Presentation to

About This Presentation
Title:

Presentation to

Description:

Title: Induction presentation Author: Competition Commission Last modified by: PC 10 Created Date: 5/14/2002 5:48:58 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:6
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation to


1
  • Presentation to
  • Parliaments Portfolio Committee on Trade and
    Industry
  • by
  • Shan Ramburuth, Thulani Kunene and Tembinkosi
    Bonakele
  • 28 March 2007

2
Why competition policy?
  • Fairness and access
  • Prices and Quality
  • Innovation
  • Consumer Choice

3
Competition Commissions activities
  • Prosecution of anti-competitive behaviour
  • Merger control
  • Advocacy

4
Commissions structure
COMMISSIONER
CORPORATE SERVICES
POLICY RESEARCH
MERGERS ACQUISITIONS
FINANCE
LEGAL SERVICES
ENFORCEMENT EXEMPTIONS
COMPLIANCE
HR
IT
REGISTRY
SECURITY FACILITIES
5
Horizontal restrictive practices
A
C
B
  • Agreement between competitors
  • Rule of reason prohibition
  • - substantial lessening or prevention of
    competition
  • - technological, efficiency, pro-competitive
    gains defences
  • Per se prohibitions
  • - price fixing
  • - division of markets
  • - collusive tendering

6
Vertical restrictive practices
  • Agreement between a firm and its suppliers, its
    customers or both
  • Rule of reason prohibition
  • - substantial lessening or prevention of
    competition
  • - technological, efficiency, pro-competitive
    gains defences
  • Per se prohibitions
  • - minimum resale price maintenance
  • - may recommend a non-binding price

Supplier
Firm
Customer
7
Dominant firms
  • Threshold R5 million
  • Market shares
  • - 45 of market
  • - between 35 and 45, unless it can show no
    market power
  • - less than 35 with market power
  • Market power
  • -demand and supply substitutability
  • -product and geographic markets
  • -small but significant and non-transitory
    increase in price

8
Abuse of Dominance
  • Excessive pricing to the detriment of consumers
  • Refusal to give access to an essential facility
  • Exclusionary conduct
  • Requiring or inducing not to deal
  • Refusing to supply scarce goods
  • Tying
  • Predatory pricing
  • Buying up scarce supply of intermediate
    goods/resources
  • Price discrimination

9
Exemptions
  • Maintenance or promotion of exports
  • Promotion of SMEs business owned by HDIs to
    become competitive
  • Stop decline in an industry
  • Economic stability of a designated industry
  • Intellectual property rights
  • Professional rules

10
Merger control
  • Test
  • Substantial lessening or preventing of
    competition
  • Technological, efficiency and pro-competitive
    justifications
  • Public interest grounds
  • - Effect on particular industrial sector or
    region
  • - Employment
  • - SMEs or firms owned by HDIs to become
    competitive
  • - Ability to compete in the international market

11
Public Interest
  • Consideration is given to the effects of the
    merger on
  • A sector or region
  • Employment
  • Ability of SMEs or HDIs to become competitive
  • Ability to compete internationally

12
Case study Bread
  • Initiation of complaint by Commissioner and
    complaint from bread distributor
  • Against Blue Ribbon, Sasko, Duens and Albany
    bakeries in Western Cape region
  • Evidence of price fixing/collusion
  • Corporate leniency application
  • Referral
  • National investigation
  • Milling

13
Case study Milk
  • Complaint initiated against Clover, Parmalat,
    Ladismith Cheese, Woodlands Dairy, Lancewood,
    Nestle and Milkwood Dairy
  • Price fixing of milk
  • Manipulation of trading conditions
  • Corporate leniency application
  • Referral

14
Case study Motor vehicles
  • Complaint against Toyota
  • Minimum resale price maintenance
  • Commissioner initiated complaints against BMW,
    General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Nissan,
    Volkswagen, Citroen
  • Discounting policies
  • Smoking gun evidence
  • Penalties totaling R51 million in settlement

15
Case Study TAC Ms Hazel Tau
  • Complaint against GlaxoSmithKline Boehringer
    Ingelheim
  • Excessive pricing, refusing competitor access to
    an essential facility, exclusionary conduct
  • Impeded generic manufacturers from entering ARVs
    market
  • Settlement agreements
  • Agreement to issue patented licences of ARVs to
    generic manufacturers
  • Prices of ARVs fell dramatically

16
The banking inquiry
  • Concern relating to allegations of high bank
    charges
  • National Treasurys research
  • Competition Commissions research
  • Market transparency
  • Voluntary submissions
  • Public hearings
  • Recommendations on

17
Compliance
  • Dedicated division to
  • Promote voluntary compliance
  • Promote culture of competition
  • Through
  • Education and Advocacy
  • Communication
  • Stakeholder Relations

18
Education
  • Stakeholders Trade unions, consumer forums,
    SMMEs, business
  • Advisory opinions, clarifications
  • Corporate compliance programmes
  • Workshops and presentations

19
Advocacy
  • Government, Regulators, Parliament, organised
    business, professional associations
  • Policy, legislation, regulations, administrative
    decisions, professional rules, business practices
    must be consistent with sound competition
    principles
  • Examples
  • - Pension Funds Adjudicators ruling on switching
    retirement annuity funds
  • FAIS ombuds referral Changes to the Short Term
    Insurance Act - untying insurance and bond
  • Mobile number portability

20
Communication
  • Inform members of the public about what we do
  • Create awareness of competition issues
  • Every member of society a consumer
  • Print and electronic media
  • Publications

21
Stakeholder relations
  • Addressing concurrent jurisdiction issues
  • - Forum Shopping
  • MOUs - ICASA, NER, Postal Services Regulator,
    negotiating with the SARB, FSB, NLA, DME
  • South African Regulators Forum
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)