Title: The origin and design of life
1The origin and design of life
2Outline
- Evolutionary theory
- What are organisms?
- Natural Selection vs. Intelligent Design
3Logic of Darwins argument
- Natural populations could grow exponentially
4Exponential growth
5Logic of Darwins argument
- Despite this potential for exponential growth,
natural populations normally are relatively
stable
- Many individuals do not leave as many offspring
as they might
- Those best suited to the prevailing environment
will leave the most offspring (i.e. the best
fit to the environment
6Logic of Darwins argument
- Because of heredity, offspring are like their
parents
- Over many generations, natural selection builds
individuals that are progressively better adapted
to their environment
7Natural Selection
- 3 essential components
- Variation
- Inheritance
- Selection
- Differential reproductive success
- Over time, natural selection produces designs for
reproduction (adaptations)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10The easy way
- Imagine a gene that happens to make an organism
more likely to be X.
- Would that gene become more common in the next
generation?
- If yes, it will be selected for and we should
look for it in nature.
- If no, it will disappear and shouldnt be found
in nature.
11Two general approaches
- Phylogenetic approach organisms are related to
each other by virtue of common descent
- Searches for features that are similar because
both species inherited them from a common
ancestor
- Adaptationist approach organisms have particular
design features by virtue of their unique
evolutionary histories
- Explores how natural selection functionally
organizes the design of organisms can be applied
to unique features
12Phylogenetic approachWho are you?
- Kingdom Animalia
- Phylum Chordata
- Subphylum Vertebrata
- Class Mammalia
- Order Primate
- Family Hominidae (includes Homo erectus)
- Genus Homo
- Species Sapiens
- Subspecies sapiens (not neanderthalenis)
13An evolutionary tree of primates based on DNA
evidence
after Goldsmith Zimmerman (2001)
14Adaptation Products of Evolution
- Organisms are composed of the following three
features
- Adaptations (design features)
- Solve particular adaptive problems (i.e.
selection pressures)
- By-products
- Noise
- Can apply this classification to features of
man-made artifacts as well
15Adaptations (design features)
- Inherited and reliably developing characteristics
that come into existence through natural
selection because they helped to solve problems
of reproduction during the period of their
evolution (i.e., in the EEA) - EEA Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness
- E.g., umbilical cord
16Adaptive problem
- Anything that affects reproduction
- E.g., finding food, avoiding predators, fighting
disease, competing or cooperating with
conspecifics, finding a mate, giving birth,
raising an offspring - Had to recur across many generations
- Its solution had to affect reproduction, however
indirectly
17Features of adaptations
- Reliably developing
- Specialized
- Show evidence of design
- Adapted to ancestral environments
18By-products
- Characteristics that do not solve adaptive
problems and do not have functional design they
are carried along with characteristics that do
have functional design because they happen to be
coupled with those adaptations - E.g., belly button
19Noise
- Random effects produced by forces such as chance
mutations, sudden and unprecedented changes in
the environment, or chance effects during
development - E.g., particular shape of a persons belly button
20Life Machinery
- Natural selection provides a causal explanation
of design
- The organism is a self-reproducing machine.
21Structure reflects function
- Organisms are highly ordered entities
- Organization comes from natural selection
- Chance processes act to randomize relationships
within organism
- Superhero problem
- Bunny in the blender
- Natural selection is NOT chance
22- Natural selection is a feedback process
- Design modifications that improve reproduction
spread throughout the population
23Biological functionality is weird
- In evolutionary theory, to say a feature was
adaptive means that, in the environment in which
that feature evolved, that feature promoted its
own reproduction - Adaptive does NOT mean
- Beneficial in terms of well-being, health,
happiness or other human values
- Good for the species, group, or even individual
- The feature is desirable or inevitable
- Nature is indifferent, not cruel or benevolent
24Test yourself
- How do fruits and vegetables reproduce?
- Fruit Vegetables
- Edible?
- Cook?
- Sugar?
- Toxins?
- Colors?
- Defenses?
Almost all A few None Most High Very low
Low High Bright Camouflaged Pesticide Pesti
cide, poison, thorns, bark
25Natural Selection, Intelligent Design
Creationism
26Caveat Why bother?
- Reasons not to teach ID or Creationism
- Can be offensive to the religious
- You hear enough bashing of conservatism
- Theres no real debate we dont teach
astrology, e.g.
- Reasons to teach the controversy
- Expose the lack of actual controversy
- Brings to light evidence you wouldnt otherwise
see
- Educate those who dont know the main arguments
- They asked for it
27Data in support of Natural Selection
- comparative morphology (e.g. hands on whales)
- fossil record of transitional forms
- Carbon, Potassium-Argon dating of those forms
- mDNA clocks dating of those forms
- geological evidence supporting timing of those
forms
- comparative embryology
- all life come from their own kind (unlike all
tools)
- all life shares same biochemical background
- vestigial organs (e.g. man-nipples fingernails)
- NO species designed for non-reciprocal aid of
another
- design flaws (e.g. backward retina)
28Flawed Design examples in humans
29Data in support of Natural Selection
- 50/50 sex ratio
- Inter-species conflict
- Intra-species conflict
- Intra-genomic conflict
- visible mutations
- visible inheritance
30Data in support of Natural Selection
- mathematical certainty of natural selection given
mutations and inheritance
- behavioral patterns in hundreds of species
indicating design for reproduction
- blurred lines between species, e.g. donkey/mule,
wolf/pug
- creation of different species through
artificial selection, e.g. nuclear bacteria
- watching natural selection take place (e.g.
sickle cell anemia, resistant bacteria, lactose
tolerance)
- Etc.
