Designing a Course for Evaluation: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Designing a Course for Evaluation:

Description:

The University of Akron. November 7, 2003. Triangulation of assessment to improve ... Richard Hake's 'normalized gain' (Post Pre)/(40 Pre) Average 13% gain ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: RWS1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Designing a Course for Evaluation:


1
Designing a Course for Evaluation
Triangulation of assessment to improve teaching
in a single course section
  • Richard W. Stratton
  • Economics Department
  • The University of Akron
  • November 7, 2003

2
Begin at the beginning
  • How could I design a course that would allow me
    to evaluate its effectiveness objectively?

3
Begin at the beginning
  • Set specific goals and objectives
  • Identify course components
  • Identify assessment tools
  • Evaluate success

4
Set specific outcome goals
  • Mine were based on Hansens proficiencies (2001
    JEE 32232-233)
  • access existing knowledge
  • demonstrate command of knowledge
  • interpret knowledge
  • find and interpret existing economic data
  • apply existing knowledge

5
Set specific outcome goals
  • Objectives (cont.)
  • demonstrate their ability to apply economic
    knowledge
  • effectively employ select analytical and critical
    thinking tools used by economists
  • demonstrate their ability to apply these tools
  • persist to the end of the semester

6
Two objectives
  • Students will be able to write a well reasoned
    supporting a policy recommendation
  • Students will demonstrate ability to work
    cooperatively with others (Teams)

7
Design course components to address goals and
objectives
  • Worksheets prior to class
  • Team work in class
  • Participation in class
  • CAT in class
  • Essays after class
  • Exams after class

8
Criterion basedMastery influenced
  • Worksheets
  • Pre-class encounter
  • Basis of team exercises
  • CAT student assessment of class
  • Essays
  • Rubric based grading
  • Exams

9
How well did I do?
  • Did Retention improve?
  • no - 50
  • Did the grade distribution improve?
  • Yes - 40 of completers A or B

10
How well did I do?
  • Analysis of Final Essay
  • Used rubric to determine performance

11
How well did I do?
  • Learning Gains
  • Pre-test / Post-test
  • Richard Hakes normalized gain
  • (Post Pre)/(40 Pre)
  • Average 13 gain
  • 8 students more than 1 s.d. above 0
  • 12 students within 1 s.d. of 0

12
How well did I do?
  • Student CATs
  • Increase rating of all three components
  • 5 point scale
  • Worksheets 2.48 to 2.88 sig. 1
  • Essays 2.29 to 2.35 ns
  • Class time 3.24 to 3.35 ns
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com