Title: Best Practices in Implementing an Effective Compliance Program
1Best Practices in Implementing an Effective
Compliance Program
Presented By David B. Crawford, CIA,
CCSA Justina Crawford, MA, BME JDEnterprises cr
awfordjd_at_earthlink.net
2Agenda
- Introduction
- Essentials of An Effective Compliance Program
- How to Begin
- The First Six Months
- Code of Conduct and General Compliance Training
3Agenda(continued)
- Risk Assessment
- Managing the Critical Risks
- Assurance Strategies
- Handling Potential and Actual Instances of
Non-compliance - What About the Non-critical Risks?
- Whats Next?
4Compliance Program Objective
To provide an infrastructure that facilitates
on-going assurance that the institution is
complying with internal and external laws,
regulations, policies, and procedures.
5Essential Elements
- Compliance standards and procedures
- High level manager in charge
- Communicate what is important to all employees
- Monitor and Audit
- Confidential Reporting Mechanism
- Consistent enforcement and discipline
- Respond, learn, and adjust
6Compliance COSO
- Control Environment
- Risk Assessment
- Control Activities
- Information Communication
- Monitoring
- Standards high level manager in charge
- Communicate what is important
- Monitoring Plans
- Awareness and reporting mechanisms
- Monitor and Audit
7Developing the Action Plan
- Ad hoc committee to develop plan
- Outside assistance
- Words are so important
- Approval from highest authority possible
- It takes longer than you think
- It must have relevance to each individual employee
8The First Six Months
- Establish the compliance committee structure
- Appoint a Compliance Officer
- Establish a compliance function
- Train the infrastructure employees
9Compliance Committees
- Executive Compliance Committee (ECC)
- Compliance Working Committee (CWC)
- High-risk Sub-committees
10 ECC Purpose
- To provide the executive level decision-making
function for the institutions compliance program - To serve as an extension of the Board in
providing the oversight function for the
compliance program at the institution
11ECC Duties and Responsibilities Provide Guidance
Direction
- Establish the policies for the compliance program
- Set the tone at the top for the institutions
commitment to ethics, integrity, and doing the
right thing - Walk the talk that is, provide continuous
example of how the institution expects employees
to act
12ECC Duties and Responsibilities Allocate
Appropriate Resources
- Appoint an senior executive as the Compliance
Officer - Appropriate resources are dictated by the
complexity of the compliance environment of the
institution - Resources include budgets specifically for
compliance infrastructure activities and the
structuring of compliance activities into normal
operational duties
13ECC Duties and Responsibilities Oversee the
Institutions Compliance Program
- Understand the compliance risk picture of the
institution - Approve the Annual Compliance Operating Plan to
manage the institution critical compliance risks - Monitor the execution of the plan to manage
compliance risks - Review sanctions (for significant non-compliance
instances) and rewards (for exemplary compliance
efforts) to ensure equity and consistency
14ECC Composition and Operation
- Senior executives
- Size is determined by compliance complexity and
operating philosophy - Meetings should be as frequently as necessary to
perform duties and responsibilities but at least
Quarterly - Maintains minutes of meetings
15Compliance Working Committee
- Composition the responsible party from each
high-risk area - Duties
- Receive periodic activity reports from each
high-risk area - Perform specific tasks assigned by Compliance
Officer - Recommend the Critical Risks to the ECC
- Act as Compliance Advocates Cheerleaders
16High-Risk Area Sub-Committees
- Leader - Compliance Working Committee Member
from High-risk area - Members Employees representing each risk in the
high-risk area - Duties
- Perform risk assessment of the High-risk area