31Percentages of people with lactose intolerance
32Intelligent Design advocates say
- Irreducible complexity
- By irreducibly complex I mean a single system
composed of several well-matched, interacting
parts that contribute to the basic function,
wherein the removal of any one of the parts
causes the system to effectively cease
functioning. Michael Behe - How could natural selection design this?
- E.g. a mousetrap, a single-cell organism?
- If it requires all functional parts at once,
natural selection cant design itright?
- Therefore, some intelligent being designed it
33Intelligent Design
- Three kinds of ID
- Creationism
- Design of species
- no whale transitional forms
- First causes
- ID happened billions of years ago
34Magic Trick Fallacy
- http//www.youtube.com/watch?vUYTmEVFL_NA
- Intelligent Design works like magicians
- Your theory fails to explain some stuff
- Therefore, my theory is right
- Problem?
- Its not enough that we are wrong, YOU have to be
right.
35Data in support of Intelligent Design
- None
- ID doesnt make predictions.
- Thesis of ID Someone did something somehow at
some time that natural selection cant explain.
- ID doesnt make predictions
- Creationism does
36Creationism
- Two creationist accounts in Genesis
- Genesis 124. And God said, "Let the land
produce living creatures according to their
kinds livestock, creatures that move along the
ground, and wild animals, each according to its
kind." And it was so. (125) God made the wild
animals according to their kinds, the livestock
according to their kinds, and all the creatures
that move along the ground according to their
kinds. And God saw that it was good. (126)Then
God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our
likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the
sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock,
over all the earth, and over all the creatures
that move along the ground."
37Creationism
- Genesis 218. And the LORD God said, It is not
good that man should be alone I will make him a
helper comparable to him. 219 Out of the ground
the LORD God formed every beast of the field and
every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam
to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam
called each living creature, that was its name.
220 So Adam gave names to all cattle, to the
birds of the air, and to every beast of the
field. But for Adam there was not found a helper
comparable to him. - 221 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall
on Adam, and he slept and He took one of his
ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place. 222
Then the rib which the LORD God had taken from
man He made into a woman, and He brought her to
the man.
38Creationist account of animals
- Account 1 suggests that animals should be
designed for humans to lord over.
- Account 2 suggests that animals should be
designed for male companionship.
39Data contradicting Creationism
- Universe infinitely larger than necessary to
house humans
- Earth not designed for us
- Worst possible shape for surface dwelling
creature
- More water on surface than land
- Much of the land not hospitable
- Earth has existed for billions of years, humans
for 100,000
- Immune system AND diseases?
- Life appears to fight itself, which is
inconsistent with single creator
- Oxygen and breathing?
- Physics structured in ways that introduce
problems, then massive design to solve it.
Whoever designed physics didnt do it for humans.
40Data contradicting Creationism
- Animals run away? Resist being eaten? Fight
back?
- If they are helpers or servants they shouldnt do
that
- Genesis 9 changes this, but reaffirms that
Every creature that is alive shall be yours to
eat.
- Natural plants are high in useless toxins
- Most plants are inedible because of toxins
manufactured for that purpose
- Most animals are highly inedible without great
preparation
- Only fruit seems well designed for consumption
- and then only when the fruit can reproduce
- Animals exist at the bottom of the ocean
- Microscopic life?
41Data contradicting Creationism
- comparative morphology (e.g. hands on whales)
- fossil record of transitional forms
- Carbon, Potassium-Argon dating of those forms
- mDNA clocks dating of those forms
- geological evidence supporting timing of those
forms
- vestigial organs (e.g. man-nipples fingernails)
- design flaws (e.g. backward retina)
42What controversy?
- The data is such that there is no debate between
evolution and creationism among anthropologists,
archaeologists, geologists, astrophysicists, or
any other group of scientists.
43Explaining Irreducible Complexity
- Irreducibility can evolve after addition of new
features.
- Example of an irreducibly complex object
44Explaining Irreducible Complexity
- Bridge
- Add better part
- Remove useless part
45Data contradicting Natural Selection
- None.
- After 150 years of the most vehement attacks any
scientific theory has ever had there is not a
single reliable data set contradicting natural
selection - This doesnt mean we understand everything.
- E.g. car manufacturing and the laws of physics
46Nonsense about Natural Selection
- An ant is less evolved than a monkey
- It means less human like but thats silly
- Survival of the species
- Animals have instinct which has evolved and
reason which hasnt
- Evolution doesnt apply to humans because we
learn.
- learning is something natural selection
designed animals to do
- other animals learn
47Conclusions
- Natural selection created and designed life on
earth into self-replicating machines.
- Next time
- Evolutionary Psychology how can an understanding
of natural selection help us understand the
workings of the human brain?
48- Readings for this week
- Buss Ch. 1 2
- No Section on first week
- See me for add codes