Title: The New Prenatal Screening Tests
1The New Prenatal Screening Tests
- St. Pauls Hospital CME Conference for Primary
Physicians - November 22, 2007
- Ken Seethram, MD, FRCSC, FACOG
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
pacificfertility.ca
2Disclosure statement
I have no financial relationship with
pharmaceutical or medical ultrasound corporations
associated with prenatal screening and/or
diagnosis.
3- ..wow, things have changed
4Objectives
- To make you current with 2007/08 guidelines from
ACOG and SOCG with regards to Prenatal screening
options - Help fully understand all options in order to
better undertake counseling - Help understand how and when to get your patients
screened once their options are known
5(No Transcript)
6Outline
- Definitions
- Background and Evolution
- Second Trimester Serum Screening
- First Trimester Screening
- Combined Screening
- Guidelines
- Final words and resources
7Quick Definitions
- DR Detection rate
- the rate at which a test will pick up the
problem. This is accuracy, not reliability - FPR False positive rate
- the chance that the screening tool will be
positive when the condition is absent - Screen positive
- the literature term to describe the number of
times the test will be positive (either truly or
falsely)
8Background
- What are we screening for?
- Aneuploidy majority of which is Trisomy 21,
with T18, T13, and monosomy X (45X) - Secondary screening benefits?
- Dating the pregnancy
- Anatomy evaluation, placental evaluation, twins,
early anomalies
9Evolution of screening
- 1887 John Langdon Down presented
- 1930s first association made with maternal age
and risk of major malformations - due to egg age, declining quality of spindle
mechanism nondisjunction at meiosis I prior to
fertilization aneuploidy results - late 1970s age was first put to use to triage
women for amniocentesis
10Evolution of screening
- Age 35 became the high risk age
- at which the rate of aneuploidy was equal to the
rate of amniocentesis/CVS related miscarriage. - Therefore, maternal age was the first screening
tool. - Bad news its the worst screening tool, with
only 30-40 detection rate - Today dont use age 35 as a cut-off
111980s 2nd Trimester serum
- AFP
- Total hCG
- Unconjugated estriol uE3
Inhibin A
Quad Screen (TMS/Quad multiple marker scrg
test, maternal serum screen)
12TMS and Quad Screening
- Nothing really has changed with multiple marker
screening tools - Uses 2-4 biochemical markers to adjust the age
related risks - Problem - specificity drops as disease prevalence
increases - i.e. Many false positives
13What has evolved in the first trimester?(11-14
weeks)
- Nuchal Translucency (NT)
- Serum biochemistry
- Nasal Bone (NB)
- Tricuspid regurgitation (TR)
- Frontomaxillary facial angle (FMF Angle)
14The First Trimester - NT
- US measurement, 11-14w spine to skin
- Fetal Medicine Foundation
- Aneuploidy - a change in extracellular matrix and
potential for cardiac/lymphatic changes causing
increased NT - Congenital hearts, others
15(No Transcript)
16What has evolved in the first trimester?
- Nuchal Translucency (NT)
- Serum biochemistry
- Nasal Bone (NB)
- Tricuspid regurgitation (TR)
- Frontomaxillary facial angle (FMF Angle)
17PAPP-A free beta hCG
- Serum biochemistry
- Free beta hCG (different than TMS/Quad)
- PAPP-A (Preg Assoc. plasma protein-A)
- relative levels are used to predict T21, T13, T18
- Low PAPP-A
- may be associated with a poorly developing
placenta - Evolving method of screening for placental
disease (IUGR, PIH)
18What has evolved in the first trimester?
- Nuchal Translucency (NT)
- Serum biochemistry
- Nasal Bone (NB)
- Tricuspid regurgitation (TR)
- Frontomaxillary facial angle (FMF Angle)
19Nasal Bone (NB)
- 60-70 of T21 absent Nasal bone
- 99 of euploid fetuses have Nasal bone
- tremendous increase in detection rates of FTS.
