Title: Global Business Today, 5e
1(No Transcript)
2chapter
8
- Regional Economic Integration
3Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- INTRODUCTION
- Regional economic integration refers to
agreements between countries in a geographic
region to reduce tariff and nontariff barriers to
the free flow of goods, services, and factors of
production between each other. - While regional trade agreements are designed to
promote free trade, there is some concern that
the world is moving toward a situation in which a
number of regional trade blocks compete against
each other.
4Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- LEVELS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION
-
- There are five levels of economic integration.
- In a free trade area all barriers to the trade
of goods and services among member countries are
removed, but members determine their own trade
policies with regard to nonmembers - Examples of free trade areas include the
European Free Trade Association (between Norway,
Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland), and the
North American Free Trade Agreement (between the
U.S., Canada, and Mexico)
5Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The different levels of economic integration are
shown in Figure 8.1.
6Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The customs union is one step further along the
road to full economic and political integration,
and eliminates trade barriers between member
countries and adopts a common external trade
policy - The Andean Pact (between Bolivia, Columbia,
Ecuador and Peru) is an example of a customs union
7Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The common market has no barriers to trade
between member countries, a common external trade
policy, and the free movement of the factors of
production - MERCOSUR (between Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay,
and Uruguay) is aiming for common market status
8Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- An economic union involves the free flow of
products and factors of production between
members, the adoption of a common external trade
policy, and in addition, a common currency,
harmonization of the member countries tax rates,
and a common monetary and fiscal policy - The European Union (EU) is an economic union,
although an imperfect one since not all members
of the EU have adopted the euro, and differences
in tax rates across countries still remain
9Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- In a political union, independent states are
combined into a single union
- The EU is headed toward at least partial
political union, and the United States is an
example of even closer political union
10Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Classroom Performance System
- In a _______, all barriers to the free flow of
goods and services between member countries are
removed, and a common policy toward nonmembers is
established. - Free trade area
- Customs union
- Common market
- Economic union
11Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Classroom Performance System
- The European Union is an example of a(n)
- Free trade area
- Customs union
- Common market
- Economic union
12Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- THE CASE FOR REGIONAL INTEGRATION
- The Economic Case for Integration
- Regional economic integration is an attempt to
achieve additional gains from the free flow of
trade and investment between countries beyond
those attainable under international agreements
such as the WTO -
13Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Political Case for Integration
- The political case for integration has two main
points
- by linking countries together, making them more
dependent on each other, and forming a structure
where they regularly have to interact, the
likelihood of violent conflict and war will
decrease - by linking countries together, they have greater
clout and are politically much stronger in
dealing with other nations
14Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Impediments to Integration
- There are two main impediments to integration
-
- while a nation as a whole may benefit from a
regional free trade agreement, certain groups may
lose
- concerns over the loss of national sovereignty
15Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- THE CASE AGAINST REGIONAL INTEGRATION
-
- Regional economic integration only makes sense
when the amount of trade it creates exceeds the
amount it diverts
- Trade creation occurs when low cost producers
within the free trade area replace high cost
domestic producers
- Trade diversion occurs when higher cost
suppliers within the free trade area replace
lower cost external suppliers
16Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN EUROPE
-
- Evolution of the European Union
- The EU is the result of
-
- the devastation of two world wars on Western
Europe and the desire for a lasting peace
- the desire by the European nations to hold their
own on the worlds political and economic stage
17Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The evolution of the European Union is shown in
Map 8.1.
18Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The forerunner of the EU was the European Coal
and Steel Community, which had the goal of
removing barriers to trade in coal, iron, steel,
and scrap metal formed in 1951 - The European Economic Community was formed in
1957 at the Treaty of Rome with the goal of
becoming a common market
19Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Political Structure of the European Union
- The five main institutions of the EU are
- the European Council (resolves major policy
issues and sets policy directions)
- the European Commission (responsible for
implementing aspects of EU law and monitoring
member states to ensure they are complying with
EU laws) - the Council of the European Parliament (the
ultimate controlling authority within the EU)
- the European Parliament (debates legislation
proposed by the commission and forwarded to it by
the council)
- the Court of Justice (the supreme appeals court
for EU law)
20Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Single European Act
- The Single European Act, adopted by the EU
member nations in 1987, committed the EC
countries to work toward establishment of a
single market by December 31, 1992 - The Stimulus for the Single European Act
- The Single European Act was born out of
frustration among EC members that the community
was not living up to its promise
21Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Objectives of the Act
- frontier controls to remove all frontier
controls between EC countries
- mutual recognition of standards to apply the
principle of mutual recognition, which is that
a standard developed in one EC country should be
accepted in another, provided it meets basic
requirements in such matters as health and
safety - public procurement to open procurement to
non-national suppliers
22Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- financial services to lift barriers to
competition in the retail banking and insurance
businesses
- exchange controls to remove all restrictions on
foreign exchange transactions between members by
the end of 1992
- freight transport to abolish restrictions on
sabotage, the right of foreign truckers to pick
up and deliver goods within another members
borders, by the end of 1992 - supply-side effects should lower the costs of
doing business in the EC, but the single-market
program is also expected to have more complicated
supply-side effects
23Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Impact
- The Single European Act provided the impetus for
the restructuring of substantial sections of
European industry allowing for faster economic
growth than would otherwise have been the case
24Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Establishment of the Euro
- The Treaty of Maastricht, signed in 1991,
committed the EU to adopt a single currency, the
euro, by January 1, 1999
- The euro is used by 12 of the 25 member states
- By adopting the euro, the EU has created the
second largest currency zone in the world after
that of the U.S. dollar
- For now, three EU countries, Britain, Denmark
and Sweden, are opting out of the euro-zone
- Euro notes and coins were issued on January 1st,
2002 (in the interim, national currencies
circulated, and were worth a defined amount of
euros)
25Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Benefits of Euro
- Businesses and individuals should realize
significant savings from having to handle one
currency, rather than many
- The adoption of a common currency will make it
easier to compare prices across Europe
26Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Faced with lower prices European producers will
be forced to look for ways to reduce their
production costs in order to maintain their
profit margins - The introduction of a common currency should
give a strong boost to the development of highly
liquid pan-European capital market
- The development of a pan-European euro
denominated capital market will increase the
range of investment options open both to
individuals and institutions
27Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Costs of Euro
- A drawback of a single currency is that national
authorities lose control over the monetary
policy
- The Maastricht treaty called for the
establishment of an independent European central
bank (ECB) with a clear mandate to manage
monetary policy so as to ensure price stability
28Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The ECB sets interest rates and determines
monetary policy across the euro-zone
- Another drawback of the Euro is that the EU is
not an optimal currency area (an area where
similarities in the underlying structure if
economic activities make it feasible to adopt a
single currency and use a single exchange rate as
an instrument of macro-economic policy)
29Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Early Experience
- Since its establishment January 1, 1999, the
euro has had a volatile trading history with the
U.S. dollar
- Initially, the euro fell in value relative to
the dollar, but strengthened to a five year high
of 1.33 in March 2005
30Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Enlargement of the European Union
- Many countries, particularly from Eastern
Europe, have applied for membership in the EU
- Ten countries joined on May 1, 2004 expanding
the EU to 25 states, with population of 450
million people, and a single continental economy
with a GDP of 11 trillion
31Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Classroom Performance System
- The ultimate decision making body of the European
Union is the
- Council of the European Union
- European Parliament
- Court of Justice
- European Commission
32Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION IN THE AMERICAS
- Regional economic integration is on the rise in
the Americas.
-
33Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Regional economic integration in the Americas is
shown in Map 8.2.
34Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
- NAFTAs Contents
- The free trade agreement between the United
States, Canada, and Mexico became law January 1,
1994
- NAFTA abolished tariffs on 99 percent of the
goods traded between Mexico, Canada, and the
United States, removed most barriers on the
cross-border flow of services, protects
intellectual property rights, removes most
restrictions on FDI between the three member
countries, allows each country to apply its own
environmental standards, provided such standards
have a scientific base, establishes two
commissions to impose fines and remove trade
privileges when environmental standards or
legislation involving health and safety, minimum
wages, or child labor are ignored
35Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Case for NAFTA
- Proponents of NAFTA have argued that it will
provide economic gains to all countries
- Mexico will benefit from increased jobs as low
cost production moves south, and will attain more
rapid economic growth as a result
- The U.S. and Canada will benefit from the access
to a large and increasingly prosperous market and
from the lower prices for consumers from goods
produced in Mexico - In addition, U.S. and Canadian firms with
production sites in Mexico will be more
competitive on world markets
36Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Case against NAFTA
- Opponents of NAFTA argued
- that jobs would be lost and wage levels would
decline in the U.S. and Canada
- Mexican workers would emigrate north
- pollution would increase due to Mexico's more
lax standards
- Mexico would lose its sovereignty
37Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- NAFTA The Results so Far
- Studies of NAFTAs early impact suggest that
both advocates and detractors may have been
guilty of exaggeration
- The agreement has helped to create the
background for increased political stability in
Mexico
38Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Enlargement
- Several other Latin American countries have
indicated their desire to eventually join NAFTA
- Currently both Canada and the U.S. are adopting
a wait and see attitude with regard to most
countries
39Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Classroom Performance System
- Studies show that after its first decade,
- There was a small net gain of jobs in the U.S.