- Determine Critical Risks for the high-risk area
- Develop monitoring, specialized training, and
reporting plans for the critical risks in the
high-risk area
17The Compliance Officer? Current Executive Staff
Member
- Pro
- Knows the culture
- Immediate start
- Network already established
- No reallocation of resources required
- Con
- Not the main job
- Compliance perceived as part of functional area
- Possibly conflicts with regular duties
18The Compliance Officer? Create a New Executive
Staff Position
- Pros
- Main job
- Not attached to an existing functional area
- Cons
- Hiring process takes time
- Must learn institutional culture
- Must develop personal network
- Delays program implementation
- Reallocation of institutional resources required
19Compliance Officer Responsibilities
- Make compliance a part of everyday activities of
the institution - Monitor the various compliance program activities
- Communicate with the chief executive officer and
others regarding compliance program activities - Establish a compliance function
20Making Compliance a Part of Everyday Activities
- Awareness communication avenues
- Risk-based plan and compliance manual
- Training tools and delivery mechanisms
- Monitoring plans and assurance processes
- Confidential reporting mechanism
- Reporting procedures
21Monitor Compliance Program Activities
- Training
- Critical risks monitoring plans
- Monitoring of Non-compliance
22Communicate with Executive Management
- Instances of non-compliance that require
executive action - Risk-based plan
- Monitoring activities
- Compliance Working Committee meeting minutes
- Compliance program self-assessment
23Establish the Compliance Function
- Robust compliance function
- Coordinator compliance function
- Informal compliance function
- No compliance function
24Robust Compliance Function
- Complex compliance environment
- Full-time compliance officer
- Full-time support staff
- Separate budget and organizational chart
- Absorbs previously independent compliance
activities such as medical billing or
environmental health safety - Usually found in health-related and major
research-oriented institutions
25Coordinator Compliance Function
- Complex compliance environment
- Compliance Officer has other pre-existing
responsibilities and devotes little time - Delegates daily operation of the compliance
program to a coordinator - Full-time support staff, usually with separate
budget - Usually found in academic institutions with some
research, intercollegiate athletics, on-campus
housing, etc.
26Informal Compliance Function
- Limited compliance environment
- Full-time compliance officer
- Support staff comes from existing institutional
operating units such as EHS, internal auditing,
human resources, etc - Budget limited and may be buried
27No Compliance Function
- Limited compliance environment
- Compliance officer has other pre-existing
functional responsibilities - Support provided by compliance committee, other
institutional units, and outsiders - Budget usually for external help only
- Usually found in small institutions engaged
mostly in undergraduate instruction
28Compliance Officer and Function Summary
- Big job
- Compliance officer must be a communicator
- Compliance coordinator and staff need consultant,
assurance provider mentality - Start-up decisions and long-term decisions may
not be the same
29Code of Conduct
- Be careful of the words used
- Do not establish new policies and procedures
- Use a committee with broad representation of the
university community to develop - Include faculty up-front
30General Compliance Training
- Curriculum
- Content
- Testing for Knowledge Transmission
- Delivery Mechanisms
- General Compliance Training Plan
- Initial effort
- Subsequent years
31Risk AssessmentDefinition of Compliance Risks
- A compliance risk is the likelihood that an
employee (faculty, administration, or staff) will
fail to follow an internal policy or procedure or
an external law, rule or regulation that applies
to the activity in which they are engaged.
