Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Learning

Description:

Note: The lack of evidence for implicit learning (Lecture 1) does not ... (e.g. Christopher Wren) Jacoby, Woloshyn, Kelley (1989) Retrieval routes. Intentional ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: andyw2
Category:
Tags: learning | wren

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning


1
Learning Memory
  • 10. Retrieval processes II

2
Retrieval processes II
Essential (also for lecture 9) a) Baddeley,
ch. 11, b) Eysenck Keane, ch. 6 c) Anderson,
ch. 7, d) Blaxton 1989 e) Jacoby 1991
Implicit explicit Amnesia
Implicit explicit Normals
Automatic False fame
Retrieval processes I
Process dissociation procedure
Feeling of Knowing
Tip of the tongue
Before
After
During
3
Multiple retrieval processes
  • Last week
  • Episodic vs. semantic?
  • Data-driven vs. conceptually-driven retrieval
  • This week
  • Implicit vs. explicit retrieval
  • Note The lack of evidence for implicit learning
    (Lecture 1) does not preclude implicit retrieval
    of explicitly learned information.
  • Recollection vs. familiarity.

4
Evidence from amnesia
P L I _ _ _ _
ORANGE
Warrington Weiskrantz (1970)
5
Evidence from normals
A _ _ A _ _ I N C _ A R _ T _ H _ O _ R E M _ Y S
_ _ R Y
Tulving, Schacter Stark (1982)
6
False fame effect
  • Study
  • Read non-famous names aloud (e.g. Sebastian
    Weisdorf)
  • Full attention
  • Divided attention(digit detection)
  • Test
  • Fame judgements
  • Old, non-famous (e.g. Sebastian Weisdorf)
  • New, non-famous(e.g. Avril Zwickel)
  • Famous(e.g. Christopher Wren)

Jacoby, Woloshyn, Kelley (1989)
7
Retrieval routes
  • Intentional
  • Effortful
  • Automatic
  • Familiarity-based

8
Naïve empiricism
  • Intentional or explicit tests
  • Recall, recognition
  • Automatic or implicit tests
  • Fragmented words, fragment completion, fame
    judgements.

9
Process dissociation
  • Intentional process
  • Automatic process
  • Typically, both contribute to successful
    retrieval
  • Stronger claim Both contribute, but the
    contributions are independent.

Jacoby (1991)
10
Process dissociation procedure
  • Read a list of words List 1
  • Hear a list of words List 2
  • Two retrieval tests
  • Both tests include List 1, List 2 and novel
    words.
  • Inclusion test Respond old if word was on
    either list.
  • Exclusion test Respond old only if word was on
    List 2.

11
Inclusion test
  • Inclusion test Respond old if word was on
    either list.
  • Intentional (recollective) process will have a
    certain probability of concluding old for List
    1 words R
  • Automatic process will also have a certain
    probability of concluding old for List 1 words
    A
  • If either process concludes old, the subject
    will respond old
  • P(old) R A RA (Laws of probability)

12
Exclusion test
  • Exclusion test Respond old only if word was on
    List 2.
  • Subject will only respond old to List 1 words
    if two things happen
  • The automatic process responds old due to a
    feeling of familiarity A
  • The intentional process fails to recognise the
    word (if it had, it would recall it was from List
    1) (1-R)

P(old ) A(1-R)
13
Dissociating the processes
  • Inclusion P(old) R A RA
  • Exclusion P(old) A(1-R)
  • Inclusion Exclusion
  • ( R A RA ) A (1 R)
  • R A RA A RA
  • R
  • A Exclusion / (1-R)

14
Process dissociation Evidence
  • Read a list of words List 1
  • Hear a list of words List 2
  • Two retrieval tests
  • Inclusion test P(old) 0.48
  • Exclusion test P(old) 0.37
  • R Inclusion Exclusion 0.11
  • A Exclusion / (1-R) 0.37 / 0.89 0.42
  • Intentional process should be eliminated by
    divided attention (digit task) R 0.
  • Exclusion A(1-R) 0.42 (1-0) 0.42
  • Actual data 0.43

Jacoby (1991)
15
Interim summary
  • R retrieval
  • Retrieval is explicit
  • Intentional
  • Effortful
  • Retrieval is conceptually-driven
  • Retrieves episodic information
  • Highly contextual
  • Interference-prone (e.g. effect of delay).

16
Interim summary
  • A retrieval
  • Retrieval is implicit
  • Relatively automatic
  • Relatively effortless.
  • Retrieval is data-driven
  • Retrieval can be based of a feeling of
    familiarity.
  • Retrieves semantic information
  • Relatively non-contextual
  • Relatively robust to interference (e.g. effect of
    delay).

17
Feeling of knowing
  • Which planet is the largest in our solar system?
  • What sea does West Pakistan border?
  • If fail to answer, rate Feeling of Knowing (FoK)
    as ability to pick correct answer from several
    alternatives.
  • Then do this recognition test.

Hart (1965)
18
Tip of the tongue phenomenon
  • Definition a navigational instrument used in
    measuring angular distances, especially the
    altitude of the sun, moon, and stars at sea
  • Whats the word?
  • ToT state strong FoK, without retrieval
  • Number of syllables
  • Two.
  • 60 correct
  • First letter
  • S
  • 50 correct
  • Retrieval is not all or none.

Brown McNeil (1966)
19
What next?
Essential (also for lecture 9) a) Baddeley,
ch. 11, b) Eysenck Keane, ch. 6 c) Anderson,
ch. 7, d) Blaxton 1989 e) Jacoby 1991
Revision lecture!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com