Title: Diapositive 1
1NOAA/NCEP Washington, Aug. 2005
Radiation and fog in complex topography
- Research and operational forecasting with NMM
Z.Janjic, D. Scherer A. Bott
Mathias D. Müller Institute of Meteorology,
Climatology Remote Sensing University of Basel,
Switzerland Mathias.mueller_at_unibas.ch
2WHAZZZUPP !
The forecast system at the University of
Basel A radiation parameterization of
topographic effects Towards a 3D fog
model Coffee and Cookies -)
3Realtime Forecasts / Nesting
GFS 00/12 UTC
NMM-22 ETA-22 00/12 UTC
5 grids
72 h
NMM-4 03/15 UTC ETA-4 15 UTC
NMM-2 15 UTC
45 h
4Hardware
Weather Forecast Post Processing Beowulf
Cluster Theoretical Performance 386 Gflops1
Master 2 x 2.4 GHz Xeon Cpu's, 2GB Mem1
Fileserver 1.1TB Disk36 Nodes 2 x 2.4 GHz Xeon
Cpu's, 2GB MemGigabit Ethernet and SCI
interconnect Visualisation Preprocessing 2 x
3.0 GHz Xeon CPUs, 4 GB Mem, Linux OS IDL, 2 TB
Disk
5NWP at the University of Basel - Flow chart
VAR Data
6NDVI initialization with NOAA-AVHRR
CLIMATOLOGY AND REALTIME NDVI
CLIMATOLOGY NDVI
REALTIME NDVI
AUGUST, 13 2003
AGGREGATED TO 4 KM MODEL RESOLUTION
722 km NMM
4 km NMM
Operational Model Statistics
Forecast output of 5 Model Grids 35 GB /
24h Total number of Images produced 20000 /
24h Programming language for all
Graphics IDL Operating System LINUX Communic
ation and time synchronisation with forecast
Models, running on Cronos Cluster. Computing
Time NMM22 60 min (critical !) NMM4 90
min NMM2 4 hours
2km NMM
Computing Time of Models is upper limit for
Visualisation time
8Forecast Visualisation key points
Efficiency of Visualisation
Data and Information Reduction / Aggregation
(storage and resolution restrictions) (e.g.
Smoothing, Skipping, 24h-precipitation)
Conversion / Computation of Variables for
visualisation from raw model output (e.g.
Vorticity, CAPE, Helicity, Streamlines)
Precomputation of domain dependent but constant
layers (Topographic Shading, Continent
outlines,.)
Model Coordinate Systems (Lambert, Eta-Grid, ,
Lat/Lon) Internal Coordinate System
(Geographical Lat/Lon) Projection / Mapping to
different Coordinate Systems for Visualisation
Scaling constant, image optimized,
constant-optimized for forecast range
9Maps transparent, constant and content Layers
10Point Forecasts Meteograms
11Point Forecasts Tephigrams
12Internet meteoblue.ch
13Pictograms its for children
3. Web-page compilation
2. Decision Tree
1. Local field statistics
rain
no rain
Rain Cloud Cover Temperature ..
Rain Cloud Cover Temperature ..
clouds
Rain Cloud Cover Temperature ..
Rain Cloud Cover Temperature ..
143D visualisations nice and useless?
15A radiation parameterization of topographic
effects
Mathias Müller, Dieter Scherer
16Parameterization features
Considers Slope and azimuth angle of absorbing
surface Shadows Sky-view restriction Negligible
computational costs Computation of radiative
mean fluxes for model grid cells based on higher
resolution DEM Interface between land-surface
model and radiative transfer model Relatively
easy to include in other models (sandwich-like)
Parameterization features
17Shortwave radiation - direct diffuse
Radiation fluxes from Mesoscale Model
Land-Surface Model of Mesoscale Model
18Longwave radiation
Radiation fluxes from Mesoscale Model
Land-Surface Model of Mesoscale Model
19Effects of slope angle, slope aspect and shadow
20Effects of slope angle, slope aspect and shadow
21Effects of slope angle, slope aspect and shadow
22Effects of slope angle, slope aspect and shadow
23Sky-view factor
0.5
- affects
- diffuse shortwave
- longwave
24Case Studies
Parameterization was tested in the Nonhydrostatic
Mesoscale Model (NMM) of NOAA/NCEP (version Z.
Janjic)
220 Alpine stations
252m Temperature Differences
2 K Sun facing -3 K shadow
262m Temperature Differences
0.5
2 K in Valleys
- Skyview affects
- diffuse shortwave
- longwave
27Verification Clear sky summer conditions
(alpine stations)
22 June 2003 Nighttime warming reduces model
cold bias (0.5K) Problem of verification
Stations are located in valleys but radiation
affects slopes
28Verification overcast conditions (alpine
stations)
24 December 2003 Nighttime warming reduces
model cold bias
29Benefits from subgrid topography
doubles the effect !