32Risk Assessment Process
- Perform compliance risk assessment for each risk
area of the institution - Present area risk matrix to the Compliance
Working Committee - CWC prepares a risk matrix for the institution
that includes each area and its critical risks - CWC then re-determines the impact and probability
of these risks from an institution perspective
rather than an area perspective - The result is the Institutional Compliance Risk
Matrix
33How To Determine Your Critical Risks
- This is determined by each institution
- Guidelines might be
- Items with HH and HM values (high impact/high
probability and high impact/medium probability)
should be on critical list - Items with HL and MH may be on critical list
34Validate Your Critical Risk List
- Compare your institutional critical risks to
similar institutions or to available models - Be able to explain rationale for any item on your
critical list that is not on the other
institution or model risk list - Be able to explain rationale for any item on
other institution or model risk list but not on
your critical list
35What About All the Other Compliance Risks
- Critical risks at every level must be managed
- Critical risks at every level require
- Responsible party
- Monitoring plan
- Specialized training plan
- Reporting plan
- Difference between critical risks at the
different levels is who performs the oversight,
on whom, and for whom
36Oversight Controls for Critical Risks at All
Levels
37Keep Up with Changing Risk Environment
- Centralized office to monitor external
environment - High Risk responsible parties monitor their
respective high risk area internal and external
environment - Compliance Working Committee discusses
environment and potential changes as a part of
every meeting - Annual assessment of both internal and external
environment
38Risk Assessment Summary
- Risk environment for your institution is unique
- Risk environment continuously changes
- Risk ranking changes with the environment
- Risk assessment is on-going, not periodic
- Be Prepared for change by Managing the Critical
risks at every level of the institution
39Managing Critical Risks
- Elements required for managing compliance
critical risks - Essential role of the responsible party in
managing risks - Attributes of monitoring plans that must be
documented - Specific details required for training plans
- Activities that should be reported in a sound
reporting plan - Definitive lessons that can be learned in the
management of critical risks
40Four Elements Required for Managing Critical
Risks
- Responsible party
- Monitoring plan
- Specialized training plan
- Reporting plan
-
41Responsible Party Characteristics
- Exclusive responsibility for managing the risk
- Knowledge to manage the risk
- Authority to manage the risk
42Lesson Learned
- If more than one responsible party is indicated,
it usually means - -- Risk should be split into multiple risks.
- -- One of the responsible parties does not
fulfill the requirements of a responsible party
usually the authority to manage is the
requirement not met. - -- True responsible party does not want to
acknowledge responsibility.
43Lesson Learned
- The Chief Executive Officer has a vested
interest in having the appropriate staff member
designated as the responsible party for each
high-risk area because the responsible party is
the CEOs direct representative in the on-going,
everyday compliance assurance network.
44Monitoring Plan
- Every step in a monitoring plan should already
exist in the policies procedures that manage
the risk - The monitoring plan serves as the criteria for
all types of assurance services - The monitoring plan must include Level 1, Level
2, and Level 3 controls - The monitoring plan must indicate the
documentation that is created by each of the
levels of control
45Assurance Continuum Levels of Control in COSO
Collaborative Assurance (Governance and
Management Control Processes)
Periodic Assurance
I----------I
I----------I
(Governance Control Processes)
I------------ On-going Assurance
------------I (Management Control Processes)
Level 1 Controls (Execution )
Level 3 Controls (Oversight)
Level 2 Controls (Supervisory)
Level 4 Controls (Internal Audit)
Level 4 Controls ( Internal Audit)
Pre-operations design review of on-going assurance
During execution of event or transaction
Immediately after execution of event or
transaction
Soon after execution of event or transaction
Post-operations audit of execution of on-going
assurance
46Level 1 Controls(Execution Controls)
- Embedded in day-to-day operations
- Policies and procedures
- Segregation of Duties
- Reconciliations/Comparisons
- Performed on every event/transaction
- Performed by the generators of the
event/transaction - Performed in real time as the
event/transaction is executed
47Level 2 Controls(Supervisory Controls)
- Re-application of operating controls
- Supervisory Review Quality Assurance Self
Assessment - Performed very soon after the generation of
the event/transaction - Performed by line management or staff
positions who do not originate the
event/transaction - Performed on a sample of the total number of
events/transactions
48 Level 3 Controls(Oversight Controls)
- Exception reports, status reports, analytical
reviews, variance analysis - Performed by representatives of executive
management - Performed on information provided by supervisory
management - Performed within a short period (weeks/months)
after the event/transaction is originated
49Level 4 Controls(Internal Audit Controls)
- Audit of the design of controls not the
operation of controls - Performed either before the event/transaction
is originated or long after - Performed by staff with no involvement in the
operations - Performed on individual events/transactions for
discovery only
50Lesson Learned
- The best place to seek and get help in developing
an appropriate monitoring plan is your internal
audit department.
