Heart failure Achieving Excellence in Heart Failure care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Heart failure Achieving Excellence in Heart Failure care

Description:

Direct referral from HF Rehab to Community Cardiology Services. ... Some of these patients may not have been referred to cardiology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:382
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: MKC1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Heart failure Achieving Excellence in Heart Failure care


1
Heart failureAchieving Excellence in Heart
Failure care
  • Naguib Hilmy GPSI Milton Keynes
  • John Parnell Manager HealthMK

2
One-year survival rates, heart failure and major
cancers compared, mid-1990's, England and Wales
ONS (2001) Cowie MR et al (2000) Heart 83
505-510
www.heartstats.org
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Prevalence of heart failure by age and sex, most
deprived and least deprived areas compared,
1998, England and Wales
Ellis C et al (2001) Health Statistics Quarterly
11 17-24
www.heartstats.org
7
Health MK is a practice based commissioning
collaborative with 26 member practices and
serving a population of gt245,000 (total MK
population gt250,000).
8
MK Community cardiac service
  • 2 GPSIs, Admin, HCAs Practice nurses
  • GPSI in North MK Dr Mahendran
  • MKPCT CHD Lead
  • Support from MK NHS trust Cardiology
  • Dr David Gwilt . Dr Attila Kardos

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Patients on database 2558
  • Sept 08

12
24 Hour ECGs- Event recorders
  • 2008 400
  • 2007 356
  • 2006 252
  • 2005 136
  • 2004 49

13
Registers
14
North Central London sector-wide Heart failure
QOF data National estimated prevalence
2.3National recorded prevalence 1.8
15
Heart Failure 2 (Echo)
16
Heart Failure 3 -ACEI
17
(No Transcript)
18
Audit
  • PCT is providing help to practices to look at
    their registers.
  • We have trialled a series of data audits and
    actions to pick-up missing and lost patients from
    the Heart Failure Registers. In both trial
    practices patients have been added to the
    registers.
  • The audits are being rolled out, either to be
    done by the practice or by PCT Heart Failure
    Nurse facilitator

19
Registers
  • Change in 2007 from implicit coding to explicit,
    GPs or CHD nurse involvement now needed.
  • OPD letters rarely stated Heart Failure as a
    diagnosis.
  • Registration is geared to providing therapeutic
    management.

20
Support
  • The process involves checking and advising
    summarisers of the read code issues, and identify
    any learning issues for incorporation into
    training.
  • Heart Failure discussed with practices CHD nurse
    to ensure HF patients are seen. In this process
    we will also identify any training needs.
  • Updated Heart Failure Manual is being produced.

21
Heart Failure Rehabilitation Service
  • A new service will start in May 2009 (probably)
    which will provide exercise and psychological
    support for patients with a new diagnosis of
    Heart Failure.
  • Direct referral from GPs, Practice Nurses and
    MKFT.
  • Direct referral from HF Rehab to Community
    Cardiology Services.
  • With a pathway to provide long term self-care
    support.

22
Experience from initial searches at pilot
practices
  • Until recently there was no universal definition
    for Heart Failure and a complicated system of
    read coding has evolved for QOF.
  • GMS QOF HF indicators include patients with -
    LVSD-LVDD
  • About half of the patients with measurable left
    ventricular dysfunction in the MONICA and ECHOES
    studies - had no symptoms.

23
Echocardiogram
  • Data missing ejection fractions and
    ventricular function status.
  • For QOF purposes echo code needs to be linked to
    G58 codes.

24
Method of Case Review
  • Loop Diuretics search (exclusions), problem
    lists, medical history, current therapy,
    echocardiogram results if available.
  • Some empirical management of patients with
    symptoms, especially elderly patients.
  • Healthcare Commission found that nationally,
    only 33.4 of patients discharged with heart
    failure were prescribed beta-blockers and issues
    remain over follow up and titration of
    medication.  

