Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco

Description:

(Watson-Lamprey) ... (Youngs/DGML, Alimoradi, Baker, Watson-Lamprey, Shantz) ... (Bazzurro/RASCAL, Watson-Lamprey/RSPMATCH, Bozorgnia) NSF Year 7 Site Visit ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jackpm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco


1
Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco
1st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and
Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis 27
October 2006
2
GMSM Methods Currently being Compared
3
Nonlinear Analysis Results being Compared
  • (Objectives of GMSM Methods Currently being
    Compared)
  • Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the
    Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP) for a given
    earthquake magnitude (M), source-to-site distance
    (R), 30m shear wave velocity (S), and style of
    faulting (F).
  • Median EDP M, R, S, F.
  • CDF of EDP M, R, S, F and a given pseudo
    spectral acceleration at the estimated
    fundamental period of the structure (and a 5
    damping ratio), SA(T1).
  • Median EDP M, R, S, F and SA(T1).

4
Specifics of Current Comparison Case
  • Structure 4-Story Reinforced Concrete (RC)
    Special Moment Frame (SMF) Building, T1 1
    sec.
  • EDP maximum (over height) peak (over time)
    inter-story drift ratio (MIDR)
  • M 7 (moment magnitude)
  • R 10 km (closest distance to rupture)
  • S 400 m/sec (30m shear wave velocity)
  • F strike-slip (style of faulting)
  • SA(T1) 2 sigma level (e2) based on Campbell
    Bozorgnia (2006) GM prediction equation

5
Specifics of Current Comparison Case

6
Categories of Methods for Objective 1
  • ( i.e., CDF of EDP M, R, S, F )
  • Select GMs for a M-R-S-F "bin" chosen to be
    consistent with the given M, R, S, F (no
    scaling).
  • (Watson-Lamprey)
  • Scale (in amplitude) each GM in bin so as to
    "correct" for ranges of M, R, S, F values vs.
    given values.
  • (Bozorgnia)
  • Select GMs that, with scaling, will both
  • (i) closely match the median response spectrum
  • (ii) sample the variability of the response
    spectra
  • (Rathje, Youngs/DGML, Almoradi)
  • Adjust resulting variability of EDP for effects
    of scaling.
  • (Shome)

7
Example GMSM Method for Objective 1
  • ( i.e., CDF of EDP M, R, S, F )
  • Selection Procedure
  • Gather GMs for bin consistent with given M, R, S,
    F.
  • Select from combinations of scaled GMs generated
    by modification procedure
  • Modification Procedure
  • Scale GMs such that their median matches the
    median response spectrum for given M, R, S, F,
    and such that their variability matches the
    variability in SA(T).

8
Example GMSM Method for Objective 1
  • ( i.e., CDF of EDP M, R, S, F )

9
Categories of Methods for Objective 2
  • ( i.e., Median of EDP M, R, S, F )
  • Select GMs according to M-R-S-F bin and scale to
    median value of scalar EDP-proxy (e.g., SA(T1) or
    inelastic spectral displacement) for given M, R,
    S, F.
  • (Shome, Haselton, Cornell, Bozorgnia)
  • Select GMs to match, with scaling allowed, median
    of EDP-proxy (e.g., elastic response spectrum or
    inelastic spectral displacement) for given M, R,
    S, F.
  • (Youngs/DGML, Alimoradi, Baker, Watson-Lamprey,
    Shantz)
  • Select GMs according to M-R-S-F bin (or randomly
    select?) and spectral-match them to median
    elastic or inelastic response spectrum.
  • (Bazzurro/RASCAL, Watson-Lamprey/RSPMATCH,
    Bozorgnia)

10
Example GMSM Method for Objective 2
  • ( i.e., Median of EDP M, R, S, F )
  • Selection Procedure
  • Gather GMs for bin consistent with given M, R, S.
  • After scaling (procedure below), select GMs with
    smallest Mean Squared Error (MSE) w.r.t. median
    spectrum for given M, R, S, F.
  • Modification Procedure
  • Scale GMs to minimize MSE w.r.t. median spectrum
    for given M, R, S, F.

