Title: NCAA Division I Academic Reform: An Update
1NCAA Division I Academic Reform An Update
2Overview of Session
- Initial-eligibility standards.
- Initial-eligibility trends and issues.
- Progress-toward-degree standards.
- NCAA Division I Academic Performance Program
rates of measure. - Penalties and incentives structure.
3Academic Reform as a Package
- Individual student-athlete accountability through
increased academic-eligibility standards. - New academic rates of measure, real-time rate and
better graduation rate. - Team performance accountability through
contemporaneous and historical penalties. - Institutional/athletics department academic
accountability through historical penalties. - Rewards and recognition to academically
high-achieving teams. - ALL components critical to overall academic
improvement.
4Initial-Eligibility Standards
- Initial-eligibility legislation adopted October
2002/April 2003. - Increased number of core courses and changed the
grade-point-average(GPA)/test-score sliding
scale. - Eliminated partial qualifiers as a category.
- Eliminated use of computer science courses unless
such courses are in the mathematics or science
areas.
5Initial-Eligibility Standards
- Currently PSAs must pass 14 core courses as
follows - English (four years)
- Math (two years)
- Natural/physical science (two years)
- Social science (two years)
- Plus one additional year of English, math or
natural physical science and - Additional courses from above or foreign
language, philosophy or nondoctrinal religion
(three years).
6Initial-Eligibility Standards
- Effective August 1, 2008, PSAs must pass 16 core
courses as follows - English (four years)
- Math (three years)
- Natural/physical science (two years)
- Social science (two years)
- Plus one additional year of English, math or
natural/ physical science and - Additional courses from above or foreign
language, philosophy or nondoctrinal religion
(four years).
7Initial-Eligibility Trends and Issues
- High school reviews.
- Prospective student-athlete (PSA) reviews.
8Charge of Initial-Eligibility Trends Working Group
- NCAA President Myles Brand authorized creation
of a working group to review initial-eligibility
trends for the purpose of reviewing recent trends
in secondary-school education and how such trends
should impact NCAA legislation and academic
policies.
9Final Working Group Recommendation Additional
Review
- Amend NCAA Division I Bylaw 14.1.2.1 to provide
the NCAA the authority to conduct an academic
review of any high school and a review of any
PSAs academic record. - The review may result in a determination that the
high school or PSAs academic credentials may
not be used for the purpose of meeting
initial-eligibility requirements. - The reviews will be conducted consistent with
established policies and procedures. - Adopted by NCAA Board of Directors and NCAA
Division II Presidents Council in April.
10High School Review Process
- NCAA Initial-Eligibility Clearinghouse will
review high schools based on policies and
procedures. - Based on information provided by the high school,
the school will be evaluated by NCAA staff to
determine if high school is validated. - Evaluation may include on-site visit.
- Process will be conducted for all high schools in
clearinghouse database. - If high school is invalidated, it may appeal to
the high school review group. - Report provided to NCAA Division I
Academics/Eligibility/ Compliance Cabinet and
NCAA Division II Academic Requirements Committee
on an annual basis.
11Individual Prospective Student-Athlete Review
Process
- Basic Process PSA Review
- Clearinghouse will review individual records
based on policies and procedures. - If issue is identified and PSA is not on the
Institutional Review List (IRL), the case is put
on hold. - If issue is identified and PSA is on the IRL,
institution is notified that PSA needs special
review and additional information is needed. - Institution works with PSA to obtain additional
information. - Case is forwarded to NCAA staff staff reviews
information to determine if record should be
accepted.
12Individual Prospective Student-Athlete Review
Process
- Staff may issue the following decisions
- Validate the academic record and remove
indication of special review. - Validate the academic record, but indication of
special review remains. - Determine if academic record should not be
accepted. - If record is not accepted, clearinghouse runs
final certification without use of academic
credentials. - Institution may appeal decision to the NCAA
Student Review Group.
