS
- Therapy of Patients With Acute Stroke (Stroke.
32(1)22-29, January 2001) - TAIST
- Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (Lancet.
2001 358 702710)
4Characteristics of Trials Reviewed
- Randomised
- Double blind except IST
- Anticoagulants was started within 48hr of stroke
- Studies was analyzed individually
-
5(No Transcript)
6Key Questions Reviewed
- Safety of Emergent Anticoagulation
- Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Prevention of Early Recurrent Stroke
- Halting Neurological Worsening
- Reducing Mortality and Disability From Stroke
- Anticoagulation as an Adjunctive Therapy
- Current Status of Emergent Anticoagulation
7Safety of Emergent Anticoagulation
8Risk of Hemorrhagic Transformation with Emergent
Anticoagulants use
- NIHSS gt 15
- High dose anticoagulant is used
- No comparison of risk between different
anticoagulants - Non-neurologic hemorrhagic complication
- All the trials demonstrate an increased risk of
hemorrhage with the administration of
anticoagulants
9Prevention of Early Recurrent Stroke
10Halting Neurological Worsening
11Reducing Mortality and Disability From Stroke
- anticoagulants has not been associated with an
increased rate of early mortality - No significant decline in death or disability or
increase in favorable outcomes with the
administration of anticoagulants - no net benefit from urgent anticoagulation
12(No Transcript)
13Current Status of Emergent Anticoagulation
- Available trials do not provide any data to
support the emergent administration of
anticoagulants as a monotherapy for treating most
patients with acute ischemic stroke - No strong evidence to support the use of emergent
anticoagulant therapy in the prevention of early
recurrent stroke, in the arrest of neurological
worsening, in the reduction of mortality, or in
improving outcomes - The studies show that anticoagulants are
associated with an increase in the risk of
serious bleeding complications, including
symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation of the
infarction
14Considering the Role of Heparin and
Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in Acute Ischemic
Stroke
- Stroke. 33(7)1927-1933, July 2002
15Key Questions Discussed
- anticoagulation with parenteral unfractionated
intravenous heparin (UFIH) and low-molecular-weigh
t heparin (LMWH) for acute ischemic stroke
remains an area of ongoing controversy - lack of knowledge about a number of relevant
variables such as the precise risk of early
recurrent stroke (RS), the effect of UFIH and
LMWH on recurrence risk, the natural history for
the risk of secondary hemorrhagic conversion
(SHC) and the effect of heparin on this risk, and
the effects of UFIH and LMWH on improving stroke
outcome
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in acute
ischemic stroke Report of the Joint Stroke
Guideline Development Committee of the American
Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke
Association (a Dividion of the American Heart
Association)
20Objectives
- Reviewed the published evidence relevant to the
effects of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents
on acute ischemic stroke mortality, morbidity,
and recurrence rates as well as associated
ancillary benefits and risks of those treatments
on the rates of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary
embolus, and cardiovascular complications
21Methods
- Reviewed by experienced neurologists appointed by
- Quality Standards Subcommittee (QSS) and the
Therapeutics and Technology Assessment (TTA)
Subcommittee of the American Academy of
Neurology, - The Stroke Council and Science Advisory and
Coordinating Committee (SACC) of the American
Heart Association (AHA).
22Methods
- The literature review was based on MEDLINE
searches from 1966 through February 2001 - Treatments trial included unfractionated heparin,
low molecular weight (LMW) heparin, heparinoids,
aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, dipyridamole,
hirudin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists - a study had to be a controlled clinical trial
that tested an anticoagulant or antiplatelet
agent in patients with ischemic stroke - the drug must have been given within 48 hours of
symptom onset
23(No Transcript)
24Results
- Of the 310 study reviewed, only 10 articles
satisfied all inclusion criteria. Despite the
apparently common use of anticoagulation for
progressing stroke or vertebrobasilar stroke, we
found no Class I or II evidence addressing these
specific clinical situations. - None of the included studies that fulfilled the
prespecified inclusion criteria and addressed the
reviews key questions examined the use of
hirudin, dipyridamole, ticlopidine, or
clopidogrel in the setting of acute ischemic
stroke
25(No Transcript)
26Recommendations 1
- Patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting
within 48 hours of symptom onset should be given
aspirin (160 to 325 mg/day) to reduce stroke
mortality and decrease morbidity, provided
contraindications such as allergy and
gastrointestinal bleeding are absent, and the
patient has or will not be treated with
recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator
(Grade A). The data are insufficient at this time
to recommend the use of any other platelet
antiaggregant in the setting of acute ischemic
stroke.
27Recommendations 2
- Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, LMW
heparins, and heparinoids may be considered for
DVT prophylaxis in at-risk patients with acute
ischemic stroke, recognizing that
nonpharmacologic treatments for DVT prevention
also exist (Grade A). A benefit in reducing the
incidence of PE has not been demonstrated. The
relative benefits of these agents must be weighed
against the risk of systemic and intracerebral
hemorrhage.
28Recommendations 3
- Although there is some evidence that fixed-dose,
subcutaneous, unfractionated heparin reduces
early recurrent ischemic stroke, this benefit is
negated by a concomitant increase in the
occurrence of hemorrhage. Therefore, use of
subcutaneous unfractionated heparin is not
recommended for decreasing the risk of death or
stroke-related morbidity or for preventing early
stroke recurrence (Grade A).
29Recommendations 4
- Dose-adjusted, unfractionated heparin is not
recommended for reducing morbidity, mortality, or
early recurrent stroke in patients with acute
stroke (i.e., in the first 48 hours) because the
evidence indicates it is not efficacious and may
be associated with increased bleeding
complications (Grade B).
30Recommendations 5
- High-dose LMW heparin/heparinoids have not been
associated with either benefit or harm in
reducing morbidity, mortality, or early recurrent
stroke in patients with acute stroke and are,
therefore, not recommended for these goals (Grade
A).
31Recommendations 6
- IV, unfractionated heparin or high-dose LMW
heparin/heparinoids are not recommended for any
specific subgroup of patients with acute ischemic
stroke that is based on any presumed stroke
mechanism or location (e.g., cardioembolic, large
vessel atherosclerotic, vertebrobasilar, or
progressing stroke) because data are
insufficient. Although the LMW heparin,
dalteparin, at high doses may be efficacious in
patients with atrial fibrillation, it is not more
efficacious than aspirin in this setting. Because
aspirin is easier to administer, it, rather than
dalteparin, is recommended for the various stroke
subgroups (Grade A).