11
Example GMSM Method for Objective 2
  • ( i.e., Median of EDP M, R, S, F )

(Source Youngs, Power Chin 2006)
12
Categories of Methods for Objective 3
  • ( i.e., CDF of EDP M, R, S, F, and SA(T1) )
  • Select GMs for bin that is consistent with given
    M, R, S, F, and SA(T1) (no scaling).
  • Scale (individually) GMs in bin to "correct" for
    ranges of M, R, S, F, and SA(T1) values vs. given
    values.
  • (Luco/Bozorgnia/Tothong)
  • Select GMs for M-R-S-F-consistent bin and scale
    them to given SA(T1).
  • (Shome)
  • Select GMs for Objective 1 (CDF of EDP M, R,
    S, F) and scale them to given SA(T1).
  • (Alimoradi, Youngs/DGML)

13
Example GMSM Method for Objective 3
  • ( i.e., CDF of EDP M, R, S, F, and SA(T1) )
  • Selection Procedure
  • Gather GMs for bin consistent with M, R, S, F,
    SA(T1).
  • Modification Procedure
  • For each GM (unscaled), calculate
  • Iteratively scale each GM such that
  • IM1I2E scalar combination of first-mode
    inelastic spectral displacement and SA(T2)
    (Luco Cornell, 2002)

14
Example GMSM Method for Objective 3
  • ( i.e., CDF of EDP M, R, S, F, and SA(T1) )
  • Ground Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) for
    IM1I2E is available from Tothong Cornell
    (2007).
  • GMPEs for Inelastic Spectral Displacement (part
    of IM1I2E) are available for
  • constant strength, dy (Tothong Cornell,
    2006)
  • constant ductility, m (Bozorgnia et al., 2006)
  • constant strength reduction factor, R (???)
  • Combine with GMPE for SA(T2) and its correlation
    with SA(T1) to approximate GMPE for IM1I2E.

15
Categories of Methods for Objective 4
  • ( i.e., Median of EDP M, R, S, F and SA(T1) )
  • Select GMs for Objective 2 (Median of EDP M,
    R, S, F) and scale them to given SA(T1).
  • (Youngs/DGML)
  • Select GMs to match, with scaling allowed, median
    (or other target) of EDP-proxy (e.g., elastic or
    inelastic response spectrum) for given M, R, S,
    F, and SA(T1).
  • (Alimoradi, Baker, Watson-Lamprey, Shantz,
    Rathje)
  • Select GMs according to M-R-S-F bin (or randomly
    select?) and spectral-match them to elastic or
    inelastic response spectrum consistent with
    SA(T1).
  • (Bazzurro/RASCAL, Watson-Lamprey/RSPMATCH,
    Bozorgnia)

16
Example GMSM Method for Objective 4
  • ( i.e., Median of EDP M, R, S, F, and SA(T1) )
  • Selection Procedure
  • Gather GMs for bin consistent with given M, R, S,
    F, and/or SA(T1) (e.g., M 6.75 to 7.25, R 0
    to 20 km).
  • Or randomly select GMs?
  • Modification Procedure
  • Spectral-match each GM to Conditional Mean
    Spectrum (CMS Baker Cornell, 2006) for given
    M, R, S, F and SA(T1).

17
Example GMSM Method for Objective 4
  • ( i.e., Median of EDP M, R, S, F, and SA(T1) )
  • e.g., from Bazzurro using RASCAL (Silva Lee,
    1987)

18
GMSM Methods Currently being Compared
19
Additional GMSM Methods to be Compared
20
(No Transcript)
21
Example GMSM Method for Objective 1
  • ( i.e., CDF of EDP M, R, S, F )
  • Selection Procedure
  • Decide on "bin" consistent with given M, R, S, F.
  • (e.g., M 6.75 to 7.25, R 0 to 20 km)
  • Gather GMs for chosen bin.
  • Modification Procedure
  • Scale each GM by
  • where the Median SA(T1) is from a GM
    Prediction Equation (GMPE).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com