13Continuing-Eligibility Standards
- Continuing-eligibility legislation adopted
October 2002/April 2003. - Changed credit-hour requirements to better assess
that a student-athlete is functioning as a
student during the academic year. - Increased the degree-completion percentage
requirements. - Increased the GPA percentage requirements.
14Continuing-Eligibility Standards
- Student-athlete who initially enrolled in college
after August 1, 2003, must fulfill the following
credit-hour requirements - Pass six hours of academic credit during the
preceding regular academic term - Pass 18/27 hours during each regular academic
term - Pass 24/37 hours prior to the start of the
student-athletes second year of college
enrollment.
15Continuing-Eligibility Standards
- Student-athlete who initially enrolled in college
after August 1, 2003, must fulfill the following
percentage-of-degree requirements - Complete at least 40 percent of the declared
degree before the start of the third year of
enrollment - Complete at least 60 percent of the declared
degree before the start of the fourth year of
enrollment - Complete at least 80 percent of the declared
degree before the start of the fifth year of
enrollment.
16Continuing-Eligibility Standards
- Student-athlete who initially enrolled in college
after August 1, 2003, must fulfill the following
grade-point- average requirements - Present a cumulative GPA equal to 90 percent of
the GPA the institution requires for graduation
at the start of the second year of enrollment - Present a cumulative GPA equal to 95 percent of
the GPA the institution requires for graduation
at the start of the third year of enrollment and - Present a cumulative GPA equal to 100 percent of
the GPA the institution requires for graduation
at the start of the fourth and any subsequent
years of enrollment.
17Academic Performance ProgramRates of Measure
- Graduation Success Rate (GSR).
- NCAA Division I Academic Progress Rate (APR).
18Graduation Success Rate
- Why the GSR?
- More accurate than the federal graduation rate.
- Includes transfers into an institution.
- Includes midyear enrollees.
- Removes student-athletes who withdraw and would
have been academically eligible to compete the
next regular academic term had they returned. - Calculated for every sport.
19Graduation Success Rate (cont.)
- Data submitted electronically via
password-protected Web site. - Data used in analysis for historical penalties
and in appeal process. - Failure to submit will result in an institution
being declared ineligible for postseason
competition, including NCAA championships.
20Academic Progress Rate
- Why APR?
- Real-time rate.
- Includes all student-athletes meeting the
definition of the cohort on a team in a given
year (as opposed to entering class). - Used in analysis for contemporaneous and
historical penalties and public recognition for
successful programs. - Points awarded for eligibility/graduation and
retention. - Term-by-term measurement.
21Academic Progress Rate (cont.)
- Totaled over four years.
- Includes currently enrolled student-athletes
receiving institutional financial aid based in
any degree on athletics ability. - OR
- For nonscholarship programs/teams, a subset of
full-time recruited student-athletes who, on or
after the varsity team's first date of
competition in the championship segment, are
listed on the varsity team's roster. - Data is submitted electronically (please attend
the data-collection sessions for updates).
22Academic Progress Rate (cont.)
- Two available points each academic term.
- E point student-athlete meets all academic
eligibility standards (e.g., institutional,
conference, NCAA) for the next academic term. - R point student-athlete is enrolled full time
as of the fifth week of class of the next term. - points earned
- points possible
X 1000 APR
23Academic Progress Rate (cont.)
- Due date for APR data is six weeks after the
institution's first day of classes in the fall
term. - Failure to submit will result in an institution
being declared ineligible for postseason
competition, including NCAA championships. - 0/2 refers to a student-athlete who was not
retained and not eligible in the next academic
term. - Adjustments to data are available more details
in the data-collection session. - Professional departures.
- Medical hardship.
- More details in data-collection guide.
24Penalty and Incentives Structure
25Academic Performance Program Penalty Structure
- Two different penalty structures.
- Contemporaneous penalties.
- Intent is to encourage improved academic
performance, serve as a warning for
underperforming teams and help avoid the more
serious historical penalties (e.g.,
rehabilitative in nature). - Historical penalties.
- More significant punitive measure for teams that
habitually under perform academically.
26Contemporaneous Penalties
- Financial aid restriction.
