Cardiac Toxicity in Oncology: Why and When - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Cardiac Toxicity in Oncology: Why and When

Description:

To provide information on the cardiac risks of chemotherapy and the various ... Long-tern cardiac toxicity for survivors of childhood leukemia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:843
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: oncolo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cardiac Toxicity in Oncology: Why and When


1
Cardiac Toxicity in OncologyWhy and When
  • Sean Hopkins
  • The Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre
  • CSHP PPC 2005

2
Review of Goals Objectives
  • To provide information on the cardiac risks of
    chemotherapy and the various agents that are
    associated with cardiac dysfunction
  • To provide pharmacists with examples of the
    various chemotherapy regimens that are associated
    with cardiac toxicity and their efficacy, along
    with their role in therapy

3
Review of Goals Objectives
  • To introduce newer agents and combinations that
    are under investigation for cancer treatment
  • Focus will be on Breast Cancer therapy, but the
    toxicities can be translated in many other cancers

4
Cardiac Toxicity Why ?
  • Why do we risk Cardiac toxicity ?
  • Why do we accept ANY toxicity in Oncology ?
  • An acceptable risk
  • 50-90 of patients experience Nausea and vomiting
  • 10-100 of patients experience alopecia
  • 0-100 of patients experience bone marrow
    suppression
  • No other discipline allows this degree of
    toxicity
  • Balance of risk vs benefit

5
Cardiac Toxicity Why ?
  • Adjuvant therapy improves survival
  • Improved survival means that more women are alive
    after being diagnosed and treated for early
    breast cancer (EBC)
  • Therefore, more women will be at risk of
    experiencing long-term toxicities from therapy
  • Cardiotoxic drugs are a cornerstone of adjuvant
    therapy in breast cancer
  • Also very important in Lymphomas (Hodgkin's and
    Non-Hodgkin's) as well as leukemias.

6
Overview of therapy of solid tumors
  • Surgery
  • Only definitive action in solid tumors makes
    largest impact on survival
  • Local Therapy (radiotherapy)
  • Reduces risk of local recurrence
  • Hormonal therapy
  • Reduces risk in hormone receptor positive tumors
    (60 breast cancer)

7
Overview of therapy of solid tumors Breast
Cancer
  • Systemic Chemotherapy
  • Reduces risk of recurrence of disease distantly.
  • Many Regimens and Abbreviations
  • FAC (Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide)
  • TAC (Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide)
  • CEF (Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, Fluorouracil)
  • FEC (Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide)
  • AC (Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide)
  • AC -gt T (AC followed by Paclitaxel)
  • CMF (Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Fluorouracil)

8
Adjuvant Therapy How Effective is it ?
  • Absolute benefit of 6 in Overall Survival

9
Adjuvant Therapy How Effective is it ?
  • NCIC MA.5 Trial (CEF vs CMF)
  • 7 absolute increase in survival
  • gt50 of patients are alive and free of disease at
    10 years
  • FASG (see next slide)
  • Online resource for risk analysis
  • www.adjuvantonline.com

10
Efficacy of FEC100 Overall Survival
  • FASG05 (FEC100 vs FEC50)
  • 12 absolute increase in survival
  • J Clin Oncol 19602-611 2001

11
Efficacy of Combinations in Metastatic disease
  • The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy was
    associated with
  • A longer time to disease progression (median, 7.4
    vs. 4.6 months Plt0.001)
  • A higher rate of objective response (50 percent
    vs. 32 percent, Plt0.001)
  • A longer duration of response (median, 9.1 vs.
    6.1 months Plt0.001)
  • A lower rate of death at 1 year (22 percent vs.
    33 percent, P0.008)
  • Longer survival (median survival, 25.1 vs. 20.3
    months P0.046) and
  • A 20 percent reduction in the risk of death.

