Title: Capital Punishment
1Capital Punishment
- 74 percent of Americans surveyed say they favor
the death penalty for people convicted of murder
in a 2003 Gallup poll
- Despite its public support capital punishment
remains controversial in the US
2Capital Punishment
- Of the 85 prisoners executed in 2000, 49 were
white, of which 6 were white Hispanic 35 were
black and 1 was American Indian.
- Of the 3,593 prisoners on the death rows of U.S.
prisons at the end of 2000, about 55 percent were
white, 43 percent were black, with all other
races represented 2 percent.
3Capital Punishment How To Kill?
4Capital Punishment How To Kill?
5Capital Punishment Ignorance Hypothesis
- Furman vs Georgia
- Justice Marshall
- A woman taking Social Psychology
- Stuart and Vidmar
6Capital Punishment Who Do We Execute
- Of the 85 prisoners executed in 2000, 49 were
white, of which 6 were white Hispanic 35 were
black and 1 was American Indian.
- Of the 3,593 prisoners on the death rows of U.S.
prisons at the end of 2000, about 55 percent were
white, 43 percent were black, with all other
races represented 2 percent. - Blacks were almost five times as likely as Whites
to be on death row
7Executions By State (2002)
State Executions State
Executions Texas 33
Ohio 3
Oklahoma 7 Alabama
2 Missouri 6
Mississippi 2
Georgia 4 North
Carolina 2 Virginia 4
Louisiana 1
Florida 3
California 1 South Carolina 3
Of 71 Executions 67 (94) Occurred in the
South
8Executions Of Juveniles By State Since 1976
State
Executions Texas
13
Virginia
3
Oklahoma
3
Georgia
1 Louisiana
1 Missouri
1 South Carolina
1
Of 23 Executions 23 (100) Occurred in the Sout
h
9Capital Punishment Phillips Archival Study
- Phillips (1980) recorded reports of murders and
capital punishments publicized in London between
1858 and 1921.
- Immediately after a well-publicized execution,
homicides dropped about 35.
- Several weeks later homicides increased above the
rate that would have been expected if no
execution had taken place.
- When averaged over a period of six weeks, capital
punishment did not influence the number of
homicides.
10Employing Terrorism, Guerrilla Warfare and
International Conflict To Achieve Social Influence
11Reasons To Avoid This Topic
- Too controversial
- Traditional social psychology topics like
conformity, attribution, aggression, etc.
- Less time can be spent talking about research
from my laboratory
- There are many topics that I and other persons
know more about
12Reasons To Examine This Topic
- The importance of the topic suggests that social
psychologists should have been studying this for
years
- Social psychologists have skills and have
developed a knowledge base not available to
politicians, journalists, historians, etc
- Chance to talk about where we are going rather
than where we have been
13Premises We Will Adopt
- No moral judgment is implied in the labels
terrorist, guerrilla, and state. These
simply describe activities that individuals and
organizations employ to gain social influence. - Terrorist, guerrilla and state organizations form
a continuum. Larger organizations retain all the
capacities of the smaller organizations, but
smaller organizations lack some of the capacities
of larger organizations.
14Premises We Will Adopt
- Conceptual structures are best formed by allowing
permeability between disciplines. Our structure
will take from psychology, history, philosophy,
art, politics, etc. - No new forms of social interactions have occurred
since 09-10-01. Thus, while we will not avoid
discussing the present international climate,
analysis of the current political situation is
unlikely to yield any new principle of social
influence.
15Organizations Definitions
- State-A organizational unit or group of allied
units that maintain a military force capable of
fighting conventional battles.
- Guerilla-A permanent or semi-permanent military
organization that is not sufficiently strong to
confront the military of a state in a
conventional battle. - Terrorist-A relatively small organization that is
not sufficiently strong to maintain an
identifiable group for an extended time.
16Organizational Goals
- States To 1) maintain their group in power and
2) dispense resources among the supporters of the
government.
- Guerillas-To become a state
- Terrorists-To become a guerilla organization and
eventually a state.