4 km Grid with 1 km subgrid topography
30Parallel run intercomparison (4 km grid)
31Conclusions
Mean radiation flux based on high resolution
DEM Modifies temperature in a full physics NMM
run up to /-3 K Reduces nighttime cold bias by
about 0.5-1 K No computational costs during time
integration Easy to implement, sandwich-like
module for mesoscale models
323D fog with NMM and PAFOG
Mathias Müller, Andreas Bott, Zavisa Janjic
33NMM_PAFOG
Droplet number concentration
Liquid water content
NMM dynamical framework
PAFOG microphysics
Condensation/evaporation in the lowest 1500 m is
replaced by PAFOG
34PAFOG microphysics
Supersat.
where S is the Supersaturation
Assumption on the droplet size distribution
Log-normal function
D droplet Diameter
Dc,0 mean value of D
sc Standart deviation of the given droplet size
distribution (sc0.2)
35GRID of NMM_PAFOG
50 x 50 x 45 27 layers in the lowest 1000 m 11
soil layers Thickness(cm) 0.5 0.75
1.2 1.8 2.7 4.0 6.0 10 30 60 100
36Boundary conditions for dNc
1000m
PAFOG TOP
37Nesting
GFS
NMM-22
NMM_PAFOG GRID 50 x 50 x 45 (11 soil
layers) dx 1 km dt 2s (dynamics) / 10s
(physics) CPU 40 min/24hr on 9 Pentium-4 (very
efficient!)
NMM_PAFOG
NMM-4
NMM-2 15 UTC
381900 MEZ (3 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
27 Nov 2004
392200 MEZ (6 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
27 Nov 2004
400200 MEZ (10 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
Accurate sedimentation in PAFOG due to dNc
computation.
28 Nov 2004
410800 MEZ (16 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
28 Nov 2004
421000 MEZ (18 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
28 Nov 2004
43qc at 5m height (0100 MEZ)
PAFOG STANDARD
44qc at 5m height (0600 MEZ)
PAFOG STANDARD
45Nc at 5m height (0600 MEZ)
46Cold air pooling (0500 MEZ)
too cold !
47Cold bias problem
Z.Janjic
481900 MEZ (3 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
27 Nov 2004
492200 MEZ (6 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
27 Nov 2004
500200 MEZ (10 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
Accurate sedimentation in PAFOG due to dNc
computation.
28 Nov 2004
510600 MEZ (14 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
Accurate sedimentation in PAFOG due to dNc
computation.
28 Nov 2004
520800 MEZ (16 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
28 Nov 2004
531000 MEZ (18 hr forecast)
PAFOG
STANDARD
28 Nov 2004
54qc at 15m height (0200 MEZ)
PAFOG STANDARD
55qc at 15m height (0600 MEZ)
PAFOG STANDARD
56Cold air pooling (0500 MEZ) new PBL
57Conclusions
3D model with detailed microphysics Promising
first results Computationally very efficient and
feasible in todays Operational framework More
cases and verification needed
58Temperature Verification
Forecasthour 9-32 Temporal resolution 1 hour
NMM-2
ETA-4
NMM-4
59Temperature Verification
Forecasthour 33-45 Temporal resolution 1 hour
NMM-2
ETA-4
NMM-4
60References
Berry, E.X Pranger, M. P. (1974), Equation for
calculating the terminal velocities of water
drops, J. Appl. Meteor. 13, 108-113.
Bott, A. (1989), A positive definite advection
schemme obtained by nonlinear renormalization of
the advective fluxes, Monthly Weather Review 117,
1006-1015.
Bott, A. Trautmann, T. (2002), PAFOG a new
efficient forecast model of radiation fog and
low-level stratiform clouds, Atmospheric Research
64, 191-203.
Chaumerliac, N., Richard, E. Pinty, J.-P.
(1987), Sulfur scavenging in a mesoscale model
with quasi-spectral microphysic Two dimensional
results for continental and maritime clouds, J.
Geophys. Res. 92, 3114- 3126.
Janjic, Z. I., 2003 A Nonhydrostatic Model
Based on a New Approach. Meteorology and
Atmospheric Physics, 82, 271-285. Janjic, Z. I.,
J. P. Gerrity, Jr. and S. Nickovic, 2001 An
Alternative Approach to Nonhydrostatic
Modeling. Monthly Weather Review, 129, 1164-1178
61References
Sakakibara, H. (1979), A scheme for stable
numerical computation of the condensation
process with large time step, J. Meteorol. Soc.
Japan 57, 349-353.
Twomey, S. (1959), The nuclei of natural cloud
formation. Part ii The supersaturation in
natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet
concentration, Geophys. Pura Appl. 43, 243-249.