25
LVD/ Heart Registers
  • Access To diagnostics
  • Coding
  • Co-morbidities
  • Has the patient been given the diagnosis?
  • Weak Heart 'fluid on your lungs - your heart
    is not pumping hard enough
  • a diagnosis of 'heart failure' was rarely
    communicated to patients to avoid causing
    anxiety

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Heart Failure 1 (READ2)
  • Heart Failure (G58)
  • Rheumatic Left ventricular failure (G1yz1)
  • NYHA classification class I (662f)
  • NYHA classification- class II (662g)
  • NYHA classification class III (662h)
  • NYHA classification- class IV (662i)

30
Codes not included as heart failure
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy
  • Ischaemic cadiomyopathy
  • Left ventricular systolic dysfunction
  • Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction

31
Heart Failure 2 Echocardiography
  • Echo shows LVSD 585f
  • Echo shows LVDDF 585g
  • U-S heart scan 5853
  • Echo abnormal 58531
  • Echo equivocal 5C20
  • Echo requested 33BD
  • Referral for echo 8HQ7
  • Echo abnormal R1320
  • Ultrasound cardiog abn R1322
  • Ref to cardio sp int gp 8H4R
  • Priv ref to cardiologist
  • 8HVJ
  • Cardiological referral
  • 8H44
  • Angiocardiography
  • 5531, 5532, 5533,5538
  • 79380, 79382

32
Should every body with suspected heart failure
have an Echocardiogram?How many?How often?
33
  • If investigation is limited to patients with more
    definite symptoms and signs of heart failure,
    fewer than 50 of cases will be identified and a
    large number of patients with mild symptoms will
    be missed EPICA

34
EPICA
  • Abnormal ECG 81 sensitivity
  • Abnormal CXR 57 sensitivty
  • 25 of CHF patients had normal ECG or CXR

35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Heart failure is most unlikely in a patient with
a normal ECG or normal plasma concentration of
BNP or NT-proBNP given the high sensitivity of
these tests
  • The sensitivity of BNP may be as high as 90-97
    in patients presenting with new symptoms ,
    depending on assay used cut off point
  • The sensitivity of ECG is as high as 94

39
Tests used to diagnose significant
CHD Treadmill test sensitivity of 68,
specificity of 77 Nuclear test sensitivity of
81, specificity of 85-95 Portable Echo (
LVSD) sensitivity 96,
specificity 98
NPV 99.6 PSA
for Prostate Cancer gt4
sensitivity 7079
specificity
5990 one in 8 men with PSA lt 4 will have
prostate cancer
40
Predictive Value
  • BNP (Biosite)
  • NPV 88.2 at 40pg/ml
  • Avoid 51 referrals but miss 6 with LVSD
  • PPV 55 at 40pg/ml
  • NT pro-BNP (Roche)
  • NPV 97.3 at 150pg/ml
  • Avoid 37 referrals miss 1 with mild LVSD
  • PPV 52 at 150pg/ml

41
(No Transcript)
42
What proportion of patients referred for
suspected HF have heart failure ?
  • 29 Cowie 1999
  • 5-8 in asymptomatic patients ?

43
Suspected Heart failureSOB , Fatigue, Oedema
Clinical assessment
NT-ProBNP
ECG
Normal Heart failure unlikely
Abnormal Echocardiogram
Murmurs Blackouts Echo monitors
44
(No Transcript)
45
First 100 NT-ProBNP( Jan to June 08)
46
  • Results of less than 60 pg/ ml 21 patients
  • Results of less than 100pg/ml 37 patients
  • Results of less than 150pg/ml 39 patients
  • Results of less than 200 pg/ ml 54 patients
  • Results of less than 300 pg/ml 66 patients
  • Results of 300 to 500 pg/ ml 6
    patients
  • Results of 500 to 1000 pg/ ml 12 patients
  • Results over 1000 pg/ml 16
    patients
  • Results over 3000 pg/ml 5
    patients

47
RESULTS
  • 45/100 did not require a new or repeat
    Echocardiogram.
  • Heart failure with evidence of LVSD
  • eight
    patients.
  • Heart failure due to diastolic dysfunction
  • twelve
    patients.