- Exports from the U.S. failed to grow
- NAFTAs overall impact has been significant
- The U.S., Canada, and Mexico all experienced a
decrease in productivity
40Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- The Andean Community
- The Andean Pact, originally formed in 1969, was
based on the EU model
- By the mid-1980s, the Andean Pact had more or
less failed
- In the late 1980s, Latin American governments
began to adopt free market economic policies
- In 1990, the Andean Pact was re-launched, and
now operates as a customs union
- In 2003, it signed an agreement with MERCOSUR to
restart negotiations towards the creation of a
free trade area
41Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- MERCOSUR
- MERCOSUR originated in 1988 as a free trade pact
between Brazil and Argentina
- In 1990, it was expanded to include Paraguay and
Uruguay
- MERCOSUR has been making progress on reducing
trade barriers between member states
- Given some fairly high tariffs for goods from
other countries, it appears that in some
industries, MERCOSUR is diverting trade rather
than creating trade, and local firms are
investing in industries that are not competitive
on a worldwide basis
42Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Central American Common Market and CARICOM
- There are two other trade pacts in the Americas
- the Central American Trade Market
- CARICOM
- Neither has made much progress yet.
43Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Free Trade of the Americas
- Talks began in April 1998 to establish a FTAA
(Free Trade of The Americas) by 2005
- If the FTAA is established, it will have major
implications for cross-border trade and
investment flows within the hemisphere
- The FTAA would create a free trade area of
nearly 800 million people
44Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION ELSEWHERE
- Association of Southeast Asian Nations
- Formed in 1967, ASEAN currently includes Brunei,
Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore,
Thailand, and, most recently, Vietnam, Myanmar,
Laos, and Cambodia - The basic objectives of ASEAN are to foster
freer trade between member countries and to
achieve some cooperation in their industrial
policies - In 2003, an ASEAN Free trade Area (AFTA) between
the six original members of ASEAN came into full
effect with a goal of reducing import tariffs
among the older members to zero by 2010, and for
newer members by 2015
45Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
- APEC currently has 21 members including the
United States, Japan, and China
- The stated aim of APEC is to increase
multilateral cooperation in view of the economic
rise of the Pacific nations and the growing
interdependence within the region
46Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Regional Trade Blocs in Africa
- There are nine trade blocs on the African
continent, however progress toward the
establishment of meaningful trade blocs has been
slow
47Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGERS
- Opportunities
-
- Markets that were formerly protected from
foreign competition are opened
- The free movement of goods across borders, the
harmonization of product standards, and the
simplification of tax regimes, makes it possible
for firms to realize potentially enormous cost
economies by centralizing production in those
locations where the mix of factor costs and
skills is optimal
48Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- Threats
- The business environment becomes competitive
-
- For non-EU and/or non-North American firms,
challenges arise from the likely long-term
improvements in the competitive position of many
European and North American companies -
49Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
-
- There is a risk of being shut out of the single
market by the creation of a trade fortress
- Firms may be limited in their ability to pursue
the strategy of their choice in the EU as the EU
continues to increase its role in competition
policy and intervene and impose conditions on
companies proposing mergers and acquisitions
50Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 1. NAFTA has produced significant net benefits
for the Canadian, Mexican, and U.S. economy.
Discuss.
51Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 2. What are the economic and political arguments
for regional economic integration? Given these
arguments, why dont we see more substantial
examples of integration in the world economy?
52Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 3. What effect is creation of a single market and
a single currency within the EU likely to have
on competition within the EU? Why?
53Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 4. Do you think it is correct for the European
Commission to restrict mergers between American
companies that do business in Europe? (For
example, the European Commission vetoed the
proposed merger between WorldCom and Sprint, both
U.S. companies, and it carefully reviewed the
merger between AOL and TimeWarner, again both
U.S. companies.)
54Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 5. How should a U.S. business firm that currently
only exports to ASEAN countries respond to the
creation of a single market in this regional
grouping?
55Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 6. How should a firm that has self-sufficient
production facilities to in several ASEAN
countries respond to the creation of a single
market? What are the constraints on its ability
to respond in a manner that minimizes production
costs?
56Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 7. After a promising start, in the last few
years, MERCOSUR, the major Latin American trade
agreement, has faltered and made little progress
since 2000. What problems are hurting MERCOSUR?
What can be done to solve these problems?
57Chapter 8 Regional Economic Integration
- CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
- 8. Would the establishment of a Free Trade Area
of the Americas (FTAA) in 2005 be good for the
two most advanced economies of the hemisphere,
the United States and Canada? How might the
establishment of the FTAA impact the strategy of
North American firms?