- Teams with an APR below 925 are subject to
contemporaneous penalties if - Any student-athlete departed the institution and
- Did not earn eligibility (0/2).
- Penalty aid previously awarded to a
student-athlete who did not earn eligibility for
the next regular academic term and did not return
to the institution (0/2) cannot be re-awarded.
27Contemporaneous Penalties Determining the Penalty
- Penalty must be taken at the next available
opportunity. - Some exceptions apply (e.g., student-athlete with
no athletics eligibility remaining). - Maximum limit on the number of penalties.
28Historical-Penalty Structure
- Incremental penalties.
- Occasion 1 public warning.
- Occasion 2 recruiting/financial aid/practice.
- Occasion 3 competition restrictions.
- Occasion 4 membership status.
- Bylaw 23.2
29Institution X Habitually Underperforming Team
- 2006-07 Occasion 1 public warning.
- 2007-08 Occasion 2 financial aid, recruiting
and practice limitations. - 2008-09 Occasion 3 preseason and
postseason limitations. - 2009-10 Occasion 4 membership status.
- Must have three clean years or institution
progresses to next occasion.
30Historical Penalties By the Numbers
- 2006-07 0.5 to 1 percent of all squads or
approximately 30 to 60 teams. - 2007-08 When squad-size adjustment is no longer
in effect, 2.5 to 6 percent of all teams or
approximately 150 to 360 teams.
31Historical-Penalty Structure
- Approved by NCAA Division I Board of Directors in
August. - This structure will be used this year to
determine historical penalties, including
Occasion-One Public Warning. - Referred to as Improvement Plus.
32Historical-Penalty StructureStep One
- Is the teams multiyear APR below 900?
Yes Proceed to step 2.
No Team not subject to historical penalty. STOP.
Squad-size adjustment will be used in 2006-07
for all teams. After 2006-07, squad-size
adjustment used only for teams with Nlt30. NOTE
900 APR correlates to approximately 50 percent
GSR.
33Historical-Penalty StructureStep Two
- Is the team demonstrating meaningful APR
improvement toward 925?
Yes Proceed to step three.
No Team subject to historical penalty unless
waiver granted.
34Meaningful Academic Progress Rate Improvement
Step Two
- A statistical analysis that identifies meaningful
APR improvement. - Accounts for squad size.
35Historical-Penalty StructureStep Three
- Is the team outperforming expectations given
institutional academic characteristics,
institutional financial resources or academic
levels in the sport?
Yes Team not subject to historical penalty.
No Team subject to historical penalty unless
waiver granted.
36Institutional Characteristics Step Three
- Student-athlete academic performance (by team)
compared to student-body academic performance at
institution. - Student-athletes must have an APR that projects
to a federal graduation rate of 10 or more
percentage points higher than the student-body to
meet this filter.
37Academic Progress Rate/Federal Graduation Rate
Concordance Chart
38Institutional Characteristics (cont.)
- Example APR of 850, projects to federal
graduation rate of 10 percent. - Student-body federal graduation rate is 20
percent. - This team would NOT meet this filter.
- Team would need an APR of 890, projects to a
federal graduation rate of 30 percent to meet
this filter.
39Institutional Characteristics (cont.)
- Comparison of financial resources at an NCAA
Division I institution to identify the bottom 10
percent of schools. Teams in lowest 10 percent
will compare favorably. - Variables
- Per capita educational expenditures.
- Per capita athletics department operating
expenditures. - Average number of Pell Grants among all students.
40By-Sport Comparison Step Three
- Teams must be above the 10th percentile to
compare favorably. - APRs Needed to Meet By-Sport Filter
41Academic Progress Rate -Improvement Plans
- Teams with a multiyear APR below 925 without the
use of the squad-size adjustment are required to
create an APR-improvement plan. - No reporting requirement file on campus.
- Should include broad-based participation on
campus.
42Incentives/Rewards
- Public recognition.
- Top 10 percent in each sport based on team APR.
- Released March 1, 2006, and annually thereafter.
- Other incentives.
- To be finalized over the next year.
43