17Theme 1 The Villa
18Theme 1 My Friends Father
- What had produced the metamorphosis from
executioner to kind father
- Was the image of the kind father a ruse
- Did the kind man and executioner co-exist
concurrently
19Theme 2 Beautiful Art
- Michaelangelo
- Jack Kerouac On the Road
20Theme 2 On The Road
- Hitchhiking as a vocation
- Blizzards and the failed photo essay
- Rescue in Ames
- Exit on Powell Street
21Theme 2 Reappearance of Our Rescuer What A Long
Strange Trip It Must Have Been
- What social experiences led Kaczynski to renounce
a successful career to become a
techno-terrorist?
- Do monsters have redeeming qualities
22Theme 3 A Contrast of Leadership
- The impracticality of Pope John XXIII
- Vatican Deathwatch The morality of states
- JFK at the Ambassadors Residence
23Theme 3 JFK in Berlin
- Rudolph Wilde Platz
- June 26, 1963
24Theme 3 Arlington
- Gawking at the procession
- Dreams unfulfilled, a lack of closure
25Theme 3 Arthur Schlesinger
- Advisor to President Kennedy
- A Thousand Days
- Age of Jackson
- The Age of Roosevelt
26Theme 3 Schlesingers Analysis
- A sit-about Christmas Schleisinger envisions the
21st century
- 20th Century marked by great ideological
conflicts WWI, WWII, the Cold War
- Triumph of Democracy Destruction of empires,
colonialism, fascism and Communism
27Theme 3 Schlesingers Analysis
- Triumph of democracy creates a power vacuum
- Power vacuum allows expression of old hatreds
- Creates an international environment dominated
by
- Genocide
- Terrorism
28Reign of Terror
- French Revolution 1793-1794
- Origin of the term terrorist.
29Jewish Terrorists Zealots
- They believed that they served God by killing
Gods enemies
- Assassinated Jews who collaborated with the
Romans
- Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot may have been
Zealots.
- Destroyed by Roman 10th Legion in 66 AD at Masada
30American Terrorist John Brown
- Pottawatomie Creek
- Harpers Ferry
31American Terrorists Klu Klux Klan
- Racist-protestant group established in southern
US after the Civil War
- Undergone many changes throughout its history
- Still active in US
32American Terrorist Timothy McVeigh
- Gulf War veteran
- Oklahoma City Bombing
33American Terrorist John Allen Muhammad
- Gulf War Veteran
- With John Lee Malvo killed 10 and wounded 3 in DC
area sniper case
34American Terrorist Ted Kaczynski
- Former Berkeley professor
- Wrote Industrial Society And Its Future
35Palestinian Terrorists Hamas
- Arose during Intifada of 1987
- Has conducted suicide bombings against Israel
- Strongly opposes Yasir Arafat
36Peruvian Terrorists Shining Path
- Peruvian communist group founded in 1970
- Turned to terrorism in the 1980s
- Led to deaths of approximately 25000 persons
- Once several thousand strong now greatly weakened
37Italian Terrorists Red Brigades
- Formed in 1969 to break Italy from western
alliance
- Assassinated Prime Minister Aldo Moro in 1978
- Kidnapped US Army General Dozier in 1981
- Now fewer than 50 members
38Research Model Predictors of Organizational
Success
Correlate 1 . . . . . Correlate n Goal
(success, failure)
For instance, Strong Ideology . . . .
. Attack State Symbols Goal
39Components of Our Analysis
- Organizations States, guerillas, terrorists
- Citizens Opponents and supporters of the state
- Infrastructure and Resources Food,
transportation, airports, etc.
- Communication Network Television, radio,
internet, word of mouth
40Principles Guiding Our Analysis
- No moral assessment is implied in labeling a
group a terrorist, guerilla or state
organization. These groups are simply mechanisms
for gaining social influence - Terrorist, guerilla and state organizations have
existed and will exist throughout history
- Terrorist, guerilla and state organizations have
different goals and employ different strategies
- Larger organizations use strategies of smaller
organizations but smaller organizations are
rarely capable of using strategies of larger
organizations