48
16 patients with readings gt1000 pg/ ml
  • 8 had LVSD,
  • 3 LVDD,
  • 3 Aortic stenosis, one had urgent AVR
  • 1 Significant MR

49
12 patients with readings between 500 1000 pg/ml
  • 4 had diastolic dysfunction
  • 1 known heart failure with normal EF, MV repair
    AF

50
LVSD
  • EF 50 388 2025 pg/ml
  • EF 40 1929 1468 pg/ml
  • EF 30 2435 , 2526 gt 3000 pg/ml
  • EF 26 gt3000 pg/ml

51
ECGs
  • Normal 51
  • Abnormal 46
  • Not available 3

52
Echos done 54
  • Normal ( 11 patients) levels (pg/ml)
  • lt60 x5, 60, 81, 165, 187, 278, 336
  • LVSD ( 8 patients ) levels (pg/ml)
  • 388 (AF, EF 50), 1468, 1929, 2025. 2435,
    2526, gt 3000 x2

53
LVDD with or without heart failure
  • (12 patients) levels (pg/ml)
  • 74, 92, 273, 293, 332, 513, 613, 680, 772,
    1057, 1239, gt 3000

54
20 patients Other abnormalities
  • including mitral regurgitation, aortic valve
    disease, small pericardial effusion, left
    ventricular hypertrophy etc

55
Hospital referrals
  • 2 patients were admitted to hospital one on
    diagnosis one with increasing symptoms
  • 6 patients already attending cardiology
  • 11 patients referred to cardiology
  • 3 AS, 1 MR, 1 PAF, 1 for pacing

56
45 Echos were not done or repeated
  • 6 were not repeated,
  • One had been undertaken by hospital
  • 15 patients COPD, asthma, chest infection
  • 4 patients advanced cancer
  • Massive Ascites due to cirrhosis, panic attacks,
    dementia , glitazone oedema

57
Limitations
  • This is not an academic study no blinding
  • Some of these patients may not have been referred
    to cardiology
  • Some patients had previous echos
  • Patients who had Echocardiogram followed by
    NT-proBNP were included

58
Conclusions
  • NT-pro-BNP near patient testing combined with
    clinical assessment and ECG by PSI in the
    community appear to offer a method for prompt
    risk assessment for patients presenting with
    suspected heart failure

59
  • It helps to triage and prioritise patients that
    need immediate echocardiography and reassure
    those who do not require an echocardiogram and
    differentiate the ones that can have routine
    echocardiogram
  • We should continue to listen to our patients and
    not dismiss the value of careful clinical
    evaluation

60
Treatment Approach for the Patient with Heart
Failure
Stage A At high risk, no structural disease
Stage B Structural heart disease, asymptomatic
Stage D Refractory HF requiring specialized
interventions
Stage C Structural heart disease with
prior/current symptoms of HF
  • Therapy
  • Treat Hypertension
  • Treat lipid disorders
  • Encourage regular exercise
  • Discourage alcohol intake
  • ACE inhibition
  • Therapy
  • All measures under stage A
  • ACE inhibitors in appropriate patients
  • Beta-blockers in appropriate patients
  • Therapy
  • All measures under stage A
  • Drugs
  • Diuretics
  • ACE inhibitors
  • Beta-blockers
  • Digitalis
  • Dietary salt restriction
  • Therapy
  • All measures under stages A,B, and C
  • Mechanical assist devices
  • Heart transplantation
  • Continuous (not intermittent) IV inotropic
    infusions for palliation
  • Hospice care

Hunt, SA, et al ACC/AHA Guidelines for the
Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart
Failure in the Adult, 2001
61
(No Transcript)
62
Problem solving
  • Harmful substances
  • -Smoking, Excess alcohol
  • - Inappropriate type or dosing of B blocker
  • - NSAIDS, Coxibs, Glitazones
  • Community Matrons, Heart Failure Nurses

63
Seattle Heart Failure Model Calculator
  • http//depts.washington.edu/shfm/app.php?accept1
    enterEnter

64
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com