12
Cardiac Toxicity
  • What is Cardiac Toxicity ?
  • NCI CTC (National Cancer Institute Common
    Toxicity Criteria)
  • Normally most concerned with Left Ventricular
    Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
  • Arrhythmias do occur, but most important
    long-term toxicity is decreased LVEF, resulting
    in Heart Failure

13
Cardiac Toxicity
  • A cardiac clinical sign
  • CHF, rhythm disorders, angina, thromboembolic
    disease, or hypertensive cardiopathy
  • a cardiac event between the end of chemotherapy
    and the present cardiologic consultation
  • an abnormal ECG
  • an LVEF less than 50,
  • a decrease in LVEF 20 of baseline value or
  • an abnormal ultrasonographic parameter

14
Drugs that cause cardiac toxicity
  • Anthracyclines / Anthracenediones
  • Doxorubicin / Daunorubicin / Epirubicin
  • Idarubicin
  • Mitoxantrone
  • Liposomal formulations of above

15
Relative risk of Cardiac Dysfunction
  • Doxorubicin relative value 1 5 incidence of
    cardiotoxicity _at_450mg/m2
  • Daunorubicin, 10.5, 5 cardiotoxicity _at_900mg/m2
  • Epirubicin, 10.5, 5 cardiotoxicity _at_935mg/m2
  • Idarubicin, 12, 5 cardiotoxicity _at_225mg/m2
  • Mitoxantrone, 12.2, 5 cardiotoxicity _at_200m/m2

16
Drugs that cause cardiac toxicity
  • Taxanes
  • Paclitaxel / docetaxel
  • Especially in combination with anthracyclines
  • Sequencing can affect cardiac toxicity
  • Miscellaneous
  • Fluorouracil
  • Etoposide

17
Drugs that cause cardiac toxicity
  • Monoclonal Antobodies
  • Primarily trastuzumab (Herceptin)
  • Potential with bevacizumab (Avastin)
  • Both have synergistic increases in cardiac
    toxicity when combined with an anthracycline
    (investigated in sarcomas)
  • Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H)
  • Small group of patients reported a 50 cardiac
    toxicity rate

18
Combinations
  • Combinations of drugs increase risk
  • Sequencing of drugs may affect toxicity
  • PK interactions
  • Synergistic MOA for cardiac toxicity (NEJM 2001)
  • AC trastuzumab -gt 27 cardiac toxocity
  • AC -gt 8 cardiac toxicity
  • Paclitaxel trastuzumab -gt 13
  • Paclitaxel -gt 1

19
Why do we want to risk it ?
  • Response rate was highest in arm that contained
    AC trastuzumab
  • Complete partial response 80 c.f. 38 with
    paclitaxel trastuzumab
  • AC alone 58 cf 16 for paclitaxel alone
  • Other studies have shown 80-90 RR for
    anthracycline trastuzumab

20
Mechanism of Cardiac Toxicity
  • Extrinsic Pathways
  • Pro-apoptotic pathways are activated by
    anthracyclines and other drugs
  • Intrinsic pathways
  • Cytochrome C release by mitochondria induces
    caspase-9 activity which signals apoptosis
  • Probable role of iron / ferritin / reactive
    oxygen species and incomplete oxidation in
    inducing cytochrome C release

21
Extrinsic Pathway Akt
Possible explanation for monoclonal
antibody-mediated cardiac toxicty
http//www.biocarta.com
22
Mechanism of Cardiac Toxicity
  • Trastuzumab
  • Unknown mechanism
  • HER/2-neu (c-erbB-2) not overexpressed in cardiac
    tissue
  • May be related to inhibition of anti-apoptotic
    pathways
  • Bevacizumab
  • Unknown too new on market (in US only)

23
Intrinsic Pathway - Mitochondria
Mitochondria play a more significant role in
apoptosis than previously recognized and are the
primary target of cardiac toxicity from
anthracyclines
http//www.biocarta.com
24
Mechanism of Cardiac Toxicity
  • Taxanes
  • Unknown mechanism
  • PK interaction with anthracyclines increases
    production of inactive, cardiotoxic metabolite

25
Preventing cardiac toxicity
  • Administration
  • Prolonged infusions are less cardiotoxic than
    rapid IV infusion
  • Splitting dose over multiple administrations per
    week or weekly
  • Antioxidants
  • May bind up reactive oxygen species generated by
    inefficient respiration in mitochondria

26
Preventing cardiac toxicity
  • Iron chelators (Dexrazoxane)
  • Chelates Fe3 reduces production of reactive
    oxygen
  • At 101 ratio of dexrazoxane doxorubicin there
    is no interaction (PK,PD)
  • At 101 ratio of dexrazoxane epirubicin in high
    doses, AUC of epirubicin decreased
  • Potential for reduced efficacy
  • In clinical practice, with doses of epirubicin of
    100 mg/m2 I suggest ratios of 6.251 (safer and
    effective)

27
Preventing cardiac toxicity
  • Liposomal formulation
  • Reduced risk for cardiac toxicity but does not
    disappear entirely
  • May allow for prolonged administration of an
    anthracycline when effective while reducing
    cardiac toxicity