51Specialized Training Plan
- Identifies
- Who is trained
- Level of knowledge transferred
- Frequency of training
- Provider of training
52Specialized Training Matrix
53Reporting Plan should include
- ? Activity to be reported
- Supervisory control activities detailed in
monitoring plan - Training activity detailed in training plan
- ? Items to be reported for each activity, such
as number of transactions examined or number of
employees trained - ? Frequency of reporting for each activity
- ? Who receives the report for each activity
54Supervisory control activities to be
reported
- The number or percentage of execution events or
transactions in the universe and number examined - The number or percentage of execution events or
transactions that failed the control attribute - The identified causes of failure
- The action taken to mitigate repetitive failure
- The need for process improvement
- The need to escalate the consequence of
non-compliance to mitigate repetitive
non-compliance
55Examples
- Number of purchase contracts reviewed from the
universe of contracts - Number of purchase contracts that did not satisfy
the competitive bidding process - Identified causes of failure - such as, personal
preference of requestor - Action taken - such as, provided training to all
buyers - Process changes - such as modify computer program
to include RFP and Award Designation - Second instance for requestor - need to remove
budget spending authority
56Lesson Learned
- Managing the critical risks is a learning
process that provides information about - Level of compliance
- _ Instances of non-compliance and why they
occur - _ Effectiveness and/or need for specialized
training -
57Managing Critical Risks Summary (1/2)
- Responsible party should have exclusive
responsibility for the risk, knowledge to manage
the risk, and authority to manage the risk. - A monitoring plan is not new controls but an
organized method of displaying controls that
already should exist. - Monitoring plans include execution, supervisory,
and oversight controls and how they are
documented - Monitoring plans are the road map for all
assurance services..
58Managing Critical Risks Summary (2/2)
- A specialized training plan includes who will be
trained, training content for each target group,
training provider, and measurement techniques
that will be used. - A reporting plan includes what activity will be
reported, the details to be reported for each
activity, and to whom the reports will be
directed. - Managing the critical risks provides the ability
to improve operations performance
59Assurance Strategies
- Assurance strategies increase the confidence
level that others have in the reliability and
relevance of the compliance function. - The goal is to give assurance about managing the
critical risks and the compliance function - Strategies are
- Certification
- Inspections and Agreed-upon procedures
- External Expert Peer Reviews
- Audits
- Other External Assurance Providers
60Certifications
- ?Given by each manager or responsible party for
their area/s - ?Are essentially self-assessments
- ?Say that responsible parties are performing all
operating and monitoring controls that are
required - ?Usually provides minimum confidence level
- ?Signed certifications provide increased value
- ?Are greatly enhanced if validated by compliance
or internal auditing personnel - ?Should be used for every operational unit
61Lesson Learned
- ? Certifications should be used for every
operational unit - even if additional assurance
strategies are used. - Provides level of assurance for
functional areas - Pushes managers to find out what is
happening in their units before they
certify
62Inspections
- ?Are oversight controls
- ?Are on-going during current operating period
- ?Emphasize that responsible parties perform their
supervisory controls - ?Indicate that the plan in place to manage the
critical risks is being followed
63Criteria for the inspection process
- Uses the monitoring plan
- Uses the specialized training plan
-
- Compliance personnel (or others) examine
records, individual transaction documentation,
and corrective action documentation (if needed)
and ensure correct reporting to the compliance
officer.
64Lesson Learned
- ? Acceptable inspection programs require the
examination of DOCUMENTED evidence - To verify that supervisory controls were
performed - To verify that corrective action was taken if
appropriate
65Agreed Upon Procedures
- Performed by Internal Auditing function
- ? An assurance for the compliance officer -
almost exactly like an inspection - ? Results are only reported to the Compliance
Officer and Compliance Committee - ? For Internal Auditing, this is a consulting
service not an audit - ? Procedures are actually contracted with the
internal auditing department - ? Internal auditing staff are working for the
compliance function
66Lesson Learned
- ? When internal auditing is performing the
oversight function under contract or agreement
with the compliance officer, the process is NOT
an audit.
