The Value of Information

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

The Value of Information

Description:

The Value of Information Phil Kaminsky kaminsky_at_ieor.berkeley.edu David Simchi-Levi Philip Kaminsky Edith Simchi-Levi Value of Information In modern supply chains ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: edut1550

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Value of Information


1
The Value of Information
  • Phil Kaminskykaminsky_at_ieor.berkeley.edu

David Simchi-Levi Philip Kaminsky Edith
Simchi-Levi
2
Value of Information
  • In modern supply chains, information replaces
    inventory
  • Why is this true?
  • Why is this false?
  • Information is always better than no information.
    Why?
  • Information
  • Helps reduce variability
  • Helps improve forecasts
  • Enables coordination of systems and strategies
  • Improves customer service
  • Facilitates lead time reductions
  • Enables firms to react more quickly to changing
    market conditions.

3
The Bullwhip Effect and its Impact on the Supply
Chain
  • Consider the order pattern of a single color
    television model sold by a large electronics
    manufacturer to one of its accounts, a national
    retailer.

Figure 1. Order Stream
Huang at el. (1996), Working paper, Philips Lab
4
The Bullwhip Effect and its Impact on the Supply
Chain
Figure 2. Point-of-sales Data-Original
Figure 3. POS Data After Removing Promotions
5
The Bullwhip Effectand its Impact on the Supply
Chain
Figure 4. POS Data After Removing Promotion
Trend
6
Higher Variability in Orders Placed by Computer
Retailer to Manufacturer Than Actual Sales
Lee, H, P. Padmanabhan and S. Wang (1997), Sloan
Management Review
7
Increasing Variability of Orders Up the Supply
Chain
Lee, H, P. Padmanabhan and S. Wang (1997), Sloan
Management Review
8
We Conclude .
  • Order variability is amplified up the supply
    chain upstream echelons face higher variability.
  • What you see is not what they face.

9
What are the Causes.
  • Promotional sales
  • Forward buying
  • Volume and transportation discounts
  • Batching
  • Inflated orders
  • IBM Aptiva orders increased by 2-3 times when
    retailers thought that IBM would be out of stock
    over Christmas
  • Motorola cell phones

10
What are the Causes.
  • Single retailer, single manufacturer.
  • Retailer observes customer demand, Dt.
  • Retailer orders qt from manufacturer.

Dt
qt
Retailer
Manufacturer
L
11
What are the Causes.
  • Promotional sales
  • Volume and transportation discounts
  • Inflated orders
  • Demand forecasting
  • Order-up-to points are modified as forecasts
    change orders increase more than forecasts
  • Long cycle times
  • Long lead times magnify this effect

12
What are the Causes.
  • Single retailer, single manufacturer.
  • Retailer observes customer demand, Dt.
  • Retailer orders qt from manufacturer.

Dt
qt
Retailer
Manufacturer
L
13
How big is the increase?
  • Suppose a P period moving average is used.

14
Var(q)/Var(D)For Various Lead Times
14
L5
L5
12
10
L3
L3
8
6
L1
4
L1
2
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
15
Consequences.
  • Increased safety stock
  • Reduced service level
  • Inefficient allocation of resources
  • Increased transportation costs

16
Multi-Stage Supply Chains
  • Consider a multi-stage supply chain
  • Stage i places order qi to stage i1.
  • Li is lead time between stage i and i1.


qoD
q1
q2
Retailer Stage 1
Manufacturer Stage 2
Supplier Stage 3
L1
L2
17
Multi stage systems
  • Centralized each stage bases orders on
    retailers forecast demand.
  • Decentralized each stage bases orders on
    previous stages demand

18
Multi-Stage SystemsVar(qk)/Var(D)
Dec, k5
Cen, k5
Dec, k3
Cen, k3
k1
19
The Bullwhip EffectManagerial Insights
  • Exists, in part, due to the retailers need to
    estimate the mean and variance of demand.
  • The increase in variability is an increasing
    function of the lead time.
  • The more complicated the demand models and the
    forecasting techniques, the greater the increase.
  • Centralized demand information can significantly
    reduce the bullwhip effect, but will not
    eliminate it.

20
Coping with the Bullwhip Effect in Leading
Companies
  • Reduce uncertainty
  • POS
  • Sharing information
  • Sharing forecasts and policies
  • Reduce variability
  • Eliminate promotions
  • Year-round low pricing
  • Reduce lead times
  • EDI
  • Cross docking
  • Strategic partnerships
  • Vendor managed inventory
  • Data sharing

21
Example Quick Response at Benetton
  • Benetton, the Italian sportswear manufacturer,
    was founded in 1964. In 1975 Benetton had 200
    stores across Italy.
  • Ten years later, the company expanded to the
    U.S., Japan and Eastern Europe. Sales in 1991
    reached 2 trillion.
  • Many attribute Benettons success to successful
    use of communication and information technologies.

22
ExampleQuick Response at Benetton
  • Benetton uses an effective strategy, referred to
    as Quick Response, in which manufacturing,
    warehousing, sales and retailers are linked
    together. In this strategy a Benetton retailer
    reorders a product through a direct link with
    Benettons mainframe computer in Italy.
  • Using this strategy, Benetton is capable of
    shipping a new order in only four weeks, several
    week earlier than most of its competitors.

23
How Does BenettonCope with the Bullwhip Effect?
  • 1. Integrated Information Systems
  • Global EDI network that links agents with
    production
  • and inventory information
  • EDI order transmission to HQ
  • EDI linkage with air carriers
  • Data linked to manufacturing
  • 2. Coordinated Planning
  • Frequent review allows fast reaction
  • Integrated distribution strategy

24
Information for Effective Forecasts
  • Pricing, promotion, new products
  • Different parties have this information
  • Retailers may set pricing or promotion without
    telling distributor
  • Distributor/Manufacturer might have new product
    or availability information
  • Collaborative Forecasting addresses these issues.

25
Information for Coordination of Systems
  • Information is required to move from local to
    global optimization
  • Questions
  • Who will optimize?
  • How will savings be split?
  • Information is needed
  • Production status and costs
  • Transportation availability and costs
  • Inventory information
  • Capacity information
  • Demand information

26
Locating Desired Products
  • How can demand be met if products are not in
    inventory?
  • Locating products at other stores
  • What about at other dealers?
  • What level of customer service will be perceived?

27
Lead-Time Reduction
  • Why?
  • Customer orders are filled quickly
  • Bullwhip effect is reduced
  • Forecasts are more accurate
  • Inventory levels are reduced
  • How?
  • EDI
  • POS data leading to anticipating incoming orders.

28
Information to Address Conflicts
  • Lot Size Inventory
  • Advanced manufacturing systems
  • POS data for advance warnings
  • Inventory -- Transportation
  • Lead time reduction for batching
  • Information systems for combining shipments
  • Cross docking
  • Advanced DSS
  • Lead Time Transportation
  • Lower transportation costs
  • Improved forecasting
  • Lower order lead times
  • Product Variety Inventory
  • Delayed differentiation
  • Cost Customer Service
  • Transshipment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)