28
Efficacy in preventing cardiac toxicity -
dexrazoxane
  • Meta analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.21 in
    favor of dexrazoxane over placebo in preventing
    toxicity (Relative risk reduction of 79)
  • Still, a small fraction of patients may
    experience cardiotoxicity (lt1 CHF, lt15 other)
    despite therapy with dexrazoxane

29
Therapy for Cardiac Toxicity
  • Symptomatic / Standard for CHF
  • ACEi, Beta-Blockers, etc.
  • Some toxicity resolves over time
  • We have a current pt with LVEF of 24 after 6
    cycles of CEF
  • Pt is symptomatic (SOB, decreased exercise
    tolerance)
  • No resolution of symptoms 6 months post therapy

30
When can cardiotoxicity occur
  • Actuarial risks
  • At a cumulative dose of doxorubicin of 300mg/m2
    (6 cycles of FAC chemotherapy) risk is less than
    1
  • _at_500-550mg/m2, 4 risk
  • _at_551-600mg/m2, 18 risk
  • _at_601 mg/m2, 36 risk
  • Theoretical maximum dose of 500-550 mg/m2 used

31
Cardiac Toxicity with CHOP Chemotherapy
32
Different anthracyclines
  • Epirubicin
  • Epimer of doxorubicin
  • Can be used in 21 ratio for improved efficacy
  • Relative cardiotoxicity risk is 11.8-2.0 wrt
    doxorubicin
  • Theoretical maximum of epirubicin is
    800-1000mg/m2
  • Mitoxantrone
  • Maximum lifetime dose 140 mg/m2
  • No efficacy data in preventing cardiac toxicity
    with dexrazoxane

33
When can cardiotoxicity occur
  • Risk factors for developing cardiac toxicity
  • Valvular heart disease
  • Coronary / myocardial heart disease
  • Long-standing hypertension
  • Mediastinal irradiation
  • Reduced with more modern radiotherapy planning
    techniques

34
When can cardiotoxicity occur
  • Reality is that a single dose of 50 mg/m2 of
    doxorubicin has caused florid CHF
  • Patients have also tolerated over 1000mg/m2
    without toxicity
  • Timeline ?
  • Acute (during therapy)
  • Long-term (in follow-up)

35
When can cardiotoxicity occur
  • Acute (during active therapy)
  • Rare, but a significant morbidity during adjuvant
    therapy
  • Infrequent but not unexpected in therapy of
    metastatic disease with trastuzumab
  • Long-term
  • Delayed appearance of cardiac toxicity
  • May start 6 months after therapy to years later

36
Cardiac toxicity in Adjuvant Chemotherapy
for Breast Cancer
  • FASG05
  • At 8 years, 2.3 CHF rate, higher rate of
    asymptomatic decline in LVEF
  • AC Chemotherapy (NCCTG N9831)
  • 1458 pts evaluated for LVEF
  • 51 had asymptomatic decreases in LVEF
  • 2.5-2.9 of patients had more severe reduction in
    LVEF

37
Childhood Cancers
  • Long-tern cardiac toxicity for survivors of
    childhood leukemia
  • 10-15 years out from therapy, cardiac toxicity
    may occur
  • There may be physiologic factors as of yet
    determined that reduce the risk of developing
    cardiac dysfunction.

38
Investigational approach to preventing
cardiac toxicity
  • Prevent inactivation of extrinsic pathways
  • Akt inactivation prevented in vitro by Eprex
  • Neuregulin (ligand for c-erbB-2) prevents
    inactivation of Akt pathway
  • Prevent activation of intrinsic pathways
  • L-Carnitine blocks release of cytochrome c,
    activation of caspase-9
  • May prevent cardiac toxicity

39
Conclusion
  • Overall, risks for cardiac toxicity is low with
    normal doses of anthracyclines
  • 6 x cycles of FEC100 (600 mg/m2 Epi)
  • 4 x cycles of AC (240 mg/m2 Doxo)
  • 6 x cycles of TAC (300 mg/m2 Doxo)
  • 6 x cycles of CEF (720 mg/m2 Epi)
  • Long-term incidence of cardiac toxicity is a
    concern if many more breast cancer patients are
    exposed to cardiotoxic therapy

40
  • Questions ?
  • Handouts available at
  • www.cshpontario.cawww.supportivecare.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com