Economics D101: Lecture 12 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Economics D101: Lecture 12

Description:

The cost function is exactly analogous to the expenditure function of ... C(q,w,r)=mink0Cs(q,k,w,r) k(q,w,r)=argmink0Cs(q,k,w,r) z(q,w,r)=zv(q,k(q,w,r),w) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: johncp6
Category:
Tags: d101 | economics | lecture | mink

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economics D101: Lecture 12


1
Economics D10-1 Lecture 12
  • Cost minimization and the cost function

2
The minimum cost function is the workhorse of the
theory of the firm
  • The cost function expresses the minimized costs
    of the firm as a function of output level(s) and
    input prices.
  • The cost function is exactly analogous to the
    expenditure function of consumer theory.
  • The cost function can also be viewed as a
    restricted profit function, with the level of
    output taken as parametric.
  • The properties of the cost function -e.g., linear
    homogeneity and concavity in factor prices- can
    be developed using the algebraic approach,
    duality, or the Neoclassical approach.

3
Cost minimization the algebraic approach
  • The cost minimization problem produce a
    specified output level with the least expenditure
    on inputs.
  • C(q,w) minz?V(q)w?z
  • Or, in the single output case,C(q,w)
    minz0w?z f(z) q
  • C is linearly homogeneous in factor pricesPf
    C(q,tw) minz?V(q)tw?z tminz?V(q)w?z tC(q,w)

4
Solutions to this problem are conditional factor
demands
  • z(q,w) argminz0w?z f(z) q
  • Law of Downward-Sloping Conditional Factor Demand
  • Let z0?z(q,w0) and z1?z(q,w1). Then,
  • ?z?w (z1-z0)(w1-w0) (w1z1 - w1z0) (w0z0 -
    w0z1) 0
  • Concavity of costs in factor prices
  • Let wt tw0 (1-t)w1 and zt?z(q,wt)
  • C(q,wt)wtzttw0zt(1-t)w1zttw0z0(1-t)w1z1tC(q,
    w0)(1-t)C(q,w1)
  • Concavity of f (convexity of Y) implies C convex
    in q
  • Let z0?z(q0,w), z1?z(q1,w), qt tq0 (1-t)q1,
    zt?z(qt,w), and z tz0(1-t)z1. Note that, by
    concavity, f(z) f(zt). Therefore,
  • C(qt,w) w?zt w?z tw?z0 (1-t)w?z1
    tC(q0,w) (1-t)C(q1,w)

5
Cost minimization the dual approach
  • The dual approach to cost minimization derives
    differential comparative statics results using a
    Mirrlees construction.
  • The derivative property (Shephards Lemma)
  • Let z0 z(q,w0) and define the function
    g(w)C(q,w)-wz0
  • Clearly, g(w) 0 and g(w0) 0, so that g is
    maximized at w0. Therefore, if g is
    differentiable at w0
  • Dg(w0) DwC(q,w0) - z0 0 and DwC(q,w0) z0
    z(q,w0)
  • Law of Downward-sloping conditional factor demand
  • If g is twice differentiable at w0, its Hessian
    matrix D2g(w0)D2wC(q,w0)Dwz(q,w0) is negative
    semi-definite there.
  • Thus, all diagonal elements ?zi/?wi are non
    positive.

6
Cost minimization the Neoclassical approach
  • Assume that f?C2. The LaGrangian expression for
    the cost minimization problem is
  • L wz - ?(f(z)-q)
  • with FONCs of
  • Li wi - ?fi 0 zi 0 ziLi 0
  • L ? f(z) - q 0 ? 0 ?L? 0
  • Assume z(q,w) is differentiable and strictly
    positive. By ET
  • ?L/?q ?C/?q ?(q,w)
  • Total differentiation of the FONCs yields

7
The Neoclassical approach two input example
8
The restricted (short-run) cost function
  • Let f ?m???? .
  • variable cost function
  • Cv(q,k,w) minzwz f(z,k)q
  • zv(q,k,w)argminzwz f(z,k)q
  • short-run cost function
  • Cs(q,k,w,r) Cv(q,k,w)rk.
  • long-run cost function
  • C(q,w,r)mink0Cs(q,k,w,r)
  • k(q,w,r)argmink0Cs(q,k,w,r)
  • z(q,w,r)zv(q,k(q,w,r),w)
  • Breaking down an optimization problem into 2 or
    more stages
  • Makes it possible to focus on variables of
    interest
  • Short-run - long-run distinction traditional in
    economics, but time really plays no role
  • Short-run and variable cost formulations can be
    used to focus on any decision variable

9
SRMC LRMC(Jacob Viners Envelope Theorem)
  • Long-run cost equals short-run at the plant size
    efficient for that output level.
  • By the Envelope Theorem, SRMCLRMC there.
  • Intermediate Micro diagrams also show SRMC curves
    to be steeper than LRMC where they intersect
  • This fact --that value functions are less steep
    in the long-run-- is an example of the Le
    Chatlier Principle

10
The Le Chatlier Principle IValue Functions
  • Partition the decision variables into fixed k
    and variable x
  • Define the value function for the sub
    optimization problem
  • Set fixed variables to a level optimal for some
    arbitrary (interior) parameter value a0
  • Construct a Mirrlees function equal to the
    difference between short run and long-run value
    functions
  • Le Chatlier Principle follows from SONC

11
Le Chatlier Principle IIDecision Variables
  • Vector of parameters and the objective functions
    takes the special linear form.
  • Again, use Mirrlees construction.
  • FONC establish equality of SR and LR value
    functions
  • Envelope Theorem and linearity establish equality
    between SR and LR decision variables
  • SONCs establish responsiveness result
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com