High learning curve
20(No Transcript)
21The First Trimester TR, FMF, Ductus Venosus
- Tricuspid Regurge, DV, and FMF angle are somewhat
experimental and not wide clinically used outside
of research settings
22(No Transcript)
23First Trimester Screening (FTS performance)
24Screening Strategies
First Trimester Screening
Second Trimester Screening
- Serum integrated
- Integrated
- Sequential
- Contingency
Combined Screening
25Screening Strategies
- Serum Integrated Pregnancy Screening (SIPS)
- 1st TM PAPP-A Quad (SURUSS trial, 2003)
- Results disclosed at 17/18w
- Integrated Pregnancy Screening (IPS)
- 1st TM PAPP-A NT TMS/Quad
- Same as SIPS but with NT
- Results disclosed at 17/18w
- SURUSS and FASTER trials 2003/2005
26Screening Strategies
- Sequential screening model
- IPS but disclosed after 1st, and then 2nd TM
- People may opt for testing after 1st TM
- Contingency Screening models
- FTS done - lt11000, no further testing
- If risks gt150, CVS offered
- If risks 150-1999 -
- quad offered or
- Nasal bone contingency offer NB to intermediate
group - Probably best for high DRs in population based
screening
27Which test is best?
- How does each model perform
28(No Transcript)
29Best performance
- For a first trimester result
- FTS with NT NB serum
- Contingency screening programs
- For a combined result
- IPS/Contingency screening programs
- For Late entry
- Quad screen
30What do the guidelines say?
- ACOG released similar guidelines in January 2007,
and SOGC in February - Basics
- Triple screening is no longer good enough
- Dont use age as a screening tool
- Aim for highest DRs and lowest FPRs in any
method - Consent and review all options
- Quality assurance important in FTS programs
31Quality Assurance?
- Image and data audit
- Initial certification, and on-going audit
- FMF UK/USA
- NTQR?
- Importance on program based screening
- Pre/post test counseling
- Lab and clinical QA
32ACOG
- Regardless of which screening tests you decide
to offer your patients, information about the
detection and false-positive rates, advantages,
disadvantages, limitations, and risks and
benefits of diagnostic procedures, should be
available to patients so they can make informed
decisions.
33SOGC
- All women regardless of age, should be offered
consented screening for the most significant
aneuploidies, and a second trimester sonogram for
dating, growth and anomalies - 2008 Minimum standard 75 DR, 5 FPR
- Amnio/CVS can be offered to women over age 40,
without screening, but screening should still be
offered.
34SOGC
- The practice of using solely the previous cut-off
of maternal age of 35 or over at the estimated
date of delivery (EDD) to identify at-risk
pregnancies should be abandoned
35Whats the best test?
- One size does not fit all
- As long as the definitive diagnosis involves an
invasive procedure which can cause miscarriage of
a normal pregnancy, there is simply no substitute
to explaining all the options, their benefits,
and risks - best screen is the one which will service
patients needs for time of results, and action
depending on the results
36Current Western Canada options
- Alberta
- Edmonton/Calgary FTS programs, provincially
insured - British Columbia
- TMS program (does not yet comply with SOGC)
- SIPS for women over age 38
- IPS for women over age 40
- Private centre's for FTS with or without NB
(complies) - MOH investigating new options
37FMF Accredited FTS Centre's, BC
- BCWH (block funding for special groups)
- IPS (over age 40), SIPS (over age 38)
- Prior aneuploidy, Twins
- Pacific Ctr for Reproductive Medicine (495)
- FTS - NT NB serum genetic counseling
- o-s-c-a-r modeling after FMF
- Genesis Fertility Centre (495)
- FTS - NT serum genetic counseling
38Resources
- www.fetalmedicine.com
- www.earlyriskassessment.com
- www.mfmedicine.com
- www.genesis-fertility.com
- www.pacificfertility.ca