67External Expert Peer Reviews
- External subject matter experts perform the
review - Professional stature of the peer review team
will affect the value of the review - External peer reviews may be the only feasible
way to obtain assurance
68Types of External Peer Reviews
- In lieu of compliance oversight
- Provided for compliance officer
- Provided by external peer review team subject
matter experts - 2. In lieu of internal audits
- Provided for CEO and governance function
- Provided by external peer review team subject
matter experts - Of the compliance program
- Provided for CEO and governance function
- Provided by external peer review team
69Lesson Learned
- The compliance officer and compliance committee
should have a formal agreement with the peer
review team that is signed by each team member. - Agreement should address confidentiality, who
will receive the report, how to transmit
sensitive information, destruction of working
notes, etc.
70Audits
- Subject to professional standards of the
internal auditor - Criteria used by the internal auditor would be
the monitoring plan and specialized training plan
for the critical risks - Audit program will be designed to ensure that
risks are properly managed with special emphasis
on oversight controls and supervisory controls - Working papers are the property of the internal
auditing department - Audit report is through normal audit process
71Audits . . .
- ?design audits
- Requests to audit the design of the compliance
program - Internal Auditor and executive management
agree upon the purpose of the audit -
- ?information validation audits
- Requests for independent, objective party to
audit - Three parties involved group seeking
assurance (executive management), group providing
the information in question (compliance program),
and the assurance provider (internal auditing)
72Lesson Learned
- If specific instances of non-compliance are
identified during the execution of the audit
program, the internal auditor should report those
specific instances of non-compliance to the
compliance officer and the compliance committee. - Specific instances of non-compliance will not be
in the audit report.
73Other External Assurance Providers
- Compliance officer, CEO, and governance
function obtain assurance from other assurance
providers. - JCAHO External auditors
- Accreditation teams (SACS) Federal auditors
- Regulators
74Lesson Learned
- Reports of all external evaluations should be
filed with one particular institutional official,
such as the general counsel, the internal
auditor, the director of institutional research,
or the chief risk officer. - This will eliminate redundancy and will provide
opportunities to distribute reports to all
affected parties. -
75Deciding Which Assurance Strategy To Use
- Criteria depends on
- significance of the risk
- prior experience with risk and its
management - availability of cost effective assurance
strategies - confidence level needed
76 Assurance Strategies Matrix
77Assurance Strategy Summary
- The primary focus of assurance is to increase the
confidence of decision-makers to an acceptable
level at the lowest cost. - Each strategy is defined by service provided,
provider, and information being validated. - The examples presented show a wide range of
strategies that give assurance.
78Confidential Reporting Mechanism
- Methods Available
- Triage Process
- Relationship to Other Reporting Sites
79Lesson Learned
- Confidential reporting mechanisms can not and
should not be the primary mechanism for
discovering and correcting non compliance!!!!!!!!
80Line Management Responsibilities
- Process policies and procedures are the primary
mechanism for discovering and correcting
noncompliance - Line management from the first line supervisor to
the chief administrative officer are responsible
for taking corrective action in cases of
noncompliance
81Pre-Determined Consequences for Noncompliance
- Ensures consistent, equitable action
- Influences employee and manager behavior
- Fulfills the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
requirement for discipline and corrective action
82What About Those Risks That Do Not Make the
Critical List?
- Manage at the appropriate level
- Be sure the four essentials are present
- Responsible party
- Monitoring Plan
- Specialized Training Plan
- Reporting Plan
- Be prepared for changes in your risk environment
83Whats Next?Learn and Renew
- Develop a self assessment instrument
- Conduct a self assessment
- Undergo an External Peer Review
- Develop a new Action Plan
- Do It!
84 www.utsystem.edu/compliance