Title: Food Biotechnology Ethics
1Food Biotechnology Ethics
- Clark Ford, Ph.D.
- Food Science and Human Nutrition
- Iowa State University
2What is Food Biotechnology?
- Food technology based on biology
- Ancient food biotechnology
- Fermentation by microbes
- Cheese
- Beer
- Wine
- Bread
- Modern food biotechnology
- Tissue culture
- Genetic engineering
- Different from plant and animal breeding
3Genetic Engineering
- Genetic Engineering involves manipulating DNA
molecules - DNA from one species is spliced into the DNA of
another species - Called Recombinant DNA
- Genetically Engineered organisms are called
- Genetically Modified
- Transgenic
4Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 1953 Structure of DNA discovered
- 1973 First gene cloned
- in microbes
- 1977 Asilomar Conference in USA
- Recombinant DNA safety
- Regulation
- Risk assessment
- Containment
5Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 1990 Recombinant Chymosin Approved by FDA
- Enzyme for cheese making
- Originally from calf stomach
- Bovine gene expressed in GRAS microbes
- In 80 of U.S. cheese
- Vegetarian cheese in England
6Other Products from Genetically Engineered
Microbes
- Food enzymes
- Bread
- HFCS Sweeteners
- Amino acids
- Peptides
- Nutrasweet
- Flavors
- Organic acids
- Polysaccharides
- Vitamins
7Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 1994 FDA approves
- Flavr Savr Tomato
- Prolonged shelf life
- Improved quality
- Voluntarily labeled
8Other Genetically Engineered Plants
- Agronomic traits
- BT Corn
- Roundup Ready Soy
- Disease Resistance
- Food quality
- Nutrition
- Metabolic products
- Vaccines
9Bt Corn
- Natural insecticide from Bacillus thuringiensis
- Non-toxic to humans
- Target insect corn borer
- Potential to
- reduce insecticide use
- reduce mycotoxins
- 40 U.S. Corn crop Bt (2006)
10Bt Concerns
- Bt pollen harms non-target species?
- Bt crops select for resistant insects
- Bt pollen can drift to organic fields
- Food system failed to keep BT Starlink corn out
of human food products
11Herbicide Resistance
- Roundup Ready Soy, Corn, Canola
- Allows post-emergence herbicide spraying
- Increases yield
- Facilitates no-till farming
- 89 U.S. Soy crop (2006)
12Herbicide Resistance Concerns
- Encourages herbicide use
- Groundwater contamination
- Kills beneficial soil microbes
- Cross-pollinates weeds
- Fosters dependence on Agrochemcial companies
13Disease Resistance
- Canola
- Cantaloupes
- Cucumbers
- Corn
- Rice
- Papaya
- Potatoes
- Soybeans
- Squash
- Tomatoes
- Wheat
Genetically engineered papaya resistant papaya
ringspot virus
14Health and Nutrition
- Golden Rice
- Vitamin A and Iron enhanced
- Seeds given to the poor for free
- Improved Amino Acid Balance for Soy, Maize
- Banana Vaccines
15Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 1999 GM corn and soybean products are present
in 80 of processed foods in USA - Corn
- starch, high fructose corn syrup, oil
- Soy
- oil, Lecithin, protein
16Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 1999 European Union requires GM labels, blocks
import of GM corn, beans - Ban lifted 2004 but no change in anti-gm
sentiment in Europe
17Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 1999 Gerber and Heinz baby foods GM-free
- 2000 Mc Donalds and Frito-Lay products GM-free
18Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 2000 USDA Organic Foods Standards
- Must be GM-free
19Milestones in Food Biotechnology
- 2005 222 million acres worldwide
- Planted in Genetically modified crops
- 55 in USA
- Soy
- Corn
- Cotton
- India, China
- Canola
http//www.isaaa.org/kc/bin/briefs34/es/index.htm
http//www.newscientist.com/data/images/archive/24
83/24833301.jpg
20Controversy over Biotech Foods
- Debate pits consumer and ecology groups against
Multinational Corporations - Many farmers, scientists, government agencies
caught in the middle
21Arguments for Genetically Engineered Food
- Potential to
- Increase productivity
- Increase purity
- Increase safety
- Improve nutrition
- Improve food quality
- Improve sustainability
- Benefit ecosystem
- Process not inherently harmful
- Similar to traditional Plant and Animal breeding
- Unless misused, outcome expected to be beneficial
- Is a powerful technology that could help humanity
- Bad ideas weeded out by the market, regulation,
lawsuit
--Paul Thompson
22Arguments against Genetically Engineered Foods
- Potential safety risk for humans
- Unintended Consequences
- Genetic Engineering is playing God
- Not Natural to move genes between species
- Potential safety risk for environment
- Could spread
- Genetically Engineered label not required in U.S.
- Benefits multinational corporations
- not consumers or developing nations
23Frankenstein Foods Unintended Consequences?
- Random gene insertion
- Toxicity
- New gene products?
- Allergies
- Eating DNA!
24Arguments for Labeling
- Not Substantially equivalent to non-GM
- Must use Precautionary principle
- Is uncertainty in risk assessment
- Labeling indicates process used
- Consumers right to know and choose
- Countrys right to know and choose
25Arguments against labeling
- Suggests non-existent hazard
- Expensive to segregate crops and change labels
- FDA labels required if change in
- Allergenicity
- Nutrition
- Food Quality
26Will it Feed the World?
- Disease resistance will benefit developing
nations - Technology requiring increased inputs benefits
wealthy, multinationals, plantations - Small, subsistence farmers cant compete, lose
land - Inequity, poverty increase
- Thus more food and more hunger
- Green Revolution unsustainable